Why would men, lets be honest here it's men who still be the ones dying to protect anything, want to to protect a country that hated them? Take your pick on any feminist Eu nation. I rather let it all burn.
And yet Ukrainians are dying by the tens of thousands for a fake country that is a vassal to countries that consider those men subhumans for being white, male and straight.
Russians died by the tens of millions for Stalin, Germans by the millions for Hitler. You can be persuaded to die for anything - with propaganda and terror.
Nobody asked the Ukrainians to fight, they were forced to and the West stood and did fuck-all to protect them. Finland, Moldova and Lithuania sent them back on sight if they tried to flee.
I would say the governments of Europe should be ashamed, but they're probably proud of what they did.
The West is corrupt and hypocritical in its claims about "human rights", and will gladly use people as cannon fodder for its geopolitical interests?
Wow? I'm so shocked!
I would say the governments of Europe should be ashamed, but they're probably proud of what they did.
They had Ukrainians die for their corrupt interests and fake country-vassal. That is a masterstroke, and it is something to be proud of if you are a Machiavellian.
Exactly what I was thinking. I would not fight to defend my country, I would fight to defend my small region I love to death though. I feel like, the more we go on the more big countries were a mistake. I have much more in common with the people in my local region than with anyone in the capital(and I've been there before).
Zelensky isn't running anything, but "the women" sure as hell aren't either. And neither are the Juice, to cover both ends of your little usual Cripple Fight.
It is the army, and by extension, the Americans - who do not care about "the women" or "the Jews" when these are not useful. Imagine being so stupid that you actually believe "we fight for democracy" or "we fight for women's rights" at face value.
To be fair, it's a vague question open to interpretation. Most of those governments probably hate their people.
Would I fight to defend my values? Absolutely. Would I fight to defend globalist government? Only if what I was defending against was significantly worse. And even then there's an argument to be made for letting the invaders take out the current power structure, and then fighting to take back your country.
They're too scared to do it, but I can easily imagine the Biden Regime completely falling apart and being brought to it's knees (the way Argentina did after the Falkland Islands War) if the they announced that they would engage in a nuclear escalation with Russia.
The only argument for it, is that a government based on right of conquest bothers even less to take account of the people's wishes than current European governments, if that is even possible. What are they going to do, after all? Allow 14,000 girls to be raped? Arrest you for jokes about the government?
But still: the cost vs. benefit is rather unfavorable. Even if a conquest would be marginally worse, it would not be worth risking one's life over.
And this is why I have advocated ending NATO in favor of a new "Not NATO" of Eastern Europe (The Poles, The Czechs, the Baltics, the Nords, and Ukraine). Since they would actually put their money where their mouth is for a defense alliance.
The reason many Europeans won't fight to defend their country is because the USA owns their country so any war for "their country" becomes some Jewish war that isn't actually in their interests.
I'm Canadian and I would never fight to defend this country because my government doesn't represent my interests. If China invaded tomorrow, I'd be trying to figure out how I can aid the Chinese. I want to see this country destroyed. It's not worth fighting for. I'm sure many Europeans feel the same way. People don't want to defend countries that don't represent their interests.
If you were honest with yourself, and thought "can I actually demonstrate objectively that Da Jooz control America", you'd have to admit that you might be the one suffering under a delusion.
Why would I ever fight FOR my country ? At this point in time I'd much rather fight against it but I'm content in watching it all burn.
Besides my countries path to survival is not in fighting exterior forces but by remaining as neutral as possible. We simply can't win much so it is better to just make it so it isn't a worthwhile investment for enemies to attack us in the first place by selling our benefits and remaining on good terms with everyone.
I'm sure that 28% will tickle a possible invader, question is do we lose to an invader that even bothers to invade us or do we sell everything to the chinese 1st ?
That's because the city deserves what they get and it's probably just turf disputes anyways. Personally, I'd consider nuking Portland or LA a public service at this point. New York is still too tied to our financial system and few other east coast might cost us too much to be lost, but the west coast cities are all magic erase boards.
I wonder how many people understood that question to really be "Will you fight for your current government?".
I wonder how many more people would have actually said yes to "Would you fight for your country, if it was against the globalist parasites plundering it from your own seats of power?"
We shouldn't be defending Europe. For starters the Soviet Union is dead, and beyond that having us as a shield for the better part of a century has turned them into arrogant, entitled parasites.
Western Europeans deserve to die out. If you have no self preservation instinct, then you will inevitably perish from those who are stronger. In this is already happening. The native populations in Western Europe will die out and be replaced by Arabs. It’s the way of the world. I’m just sad that I won’t be around a hundred years from now to say I told you so.
European elites are absolutely far and away more corrupt than US elites.
Hm. I didn't mean to suggest that I was defending these bastards, but it's hard to judge. In some respects, they are slightly less bad, but in other respects, they are slightly worse. It's difficult to distinguish 97% bad from 98% bad though.
At least the government elites in the US have to pretend to win an election, European Parliament members don't even give that courteousy.
Well, they do. But the problem is that all parties are basically the same, so it doesn't matter who you 'vote' for. And their powers are very limited. You may have meant the European Commission, whose membership is determined by the member states. (And both are very corrupt.)
Ironically, the sort of indirect election that some American conservatives praise for the Senate.
Depending on who attacks my life would not change at all if they would win. I would just pay my taxes to someone else.
The politicians in my country don't care about me - they would of course gladly accept me being killed in a war to defend them. They would not fight though.
Just look at Zelensky & Putin. They both are safe and there's 0 danger of them being killed during the war. Only if one side would absolutely be destroyed they would be in danger of being executed.
But they are fine with sending thousands of their people to die.
Why fight for those?
It would be different to fight for values & family
I don’t know, if LA or NYC were attacked, I sure won’t be defending them.
Maybe 10 years ago, but I have zero interest to defend what is left of our nation.
Why would men, lets be honest here it's men who still be the ones dying to protect anything, want to to protect a country that hated them? Take your pick on any feminist Eu nation. I rather let it all burn.
Why indeed.
And yet Ukrainians are dying by the tens of thousands for a fake country that is a vassal to countries that consider those men subhumans for being white, male and straight.
Russians died by the tens of millions for Stalin, Germans by the millions for Hitler. You can be persuaded to die for anything - with propaganda and terror.
Nobody asked the Ukrainians to fight, they were forced to and the West stood and did fuck-all to protect them. Finland, Moldova and Lithuania sent them back on sight if they tried to flee.
I would say the governments of Europe should be ashamed, but they're probably proud of what they did.
The West is corrupt and hypocritical in its claims about "human rights", and will gladly use people as cannon fodder for its geopolitical interests?
Wow? I'm so shocked!
They had Ukrainians die for their corrupt interests and fake country-vassal. That is a masterstroke, and it is something to be proud of if you are a Machiavellian.
Exactly what I was thinking. I would not fight to defend my country, I would fight to defend my small region I love to death though. I feel like, the more we go on the more big countries were a mistake. I have much more in common with the people in my local region than with anyone in the capital(and I've been there before).
Ah yes, are we still thinking that it’s women and not the people with small hats and big noses running things?
Right, you think the failed actor runs shit.
His wife is a script writer.
Zelensky isn't running anything, but "the women" sure as hell aren't either. And neither are the Juice, to cover both ends of your little usual Cripple Fight.
It is the army, and by extension, the Americans - who do not care about "the women" or "the Jews" when these are not useful. Imagine being so stupid that you actually believe "we fight for democracy" or "we fight for women's rights" at face value.
Ah, but they are. Who do you think is profiting off this war? The woman-led defense contractors.
Do tell me if you think things would be different if men were in charge of those defense contractors of yours.
Exactly, why the fuck would we die for women's profits.
Get a load of this bigot!
He thinks women will exist in 20 years!
To be fair, it's a vague question open to interpretation. Most of those governments probably hate their people.
Would I fight to defend my values? Absolutely. Would I fight to defend globalist government? Only if what I was defending against was significantly worse. And even then there's an argument to be made for letting the invaders take out the current power structure, and then fighting to take back your country.
They're too scared to do it, but I can easily imagine the Biden Regime completely falling apart and being brought to it's knees (the way Argentina did after the Falkland Islands War) if the they announced that they would engage in a nuclear escalation with Russia.
The only argument for it, is that a government based on right of conquest bothers even less to take account of the people's wishes than current European governments, if that is even possible. What are they going to do, after all? Allow 14,000 girls to be raped? Arrest you for jokes about the government?
But still: the cost vs. benefit is rather unfavorable. Even if a conquest would be marginally worse, it would not be worth risking one's life over.
And this is why I have advocated ending NATO in favor of a new "Not NATO" of Eastern Europe (The Poles, The Czechs, the Baltics, the Nords, and Ukraine). Since they would actually put their money where their mouth is for a defense alliance.
That is a bad idea. Czechia is at 23%, and Ukraine is not a real country.
So, by "Not NATO" you just mean "The Polish-Lithuanian Commonwealth".
I can get behind that.
I definitely wouldnt say no.
England isn't a country anymore it's a massive airport for migrants who have no connections to the land. Why the fuck would I fight for that?
England seriously needs another civil war.
The reason many Europeans won't fight to defend their country is because the USA owns their country so any war for "their country" becomes some Jewish war that isn't actually in their interests.
I'm Canadian and I would never fight to defend this country because my government doesn't represent my interests. If China invaded tomorrow, I'd be trying to figure out how I can aid the Chinese. I want to see this country destroyed. It's not worth fighting for. I'm sure many Europeans feel the same way. People don't want to defend countries that don't represent their interests.
Poll dumb anyways. Saying it is cheap
Yes.
But not sure how the Jews entered the conversation.
Who runs the USA...
Da JOOZ?
Correct.
Pretty dumb, but the rest of your comment made sense.
It's alright. I used to think like you did until I was unplugged from the matrix. We've all been there. You'll wake up one day.
He won't. Because he is one.
If you were honest with yourself, and thought "can I actually demonstrate objectively that Da Jooz control America", you'd have to admit that you might be the one suffering under a delusion.
Why would I ever fight FOR my country ? At this point in time I'd much rather fight against it but I'm content in watching it all burn.
Besides my countries path to survival is not in fighting exterior forces but by remaining as neutral as possible. We simply can't win much so it is better to just make it so it isn't a worthwhile investment for enemies to attack us in the first place by selling our benefits and remaining on good terms with everyone.
I'm sure that 28% will tickle a possible invader, question is do we lose to an invader that even bothers to invade us or do we sell everything to the chinese 1st ?
Under current leadership, who can blame them? Why risk your life for someone that views you as a qouta than a valuable asset
Apparently, my country doesn't trust it's law abiding populace to own guns but I'm supposed to die for another country? Get fucked.
Defend centralized bank dept and secular multiculturalism? Whoo lad!
Alternate caption:
"Netherlands, Germany and Belgium have the lowest percentage of cucks willing to die under their feminist ministers of defense."
Defend from what/whom?
Even in the US, I’d sit back and watch for a few days if one of our cities were attacked.
That's because the city deserves what they get and it's probably just turf disputes anyways. Personally, I'd consider nuking Portland or LA a public service at this point. New York is still too tied to our financial system and few other east coast might cost us too much to be lost, but the west coast cities are all magic erase boards.
I wonder how many people understood that question to really be "Will you fight for your current government?".
I wonder how many more people would have actually said yes to "Would you fight for your country, if it was against the globalist parasites plundering it from your own seats of power?"
We shouldn't be defending Europe. For starters the Soviet Union is dead, and beyond that having us as a shield for the better part of a century has turned them into arrogant, entitled parasites.
I’d like to see Israel on there too - since we spend more on them and they get free healthcare whereas we do not.
Looks like they’re all ripe for conquest. Let’s go, boys!
There's a portion of Luxembourg that's been clearly playing too much HOI 4.
"LET ME AT THE GERMANS! I CAN TAKE THEM!"
surveying the total population is misleading, only the men matter
Men make up a nation. Women are a resource like oil or gold.
Western Europeans deserve to die out. If you have no self preservation instinct, then you will inevitably perish from those who are stronger. In this is already happening. The native populations in Western Europe will die out and be replaced by Arabs. It’s the way of the world. I’m just sad that I won’t be around a hundred years from now to say I told you so.
Now I know you're a malicious actor.
The only thing that's "cucked" is fighting for the wealth and power of people who hate you.
Europeans won't get killed for their elites, and neither should Americans for their possibly even more corrupt elites.
European elites are absolutely far and away more corrupt than US elites.
At least the government elites in the US have to pretend to win an election, European Parliament members don't even give that courteousy.
Hm. I didn't mean to suggest that I was defending these bastards, but it's hard to judge. In some respects, they are slightly less bad, but in other respects, they are slightly worse. It's difficult to distinguish 97% bad from 98% bad though.
Well, they do. But the problem is that all parties are basically the same, so it doesn't matter who you 'vote' for. And their powers are very limited. You may have meant the European Commission, whose membership is determined by the member states. (And both are very corrupt.)
Ironically, the sort of indirect election that some American conservatives praise for the Senate.
If Western European men had a backbone, they’d kill their leaders and then expel the Muslims. But they don’t, so they won’t.
Depending on who attacks my life would not change at all if they would win. I would just pay my taxes to someone else.
The politicians in my country don't care about me - they would of course gladly accept me being killed in a war to defend them. They would not fight though.
Just look at Zelensky & Putin. They both are safe and there's 0 danger of them being killed during the war. Only if one side would absolutely be destroyed they would be in danger of being executed.
But they are fine with sending thousands of their people to die.
Why fight for those?
It would be different to fight for values & family
I don’t know, if LA or NYC were attacked, I sure won’t be defending them. Maybe 10 years ago, but I have zero interest to defend what is left of our nation.