Men have more variance -- your biggest losers and your biggest winners will all be men. Women tend to clump in the middle, neither exceptionally good nor bad.
This tends to make women shitty leaders. I've seen this borne out across cultures, too, so it's not part of the unique American ennui going around. It doesn't mean that women can't be leaders (Margaret Thatcher, like her or hate her, was definitely a leader), it just means that trying to fulfill leadership quotas or pointing to a 50/50 split is a bad thing.
Men have more variance -- your biggest losers and your biggest winners will all be men. Women tend to clump in the middle, neither exceptionally good nor bad.
Men are encouraged to excel and break away from the pack as such traits attract women.
Women are berated and ostracised if they try to stand out because it diminishes the remaining women.
So women may clump in the middle more however that could be a result of social pressure from their harridan peers rather than a true representation of things.
Why can't it be a social pressure that is biologically motivated? Human societies evolved these traits for survival in a different time, but we still have to answer to our biological instincts.
How much better the world would be if we leaned into our sexual dimorphism and brought the best manliness characteristics out alongside the best feminine characteristics.
You'd probably see a lot less mental illness. Our world and social order has changed dramatically in a very short amount of time, and not enough research has been done into how this "change in social ecology" has affected us.
I mean, just look at this post and tell me that's a rational adult who can depend her on opinion. And that's a TEACHER! Future generation is either growing up dumb as brick or based because they learn on their own.
Yea including iq, women have a “higher” average, but are all overwhelmingly mediocre and the vast majority reside in the 90-110 range. Men tend to be far more spread out and completely dominate iq percents over 110. Unfortunately women keep breeding with low iq men then end up single moms, which repeats the cycle. Using chess as an example there has been 1 woman, Judit Polgar, who completely demolished the women's league, but never won a male tournament.
She has been the highest-rated woman ever since FIDE's January 1990 list, and in 2003 she entered the overall top ten. In 2005, she became the first woman to take part in the final of an open world championship cycle when she participated in the FIDE World Championship Tournament (2005). Although she finished last.
The simple fact of the matter is for the most intelligent woman there are at least 50 men who are just as if not more capable. This is why women don’t want equal opportunity but equal outcomes. Men must be castrated down to the womens level.
They don't like to acknowledge that bit; like all disadvantages of males and masculinity, they skip over it because it's inconvenient. They want to cherry pick the "men are smarter" part so they can have something to be outraged about.
By birth yes. The fun part about retards is most of them don't live long. Whether by physical struggles/defects or just being retarded enough to get themselves killed young.
So by a certain age, the retarded half will be dropping off and distorting the average in men's favor.
By nearly every statistical measure, men are both superior and inferior to women.
Nature realized a long time ago that wombs are expensive productions, while sperm is cheap. That's why the Y chromosome is much more mutatable and variable than the X. So it can try out new shit and not lose a lot if it fails.
Which means the stupidest and smartest people will always be men. In every category it is almost guaranteed the top and bottom will be men. Women will just cluster at the "average" area.
I wouldn't even consider comparing height or strength, because sexual dimorphism means there isn't even a playing field to compare on. The physical differences that are the literal definition of men vs women. Its comparing pugs to wolves at that point.
Hopefully it did happen, this is exactly the kind of thing we need. Young men should see that the world the left wants to push on them is one in which they are slaves.
Y'all predates black ebonic shit by a LOT. It also fulfills a necessary linguistic hole left after the move from middle english to modern english where the 2nd person plural and the 2nd person singular merged. The informal 2nd person plural "thou" was dropped to make way for the formal version and the conjugation suffered because of it. There is an alternative practiced in NE north america: "Youse" which I hear often in the great lakes dialects and rural western Canada, but I prefer Y'all and use it myself. Y'all also has roots in england, so there's that.
Yeah but Youse is from the North, aka the good guys. So its just a funny accent. Y'all is from the South, aka the retarded inbred racists, so it was incredibly bad until black culture become popular (of which half of their culture is just Southern shit but worse) and with it, speaking like them.
That nice little southern girl who went to a nice conservative school has still had all of her education classes and most of her Gen Eds infiltrated with DEI bullshit. She says ya'll because she looks like a nice, well-adjusted person but is really just a Trojan Horse for the feminizing bullshit.
I do find it funny they get so triggered by a guy who mainly says have some self-worth. It's not the pick up artist stuff they hate, it's that he made fun of masks and people going off to fight Putin. They want every streamer to be xQc or Ludwig type of soyboys.
Tate began offering paid courses and memberships through his website
I'm getting a definite "Jack Murphy cuckold" vibe from this one. When you see someone banging on about how alpha they are you just know we're in for another epic meltdown.
Women are objectively inferior to men in terms of things like most types of intelligence and physical strength, as well as the benefits of testosterone which make men more mentally resilient and focused. That's why feminism has always been about trying to LARP as men and replace men in doing male roles.
Women were genetically designed as the support class for men. They are dominating in universities now (except in some difficult fields like STEM) because university professors don't want independent thinkers, they want sheeple who will confirm and cater to them, which is what women are.
Yet when you look at who is changing the world? It's still men, always has been.
The only time I heard of a woman who was a bigshot startup queen, it was the manvoice bitch behind Theranos, which was entirely a scam. She was only able to pull off the scam for as long as she did by exploiting everyone YASS QWEENing her.
I don't think anyone heard of Andrew Tate until very recently. Nor do I think middle school boys are sitting around watching him. r/teachers I suspect is teachers trying to out virtue signal and out-outrage each other by all making shit up.
I think there is a good chance this is real. Even if someone isn't popular across the nation, schools will have certain mobile games, influencers, or whatever be popular in waves; if a handful of students know, most of the school might.
Moreover, youth are smart, they know right away that a teacher is a liberal, and if pushing her buttons gets a reaction they like they will keep it up.
Our species for most of the time was made of small nomadic or semi-nomadic bands. With the pass of aeons someone had the fine idea that you can trade your sister for someone else's and the gig was on.
People in neolithic Balkans could be divided in two groups : European hunter gatherers & Middle Eastern farmers, their settlements were clearly distinct except the presence of MEF female remains in EHG areas. Archaeologists call them "pioneers" when in reality they were traded for game meat, honey and pelts.
I can go on with various examples from the Indoeuropean copper age to 17th century England (were people still sell their wives) to dowry traditions. Just consider the first thought that crosses your mind when you see a women in an advertizement.
My point is that women do not belong in the kitchen but the market. Those boys are clearly wrong.
Scientists have long suspected that Danube foragers and their farming neighbors gathered at Lepenski Vir to exchange stories and ideas, and probably to find mates. The strontium analysis, published in a 2013 PNAS paper, supports this idea. Of the 45 remains tested, 10 belonged to women who came from Anatolia, presumably as part of the farming communities — a head-turning number in what is essentially a forager settlement. Adding to the mystery, three of those women were buried in the hunter-gatherer manner.
The discovery suggests the casual manner in which farming spread, says Bori, co-author of the paper. “It is very likely that Neolithic women coming into the forager settlements spread [farming] skills,” he says.
Lepenski Vir’s most intriguing human burial is that of 7/I — the large-framed man, likely in his 50s, that some researchers believe was born a hunter and died a farmer. He was laid to rest beneath a building’s plaster floor, with the detached skull of another individual placed over his left shoulder.
NOTE: this happened in Southern Europe as it apears in the North HGs use to sell their women to the farmers. Of course at the start of the metal age strange Steppes IE peoples appear and took all the bitches without paying ( almost no Indoeuropean mtDNA) .
Hopefully it did happen. That's hilarious.
women are statistically inferior to men, that's why you made up emotional IQ despite women having the emotional control of a 5 year old.....
The way I think of it is this:
Men have more variance -- your biggest losers and your biggest winners will all be men. Women tend to clump in the middle, neither exceptionally good nor bad.
This tends to make women shitty leaders. I've seen this borne out across cultures, too, so it's not part of the unique American ennui going around. It doesn't mean that women can't be leaders (Margaret Thatcher, like her or hate her, was definitely a leader), it just means that trying to fulfill leadership quotas or pointing to a 50/50 split is a bad thing.
Men are encouraged to excel and break away from the pack as such traits attract women.
Women are berated and ostracised if they try to stand out because it diminishes the remaining women.
So women may clump in the middle more however that could be a result of social pressure from their harridan peers rather than a true representation of things.
Why can't it be a social pressure that is biologically motivated? Human societies evolved these traits for survival in a different time, but we still have to answer to our biological instincts.
How much better the world would be if we leaned into our sexual dimorphism and brought the best manliness characteristics out alongside the best feminine characteristics.
You'd probably see a lot less mental illness. Our world and social order has changed dramatically in a very short amount of time, and not enough research has been done into how this "change in social ecology" has affected us.
I mean, just look at this post and tell me that's a rational adult who can depend her on opinion. And that's a TEACHER! Future generation is either growing up dumb as brick or based because they learn on their own.
Including IQ? Serious question.
I wonder if they lag behind men in mental games like chess, too.
Yea including iq, women have a “higher” average, but are all overwhelmingly mediocre and the vast majority reside in the 90-110 range. Men tend to be far more spread out and completely dominate iq percents over 110. Unfortunately women keep breeding with low iq men then end up single moms, which repeats the cycle. Using chess as an example there has been 1 woman, Judit Polgar, who completely demolished the women's league, but never won a male tournament.
The simple fact of the matter is for the most intelligent woman there are at least 50 men who are just as if not more capable. This is why women don’t want equal opportunity but equal outcomes. Men must be castrated down to the womens level.
Thank you, sir.
So men have a higher share of the retards?
Duh? It’s been known for a while that autism is a male majority
They don't like to acknowledge that bit; like all disadvantages of males and masculinity, they skip over it because it's inconvenient. They want to cherry pick the "men are smarter" part so they can have something to be outraged about.
By birth yes. The fun part about retards is most of them don't live long. Whether by physical struggles/defects or just being retarded enough to get themselves killed young.
So by a certain age, the retarded half will be dropping off and distorting the average in men's favor.
Absolutely. Top female chess ELOs are around 500th in male ranking. Just like the Braasch/Williams tennis matches.
I still get a giggle out of: https://boysvswomen.com/
You wonder instead of Yandexing it?
Top women grandmaster is #388 in mixed gender ranking.
Source: https://www.chess.com/players?page=16
At this point, I don't trust any site that doesn't end in .win anymore.
I don't even trust nba.com to tell me basketball scores.
By nearly every statistical measure, men are both superior and inferior to women.
Nature realized a long time ago that wombs are expensive productions, while sperm is cheap. That's why the Y chromosome is much more mutatable and variable than the X. So it can try out new shit and not lose a lot if it fails.
Which means the stupidest and smartest people will always be men. In every category it is almost guaranteed the top and bottom will be men. Women will just cluster at the "average" area.
I wouldn't even consider comparing height or strength, because sexual dimorphism means there isn't even a playing field to compare on. The physical differences that are the literal definition of men vs women. Its comparing pugs to wolves at that point.
Women are more likely to be average or slightly above average and men are more likely to be on one extreme or another
Hopefully it did happen, this is exactly the kind of thing we need. Young men should see that the world the left wants to push on them is one in which they are slaves.
Funny because people in school would openly push boys being inferior to girls. Now it becomes a problem though.
You think you're kidding but people are saying that it's racist because they're imitating blacks when they do it.
Y'all predates black ebonic shit by a LOT. It also fulfills a necessary linguistic hole left after the move from middle english to modern english where the 2nd person plural and the 2nd person singular merged. The informal 2nd person plural "thou" was dropped to make way for the formal version and the conjugation suffered because of it. There is an alternative practiced in NE north america: "Youse" which I hear often in the great lakes dialects and rural western Canada, but I prefer Y'all and use it myself. Y'all also has roots in england, so there's that.
Yeah but Youse is from the North, aka the good guys. So its just a funny accent. Y'all is from the South, aka the retarded inbred racists, so it was incredibly bad until black culture become popular (of which half of their culture is just Southern shit but worse) and with it, speaking like them.
Both are corruptions.
Not quite.
That nice little southern girl who went to a nice conservative school has still had all of her education classes and most of her Gen Eds infiltrated with DEI bullshit. She says ya'll because she looks like a nice, well-adjusted person but is really just a Trojan Horse for the feminizing bullshit.
Lol this is true but most of that y'alling comes from urbanites
I mean pretty much, tough women are the exception whereas with tough men it SHOULD be the rule.
That whole "everyone can be whatever they want to be" is why you got guys with skirts coming into your bathrooms.
Remember all those jokes in the mid-2000s about the generation who never got told "No"?
Yeah, they're so averse to the word No that they would rather let men into women's bathrooms than say No.
No, actually. I hadn't heard of him until he got banned.
I do find it funny they get so triggered by a guy who mainly says have some self-worth. It's not the pick up artist stuff they hate, it's that he made fun of masks and people going off to fight Putin. They want every streamer to be xQc or Ludwig type of soyboys.
Literally, who?
I'm getting a definite "Jack Murphy cuckold" vibe from this one. When you see someone banging on about how alpha they are you just know we're in for another epic meltdown.
He's no Kevin Samuels that's for sure.
Women are objectively inferior to men in terms of things like most types of intelligence and physical strength, as well as the benefits of testosterone which make men more mentally resilient and focused. That's why feminism has always been about trying to LARP as men and replace men in doing male roles.
Women were genetically designed as the support class for men. They are dominating in universities now (except in some difficult fields like STEM) because university professors don't want independent thinkers, they want sheeple who will confirm and cater to them, which is what women are.
Yet when you look at who is changing the world? It's still men, always has been.
The only time I heard of a woman who was a bigshot startup queen, it was the manvoice bitch behind Theranos, which was entirely a scam. She was only able to pull off the scam for as long as she did by exploiting everyone YASS QWEENing her.
I don't think anyone heard of Andrew Tate until very recently. Nor do I think middle school boys are sitting around watching him. r/teachers I suspect is teachers trying to out virtue signal and out-outrage each other by all making shit up.
I think there is a good chance this is real. Even if someone isn't popular across the nation, schools will have certain mobile games, influencers, or whatever be popular in waves; if a handful of students know, most of the school might.
Moreover, youth are smart, they know right away that a teacher is a liberal, and if pushing her buttons gets a reaction they like they will keep it up.
Our species for most of the time was made of small nomadic or semi-nomadic bands. With the pass of aeons someone had the fine idea that you can trade your sister for someone else's and the gig was on.
People in neolithic Balkans could be divided in two groups : European hunter gatherers & Middle Eastern farmers, their settlements were clearly distinct except the presence of MEF female remains in EHG areas. Archaeologists call them "pioneers" when in reality they were traded for game meat, honey and pelts.
I can go on with various examples from the Indoeuropean copper age to 17th century England (were people still sell their wives) to dowry traditions. Just consider the first thought that crosses your mind when you see a women in an advertizement.
My point is that women do not belong in the kitchen but the market. Those boys are clearly wrong.
I want more info on the EHG and MEF trading. That sounds very interesting.
I have no idea how to time stamp videos
https://invidious.snopyta.org/watch?v=a1aJ_UBBwE4 7:31
from here : https://www.discovermagazine.com/the-sciences/when-farmers-and-foragers-first-met
NOTE: this happened in Southern Europe as it apears in the North HGs use to sell their women to the farmers. Of course at the start of the metal age strange Steppes IE peoples appear and took all the bitches without paying ( almost no Indoeuropean mtDNA) .
v bbc ased
Hilarious if true