Women are objectively inferior to men in terms of things like most types of intelligence and physical strength, as well as the benefits of testosterone which make men more mentally resilient and focused. That's why feminism has always been about trying to LARP as men and replace men in doing male roles.
Women were genetically designed as the support class for men. They are dominating in universities now (except in some difficult fields like STEM) because university professors don't want independent thinkers, they want sheeple who will confirm and cater to them, which is what women are.
Yet when you look at who is changing the world? It's still men, always has been.
The only time I heard of a woman who was a bigshot startup queen, it was the manvoice bitch behind Theranos, which was entirely a scam. She was only able to pull off the scam for as long as she did by exploiting everyone YASS QWEENing her.
Women are objectively inferior to men in terms of things like most types of intelligence and physical strength, as well as the benefits of testosterone which make men more mentally resilient and focused. That's why feminism has always been about trying to LARP as men and replace men in doing male roles.
Women were genetically designed as the support class for men. They are dominating in universities now (except in some difficult fields like STEM) because university professors don't want independent thinkers, they want sheeple who will confirm and cater to them, which is what women are.
Yet when you look at who is changing the world? It's still men, always has been.
The only time I heard of a woman who was a bigshot startup queen, it was the manvoice bitch behind Theranos, which was entirely a scam. She was only able to pull off the scam for as long as she did by exploiting everyone YASS QWEENing her.