Why Won’t Leo Date A Real Wahman?!
(media.communities.win)
Comments (84)
sorted by:
Translation: why won’t Leo date me?
Replace "Leo" with "anyone" and its more accurate
40 years old shitskin wine aunt most affected
20-year-olds are not mature enough for that. It's not as if they're making the decision to cut off their breasts, which is OK even for 12 year olds. Having a relationship with DiCaprio is quite another ballpark.
I think most of the people who support 12 year olds cutting off their breasts would also support 12 year olds consenting to sex.
That is in fact where they are going.
I think they would support 5-year-olds consenting to sex.
Woodchipper is just a machine
If consent is the sole foundation of sexual morality, your moral system is based solely on power and you're on the slope to "but what if the child consents?"
This particular situation isn't a huge problem by itself and I'm rather fond of such a pure display of misogyny, but the reasoning that brought it about isn't sound.
I'm saying that consent is not a solid foundation of sexual morality. Harvey Weinstein did nothing wrong based purely on a consent based system, but most people instinctively recognize that the casting couch is not a good thing. The sexual revolution, and its consequences, have been a disaster for civilization.
This particular case isn't a huge problem, but the logic is. The reasoning of consent demonstrably brought us to this point of trans kids dancing on stripper poles, and always will. Hedonism as a value is not healthy for society.
The same thing that has worked for all high cultures, heterosexual marriage.
Duress is a fake concept where people don't have the spine to deal with the sinking cost fallacy.
You say that though. Even leaving aside the fact that this allows for all sorts of gross wrongs, like incest between adults, your motivation for limiting it to adults is likely that you think children cannot consent.
But we're dealing with people who think 9 year olds are able to consent to being trooned and getting drugs to chemically castrated sex offenders. Is this really the world in which we want to introduce the idea that consent and the ability to consent is all that matters?
Truth of the matter is that 'consent' is an empty standard.
Tony and the Elephant simply hijacked your comment to argue a theoretical. I wouldn't take it personally. On this topic you guys haven't said anything contradictory.
I'm glad you don't need to worry. But you do posit a standard which would allow for that. Don't you see that someone would then point out that this standard may then not be the be all and end all?
Are you calling me a 'rape apologist', or was this unfortunate phrasing?
The whole point is that it is necessary but definitely not sufficient.
Also, I don't disapprove of DiCaprio here. I'm just objecting to 'consent-only', which opens the floodgates for all sorts of filth.
It is by no means 'misogynistic' to date only young women.
He has reduced them to pleasure meat, no different than a good veal.
Women reduced themselves to pleasure meat, not men.
The veal isn't getting anything out of it though.
It could also just be based on stripping out emotion and leaving it to pure logistics.
No power needed, just A wants X and B wants Y, both can provide. No further depth needed. Which seems to be the case here.
It's not particularly good for the women. Every new partner a woman has impairs her ability to bond, or as Gibbons put it, "the female mind is totally depraved by the loss of chastity."
Little of what women do is good for women. They are allowed to ruin their own lives.
Yeah but I'm not going praise or excuse the retard acting in tandem with them
Even without science, you can tell that someone who regularly goes into shallow, meaningless, short-term relationships isn't going to be able to develop long, meaningful ones. Any attempt to start one will end at the first hurdle because "I can just get a new one", "plenty fish in the sea", "if he can't handle me at my worst..." etc.
Might be a bit of chicken and egg situation. Does casual sex/dating lead to shallow, low-value women or are those women drawn to casual relationships/incapable of 'bonding'?
True, but we're talking about the stress of normal relationships, not crisis situations. Marriage until death used to be the norm, so it's not like women can't have fidelity when reinforced by society, but recent cultural shifts have changed that.
Unfathomably based.
yes. romantic love is a relatively new made-up construction. Quite a lot of evidence for this, coming about sometime around The Enlightenment. Where SIMPing really started to take off, especially among the French.
The fact that women are incapable of returning romantic love should be the cuckold's first clue that it's all gaslighting.
Yes there is something wrong with being a coomer degenerate. The fuck are yountalking about
I think it's funny that it's happened enough times that the new Girl must know, and whether or not it's discussed. Like they're on his yacht and he makes comments "make sure you don't leave anything behind"
Here's what I've always wondered: at this point his hardline age preference is well-known, so are the women who date him doing so seriously thinking, "I am the one that's going to tame his penis and when my vagina turns 25 he won't leave me," or are they in it knowing they'll get dumped and just want a few months of movie star attention?
And which is sadder?
The amount of "I can fix him" women that get beaten, raped, or murdered yearly for signing up for actual thugs with real criminal histories says that yes this is exactly what's happening.
Most women are raised around the idea that their vagina is a magical organ that has had hypnotic powers over every man in their life since they were in middle school. Especially hot girls. The very notion of a man who is drowning in so much puss that any individual one is worthless and disposable to him is unthinkable to them.
Seemingly the most attractive I am to women is when I'm having a bad week and when I'm back to my normal self it's oh now you're boring. Like bitch why should I be depressed for your pleasure
It's because women are evolutionarily hardwired to seek men who are a little bit dangerous and wild. Such men are the ones who will be capable hunters and protectors They then "civilize" them into domestic family life and broader mainstream civilization. We have examples of this dating back to ancient literature with The Epic of Gilgamesh.
Historically, this worked pretty well. Murderers were rare, and were generally quickly dispatched by their societies. Close communities and draconian laws kept order. Most violence that did exist was intertribal and socially condoned.
Three big issues muck this all up.
1.) The erosion of shared moral and cultural values has lead not only to more crime, but it also makes people's expectations of each other less accurate.
2.) Increased urbanization leads to anonymity, less accountability, and less empathy towards one's neighbors.
3.) The emasculation and infantilization of noncriminal Western men. When women cannot find traditional masculinity, they will seek its perverted form in black gang culture or Islam.
Live the high life with an attractive and wealthy older man who has a decades-long reputation of being an absolute slayer. Get your name out there, make famous and lucrative contacts and boost any media career in five years.
I wouldn't be surprised if Leo literally has a contract that they sign that lays out the deal.
At some point he'll be too old to attract a new 20-year-old, they think, I assume.
His money will always be attractive.
Right because Hugh had a hard time finding 20 somethings to fuck.
Hugh Grant?
I'm not familiar with the dating lives of celebrities.
I think he meant Hugh Hefner, the Playboy guy.
Sign a contract for seven figures to sleep with a movie star for a couple years. Play your cards right, and become a movie star in your own right. Seems like many women would make that choice, it's just profitable.
Mahdawi would rather he marry 6 year olds like her prophet.
EXCUSE ME, at least he didn't dump Aisha when she turned 25... because he had been dead for 7 years by that time.
"Who better than the prophet?" -- Muslims, defending their pedofile founder.
Madonna has consistently been with men much younger than her for decades, most recently one not even half her age. I'm sure "Mahdawi" is equally jea...disgusted about this.
Why don't you mind your own fuckin business you hag?
''Hitting the wall hurts and I am jealous the high status males can date young fertile women, which I am not anymore. I should have everything. REEEE.'
~Feminism.
Why would any sane man date a woman over 25 if he could date a younger one instead? Obviously he should have just stuck to one woman but that's not the point.
Ben Franklin had some opinions about it.
Because he's rich and he doesn't have to.
Who cares? Like seriously, who gives a flying fuck? I really don't care what two consenting adults do in the privacy of their own homes. Why should anyone else? I don't care if Leo likes them in their 20's. I don't care if a 20-something woman is smart enough to enjoy the ride and the media attention she'll probably get from it. I just don't give a fuck about the sex lives of the rich and famous!
Imagine earning a journalism degree and this is the type of shit you have to write in order to make a living? What a shitty existence that would be. That to me is way worse than some rich millionaire movie star churning through 20-something girls. Hey, at least he gets the pleasure of a hot 20-something riding his dick.
Meanwhile, Ms. Mahdawi up there will probably be at home stroking her cats wondering what the fuck happened with her life as she writes another useless article.
That is one way of putting it.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=6zXDo4dL7SU
In before Leo gets metood?
Nah I think he bought himself protection by supporting the climate change grift.
I mean nothing is wrong with that although if I see a young woman with an older man I assume the older man is wealthy
Because he doesn’t have to
If it isn't Arwa 'Batshit Feminist' Mahdawi again.
Absolutely no shame.
Leo is not hetero. End of story.
I mean, if the person you're dating wasn't even born when you were their age, it is a bit weird