He should sue for years of unpaid rent and utility bills
(media.scored.co)
You're viewing a single comment thread. View all comments, or full comment thread.
Comments (58)
sorted by:
"MRA and MGTOW circles" make all sorts of claims though, and many of them have a professional victim complex. This is pretty outrageous.
MGTOW proven right yet again, Antonio dissembles, news at 11.
Yet again?
What was the first time? And why is being a broken clock impressive?
When was your first post?
This is standard, dude.
There's a case from Ontario a few years back where a wealthy Toronto man wanted to marry a woman he'd been seeing for 15-20 years, and sought her agreement to a pre-nup and/or marriage contract before proposing. They were not living together. She used his request for a pre-nup to break up with him, then subsequently sued him for spousal support while arguing they had been common law spouses. I repeat, they did not share a living space. They also didn't have children together. She won... a paltry $50k per month for 10 years.
Edited some mistakes.
Here's a quick link to a story on the case.
Amen, brother. It's senseless. Shared time together is not cohabitation, and I can't see how it's sufficient to establish financial dependence outside of wedlock. I guess I'm just a misogynist.
Hellcome to Canada
Counter offer: Canada, go to Hell. Warmer temperatures and similar standard of living. I have heard that MAID service guarantees entry, no passport needed.
I'd certainly go that route if I were trapped in a family court situation, although I'd do the dirty work myself. Thank god people in real life and online Manosphere guys taught me what I need to do to avoid that fate.
Six million buys a lot of high-quality pussy.
Pay up front, cheaper.
It's easy to verify those claims by reading reports of the relevant court cases. Just because you've never read similar reports before doesn't mean they don't exist, it just means you haven't looked (probably because you couldn't possibly look into what "MRA and MGTOW" people say because they make "all sorts of claims" and have a "professional victim complex" so anything they so must be wrong by default).
Obviously, not wrong by default, but not worth taking seriously. Just like I don't take feminists seriously based on their professional victim complex even though I just read about a case where a guy got 180 days in prison for raping two girls.
The entire reason you’re getting downvoted is because you aren’t even though this type of stuff happens on a regular fucking basis, all the time
"I'm not going to take that claim seriously because even though there is clear evidence of it happening, my gynocentric bias prevents me acknowledging that these
bad people who criticised miladyMRAs and MGTOW people are right."You know, its really not hard to say "hey I have my biases and don't like them, but I suppose they have a point here."
What 'shit' specifically? Alimony and child support at least have some sort of basis. This has none.
This specifically, giving women WAY too much money in proportion to what they actually deserve
she ain't gonna fuck you, lad.