I think that’s part of the circus… They know they don’t need to work very hard at it and just ignore it when called out, most people are too fucking sense to care about why it’s a problem.
It's possible, I don't really remember. I didn't expect them to push a story with such little evidence behind it. I guess now we're coming to understand why that was.
Again, still multiple parts to this argument that don't make sense.
First, Ohio law specifically allows for abortions of pregnancies that are due to rape, incest, or threatening the life of the mother. If we assume the child exists, the child was very likely raped by definition, which makes the abortion legal. Alternatively, in many sad situations like this, the parents could potentially be the attackers, which crosses the incest line. Being that the mother is 10, it's almost guaranteed to endanger the life of the mother.
Now, the Ohio Revised Code has a specific section which prohibits minors from getting abortions without very specific circumstances. One of those involves the notification of the parent. If the parent is the child's rapist, their consent no longer matters as the child needs a legal guardian. If the parent isn't the child's rapist, than you can absolutely assume that the child's parents will likely consent to, and accept an abortion, especially given the likelihood that the child would otherwise bear the child of her rapist, or the child may die from the pregnancy.
This claim comes from a doctor in Indiana, not Ohio, who claimed someone she knew called her to see if an Indiana abortion clinic could potentially preform the abortion. Allegedly, the woman on the phone claimed that the hospital spent "hours" trying to figure out the legal situation. In reality, anyone with a pulse could have figured it out, since nothing changed.
AKSCHULLY
... there is one thing that people might miss. Ohio had a trigger law that went into effect that banned abortion past 6 weeks after Roe ended. Which is why the Indiana doctor mentioned that the alleged Ohio doctor claimed that the child was 6 weeks and 2 days pregnant.
That's important because there was a pretty big legal fight in Ohio by abortionists in order to get an injunction to prevent the law from going into effect, which was happening at that exact time.
Here's the thing. One of the primary, unspoken, reasons for Jussie Smollette's hoax wasn't just because he wanted money and attention. It was because the Democrats were pushing this crazy "federal anti-lynching law". Jussie's hoax fed directly into Kamalla Harris' efforts to push this law, and they wanted to use the hoax as a mechanism to pass the law.
The federal anti-lynching law passed because... well no one cares, lynching is already illegal in literally every state, so the whole thing was a giant stunt. But the law got passed over by the scandal of Jussie's hoax.
As for this bitch, it's clear to me that this hoax was to try and put political pressure on getting an injunction to stop Ohio's trigger law. Thing is, it failed. The injunction was eventually overturned and the trigger law took effect.
Not only that but the story's source is a super anti-life activist doctor who is hiding behind doctor-patient confidentiality to break the story.
She is fully incentivized to lie to push her story knowing that doctor-patient confidentiality is not lawful to breach, so the story is unfalsifiable.
All of their provocative stories are like that. “Black man given a noose around his neck and bleached by white men in a black city saying “This is trump country!!”” When they go after people painting Nazi symbols on synagogues it’s always a Jew found having done it too. I can’t think of any popular ones that weren’t fake. Even the me too stories ended up being retarded, like Aziz’s bad date with the girl that wouldn’t stop sucking his dick off and on.
For those wondering how this can possible "convince" people, the point of this is to provide a ready-made rationalisation that people already believing it to be true can use to convince themselves that it is actually true despite the obvious lack of evidence. In other words, it's basically a hotfix to the NPC software core to prevent malfunctions due to the story being untrue.
Some lady tried arguing with me about abortion being banned and then brought up the wage gap and I just laughed. That’s a huge example of lying that people still cite. Any entry level statistics course disproves it.
This is a lie out of the mouth of an abortionist who conspired with the Indianapolis Star newspaper to publish that lie. Major "news" organizations and our President, our Retard-in-Chief, ran with it as a propaganda point in favor of legal abortion on demand.
This is a new low for the Democratic Party media machine and the evil "progressives" that feed it.
The biggest surprise is that the Washington Shitpost is casting doubt on a story that it might have run itself. It's pretty transparent--there was zero report of any rapist or sex crime to the law, and the person who supposedly raped her and knocked her up remains anonymous and at-large, if he exists at all, which ain't very likely given that everyone involved is clamming up.
I think most people are like me now where they don’t bother to read that stuff and only hear others talk about it because any time we look into it, it’s as made up as it appeared.
"acquired the status of a fact" - Orwell just headslapped himself in his coffin and exclaimed "Brilliant, why I didn't I think of that?"
“It’s true until you can prove no 10 year old was raped”
As long as male feminists and trannies exist this will always be impossible.
"no matter its provenance" 😉
Literal example of "if you repeat a lie often enough".
That's exactly what I was thinking.
It's not a lie if you believe it
'Doesn't matter, started a conversation!'
Treatment of non-believers in this story will be similar to treatment of non-believers in that other story historically.
They're not even good at propaganda, and yet they manage to persuade most people.
I think that’s part of the circus… They know they don’t need to work very hard at it and just ignore it when called out, most people are too fucking sense to care about why it’s a problem.
You were pretty sold on this story last week.
It's possible, I don't really remember. I didn't expect them to push a story with such little evidence behind it. I guess now we're coming to understand why that was.
Again, still multiple parts to this argument that don't make sense.
First, Ohio law specifically allows for abortions of pregnancies that are due to rape, incest, or threatening the life of the mother. If we assume the child exists, the child was very likely raped by definition, which makes the abortion legal. Alternatively, in many sad situations like this, the parents could potentially be the attackers, which crosses the incest line. Being that the mother is 10, it's almost guaranteed to endanger the life of the mother.
Now, the Ohio Revised Code has a specific section which prohibits minors from getting abortions without very specific circumstances. One of those involves the notification of the parent. If the parent is the child's rapist, their consent no longer matters as the child needs a legal guardian. If the parent isn't the child's rapist, than you can absolutely assume that the child's parents will likely consent to, and accept an abortion, especially given the likelihood that the child would otherwise bear the child of her rapist, or the child may die from the pregnancy.
This claim comes from a doctor in Indiana, not Ohio, who claimed someone she knew called her to see if an Indiana abortion clinic could potentially preform the abortion. Allegedly, the woman on the phone claimed that the hospital spent "hours" trying to figure out the legal situation. In reality, anyone with a pulse could have figured it out, since nothing changed.
AKSCHULLY
... there is one thing that people might miss. Ohio had a trigger law that went into effect that banned abortion past 6 weeks after Roe ended. Which is why the Indiana doctor mentioned that the alleged Ohio doctor claimed that the child was 6 weeks and 2 days pregnant.
That's important because there was a pretty big legal fight in Ohio by abortionists in order to get an injunction to prevent the law from going into effect, which was happening at that exact time.
Here's the thing. One of the primary, unspoken, reasons for Jussie Smollette's hoax wasn't just because he wanted money and attention. It was because the Democrats were pushing this crazy "federal anti-lynching law". Jussie's hoax fed directly into Kamalla Harris' efforts to push this law, and they wanted to use the hoax as a mechanism to pass the law.
The federal anti-lynching law passed because... well no one cares, lynching is already illegal in literally every state, so the whole thing was a giant stunt. But the law got passed over by the scandal of Jussie's hoax.
As for this bitch, it's clear to me that this hoax was to try and put political pressure on getting an injunction to stop Ohio's trigger law. Thing is, it failed. The injunction was eventually overturned and the trigger law took effect.
All of their prominent cases are 1% issues that don’t represent 99% of abortions and are already legal.
Just as Pedo Joe has acquired the status of a president.
All the media had to do was conspire to declare it on a Saturday on all channels at the same time - and it was so.
Not only that but the story's source is a super anti-life activist doctor who is hiding behind doctor-patient confidentiality to break the story. She is fully incentivized to lie to push her story knowing that doctor-patient confidentiality is not lawful to breach, so the story is unfalsifiable.
From a game theory standpoint, the left would be stupid not to fake this type of story.
They know the media will run with it. They know it can't really be disproven.
All of their provocative stories are like that. “Black man given a noose around his neck and bleached by white men in a black city saying “This is trump country!!”” When they go after people painting Nazi symbols on synagogues it’s always a Jew found having done it too. I can’t think of any popular ones that weren’t fake. Even the me too stories ended up being retarded, like Aziz’s bad date with the girl that wouldn’t stop sucking his dick off and on.
'Fake but accurate!'
It conveys truth.
FULL STORY: https://archive.ph/85Mya
The worst thing is Newsweek actually ran with the story. RIP journalism.
For those wondering how this can possible "convince" people, the point of this is to provide a ready-made rationalisation that people already believing it to be true can use to convince themselves that it is actually true despite the obvious lack of evidence. In other words, it's basically a hotfix to the NPC software core to prevent malfunctions due to the story being untrue.
experts agree in a study done by professionals that have come to the undisputed conclusion that u/Liberty_Prime is the rapist.
SNOPES: 100% True
Brilliant. Biden's teleprompter isn't spreading lies, because when Biden utters it, it ''acquires the status of a fact''.
This lie self-identifies as a fact and I want to go home.
"we choose truth over facts"
Imagine my shock. And unlike the welfare queen, this is a completely made up thing.
Some lady tried arguing with me about abortion being banned and then brought up the wage gap and I just laughed. That’s a huge example of lying that people still cite. Any entry level statistics course disproves it.
It could happen and it started a conversation!
Remember, the left is always guilty of that which the assert from their enemies. Misinformation is a cornerstone of leftism.
This is just like the feminist report on rape on college campuses. Jussie Smollet's claim of being attacked by MAGA.
Feminists lie all the time. They will continue to lie because we as a society have accepted that feminism is sane and logical instead of cancer.
Women love lying and manipulating, it's their basest form of defense and getting their way.
Goebbels would be proud.
This is a lie out of the mouth of an abortionist who conspired with the Indianapolis Star newspaper to publish that lie. Major "news" organizations and our President, our Retard-in-Chief, ran with it as a propaganda point in favor of legal abortion on demand.
This is a new low for the Democratic Party media machine and the evil "progressives" that feed it.
The biggest surprise is that the Washington Shitpost is casting doubt on a story that it might have run itself. It's pretty transparent--there was zero report of any rapist or sex crime to the law, and the person who supposedly raped her and knocked her up remains anonymous and at-large, if he exists at all, which ain't very likely given that everyone involved is clamming up.
"It was real in my mind"
It's funny because if Trump ever said something, the mere fact that he said it was taken as evidence of the claim being false, even if it was true.
I think most people are like me now where they don’t bother to read that stuff and only hear others talk about it because any time we look into it, it’s as made up as it appeared.
That they had an abortion provider on who said that? Probably.
Were they telling the truth? Unlikely.