He should sue for years of unpaid rent and utility bills
(media.scored.co)
You're viewing a single comment thread. View all comments, or full comment thread.
Comments (58)
sorted by:
No man is going to marry if this sort of thing is possible.
Sowell points out that you can't just arbitrarily adjust a contract to benefit one party. This will affect the willingness of the other party to make contracts. He gave as an example the way blacks are benefited by excessive protection under anti-discrimination laws (which lessens the willingness of businesses to hire them), but it applies equally well here.
Courts have been invalidating pre-nuptial agreements for years. It's not news. All it generally takes is for the agreement to be "unfair" to the woman. It's well-known in MRA and MGTOW circles.
Yup. One of my professors in undergrad is an attorney and he worked in family law. He taught our class that prenups are worthless in the vast majority of cases because they can be thrown out for violating an arbitrary "fairness" standard. That's code for the judge throwing anything out that would lead to the woman getting less than she would in the standard divorce rape scenario. There are some niche cases where they can help, but even then you're relying on the family court not to burn you for the crime of being male. The odds are terrible even in those very rare cases.
Richie rich silly contrived valley friends of mine are using family trusts AND pre-nuptial agreements. But it's still seeming like the only way to really win is not to play the game in the first place.
"MRA and MGTOW circles" make all sorts of claims though, and many of them have a professional victim complex. This is pretty outrageous.
MGTOW proven right yet again, Antonio dissembles, news at 11.
Yet again?
What was the first time? And why is being a broken clock impressive?
This is standard, dude.
There's a case from Ontario a few years back where a wealthy Toronto man wanted to marry a woman he'd been seeing for 15-20 years, and sought her agreement to a pre-nup and/or marriage contract before proposing. They were not living together. She used his request for a pre-nup to break up with him, then subsequently sued him for spousal support while arguing they had been common law spouses. I repeat, they did not share a living space. They also didn't have children together. She won... a paltry $50k per month for 10 years.
Edited some mistakes.
Here's a quick link to a story on the case.
Six million buys a lot of high-quality pussy.
Pay up front, cheaper.
It's easy to verify those claims by reading reports of the relevant court cases. Just because you've never read similar reports before doesn't mean they don't exist, it just means you haven't looked (probably because you couldn't possibly look into what "MRA and MGTOW" people say because they make "all sorts of claims" and have a "professional victim complex" so anything they so must be wrong by default).
Obviously, not wrong by default, but not worth taking seriously. Just like I don't take feminists seriously based on their professional victim complex even though I just read about a case where a guy got 180 days in prison for raping two girls.
What 'shit' specifically? Alimony and child support at least have some sort of basis. This has none.
she ain't gonna fuck you, lad.
MGTOW has been saying this all along.
Family courts routinely do exactly that, and they've been doing it for decades. There's nothing groundbreaking about this. It's only getting attention because of how brazen the extortion is in this case. Usually they go through the motions to pretend like due process was followed.
Working as intended.
I guarantee you there are males of the human species that will step in, where no Man would. They are the real bane that prevents any correction.