Atlantic: Sex Ed Is the Opposite of Grooming
(archive.ph)
Comments (53)
sorted by:
But kids don't need to know anything about it until they're about to hit puberty.
All they need to know is that if someone wants to touch them or take their clothes off, run and tell a responsible adult/cop.
Or tries to "teach" them something and tells them to keep it secret from their parents.
Anyone who tells a child to keep a secret from their parent is typically up to no good. Unless it’s the other parent and they took them shopping for the other parents Christmas/birthday/mothers/Father’s Day gift.
No see kids need to be associated with how an erect female penis looks in case someone else tries to show them!
I guess they're trying the motte and bailey approach like with CRT.
"You don't want kids to learn about history and racism."
"You don't want kids to learn sex-ed."
We don’t teach kindergartners-3rd graders sexed for the same reason we don’t teach them drivers Ed at that age. They can’t use the knowledge responsibly, they aren’t old enough for it to be practical for them to know, and anyone who wants them to know it that young does not have the children's best interest at heart
When the Christians in the 80s/90s warned that what has now happened would happen, the left swore up and down that it wouldn't and that it they would simply "teach the basics of biology".
That pact having been broken, the only reasonable answer to "you don't want kids to learn sex-ed" is "correct, because you've shown you can't be trusted with that responsibility"
Close. CRT is to fill them with guilt and Queer Theory is meant to 'absolve' them of said guilt.
not from you, no.
you know who taught sex ed in my middle school? an old woman. who was not angling to fuck kids.
This latest pedophilia panic is due to the THOUSANDS of arrested pedophiles popping up from places like Disney and the CIA. Not to mention the mass proliferation of the “lgbtqiapedo” as preschool and elementary teachers.
Having actually seen these “studies” they are about what you’d expect. Self reported studies of kids show that kids like being diddled by teachers! Plus everything listed is not part of the quit molesting kids bill.
Gay people argue their “love” is different and that a teenager felating an adult is “different”
Milo is certainly an example of that.
The study doesn't have anything to do with sex ed, as the groomer implies, but it is very racist by current year standards. Africa is most rapey, Europe is least rapey, and brown countries are in between.
But they told us not to talk to strangers or if anyone tries to touch us then tell a parent or trusted adult.
As much as I am against those places, aren't these "children" actually teenagers, not children?
The Mohammad tactic (Aisha gambit?) is still morally reprehensible. Grooming a child so you'll have a chance to violate them later is as wrong as grooming a child so you can violate them now.
Ignorance of probability and statistics is a plague on our society.
Strangers don’t get a chance to molest kids because we teach them about stranger danger.
Child abuse is enabled by access and authority. That’s why sex offenders have to register, have to live and stay away from schools, and are not permitted to work with children.
A common ploy for gaining access to children is via education. This is precisely why parents want laws against anyone “teaching” kids about sex in fucking kindergarten.
And that’s really the central issue here: leftists trust their own political and cultural cohort implicitly and would never suspect even one of them of harming children, and conservatives look at headlines and police reports and know that their children are not safe around weird and degenerate leftists.
It doesn’t confuse, it lies. These were the same people screaming slippery slope while 11 year olds were twerking for money in gay nightclubs. They know exactly what these groomers are doing, this is the excuse for the cognitive dissonance their readers need.
The motte and bailey is probably the most important concept of our times. Virtually every leftist idea depends entirely on this obfuscating rhetorical structure.
Gotta thank good old Jon Stewart and his “I’m just a comedian” bit for waking me up to that.
The amount of push the left has about grooming kids is do depressing. Even if there is some pushback against it and we will all cheer in November, I just know the left will get their way in the end. We only move in one direction. Only way I see us moving to the right is via a revolution, but that will not happen until leftists commit a genocide or there is a famine. Even genocide is kind of low, I can see genocide against white people being defended by leftist whites as being some form of payback for slavery. This leaves famine.
I'm at the point where famine or a meteor looks more appealing to me then the future where leftists get to corrupt kids and cancel parents.
Contrary to commonly received wisdom, famine and genocide does not cause revolution. That implies that people spontaneously rise up in response in to oppression, which is a liberal myth. Revolution happens when a regime is weak and there is an organized aspirational elite prepared to replace it. The good news is that the current regime is demonstrably weakening since so many people can see the Cathedral. The regime's power is based on mind control, and a mind control machine isn't working very well when people can see it.
Get. The. Fuck. Away. From. Those. Kids.
It wasn't long ago that if you said that to a six year old, you could expect their father to put a bullet in your head.
Remember the feminist push for "gender neutral" playthings? Despite the fact that Johnny wants to play with Tonka trucks and Janey wants to play with Chatty Cathy dolls, we forced them to trade off and be miserable and envious.
This looks like Phase Two of a sinister plan to subvert our understanding of one of the few things in nature we can be sure about.
The slippery slope or ratchet effect, whatever you want to call it, is an obvious fact.
Turning toddlers into trannies isn't sex ed, groomer!
Why at such a young age?
You know they argue in bad faith, the concept of gender is such a confusing concept for adults and we expect children to understand it. Not even getting in to sexual orientation, this are non-sexual innocent beings. They also claim that many European countries have this kind of teachings, this is incorrect. Most European countries are not ok with putting kids on puberty blocking or help kids transition before 16.
Gender really isn’t confusing for adults though. We have for some reason allowed society to be ruled by the perpetually offended and people with bad intentions have used what was our societies naive desire to be polite to one another as a cudgel to gain power.
We know, they’re called women.
It is, deliberately so. Gender to mean sex roles is was only recently popularised by the likes of 'dr' Money in the late 60s.
Gender absolutely is a social constuct, as in it is nonsense peddled by one of the earlier groomers. Many adults are confused and think it is a thing. By arguing for it you are arguing on their terms. It's all bullshit. There are 2 sexes.
I’d say wait til 18. And they suppress stories about people regretting it
If conservatives had any influence on culture or education we would be making sex-ed classes showing the side-effects of this gender ideology. The increase anxiety, depression and suicide thoughts that is a constant among LGBTQ+. For those that are going to take puberty blockers, it is not fully reversible as the activists are saying, it stunts your normal growth but you are still growing, is not a pause on growth or we could pause puberty and become immortal. At the very least you will have a micro-penis and some very fucked up bone structure. Who knows the full extent of the puberty blockers. Pausing puberty would also increase your depression - I think groomers are counting on this to further convince kids to transition to deal with the depression that they caused. They should make clips about de-transitioners and how cult like the trans movement is. They should put pictures of trans-women and scars from chopping off the breasts of trans-men. Also explain that there is a high chance of becoming sterile and for girls they may need to remove their uterus because it would endanger their life to keep it. They would be a patient for life, they will be on drugs for the rest of their life, a life that will be full of depression. They should mention that gender dysphoria in kids clears itself thru puberty (the thing they want to block) 80% of the time and up to 90% with psychological help. And is not worth condemning 8 or 9 kids to be trans so that 1 kid has slightly better outcome - even that 1 is debatable.
If we had some medical support we should campaign and debate against gender ideology on every news station. I looked at the gender ideology and there is no way it can hold up in a debate.
Sorry for the rant, I'm a bit black pilled on the entire kid grooming stuff.
We should have called them puberty killers. Because they don’t block puberty - they destroy it.
It’s so important to challenge leftist terms and definitions. Every time I hear a word or phrase for the first time now, I immediately research the spin behind it and look for a more accurate label. New terminology is almost always a thinly-veiled leftist tactic used to define the issue in such a way that only leftists can be correct.
All good. Completely understand
And to add to my previous rant. Since I've been going to church, I've honestly been happier and more optimistic about life. It did more good to my mental health and the happiness of my family then any doctor or medication. The entire LGBTQ+ for kids movement is making the life of the kids worse, more depression and anxiety.
Yet the left belittles religion while praising LGBTQ+ indoctrination. It seems so evil.
Because it is evil.
How bout until never.
Genital mutilation does not belong in a civilized society.
Estrogen should be a banned substance.
sex ed for a 6 year old is literally grooming.
And just like that the legacy media conflates preparing children for sexual abuse with "Sex Ed".
And parading your Baskin Robbins 47 Flavors of Gay in front of toddlers isn't sex ed, groomer.
Says a grooming, jewish, bolshie rag that's not worth even lining a bird cage.
Why are you giving it to 7 yr olds...
Having been through sex ed in school and seeing what has become now, I'm 100% against sex ed in school in general and think it's disgusting.
It doesn't do anything about teaching "safe sex," it instead creates the conditions for kids to have sex in general. Meanwhile, these classes often teach all kinds of insidious bullshit and feed kids misinformation. Hell, I'm convinced that these predatory "classes" are partially responsible for how promiscuous people, particularly women, are these days.
Homosexuality should be taught as something that's evil, however. Just a general, "men liking other men is a very bad thing and does damage to everyone around them."
https://nitter.net/olgakhazan/search?f=tweets&q=jewish
some highlights:
I wonder if this means jews have figured out they should stop fucking their cousins?
Sex Ed does not in belong in schools, not even in higher grades.
If people are too dumb to figure out how to reproduce on their own, they dont deserve to reproduce.
Parents should be the sole individuals explaining sex and puberty to their kids.
What a mealy-mouthed raft of rationalizations. "Experts"? "Some historians"? It is a load of shit not even worth commenting on other than observing it's another of the left's propaganda pieces.
The left is leagues ahead in the propaganda war. We are in a struggle for who gets to reconstruct what's left of our ruined culture and the forces of sanity and sense are losing, and any resistance is being made impotent by the economic and political chaos brought on by Dementia Joe's Deep State Handlers (sounds like the name of a bluegrass band).