They are comparing "gender affirming surgery" to killing something, chopping it into pieces and rearranging those pieces while adding foreign components. Okay, I'm fine with that.
Haven't they always tied gender affirming surgery (or even just saying you're a new gender) with killing someone? Isn't that the point of them freaking out about "dead naming"?
It absolutely is killing something. Trannies don't have souls, so killing a tranny is technically impossible. The actual death happens when someone sells their soul to become a tranny. "Killing" a tranny is just destroying the skin suit that evil is using to do a piss poor imitation of a human being.
How about taking a table, cutting the middle out, re-attaching the chunks with legs and then mounting the middle as a "back rest" then calling it a chair, despite it being completely unuseable.
It's because women have two transformations to reach adulthood.
First they go through puberty like men to become sexually active but, unlike men, women aren't fully mature until they give birth and their body changes again, hence "girls".
If the process PENISED XY MALE MEN go through to pretend they are women involved chopping them into little pieces and creating a piece of furniture, lots of people would be satisfied with that.
Don't know if it's the fact that IQs have been dropping since the early 80s but I've noticed that about half of people are incapable of understanding analogies these days.
I used it that way intentionally, since they always talk about 'correct' genders'. I make no distinction between the two. I think it is artificial. Moreover, when such skeletons are dug up, they are announced to be 'the skeleton of a man', not that of a male.
They are comparing "gender affirming surgery" to killing something, chopping it into pieces and rearranging those pieces while adding foreign components. Okay, I'm fine with that.
Haven't they always tied gender affirming surgery (or even just saying you're a new gender) with killing someone? Isn't that the point of them freaking out about "dead naming"?
If it's a killing, a lot of them make it a double kill.
It absolutely is killing something. Trannies don't have souls, so killing a tranny is technically impossible. The actual death happens when someone sells their soul to become a tranny. "Killing" a tranny is just destroying the skin suit that evil is using to do a piss poor imitation of a human being.
More accurately, I'd say "yep, it's still wood. Just because you changed the look doesn't change what it still is".
Can't change genetics
It's also still oak (or whatever the tree was), it didn't change to pine wood.
And it's not as if 'transgenders' actually change their look.
From bad to worse.
They really can’t make a coherent point. A man chopping off his penis is a man. Not sure why that is a difficult concept.
Transitioning is more like taking the chair, cutting off the back and one leg, and then claiming it's just as good a seat as this stool.
Bingo
How about taking a table, cutting the middle out, re-attaching the chunks with legs and then mounting the middle as a "back rest" then calling it a chair, despite it being completely unuseable.
Technically, it's a enuch. A eunch is to a man as a gelding is to a horse, a hog is to a boar, or a steer is to a bull.
True but still a kind of man.
It sure ain't a female.
Are this adults or is this from "I'm 14 and this deep"?
'Transwomen' generally call themselves 'girls', even when they are in their fifties.
If you want to gross yourself out, search for the Twitter hashtag 'GirlsLikeUs'. It's quite disturbing.
Yeah, because trannies are a subset of pedophiles. They're obsessed with puberty and "going through it again".
Spinsters also do this. Curious.
It's because women have two transformations to reach adulthood.
First they go through puberty like men to become sexually active but, unlike men, women aren't fully mature until they give birth and their body changes again, hence "girls".
To make an analogy, you have to actually understand the nuances of what you're talking about.
Trannies be like: chop a deep oozing gash in a tree and call it a designer chair
Somewhere between 99% and 100% of analogies are manipulative ploys. Analogies are a rhetorical device used to convince midwits of idiotic ideas.
I don't get it. Don't "transgenders" look at a chair and think to use it like they would also use a tree when they are 42%'ing?
If the process PENISED XY MALE MEN go through to pretend they are women involved chopping them into little pieces and creating a piece of furniture, lots of people would be satisfied with that.
Don't know if it's the fact that IQs have been dropping since the early 80s but I've noticed that about half of people are incapable of understanding analogies these days.
It's still not metal tho
A wobbly stool with a noose would be a little more appropriate.
This is literally the definition of "oof"
41% would take you up on that offer.
As they say, 100 years from now they will be dug up and identified according to their correct gender.
FTFY. Body records don't give a shit about "man" and "woman" and the terms "male" and "female" denote sex, not gender.
There are no "men dogs" or "women dogs", it's "male dogs" and "female dogs".
I used it that way intentionally, since they always talk about 'correct' genders'. I make no distinction between the two. I think it is artificial. Moreover, when such skeletons are dug up, they are announced to be 'the skeleton of a man', not that of a male.