You're openly whores and these men are less than betas in that they sterilise themselves just to get the approval of women who will never fuck them, they'll fuck big dicked tyrone who doesn't give a shit how many kids he fathered.
So unfortunately this won't lead to the dumb and gullible being weeded out, just the white ones.
She doesn't believe it, she might think she does, but deep down she absolutely doesn't and it's just a shit test. So she'll get some retard to actually do that, for that feeling of control, and then fuck someone else who isn't snipped, refuses to wear a rubber, and slaps her around, someone who is the exact opposite of the type of completely defeated cuckold who will end his genetic line for a nonbinding promise of a crumb of pussy.
And then she'll find out she can't have kids anyway lmao. Although from that small profile pic I can't tell how old she is, it looks incredibly weird.
I look at vasectomies like this - if you've already had as many kids as you know you want to have than a vasectomy is a totally fine idea. If you know you don't ever want to have kids due to, say, a genetic disorder you don't want to pass on, that's a good idea as well. But just getting one because your wife wants you to have one, or because you're upset that Roe v Wade got overturned, that's a stupid, emasculating idea.
It’s a bit worse than that. It’s literally self eugenics. It literally goes against one’s entire drive as an animal, let alone a human being.
This is quite literally the majority of humanity’s main reason for existing, throughout all of time: to pass on one’s genes, and, historically, as a man, to have at least one son to pass on the family name…
I find it… Astounding, that we, as “human society” in this millennium think that we have somehow surpassed that biological drive. It’s just madness to me that people think they are above that, and would willingly… “Self-terminate” their line, just in the hope that they might get some pussy out of it.
I’m sorry, but a society that collectively believes that is terminal. There’s no getting around that.
I'm not so sure. It just means that the people who think that way won't be represented in the next generation. This is a net plus for the human race as a whole.
She wouldn't be able to, adoption in civilized nations is very difficult to accomplish. There is a shortage of adoptable kids, actually. The available babies and toddlers are all spoken for and the older (severely damaged kids) are all fucked up beyond belief and too difficult for the average person to handle.
This is the ideal scenario. Modern society can't totally collapse fast enough. Unfortunately, we'll probably have to wait for a comet or hope for a massive CME as part of the pole shift package.
A few months from now... wives mysteriously pregnant... soibands rejoice publicly and virtue signal that real men raise their wives's children, despite being a bunch of cucked eunuchs.
These days, in the "West"..? Sure. But that's only because the foster care system exists, with varying degrees of success...
It's really not that long ago that orphanages à la Annie (Warbucks) were a thing... Literally less than 60 years ago, in parts...
It's just that we, as a society, have weirdly chosen to pretend that things like that are in some "long forgotten past", while making it incredibly hard for people today to adopt.
This isn't a good thing. But it is, I suppose, suitably "woke".
Results in a fuck tonne of children being adopted out of other, "less developed" countries, however, and also means that we have an entire, thoroughly dysfunctional, largely private "foster system" in place, pretty much universally, at least in the Anglosphere...
This is good eugenics.
Eugenics is all about good genetics. It's the name.
Good is used here as a moral qualifier. An example of bad eugenics would be murdering babies.
You're openly whores and these men are less than betas in that they sterilise themselves just to get the approval of women who will never fuck them, they'll fuck big dicked tyrone who doesn't give a shit how many kids he fathered.
So unfortunately this won't lead to the dumb and gullible being weeded out, just the white ones.
🎷Who could it be, now?🎷
So, according to the feminist, women are no more than non-sapient cattle who just breed and breed without care or consideration?
Literally the entire natural history of sexual reproduction in the animal kingdom (not just humans) suggests her thesis is incorrect, but hey…
Seriously, the fact that anyone would believe that Tweet, male OR female, is pretty worrying as to where we are at/headed as a species, right now…
She doesn't believe it, she might think she does, but deep down she absolutely doesn't and it's just a shit test. So she'll get some retard to actually do that, for that feeling of control, and then fuck someone else who isn't snipped, refuses to wear a rubber, and slaps her around, someone who is the exact opposite of the type of completely defeated cuckold who will end his genetic line for a nonbinding promise of a crumb of pussy.
And then she'll find out she can't have kids anyway lmao. Although from that small profile pic I can't tell how old she is, it looks incredibly weird.
That too, but even from their own perspective, it doesn't say good things about the women they claim to value.
I look at vasectomies like this - if you've already had as many kids as you know you want to have than a vasectomy is a totally fine idea. If you know you don't ever want to have kids due to, say, a genetic disorder you don't want to pass on, that's a good idea as well. But just getting one because your wife wants you to have one, or because you're upset that Roe v Wade got overturned, that's a stupid, emasculating idea.
It’s a bit worse than that. It’s literally self eugenics. It literally goes against one’s entire drive as an animal, let alone a human being.
This is quite literally the majority of humanity’s main reason for existing, throughout all of time: to pass on one’s genes, and, historically, as a man, to have at least one son to pass on the family name…
I find it… Astounding, that we, as “human society” in this millennium think that we have somehow surpassed that biological drive. It’s just madness to me that people think they are above that, and would willingly… “Self-terminate” their line, just in the hope that they might get some pussy out of it.
I’m sorry, but a society that collectively believes that is terminal. There’s no getting around that.
I'm not so sure. It just means that the people who think that way won't be represented in the next generation. This is a net plus for the human race as a whole.
It doesnt work that way. They dont have their own kids so they can afford to spend all their time and money trying to indoctrinate yours.
They’ll die eventually. Evolution will sort out the dummies who fall for the lies.
Your children might die. Later in life, you might marry a young hottie who wants to be a mother.
Never give up your ability to create life.
Thank god. It's like setting traps for animals. Only the dumb and gullible will die. Everyone left is too smart for this bullshit and those reproduce.
its the bell curve meme
the trap gets the midwits
the dumdums instinctually avoid it, the big brains intellectually use higher level reason to find the correct solution
Everyone remaining/else. Sometimes good grammar doesn't cut it- phrasing is important too XD
Was about to say the same. With the stuff we talk about normally I had to re-read his comment a couple times.
Dollars to donuts "Cutzy" has adopted zero kids.
She wouldn't be able to, adoption in civilized nations is very difficult to accomplish. There is a shortage of adoptable kids, actually. The available babies and toddlers are all spoken for and the older (severely damaged kids) are all fucked up beyond belief and too difficult for the average person to handle.
It's all about removing the sense of propagation from Humans. It'll be something the state decides.
If this caught on, and immigration faltered, society collapses. We get, in essence, voluntarily-induced Children of Men.
Society would not survive more than 20 years of that.
Seriously, I don’t think people quite understand what happens when society stops reproducing.
By that point, there won’t be a functioning state to decide these things.
This isn’t academic. Look at worker shortages already, and this is without population decline (for the most part).
I seriously don’t know how people can’t see this.
This is the ideal scenario. Modern society can't totally collapse fast enough. Unfortunately, we'll probably have to wait for a comet or hope for a massive CME as part of the pole shift package.
Irresponsible Ejaculation is a horrible name for a child. so I guess the name Bethany Dawson will have to do.
Bitch wouldn't adopt either
moment of silence for all the ugly beta guys getting vasectomies thinking it will get them laid
A few months from now... wives mysteriously pregnant... soibands rejoice publicly and virtue signal that real men raise their wives's children, despite being a bunch of cucked eunuchs.
You adopt a dog. Children are supposed to be your offspring.
These days, in the "West"..? Sure. But that's only because the foster care system exists, with varying degrees of success...
It's really not that long ago that orphanages à la Annie (Warbucks) were a thing... Literally less than 60 years ago, in parts...
It's just that we, as a society, have weirdly chosen to pretend that things like that are in some "long forgotten past", while making it incredibly hard for people today to adopt.
This isn't a good thing. But it is, I suppose, suitably "woke".
Results in a fuck tonne of children being adopted out of other, "less developed" countries, however, and also means that we have an entire, thoroughly dysfunctional, largely private "foster system" in place, pretty much universally, at least in the Anglosphere...
This woman gives a bad name to adoption.