Florida Republicans going ham right now
(media.kotakuinaction2.win)
Comments (65)
sorted by:
It's self defense at this point. How many innocents are the feds allowed to kill before they are recognized as the most dangerous terror organization in the US?
ACAB, unless the cops are going after my chosen. Then it is ACAS. (All cops are saints)
more like the chosen, am i right?
AFAB - All Feds Are Bastards.
AFAB - All Feds Are Bastards.
Comment Reported for: Rule 2 - Violent Speech
Comment Approved: It's very close, but this is still arguing for an argument of self-defense as an opinion, rather than explicitly advocating for the violence.
And yet Twitter and FB did NOT ban or censor Democrat representatives AND senators that said the same thing about police not 2 years ago!
But they're outraged about THIS?!
BS!
Governments should be afraid of their people.
Anything less is tyranny.
The first in a long line of dominoes, I hope. Where's my other southern states whom still bear that old Rebel spirit?
The South won reconstruction. There were various southern partisans that harassed the Northern occupation forces the entire time. It came to a head when Wade Hampton won the governorship of South Carolina following a wave of bloody street fighting. He subtly threatened to kick off a second round of open warfare if the North didn't leave, so they did.
Many Northerners had grown sympathetic to the South as they were being tyrannized by the occupation forces. Ironically by the end, the North had adopted the Southern view of race and the South took up Northern economics. This all tends to get glossed over because, in the post-colonial framework of the New Left, the South inevitably appears as the subaltern fighting for liberation from Northern colonialism.
The North always was, and is, racist but not in the same way as the South. The Yankees didn't have much exposure to blacks until after the war, when there was a large migration northwards. Before, they wanted to save the noble savage. After, they thought blacks needed to be segregated and strictly managed, which persists to this day informally despite the stated preferences of affluent white progressives.
Lincoln's First Inaugural Address is a fun read for destroying the regime narrative. Lincoln is the only sitting President to endorse an amendment to the constitution to protect slavery:
Every side in a war has it's own narrative. The Southern narrative is that it was about their peculiar institution of slavery, partly because the anxiety over whites being genocided as happened in Haiti was very motivating for the war effort. The Northern narrative is that it was about preserving the Union as Lincoln addresses here:
Ironically again, progressives have taken up the Southern narrative of the war, except they are disappointed the South didn't get the Haiti experience.
Lol dude is slandering my region while trying to glorify the shit show that was reconstruction
How did he slander your region?
No, my friend, it just got put away for the day when its righteous fury could be properly used.
You jest ...
― Aleksandr I. Solzhenitsyn , The Gulag Archipelago 1918–1956
This is the only realistic way a civil war will ever happen. Not secession, but a state or states asserting they are the true USA and refusing to recognize the federal government. I wish MT, ID, WY, etc. would get in on it.
That is literally the spirit of the law.
The 2nd Amendment wasn't written for hunting.
I have friends who joke Florida is the promised land.
My running joke is that we are increasingly discovering that it turns out Flordia-Man is merely crazy like a fox.
I'm conflicted because my LEDDIT background made me think Florida was the land of stupidity but it appears Florida Man is actually whooping major ass.
Florida is the Sunshine State, and sunshine is the best disinfectant against woke shit.
I don't know if its a joke anymore at this point.
Damn. He twisted the dial straight to eleven on that one.
Heh, some latins are based after all.
Is he Cuban? Might explain it.
Most of the ones in Florida are.
MTG better watch out, we've got a live one here.
Lmao
I approve this message
This guy is super based.
Wish you archived it or took a screenshot because it's gone.
I actually did save it, although archive.ph does not work well with Instagram.
Wow that guy is pretty fuckin' based lmao holy shit.
I'm holding onto my Florida residency like it's what a US passport used to be in like the 70s and 80s.
It's fed season in Florida!
Post Reported for: Rule 2 - Violent Speech
Post Approved: This actually doesn't claim to approve of violence, it simply states what is happening. To claim that someone is "going ham" is not to advocate for that position, but to simply re-state that someone is being very assertive or aggressive about what they are doing.
I don't know if they're "going ham". This is 1 dude who said a stupid and ridiculous thing that seems like an Onion/BabylonBee post. I think there is broad agreement that calls for violence like this are legitimate TOS and ban. I'd say the same thing for all the ACAB BLM people saying they want to kill police.
Also this dude was a nobody who had no chance of winning and is just trying to get fame/clout.
Technically, he's advocating making it legal to shoot feds, not that people ought to shoot feds. One is advocating a policy change, the other would be a call to action.
You can't be serious.
The fact that you are upvoted and I'm downvoted makes me absolutely disgusted with the degenerates on this sub. What a bunch of pathetic, big talk do nothing wannabe 1/6 LARPers we've got in here.
His PLAN is to make it "legal" to murder federal agents on sight. That is clear advocacy of the mass murder of all federal agents.
Let me put it in terms that you’ll understand. It’s legal to commit sodomy. I can say that it it’s legal for gays to have buttsex. I don’t have to advocate for buttsex while acknowledging that it’s legal to do so.
you're an idiot.
The correct analogy is me saying:
ALL FAGGOTS WILL HAVE PERMISSION TO BUTTFUCK ELLEAND202 ON SIGHT!!!
That is a clear incitement to rape you in the ass.
You have to be very dense to not realize this is not serious. Neither the guy twitting nor the guys supporting it. Honestly you must be like 15-25, anyone older would have been used to stuff like this.
It is absolutely serious and you're the idiot here, not me. There is no indication that it is not serious. It may be extremely STUPID, but Luis Miguel is a young, stupid person trying to get attention.
This isn't a joking or laughing matter, and "it was just a prank bro" is not a defense to calling for the death of feds.
Stop projecting you sound unhinged. You are a kid, for those of us that hit 30 we can still remember when saying "jump off a bridge", "take a long walk down a short peer", "go play in traffic" just meant you did not like that person, it was not a death threat.
You sound somewhere between a kid and some oversensitive leftist idiot.
Just take a step back and think, no one here even thinks this could even be summited as a law, definitely not the guy twitting and for sure the guys in this sub.
The only one delusional here, that seem to not understand that is you.
And furthermore, even if it was legal at the state level, it'd still be illegal on a federal level. I didn't realize that anybody took this proposal seriously.
Comment Removed: Rule 2 - Violent Speech.
You can't advocate for the instant execution of anyone. Even armed fugitives can't typically be shot on sight.
Hah, as if they'd raid her. We all know that the instant a draft was made up we'd see a spree of "random" suicides, it'd be like throwing a mild insult into a tranny convention.
I like the cut of your jib.
OTOH the trannies, just like the cut.
Comment Reported for: Rule 2 - Violent Speech
Comment Approved: This is not a violation. Unknownsailor is actually explaining why attitudes like this occur.
Yea, patriots.tight is way better