I remember my grandfather talking about this years ago regarding women at work. Men, at least proper men, are capable of disconnecting emotions from things. He'd talk about how groups of men could have a heated argument at a business meeting then go play golf in the afternoon as nothing happened. It was a business argument, not personal.
Women can't do this, they are wired to cling to their emotions for everything. Just look at when these stunning and brave working women get into it, they want to destroy each other. It is always personal to them. Just like this story, this crazy woman couldn't take a difference of opinion and had to take it out on their patient.
Granted a lot of these female traits apply the same to the emasculated soy men, because they never learned to be men to begin with.
That has definitely held true for the women in my family. They all go through cycles where one fights with another and they stop speaking for one or two years. Then they'll reconcile and things are okay for a period of time, but eventually they have another blow-up that leads to a prolonged period of no contact. My mom and my sister, my sister and my SIL, my SIL and her mom, etc.
None of them seem to be able to get into a heated argument and then let it go.
That has never happened with any of the men in my family.
I remember getting into an argument with my Mom about ten years ago. It got heated and she was crying and yelling. Towards the end she said, "We are done! Done!!"
I assumed she meant we're done arguing for now, but she explained that she meant we are done for good. As in our relationship is over. I was like wtf are you talking about?? You're my mom and I'm your son. How could you even think about ending our relationship over a verbal disagreement?
To my Mom's credit, eventually she realized that she was acting like a huge bitch all the time after my step-dad divorced her. Now she's way more chill and just goes with the flow, and she's based af which has brought us very close ever since Covid hit.
Sounds about right my wife gets into a fight with her lifelong best friend every couple years then they stop talking for a year or two then one of them gets drunk and calls,texts then they friends again for another year or two
He'd talk about how groups of men could have a heated argument at a business meeting then go play golf in the afternoon as nothing happened.
Men are capable of forming a group ego that goes toward a common goal. Men put their ego in check when they realize it's hurting their groups advancement towards a goal.
Someone adds code reviews to our project. At first everyone acts the same - leaving petty little comments, going on and on about their pet topic, etc. But for men they go through this a few times, have it done to them and get hit with empathy, and they start to realize it's accomplishing nothing towards the end goal and it's hurting feelings that aren't going towards the end goal. Month later they only comment if they have something useful to say.
The one woman on the team, she starts writing longer comments with longer inanity. Then starts looking for any excuse to make the process longer and longer. Of course she gets mad if you leave the kind of comments on her reviews that she leaves on everyone else's. And if you say that this isn't accomplishing anything (it isn't) she has a meltdown.
We got a 2nd girl on the same, she was nicer, she left nicer comments but kinda did the same thing.
A male doctor, Jon Money, literally invented the idea of "trans". He performed sex changes on babies and forced children to simulate sex acts on camera for his own pleasure.
He found identical twin boys, the perfect subjects for his study. One had a botched circumcision, so he removed his scrotum and had him raised as a girl. When they were 10, he had them perform "gender affirming" sex acts on each other. When they were 12, he published that his study was successful and that "gender is a social construct." The child later confirmed that no, they weren't trans. He chose to live as a man with a new first name (not his birth name, or his "girl" name). He married a woman. In his early 40s he killed himself.
Money's heinous experiment really proves how natural a lot of "gendered" behavior actually is. Even a mutilated man, castrated since birth, raised as a girl still ended up drawn to masculine behavior.
One of the problems trans activists now is that they also see traits or behaviors considered to be masculine or feminine as evidence that a person is male or female. If a girl likes building or cars, she could be trans. If a guy likes dolls, he could be trans.
Magnus Hirschfeld had already done origami vagene surgery in 1931 so Money didn't invent trans. He was a pedo who "contributed" some new degenerate ideas, though.
TheImp did not invent fucking antifeminism nor did he invent the concept that women in general are unfit for certain roles in society. Pretty much everyone on here believes these two things and have since before TheImp opened his mouth, stop feeding his ego.
He's a crazy man. The fact that he sometimes gibbers things that are true does not make him representative of anything. This is particularly apparent if you stop to listen to the rest of his gibbering.
I'm not even so sure that paranoia drives him as much as it seems. I can tell that he takes social media far too seriously and derives some genuine validation from feeling like people are agreeing with him on it. As such the focus must be on wamen at all times.
He's also a dedicated market liberal and from the sounds of things, has been for a long time. He firmly believes in the liberal ideal man, one lacking binding commitments and presented with near infinite outlets for self-expression provided by the free market. They struggle with the cognitive dissonance of believing in the liberating power of markets and then seeing basically every company in the Western world becoming pozzed to all hell and the false promise of liberation rendered a distant dream. I went through that myself as a former libertarian, but I guess it contributes to an existential crisis for some people.
When the liberation never comes, and the markets only have homogeneous girl power sludge for sale, rather than acknowledge that he had been hoodwinked by an illusory set of ideas that are not the truth but a product of institutions and individuals with self-interested reasons for propagating them, he instead externalizes the contradiction onto others. "I could have the liberation I was promised if it weren't for those parasitic women and children!"
The liberalism he believes in is, of course, never to blame. He clings to it with a death grip even as it destroys him and everything he holds dear.
You're the psychiatrist so what do you think of my arm-chair efforts? LOL
Oh I wasn't blaming myself, I think he was always this way and was just less angry then. Because that's what seems to be the problem, he is increasingly angry at the clown world and people's inability to see what he sees.
While he flavor of evil is "women" its not really different in manifestation than most people here's. Just others expand to Jews, The Left, the Governments, the Trannies, the Globohomo, etc. However, he is completely alone in that. Even Stormfags have each other, and the various levels of poltard.
But no MRA or other offshoot group hates women like he does. Most either want to divorce completely from them (MGTOW) or manipulate them completely (TRP), because they know you can't actually win against them completely because of biological reality.
That's why I think he is not in a rational mindset. He can barely acknowledge a lot of realities, and sees almost entirely through red lens of paranoia and anger. His ideas never have ends that are remotely feasible, and his arguments can never hold themselves together. Its running off pure emotion.
rather than acknowledge that he had been hoodwinked by an illusory set of ideas that are not the truth but a product of institutions and individuals with self-interested reasons for propagating them
Never forget he was a hardcore Epic Games shill for a long time, until the most innocuous thing (that Fortnite event) was what changed his mind. None of their actual market evils or lies, just women.
I'll admit I haven't interacted much with him on economic discussions and am not incredibly versed on them myself, so I'll actually take your word on that part because it does make sense based on what I do know.
Also I'm a psychologist, not a psychiatrist. One attempts to help through understanding and dealing with problems (in theory), the other just throws pills at people and ruins their lives worse. Though he probably could use some form of anti-mania drug to calm him down.
While he flavor of evil is "women" its not really different in manifestation than most people here's. Just others expand to Jews, The Left, the Governments, the Trannies, the Globohomo, etc.
We're more different than we seem at first glance. It's not merely competing harmatiologies. If you look at what I said above about the liberated man and lacking binding commitments, that clashes with nationalism which demands a degree of conformity to a national identity, even if it's not a racialist view of nationalism. It is this contradiction between liberalism and nationalism that will continue to bring "right-wing" liberals into conflict with the illiberal dissident right even as some insist on trying to have some sort of unified front against "wokeness."
But no MRA or other offshoot group hates women like he does.
There are incels. I know he isn't one, but he would fit in with them. I think he's too proud to roll with them, though.
that clashes with nationalism which demands a degree of conformity to a national identity, even if it's not a racialist view of nationalism
That's a fair distinction between he and the rest for sure. I simply believe a lot of his identity and beliefs are simply a result of his continued isolation and madness instead of a result of his actual political core. As in, if he could get into the little joke threads about Jews or trannies like a lot of guys here, he would be far less mad.
As such, I think we are simply coming at it from very different perspectives. I am looking at a man as an individual, while you a more general position about greater ideological combats.
There are incels. I know he isn't one, but he would fit in with them.
You'd be surprised at how few of them are incels. I was a part of that movement in the 2000s and on, and most of the problem wasn't getting women but simply the damage those women did to them. Divorce was one of the most common things that brought a man to the movement.
But they were unable to actually hate women. It was always nebulous elites and feminists, and that women were just brainwashed victims that could be changed to be good, trad (not that this term existed then) girls again. Its why so many of their big figure heads were women.
The "Manosphere" is far more diverse than most give it credit for, and every corner has a shard of the right idea covered by their own blathering bullshit. In the same way Our Boi has a lot of right ideas lost in his soap box.
I could talk for pages about the problems with the "Anti-feminist" movement and its history, but that's not on trial here. Ironically, more men like him would have helped it survive because of how much it was coopted and ruined by women.
As such, I think we are simply coming at it from very different perspectives. I am looking at a man as an individual, while you a more general position about greater ideological combats.
I don't think they are separable. Liberalism is producing this broken society full of broken, alienated, isolated people like an assembly line.
You'd be surprised at how few of them are incels.
To clarify, I'm talking about incels as a separate group, not as part of any of these others. I did my time in the manosphere (2015-2018 or around then), mostly MRA stuff, so I'm fairly familiar with it. I checked out some incel things to see what all the fuss was about and noped out quickly. They didn't seem hesitant to hate women at all and were really fucked up people.
Liberalism produces the circumstances that can create these people in mass quantities, but these people come to exist each in their own unique ways.
I checked out some incel things to see what all the fuss was about and noped out quickly. They didn't seem hesitant to hate women at all and were really fucked up people.
Most are lashing out due to extreme loneliness, which in turn warps them further and further into a worldview that cannot sustain itself and worse, does not exist anymore. I find them more pitiful than evil, and spent most of my time/effort as a psychologist working with men like them.
You'd be surprised at how little effort it takes to undo the echo chamber and years of rage. They will forever be warped to some extent, but they are far easier to make a decent person out of than almost any Leftist.
Which circles back to point one. In mass quantities they seem like a broken mass of evil, but each one in his own unique way can be changed and brought back.
I don't think he's a shill. He just derives an unhealthy validation from getting people to agree with him about wamen, and things the ADL offer..alternative explanations to wamen being the root of all evil.
Women know there isn't any consequences for their actions so why not virtue signal?
That said this seems more like a case of "I got mad and thought bad thoughts" rather than something she actually did. But no way of knowing if its true unless the patient comes forward.
Imp may be crazy, but he has principals and a clear unapologetic bias. I've said it before, I disagree with his posts a lot, but I have also learned things from him that I wouldn't have learned from anywhere else.
Explain to me how this proves there is a global conspiracy run by women with all women involved to oppress and enslave men. The same women who cant keep a secret, cant work with other women, and cant turn on a gas grill are all part of complex global conspiracy. Because that is his point.
No, he has stated as much. You are not really reading into it enough. He makes posts about the true nature of women (which was common knowledge until recently) as the candy to lure you to his van which is the crazy idea of a female supremacist global conspiracy.
Like the candy that is 'Woman are Wonderful' leading us into the 'Great Reset'?
Has he ever said those things? If hes never said those things, how is he luring you with them? The candy would be his "feminism is bad" or "women did something bad" posts the van would be when he occasionally ties it to his crazy conspiracy by making "feminism is bad, its a new female world order" posts.
OP stated sometimes and its pretty obvious that he didn't mean the kooky portion.
He doesn't have any point ever if his foundation is women run a vast evil conspiracy. Most against feminism would say "feminism is bad because both men are women are unhappier," Impl would say "feminism is bad because it is evil conspiracy in order to make women the ruling class." Those two ideas are not the same thing at all.
Impl would say "feminism is bad because it is evil conspiracy in order to make women the ruling class."
Politicians and other social influencers (and I mean the corporate sponsored ones) have been publicly pushing a "nicer" version of this for a while. This is like claiming the cia recording your phone calls is a conspiracy, neverthemind that guy who had to flee the country over revealing it.
The entire progression has gone exactly like red pill theory about women with them spiralling out of control until a man stepped in to put them in their place (putin invading ukraine). I don't like it, but his model has been spot on.
"He" was Imp. Imp doesn't have any point ever if his foundation is women run a vast evil conspiracy. Tell me what point of Imp's you agree with. If it doesn't end with "because of a evil global feminist cabal," then you don't know what you are talking about.
simply a funny little title
You are idolizing someone promoting a flat earth level conspiracy. Fucking hilarious, dude.
"Sometimes"?
Women are more emotional than logical, and that's causing the current wests downfall into degeneracy, feminism, woke environmentalism, you name it. The west would be far better off by now if we never gave women rights.
No he's not, he just wants to see female-oriented organizations wrecked by them. Still misguided though, because I highly doubt female athletes actually pushed for men to play in their leagues.
He talks both ends but is defensive of them consistently. When there is an anti-tranny thread, he will steer the convo back to women. He wants traditional gender roles abolished, and trannies are useful in doing that.
This medical student is insufferable and the tweet is smarmy, but I read the wording as more schadenfreude than intentional injury.
Drawing blood is literally like threading a needle. You have to stick the tip of needle into the exact lumen of a vein that is under another layer of skin.
There's a much better chance that this medical student had to try twice because she sucks at it rather than anything being intentional.
In this case, I don't know if there's much difference between male and female doctors. Male doctors can be petty as well.
If a doctor/nurse finds their own incompetence amusing, they probably lack the kind of attitude and personality a doctor should have. Lowering the bar like this is how we get so many shitty medical professionals working against people.
It's impossible to sort out an accidental miss from an "accidental" miss without knowing the intent of the practitioner. For which the default and the strongly reinforced ideal is "don't hurt the patient", so accidents in difficult tasks can be accepted without malice.
Then there's the tweet, which whilst not explicitly stating it was purposeful is still way too close to an admission that they wanted them to suffer. Who knows if she actually did it deliberately or not, but she has now given patients cause to doubt any accidents that occur from here on out are without malice. The tweet alone is enough to break patient trust and her public reprimand is not only justified but necessary to undo the damage she did.
Women are spiteful and emotional.
I remember my grandfather talking about this years ago regarding women at work. Men, at least proper men, are capable of disconnecting emotions from things. He'd talk about how groups of men could have a heated argument at a business meeting then go play golf in the afternoon as nothing happened. It was a business argument, not personal.
Women can't do this, they are wired to cling to their emotions for everything. Just look at when these stunning and brave working women get into it, they want to destroy each other. It is always personal to them. Just like this story, this crazy woman couldn't take a difference of opinion and had to take it out on their patient.
Granted a lot of these female traits apply the same to the emasculated soy men, because they never learned to be men to begin with.
That has definitely held true for the women in my family. They all go through cycles where one fights with another and they stop speaking for one or two years. Then they'll reconcile and things are okay for a period of time, but eventually they have another blow-up that leads to a prolonged period of no contact. My mom and my sister, my sister and my SIL, my SIL and her mom, etc.
None of them seem to be able to get into a heated argument and then let it go.
That has never happened with any of the men in my family.
I remember getting into an argument with my Mom about ten years ago. It got heated and she was crying and yelling. Towards the end she said, "We are done! Done!!"
I assumed she meant we're done arguing for now, but she explained that she meant we are done for good. As in our relationship is over. I was like wtf are you talking about?? You're my mom and I'm your son. How could you even think about ending our relationship over a verbal disagreement?
To my Mom's credit, eventually she realized that she was acting like a huge bitch all the time after my step-dad divorced her. Now she's way more chill and just goes with the flow, and she's based af which has brought us very close ever since Covid hit.
Sounds about right my wife gets into a fight with her lifelong best friend every couple years then they stop talking for a year or two then one of them gets drunk and calls,texts then they friends again for another year or two
Men are capable of forming a group ego that goes toward a common goal. Men put their ego in check when they realize it's hurting their groups advancement towards a goal.
Someone adds code reviews to our project. At first everyone acts the same - leaving petty little comments, going on and on about their pet topic, etc. But for men they go through this a few times, have it done to them and get hit with empathy, and they start to realize it's accomplishing nothing towards the end goal and it's hurting feelings that aren't going towards the end goal. Month later they only comment if they have something useful to say.
The one woman on the team, she starts writing longer comments with longer inanity. Then starts looking for any excuse to make the process longer and longer. Of course she gets mad if you leave the kind of comments on her reviews that she leaves on everyone else's. And if you say that this isn't accomplishing anything (it isn't) she has a meltdown.
We got a 2nd girl on the same, she was nicer, she left nicer comments but kinda did the same thing.
A male doctor, Jon Money, literally invented the idea of "trans". He performed sex changes on babies and forced children to simulate sex acts on camera for his own pleasure.
He found identical twin boys, the perfect subjects for his study. One had a botched circumcision, so he removed his scrotum and had him raised as a girl. When they were 10, he had them perform "gender affirming" sex acts on each other. When they were 12, he published that his study was successful and that "gender is a social construct." The child later confirmed that no, they weren't trans. He chose to live as a man with a new first name (not his birth name, or his "girl" name). He married a woman. In his early 40s he killed himself.
Money's heinous experiment really proves how natural a lot of "gendered" behavior actually is. Even a mutilated man, castrated since birth, raised as a girl still ended up drawn to masculine behavior.
Not just behavior, but identity.
One of the problems trans activists now is that they also see traits or behaviors considered to be masculine or feminine as evidence that a person is male or female. If a girl likes building or cars, she could be trans. If a guy likes dolls, he could be trans.
Magnus Hirschfeld had already done origami vagene surgery in 1931 so Money didn't invent trans. He was a pedo who "contributed" some new degenerate ideas, though.
Why is that not surprising.
It's more precise, but it misses the salient point. Evil is evil, regardless of who practices it.
no, there were "people" in weimar germany doing all this shit then too. he just brought it back.
Sexual pleasure is the one avenue that will drive men to depravity in far more instances than women.
Yes, and selfishness to women. We all have our cross.
TheImp did not invent fucking antifeminism nor did he invent the concept that women in general are unfit for certain roles in society. Pretty much everyone on here believes these two things and have since before TheImp opened his mouth, stop feeding his ego.
Correct.
He's a crazy man. The fact that he sometimes gibbers things that are true does not make him representative of anything. This is particularly apparent if you stop to listen to the rest of his gibbering.
It's still the same thing, he's pushing the same mentality feminists do, just with the genders reversed.
I remember back when he was new to KIA2 and asked me, an anti-feminist from the 90s, for perspectives on things.
Boy did I underestimate how insane and paranoid he would let himself become, to a point where I have to actually defend women in argument with him.
Don't blame yourself. The dude's got issues.
"One day I'll just be sitting in a near empty house with my phone in my hand and a stock ticker on my monitor because those are the last things I didn't let go of."
I'm not even so sure that paranoia drives him as much as it seems. I can tell that he takes social media far too seriously and derives some genuine validation from feeling like people are agreeing with him on it. As such the focus must be on wamen at all times.
He's also a dedicated market liberal and from the sounds of things, has been for a long time. He firmly believes in the liberal ideal man, one lacking binding commitments and presented with near infinite outlets for self-expression provided by the free market. They struggle with the cognitive dissonance of believing in the liberating power of markets and then seeing basically every company in the Western world becoming pozzed to all hell and the false promise of liberation rendered a distant dream. I went through that myself as a former libertarian, but I guess it contributes to an existential crisis for some people.
When the liberation never comes, and the markets only have homogeneous girl power sludge for sale, rather than acknowledge that he had been hoodwinked by an illusory set of ideas that are not the truth but a product of institutions and individuals with self-interested reasons for propagating them, he instead externalizes the contradiction onto others. "I could have the liberation I was promised if it weren't for those parasitic women and children!"
The liberalism he believes in is, of course, never to blame. He clings to it with a death grip even as it destroys him and everything he holds dear.
You're the psychiatrist so what do you think of my arm-chair efforts? LOL
Oh I wasn't blaming myself, I think he was always this way and was just less angry then. Because that's what seems to be the problem, he is increasingly angry at the clown world and people's inability to see what he sees.
While he flavor of evil is "women" its not really different in manifestation than most people here's. Just others expand to Jews, The Left, the Governments, the Trannies, the Globohomo, etc. However, he is completely alone in that. Even Stormfags have each other, and the various levels of poltard.
But no MRA or other offshoot group hates women like he does. Most either want to divorce completely from them (MGTOW) or manipulate them completely (TRP), because they know you can't actually win against them completely because of biological reality.
That's why I think he is not in a rational mindset. He can barely acknowledge a lot of realities, and sees almost entirely through red lens of paranoia and anger. His ideas never have ends that are remotely feasible, and his arguments can never hold themselves together. Its running off pure emotion.
Never forget he was a hardcore Epic Games shill for a long time, until the most innocuous thing (that Fortnite event) was what changed his mind. None of their actual market evils or lies, just women.
I'll admit I haven't interacted much with him on economic discussions and am not incredibly versed on them myself, so I'll actually take your word on that part because it does make sense based on what I do know.
Also I'm a psychologist, not a psychiatrist. One attempts to help through understanding and dealing with problems (in theory), the other just throws pills at people and ruins their lives worse. Though he probably could use some form of anti-mania drug to calm him down.
We're more different than we seem at first glance. It's not merely competing harmatiologies. If you look at what I said above about the liberated man and lacking binding commitments, that clashes with nationalism which demands a degree of conformity to a national identity, even if it's not a racialist view of nationalism. It is this contradiction between liberalism and nationalism that will continue to bring "right-wing" liberals into conflict with the illiberal dissident right even as some insist on trying to have some sort of unified front against "wokeness."
There are incels. I know he isn't one, but he would fit in with them. I think he's too proud to roll with them, though.
That's a fair distinction between he and the rest for sure. I simply believe a lot of his identity and beliefs are simply a result of his continued isolation and madness instead of a result of his actual political core. As in, if he could get into the little joke threads about Jews or trannies like a lot of guys here, he would be far less mad.
As such, I think we are simply coming at it from very different perspectives. I am looking at a man as an individual, while you a more general position about greater ideological combats.
You'd be surprised at how few of them are incels. I was a part of that movement in the 2000s and on, and most of the problem wasn't getting women but simply the damage those women did to them. Divorce was one of the most common things that brought a man to the movement.
But they were unable to actually hate women. It was always nebulous elites and feminists, and that women were just brainwashed victims that could be changed to be good, trad (not that this term existed then) girls again. Its why so many of their big figure heads were women.
The "Manosphere" is far more diverse than most give it credit for, and every corner has a shard of the right idea covered by their own blathering bullshit. In the same way Our Boi has a lot of right ideas lost in his soap box.
I could talk for pages about the problems with the "Anti-feminist" movement and its history, but that's not on trial here. Ironically, more men like him would have helped it survive because of how much it was coopted and ruined by women.
I don't think they are separable. Liberalism is producing this broken society full of broken, alienated, isolated people like an assembly line.
To clarify, I'm talking about incels as a separate group, not as part of any of these others. I did my time in the manosphere (2015-2018 or around then), mostly MRA stuff, so I'm fairly familiar with it. I checked out some incel things to see what all the fuss was about and noped out quickly. They didn't seem hesitant to hate women at all and were really fucked up people.
Liberalism produces the circumstances that can create these people in mass quantities, but these people come to exist each in their own unique ways.
Most are lashing out due to extreme loneliness, which in turn warps them further and further into a worldview that cannot sustain itself and worse, does not exist anymore. I find them more pitiful than evil, and spent most of my time/effort as a psychologist working with men like them.
You'd be surprised at how little effort it takes to undo the echo chamber and years of rage. They will forever be warped to some extent, but they are far easier to make a decent person out of than almost any Leftist.
Which circles back to point one. In mass quantities they seem like a broken mass of evil, but each one in his own unique way can be changed and brought back.
Yes I do, got any Dr. Thunder?
Fuck you.
I don't think he's a shill. He just derives an unhealthy validation from getting people to agree with him about wamen, and things the ADL offer..alternative explanations to wamen being the root of all evil.
The more important lesson here is: Never accept service from anyone with pronouns on their name tag.
They are more or less being mandated by corporate now, so soon enough that pretty much means never accept service.
No, they are evil.
Women know there isn't any consequences for their actions so why not virtue signal?
That said this seems more like a case of "I got mad and thought bad thoughts" rather than something she actually did. But no way of knowing if its true unless the patient comes forward.
It seems like an admission to me, but intention isn't clear beside the fact she tweeted about it.
Imp may be crazy, but he has principals and a clear unapologetic bias. I've said it before, I disagree with his posts a lot, but I have also learned things from him that I wouldn't have learned from anywhere else.
Like what?
Explain to me how this proves there is a global conspiracy run by women with all women involved to oppress and enslave men. The same women who cant keep a secret, cant work with other women, and cant turn on a gas grill are all part of complex global conspiracy. Because that is his point.
The fact that theimp is probably banned from saying his stuff on all of big tech - indicates their power
No, he has stated as much. You are not really reading into it enough. He makes posts about the true nature of women (which was common knowledge until recently) as the candy to lure you to his van which is the crazy idea of a female supremacist global conspiracy.
Like the candy that is 'Woman are Wonderful' leading us into the 'Great Reset'?
OP stated sometimes and its pretty obvious that he didn't mean the kooky portion.
Has he ever said those things? If hes never said those things, how is he luring you with them? The candy would be his "feminism is bad" or "women did something bad" posts the van would be when he occasionally ties it to his crazy conspiracy by making "feminism is bad, its a new female world order" posts.
He doesn't have any point ever if his foundation is women run a vast evil conspiracy. Most against feminism would say "feminism is bad because both men are women are unhappier," Impl would say "feminism is bad because it is evil conspiracy in order to make women the ruling class." Those two ideas are not the same thing at all.
Politicians and other social influencers (and I mean the corporate sponsored ones) have been publicly pushing a "nicer" version of this for a while. This is like claiming the cia recording your phone calls is a conspiracy, neverthemind that guy who had to flee the country over revealing it.
The entire progression has gone exactly like red pill theory about women with them spiralling out of control until a man stepped in to put them in their place (putin invading ukraine). I don't like it, but his model has been spot on.
"He" was Imp. Imp doesn't have any point ever if his foundation is women run a vast evil conspiracy. Tell me what point of Imp's you agree with. If it doesn't end with "because of a evil global feminist cabal," then you don't know what you are talking about.
You are idolizing someone promoting a flat earth level conspiracy. Fucking hilarious, dude.
That tweet was 100% r/ThatHappened from an idiot attempting to virtue signal, and who is now reaping the whirlwind for her stupidity.
And stop encouraging that guy's mental illness.
"Sometimes"? Women are more emotional than logical, and that's causing the current wests downfall into degeneracy, feminism, woke environmentalism, you name it. The west would be far better off by now if we never gave women rights.
Imp1 is pro-tranny so not really.
No he's not, he just wants to see female-oriented organizations wrecked by them. Still misguided though, because I highly doubt female athletes actually pushed for men to play in their leagues.
Read my reply to grinnin_barret below.
He talks both ends but is defensive of them consistently. When there is an anti-tranny thread, he will steer the convo back to women. He wants traditional gender roles abolished, and trannies are useful in doing that.
Unpopular opinion:
This medical student is insufferable and the tweet is smarmy, but I read the wording as more schadenfreude than intentional injury.
Drawing blood is literally like threading a needle. You have to stick the tip of needle into the exact lumen of a vein that is under another layer of skin.
There's a much better chance that this medical student had to try twice because she sucks at it rather than anything being intentional.
If a doctor/nurse finds their own incompetence amusing, they probably lack the kind of attitude and personality a doctor should have. Lowering the bar like this is how we get so many shitty medical professionals working against people.
It's impossible to sort out an accidental miss from an "accidental" miss without knowing the intent of the practitioner. For which the default and the strongly reinforced ideal is "don't hurt the patient", so accidents in difficult tasks can be accepted without malice.
Then there's the tweet, which whilst not explicitly stating it was purposeful is still way too close to an admission that they wanted them to suffer. Who knows if she actually did it deliberately or not, but she has now given patients cause to doubt any accidents that occur from here on out are without malice. The tweet alone is enough to break patient trust and her public reprimand is not only justified but necessary to undo the damage she did.
The wording is subtle, but important.
Like I said, phlebotomy is made to look easy by those who who are experienced in it.
"I missed his vein" coming out of the words of a medical student isn't hubris, it's incompetence.
But either way, I agree she was reveling in the outcome.
I'm defending this hard because it's important that our side stands for truth and doesn't stoop to hysterical, made-up narratives like our enemies do.
Celebrating someone's pain is evil enough.
Exaggerating and superimposing intentions that may or may not be there weakens our integrity and makes us no better than her.
I will concede that we really have no way to prove intent, we can only interpret the writings we have. Which is itself subjective.
But I think you are being consumed by what you hate and are becoming the same monster that you are fighting against.
You are insulting me because I have slightly different opinion than you and won't fully commit to the two minutes of hate.