It is lead. Lede is the neurotic form for people with OCD, usually zoomers who freak out when you type noone instead of no one while both are correct, but the former is historically acceptable.
Knock off women and the extremely young, you get to 5%.
40% of murders go unsolved. Nearly all of those are gang related. So half of 60% is 30%, plus the other 30%~ = 60%.
Imagine living in a country where 5% of the population commits 60% of the murders.
Now imagine that every major institution, from academia to media to government, is telling you that the 55% of the country who commit 20% of the murders (because Hispanics commit the other 20%) are “the real problem”.
It's actually much smaller than that. Violent crime drops off a cliff past the age of 40 in men. It's closer to 3% committing 52% (I don't understand why you chose 60, but 52 is fine as it makes no significant difference for our purposes here). And even then, it's actually the minority of black men between the ages of 14-40 that commit any violent crime. And a lot of that is repeat offenders.
Truth is you're looking at probably closer to less than 1% of the population that commits 52% of all murders.
But that's actually not surprising. The criminal class in almost every country is very small. It is universally true that criminals commit many crimes in their careers, and this factor is why mass incarceration and mass distribution of firearms has an effect on crime. If it's too risky to commit many crimes, even if not many in the criminal class get shot, then crime goes down. If you mass arrest most of the criminals, then the crime also collapses (and it normally doesn't take that many arrests), and if some of the criminals get shot by their victims: those victims didn't prevent one crime, they prevented hundreds.
I wouldn't be surprised if 95% of all violent crime in most countries were committed by no more than 3% of the entire population in final tally.
He's objectively correct in this case. Women don't commit violent crimes nearly as frequently as men. Blame it on testosterone vs estrogen, blame it on men having the physical strength to be capable of real violence in the first place, whatever. Women don't commit murder very frequently. Unless you're a small child. Then women are who you have to watch out for.
Or if they do try to kill someone, it's always through a pussy woman way. They don't use guns, they use underhanded cowardly tactics, i.e. poison, overdosing, etc.
Well, since black women aren't really involved in that statistic to being with
Black women aren't involved because women in general barely get hit for their crimes. Especially in a machismo heavy culture such as the black one where no man will even dare admit a woman did something to him.
Between domestic violence, child abuse, and rape black women would easily balance those scales even without the robbery/gang violence angle that dominates it otherwise.
I hate this pedantic take, women don't commit violent crimes in other races too, if you drop women in the black stats you have to drop women from other races stats as well to make comparison, you just ended up with same ratios anyways
It is fair to take any slice of the population and then determine what percentage of crimes they commit. As long as you're honest about what the data represents, people can draw their own conclusions.
I don't want to let black women off the hook, they're not responsible for direct violent crimes but they are indirectly responsible for the upbringing of their violent men and the other awful behaviors they have. men compared to men, race compared to race, they are awful in every way no matter how narrow you want to select the demographics, 13% is indictment of the race, it's the constant reminder to never relax.
Depending on what they mean by lack of data, I could believe it. I can imagine a scenario where certain states or cities would want to slow publication or release as much as possible. Of course, the feds can still be welcoming accomplices to the delay in this imagined scenario.
I really wish we could get those stats, because we have speculated that #StopAsianHate was both a) completely false with the media amplifying typical Black on Asian crime, and also b) that it was caused by a general rise in Black crime. Either way it was a scam and I want to show people the numbers.
really has nothing to do with democrats or republicans. they're mercs for the trans-atlantic globalist foreign infiltrators. They control both the democrats and the republicans, not all but more than enough.
Oh look, they buried the lead in the second to last paragraph.
The use of "lede" rather than "lead" is a relatively recent (1980s) invention not rooted in historical usage, and since it strikes me as journalistic elitism, I prefer not to use it.
Well, I'm glad you were that guy. I'm usually up on many of these things, but I'd always thought it was 'bury the lead' too.
It is lead. Lede is the neurotic form for people with OCD, usually zoomers who freak out when you type noone instead of no one while both are correct, but the former is historically acceptable.
So is it up to 13/70 now? Higher? Suppose we'll never know
Knock off women and the extremely young, you get to 5%.
40% of murders go unsolved. Nearly all of those are gang related. So half of 60% is 30%, plus the other 30%~ = 60%.
Imagine living in a country where 5% of the population commits 60% of the murders.
Now imagine that every major institution, from academia to media to government, is telling you that the 55% of the country who commit 20% of the murders (because Hispanics commit the other 20%) are “the real problem”.
It's actually much smaller than that. Violent crime drops off a cliff past the age of 40 in men. It's closer to 3% committing 52% (I don't understand why you chose 60, but 52 is fine as it makes no significant difference for our purposes here). And even then, it's actually the minority of black men between the ages of 14-40 that commit any violent crime. And a lot of that is repeat offenders.
Truth is you're looking at probably closer to less than 1% of the population that commits 52% of all murders.
But that's actually not surprising. The criminal class in almost every country is very small. It is universally true that criminals commit many crimes in their careers, and this factor is why mass incarceration and mass distribution of firearms has an effect on crime. If it's too risky to commit many crimes, even if not many in the criminal class get shot, then crime goes down. If you mass arrest most of the criminals, then the crime also collapses (and it normally doesn't take that many arrests), and if some of the criminals get shot by their victims: those victims didn't prevent one crime, they prevented hundreds.
I wouldn't be surprised if 95% of all violent crime in most countries were committed by no more than 3% of the entire population in final tally.
I don't need to imagine it.
Race cucks once again show their true colors.
Despite being a tiny number of the population, race cucks are 100% responsible for women getting the vote.
He's objectively correct in this case. Women don't commit violent crimes nearly as frequently as men. Blame it on testosterone vs estrogen, blame it on men having the physical strength to be capable of real violence in the first place, whatever. Women don't commit murder very frequently. Unless you're a small child. Then women are who you have to watch out for.
True. They usually get men to commit crimes for them.
Or if they do try to kill someone, it's always through a pussy woman way. They don't use guns, they use underhanded cowardly tactics, i.e. poison, overdosing, etc.
Crime is also typically only committed by 14 to 26 year olds
Black women aren't involved because women in general barely get hit for their crimes. Especially in a machismo heavy culture such as the black one where no man will even dare admit a woman did something to him.
Between domestic violence, child abuse, and rape black women would easily balance those scales even without the robbery/gang violence angle that dominates it otherwise.
Pretty much. Black women are generally more violent than any other race of women - compare black women to Asian women for example.
Its amusing that in a "they commit way more crime than you'd think" discussion, people still buy into the "women don't commit crimes at all tho."
I hate this pedantic take, women don't commit violent crimes in other races too, if you drop women in the black stats you have to drop women from other races stats as well to make comparison, you just ended up with same ratios anyways
It is fair to take any slice of the population and then determine what percentage of crimes they commit. As long as you're honest about what the data represents, people can draw their own conclusions.
I don't want to let black women off the hook, they're not responsible for direct violent crimes but they are indirectly responsible for the upbringing of their violent men and the other awful behaviors they have. men compared to men, race compared to race, they are awful in every way no matter how narrow you want to select the demographics, 13% is indictment of the race, it's the constant reminder to never relax.
No hate facts allowed at the FBI.
With all those Soros-plant DAs out there refusing to indict people based on race, I wouldn't be surprised if the data really is incomplete.
I figured that would stop posting those stats in 3 years, not in 3 months
Be honest. I can take the truth.
Reminds me of the UK's census data being mysteriously held up in limbo for the last two years.
Until they clarify I'm forced to assume 15% of the population commits 90+% of the violent crime :p
They probably realized that the data shows that white supremacy isnt nearly the epidemic that 13/50 is.
oh no, do the crime statistics once again support the "never relax" argument?
whooda thunk
Depending on what they mean by lack of data, I could believe it. I can imagine a scenario where certain states or cities would want to slow publication or release as much as possible. Of course, the feds can still be welcoming accomplices to the delay in this imagined scenario.
Female murder rates on the rise and they're hiding it.
Do you ever think about anything other than your seething hatred of women?
Do you really think they're doing it to hide black on black crime? Nobody gives a shit.
There has to be a shock in the data that they're hiding.
I vote for women becoming the new most likely group to murder a stranger being the shock that's being hidden.
Black on asian.
That's what my gut says they're hiding.
Maybe black on white, too. But black on asian has skyrocketed.
I'm thinking black on anyone and everyone. Kind of screws their narrative when one of their pet groups is so violent.
I really wish we could get those stats, because we have speculated that #StopAsianHate was both a) completely false with the media amplifying typical Black on Asian crime, and also b) that it was caused by a general rise in Black crime. Either way it was a scam and I want to show people the numbers.
really has nothing to do with democrats or republicans. they're mercs for the trans-atlantic globalist foreign infiltrators. They control both the democrats and the republicans, not all but more than enough.
The republicans play the heel and the democrats the heroes. Two faces of the same beast.