Knock off women and the extremely young, you get to 5%.
40% of murders go unsolved. Nearly all of those are gang related. So half of 60% is 30%, plus the other 30%~ = 60%.
Imagine living in a country where 5% of the population commits 60% of the murders.
Now imagine that every major institution, from academia to media to government, is telling you that the 55% of the country who commit 20% of the murders (because Hispanics commit the other 20%) are “the real problem”.
It's actually much smaller than that. Violent crime drops off a cliff past the age of 40 in men. It's closer to 3% committing 52% (I don't understand why you chose 60, but 52 is fine as it makes no significant difference for our purposes here). And even then, it's actually the minority of black men between the ages of 14-40 that commit any violent crime. And a lot of that is repeat offenders.
Truth is you're looking at probably closer to less than 1% of the population that commits 52% of all murders.
But that's actually not surprising. The criminal class in almost every country is very small. It is universally true that criminals commit many crimes in their careers, and this factor is why mass incarceration and mass distribution of firearms has an effect on crime. If it's too risky to commit many crimes, even if not many in the criminal class get shot, then crime goes down. If you mass arrest most of the criminals, then the crime also collapses (and it normally doesn't take that many arrests), and if some of the criminals get shot by their victims: those victims didn't prevent one crime, they prevented hundreds.
I wouldn't be surprised if 95% of all violent crime in most countries were committed by no more than 3% of the entire population in final tally.
He's objectively correct in this case. Women don't commit violent crimes nearly as frequently as men. Blame it on testosterone vs estrogen, blame it on men having the physical strength to be capable of real violence in the first place, whatever. Women don't commit murder very frequently. Unless you're a small child. Then women are who you have to watch out for.
Or if they do try to kill someone, it's always through a pussy woman way. They don't use guns, they use underhanded cowardly tactics, i.e. poison, overdosing, etc.
Knock off women and the extremely young, you get to 5%.
40% of murders go unsolved. Nearly all of those are gang related. So half of 60% is 30%, plus the other 30%~ = 60%.
Imagine living in a country where 5% of the population commits 60% of the murders.
Now imagine that every major institution, from academia to media to government, is telling you that the 55% of the country who commit 20% of the murders (because Hispanics commit the other 20%) are “the real problem”.
It's actually much smaller than that. Violent crime drops off a cliff past the age of 40 in men. It's closer to 3% committing 52% (I don't understand why you chose 60, but 52 is fine as it makes no significant difference for our purposes here). And even then, it's actually the minority of black men between the ages of 14-40 that commit any violent crime. And a lot of that is repeat offenders.
Truth is you're looking at probably closer to less than 1% of the population that commits 52% of all murders.
But that's actually not surprising. The criminal class in almost every country is very small. It is universally true that criminals commit many crimes in their careers, and this factor is why mass incarceration and mass distribution of firearms has an effect on crime. If it's too risky to commit many crimes, even if not many in the criminal class get shot, then crime goes down. If you mass arrest most of the criminals, then the crime also collapses (and it normally doesn't take that many arrests), and if some of the criminals get shot by their victims: those victims didn't prevent one crime, they prevented hundreds.
I wouldn't be surprised if 95% of all violent crime in most countries were committed by no more than 3% of the entire population in final tally.
I don't need to imagine it.
Race cucks once again show their true colors.
Despite being a tiny number of the population, race cucks are 100% responsible for women getting the vote.
He's objectively correct in this case. Women don't commit violent crimes nearly as frequently as men. Blame it on testosterone vs estrogen, blame it on men having the physical strength to be capable of real violence in the first place, whatever. Women don't commit murder very frequently. Unless you're a small child. Then women are who you have to watch out for.
True. They usually get men to commit crimes for them.
Or if they do try to kill someone, it's always through a pussy woman way. They don't use guns, they use underhanded cowardly tactics, i.e. poison, overdosing, etc.