Win / KotakuInAction2
KotakuInAction2
Communities Topics Log In Sign Up
Sign In
Hot
All Posts
Settings
All
Profile
Saved
Upvoted
Hidden
Messages

Your Communities

General
AskWin
Funny
Technology
Animals
Sports
Gaming
DIY
Health
Positive
Privacy
News
Changelogs

More Communities

frenworld
OhTwitter
MillionDollarExtreme
NoNewNormal
Ladies
Conspiracies
GreatAwakening
IP2Always
GameDev
ParallelSociety
Privacy Policy
Terms of Service
Content Policy
DEFAULT COMMUNITIES • All General AskWin Funny Technology Animals Sports Gaming DIY Health Positive Privacy
KotakuInAction2 The Official Gamergate Forum
hot new rising top

Sign In or Create an Account

76
He should sue for years of unpaid rent and utility bills (media.scored.co)
posted 3 years ago by user20461 3 years ago by user20461 +76 / -0
58 comments share
58 comments share save hide report block hide replies
Comments (58)
sorted by:
▲ 44 ▼
– AntonioOfVenice 44 points 3 years ago +44 / -0

When the couple first entered into the marriage in 1995, Moral had signed a separation of goods agreement, per the i. This agreement meant that her husband would split their home and common possessions with her, but hold onto his wealth.

Initially, Moral was awarded half their house but no money in the divorce, the i reported.

"The reason I decided to speak to the media is I wanted women to know that we can claim for housework when there is a separation of goods agreement," Moral said in an interview with the publication.

No man is going to marry if this sort of thing is possible.

Sowell points out that you can't just arbitrarily adjust a contract to benefit one party. This will affect the willingness of the other party to make contracts. He gave as an example the way blacks are benefited by excessive protection under anti-discrimination laws (which lessens the willingness of businesses to hire them), but it applies equally well here.

permalink save report block reply
▲ 42 ▼
– SomeHands10 42 points 3 years ago +42 / -0

No man is going to marry if this sort of thing is possible.

Courts have been invalidating pre-nuptial agreements for years. It's not news. All it generally takes is for the agreement to be "unfair" to the woman. It's well-known in MRA and MGTOW circles.

permalink parent save report block reply
▲ 27 ▼
– FuckGenderPolitics 27 points 3 years ago +27 / -0

Yup. One of my professors in undergrad is an attorney and he worked in family law. He taught our class that prenups are worthless in the vast majority of cases because they can be thrown out for violating an arbitrary "fairness" standard. That's code for the judge throwing anything out that would lead to the woman getting less than she would in the standard divorce rape scenario. There are some niche cases where they can help, but even then you're relying on the family court not to burn you for the crime of being male. The odds are terrible even in those very rare cases.

permalink parent save report block reply
▲ 8 ▼
– bloodguard 8 points 3 years ago +8 / -0

Richie rich silly contrived valley friends of mine are using family trusts AND pre-nuptial agreements. But it's still seeming like the only way to really win is not to play the game in the first place.

permalink parent save report block reply
▲ 3 ▼
– AntonioOfVenice 3 points 3 years ago +3 / -0

"MRA and MGTOW circles" make all sorts of claims though, and many of them have a professional victim complex. This is pretty outrageous.

permalink parent save report block reply
▲ 42 ▼
– current_horror 42 points 3 years ago +42 / -0

MGTOW proven right yet again, Antonio dissembles, news at 11.

permalink parent save report block reply
▲ 1 ▼
– AntonioOfVenice 1 point 3 years ago +1 / -0

Yet again?

What was the first time? And why is being a broken clock impressive?

permalink parent save report block reply
▲ 23 ▼
– FutaCumDiet 23 points 3 years ago +23 / -0

What was the first time?

When was your first post?

permalink parent save report block reply
▲ 35 ▼
– Hugs 35 points 3 years ago +35 / -0

This is standard, dude.

There's a case from Ontario a few years back where a wealthy Toronto man wanted to marry a woman he'd been seeing for 15-20 years, and sought her agreement to a pre-nup and/or marriage contract before proposing. They were not living together. She used his request for a pre-nup to break up with him, then subsequently sued him for spousal support while arguing they had been common law spouses. I repeat, they did not share a living space. They also didn't have children together. She won... a paltry $50k per month for 10 years.

Edited some mistakes.

Here's a quick link to a story on the case.

permalink parent save report block reply
▲ 23 ▼
– deleted 23 points 3 years ago +23 / -0
▲ 14 ▼
– Hugs 14 points 3 years ago +14 / -0

Amen, brother. It's senseless. Shared time together is not cohabitation, and I can't see how it's sufficient to establish financial dependence outside of wedlock. I guess I'm just a misogynist.

permalink parent save report block reply
▲ 13 ▼
– TomSeeSaw 13 points 3 years ago +13 / -0

Hellcome to Canada

permalink parent save report block reply
▲ 6 ▼
– StupidPrizeWinner 6 points 3 years ago +6 / -0

Counter offer: Canada, go to Hell. Warmer temperatures and similar standard of living. I have heard that MAID service guarantees entry, no passport needed.

permalink parent save report block reply
▲ 10 ▼
– FuckGenderPolitics 10 points 3 years ago +10 / -0

It would be a rules violation for me to say what that money would have been better spent on.

I'd certainly go that route if I were trapped in a family court situation, although I'd do the dirty work myself. Thank god people in real life and online Manosphere guys taught me what I need to do to avoid that fate.

permalink parent save report block reply
▲ 12 ▼
– mharmless 12 points 3 years ago +12 / -0

Six million buys a lot of high-quality pussy.

Pay up front, cheaper.

permalink parent save report block reply
▲ 25 ▼
– SomeHands10 25 points 3 years ago +25 / -0

It's easy to verify those claims by reading reports of the relevant court cases. Just because you've never read similar reports before doesn't mean they don't exist, it just means you haven't looked (probably because you couldn't possibly look into what "MRA and MGTOW" people say because they make "all sorts of claims" and have a "professional victim complex" so anything they so must be wrong by default).

permalink parent save report block reply
▲ 1 ▼
– AntonioOfVenice 1 point 3 years ago +1 / -0

(probably because you couldn't possibly look into what "MRA and MGTOW" people say because they make "all sorts of claims" and have a "professional victim complex" so anything they so must be wrong by default).

Obviously, not wrong by default, but not worth taking seriously. Just like I don't take feminists seriously based on their professional victim complex even though I just read about a case where a guy got 180 days in prison for raping two girls.

permalink parent save report block reply
▲ 15 ▼
– redman012 15 points 3 years ago +15 / -0

but not worth taking seriously

The entire reason you’re getting downvoted is because you aren’t even though this type of stuff happens on a regular fucking basis, all the time

permalink parent save report block reply
▲ 14 ▼
– SomeHands10 14 points 3 years ago +14 / -0

Obviously, not wrong by default, but not worth taking seriously

"I'm not going to take that claim seriously because even though there is clear evidence of it happening, my gynocentric bias prevents me acknowledging that these bad people who criticised milady MRAs and MGTOW people are right."

permalink parent save report block reply
▲ 7 ▼
– Adamrises 7 points 3 years ago +7 / -0

You know, its really not hard to say "hey I have my biases and don't like them, but I suppose they have a point here."

permalink parent save report block reply
▲ 19 ▼
– deleted 19 points 3 years ago +19 / -0
▲ 1 ▼
– AntonioOfVenice 1 point 3 years ago +1 / -0

What 'shit' specifically? Alimony and child support at least have some sort of basis. This has none.

permalink parent save report block reply
▲ 11 ▼
– redman012 11 points 3 years ago +11 / -0

This specifically, giving women WAY too much money in proportion to what they actually deserve

permalink parent save report block reply
▲ 16 ▼
– send_it 16 points 3 years ago +16 / -0

she ain't gonna fuck you, lad.

permalink parent save report block reply
▲ 21 ▼
– FuckGenderPolitics 21 points 3 years ago +21 / -0

No man is going to marry if this sort of thing is possible.

MGTOW has been saying this all along.

Sowell points out that you can't just arbitrarily adjust a contract to benefit one party.

Family courts routinely do exactly that, and they've been doing it for decades. There's nothing groundbreaking about this. It's only getting attention because of how brazen the extortion is in this case. Usually they go through the motions to pretend like due process was followed.

permalink parent save report block reply
▲ 18 ▼
– Steampunk_Moustache 18 points 3 years ago +18 / -0

No man is going to marry if this sort of thing is possible.

Working as intended.

permalink parent save report block reply
▲ 6 ▼
– TomSeeSaw 6 points 3 years ago +6 / -0

No man

I guarantee you there are males of the human species that will step in, where no Man would. They are the real bane that prevents any correction.

permalink parent save report block reply
▲ 32 ▼
– Jasen 32 points 3 years ago +32 / -0

Can I sue my ex for years of ungiven blowjobs?

permalink save report block reply
▲ 14 ▼
– FuckGenderPolitics 14 points 3 years ago +14 / -0

You can buy all the blowjobs you could ever want with the money you save from staying away from the marriage scam in the first place.

permalink parent save report block reply
▲ 10 ▼
– yvaN_ehT_nioJ 10 points 3 years ago +10 / -0

Maybe could make a claim on some sort of loss of consortium grounds.

permalink parent save report block reply
▲ 5 ▼
– SumoSlammer2k 5 points 3 years ago +5 / -0

Now that is the lawsuit all men are waiting for.

permalink parent save report block reply
▲ 1 ▼
– RandomFurryDude 1 point 3 years ago +1 / -0

IIRC in ancient times a blowjob was about one ounce of silver. So assuming 5 years without blowjobs she owes you about 50 kilograms of silver. Although accounting for inflation that increases to something like 300 kilograms.

permalink parent save report block reply
▲ 31 ▼
– SoctaticMethod1 31 points 3 years ago +31 / -0

Why do I feel we are either going to go extinct by our own stupidity of shit like this or we are all going to adopt customs to HEAVILY restrain and restrict women because of dumb shit like this?

permalink save report block reply
▲ 48 ▼
– Steampunk_Moustache 48 points 3 years ago +48 / -0

adopt customs to HEAVILY restrain and restrict women

There is no civilization in all of human history that did not do this. You are witnessing the reason why.

Women cannot build civilizations. They can only destroy them, because they fundamentally do not realize what a civilization is. They think think the state is a husband, because in all of human history, no significant number of women ever had their reproductive success depend on managing anything more complex than a child.

permalink parent save report block reply
▲ 21 ▼
– yvaN_ehT_nioJ 21 points 3 years ago +21 / -0

Men erred in relinquishing power. They were too enmeshed in the ideals of liberalism and r a t i o n a l i t y they thought our civilization was different from every single one that came before.

We do nothing so I'd say we're not much different, in all honesty.

permalink parent save report block reply
▲ 27 ▼
– deleted 27 points 3 years ago +27 / -0
▲ 8 ▼
– SoctaticMethod1 8 points 3 years ago +8 / -0

I'm growing to realise how fortunate I am that throughout my life (except in education) I've been surrounded by tomboys, I think it's im my families genetic code.

Regular women aren't cut out for leadership and frontline roles, they are meant to be in supporting roles but feminism twisted this fact to be 'a great insult'

permalink parent save report block reply
▲ 7 ▼
– TriangleGang 7 points 3 years ago +7 / -0

This is what I tell people all the time. You think every civilization in history just stumbled into a patriarchal structure, like that's just some random coincidence?

Women have been rigidly controlled and kept in their place throughout the history of mankind to prevent exactly what we're seeing today. It wasn't random or happenstance that this custom was adopted across the entire planet, but necessary for the survival of each culture.

permalink parent save report block reply
▲ 1 ▼
– AntonioOfVenice 1 point 3 years ago +1 / -0

There is no civilization in all of human history that did not do this. You are witnessing the reason why.

Were there any civilizations in history that did not heavily restrict men, instead of allowing them to get addicted to porn, video games, drugs and remain in their parents' basement unemployed?

Women cannot build civilizations. They can only destroy them, because they fundamentally do not realize what a civilization is. They think think the state is a husband

It's a constant that the most sweeping claims are always made with the least evidence.

permalink parent save report block reply
▲ 30 ▼
– current_horror 30 points 3 years ago +30 / -0

You want evidence? Look at all of the successful matriarchies throughout history. It shouldn’t take you long.

permalink parent save report block reply
▲ 1 ▼
– AntonioOfVenice 1 point 3 years ago +1 / -0

Great, you're volunteering to provide evidence? Please do.

  • Women can only destroy civilization
  • Women do not realize what a civilization is
  • Women think the state is a husband

Good luck!

permalink parent save report block reply
▲ 30 ▼
– Steampunk_Moustache 30 points 3 years ago +30 / -0

Women can only destroy civilization

No civilization has ever been created by women. Civilizations that emancipate women are destroyed in short order, either from within, or from without, by stronger civilizations that do not.

Women do not realize what a civilization is

Listen to feminists. Open borders? 'white people have no culture'? All of female intelligentsia fails to grasp the basic foundations of nationhood, and fails to understand what comes for people without nations - Chaos, Death.

Women think the state is a husband

Wherever you give women political power, they vote for a form of socialism. They vote to be fed and sheltered by the state. They vote for the role their husband should perform, to be performed by the state.

They think the state can be their husband.

They did this in Rome, they are doing it again.

They DO NOT UNDERSTAND what the state is. That is why they cannot run it. They fundamentally don't grasp its purpose, because its nature is fundamentally masculine. It was made by men, to control men, to protect men (and women, and children), from men.

You can probably see why women think that means the state is a husband. But they are wrong, and they are wrong because they are not men, and their brains are literally incapable of assessing civilizational threats.

permalink parent save report block reply
▲ 6 ▼
– SuurSuomi39_II 6 points 3 years ago +6 / -0

Where is Imp when you need him the most?

permalink parent save report block reply
▲ 1 ▼
– dzonatan 1 point 3 years ago +1 / -0

Were there any civilizations in history that did not heavily restrict men, instead of allowing them to get addicted to porn, video games, drugs and remain in their parents' basement unemployed?

As a matter of fact, they were. Wankers, perverts and degenerates of all kind were looked down upon. You thought you have a gotcha didn't you?

permalink parent save report block reply
▲ 1 ▼
– AntonioOfVenice 1 point 3 years ago +1 / -0

Obviously, I did, as you're agreeing with me.

permalink parent save report block reply
▲ 21 ▼
– FuckGenderPolitics 21 points 3 years ago +21 / -0

We'll eventually go back to checking women's worst instincts, but it will take a civilizational collapse for that to happen. There's no getting off this crazy train until it crashes and burns.

permalink parent save report block reply
▲ 5 ▼
– ParadigmShift2070 5 points 3 years ago +5 / -0

islam is right about women

permalink parent save report block reply
▲ 27 ▼
– NotMacgyver 27 points 3 years ago +27 / -0

So can he counter sue for not just rent and utilities but all kinds of goods ? If she was paid for housework then that would make her the maid and as such anything she has bought with his money belongs to him, say the clothes she is wearing, maybe her phone, how much food she ate and all manner of different things.

Surely if we want a fair system that would be the case......RIGHT?

permalink save report block reply
▲ 3 ▼
– coke501 3 points 3 years ago +3 / -0

Surely if we want a fair system

uhm ... I think i got bad news for you.

permalink parent save report block reply
▲ 21 ▼
– MargarineMongoose 21 points 3 years ago +21 / -0

Spain isn't a serious country.

permalink save report block reply
▲ 5 ▼
– TomSeeSaw 5 points 3 years ago +5 / -0

They certainly fucked S America well when they were.

permalink parent save report block reply
▲ 5 ▼
– TriangleGang 5 points 3 years ago +5 / -0

Yes, have you noticed that every place on the planet that Spain colonized is a third world shithole today? I'm pretty familiar with the Philippines, and I'm firmly convinced everything wrong with their culture was planted by the Spanish colonists. The history of South America speaks for itself.

permalink parent save report block reply
▲ 1 ▼
– TomSeeSaw 1 point 3 years ago +1 / -0

Looking at Spain today, they just used the colonies to speedrun self loathing.

permalink parent save report block reply
▲ 8 ▼
– censorthisss 8 points 3 years ago +8 / -0

Fucking insane

permalink save report block reply
▲ 6 ▼
– zakat 6 points 3 years ago +6 / -0

So how much tax did she have to pay? Considering her now also having an income how much taxes did the husband get back?

permalink save report block reply
▲ 6 ▼
– RoulerBleu 6 points 3 years ago +6 / -0

Feminism is cancer.

permalink save report block reply
▲ 5 ▼
– user20461 [S] 5 points 3 years ago +5 / -0

https://archive.is/8SPUJ

permalink save report block reply
▲ 5 ▼
– TriangleGang 5 points 3 years ago +5 / -0

Jesus, look at the shit eating grin on her face.

permalink save report block reply

Original 8chan Links to Gamer Gate:

.

The main GG discussion is on the videogames board: https://8chan.moe/v/

.

GamerGate archive is at https://8chan.moe/gamergatehq/

.

GamerGate Wiki:

https://ggwiki.deepfreeze.it/index.php/Main_Page

. . . . . .

. . . . . .

Rules:

.

ONE: Do not advocate for illegal violence or post other illegal activity. (Be aware of your local laws.)

.

TWO: Don't threaten, harass, or impersonate users. Also: don't be a psycho. New users will be held to a higher standard.

.

THREE: Do not post porn.

.

FOUR: NSFW/NSFL content must be flaired NSFW.

.

FIVE: No vote manipulation. Do not break communities.win's features.

.

SIX: No spam or reposts. Do not make more than 5 threads a day.

.

SEVEN: Do not post falsehoods and hoaxes that are obvious to an uncontroversial degree.

. . . . . .

. . . . . .

Moderation Logs:

.

(Two different versions, Scored has more features and is cleaner, but .win let's you see a few more details in certain instances.)

  • Scored
  • .win

Moderators

  • DomitiusOfMassilia
  • C
  • BandageBandolier
  • CarmenOfSandiego
  • The_Shadow_of_Intent
  • SocraticMethod1
  • Kienan
  • Smith1980
Message the Moderators

Terms of Service | Privacy Policy

2026.02.01 - bh6wd (status)

Copyright © 2026.

Terms of Service | Privacy Policy