BLM wants to steal your land back.
(media.kotakuinaction2.win)
Comments (69)
sorted by:
That's funny. Turkey is on Greek land, Israel is on Palestinian, Syrian, and Jordanian land. Some of Russia and Poland is on German land, France is on English land. Russia is in part on Japanese land. Kosovo is on Serbian land, Iraq is on Assyrian land, and I can go on and. on.
The only difference is that in all of the above cases, the people were wiped out, not set up on reservations and given welfare for eternity.
Correct except Israel is still actively in the process of colonization, funded largely by the us, so they haven't finished the wiping out phase yet.
Not to mention its not like "native" people's didn't steal each other's lands all the time. Every civilization in history has conquered land. That's just reality
"Norman Conquest, the military conquest of England by William, duke of Normandy, primarily effected by his decisive victory at the Battle of Hastings (October 14, 1066) and resulting ultimately in profound political, administrative, and social changes in the British Isles."
Nani?
Honestly I’m so sick of them bringing this up. History of the world is land conquest and tribal warfare.
Ancient central and south Americans were crazy blood thirsty. Hell, they still are.
They were bad enough that locals threw themselves at the Europeans to free them from the most oppressive and evil tribes.
Mexicans claim they own America because they are descended from Indians. All while speaking Spanish and worshipping light skin.
Honestly if they taught some global history it would go a long way.
every culture on the planet has engaged in land conquest and slavery.
it was white people who were the first ones to say "let's stop this, have an actual agreement on sovereign borders that we all honor, and cut it with the whole slavery thing."
to this day, border contests are almost exclusively in regions not run by white people. russia/georgia only gets media time because it's the only one happening in the white world. africa and latin america and the middle east have entire regions in constant dispute.
Thomas Sowell once asked why the people in the US who constantly talk about slavery that ended over 150 years ago don’t use their energy and resources to help victims of modern day slavery. I guess that answer is simple. It’s too much work to do that. Much easier to endlessly complain about the past.
You bring up a good point. I think it’s a shame so many people have zero knowledge of non western history/current affairs.
Only one ethnic group needs a 150 yr old excuse for sucking. Irish, Chinese, Italians and Slavs all doing just fine post-slavery.
I’m black and I’ve been beating this drum forever. Every ethnic group or most have been enslaved or suffered at some point in time. You can either choose to move past it or never shut up about it. I made my choice. Sadly many I know choose to be “oppressed”
All of my life BLM stood for Bureau of Land Management, so naturally they were in the land business.
Show me a group that has been on the same land since the beginning. History of the world involves countless tribal warfare and land conquest in every continent. Getting mad about it is pointless. Honestly why don’t these jerks go to Africa and complain to the governments for selling their ancestors to the Europeans.
Because they're bullies and Africa's tin pot dictators won't put up with their shit. They would have them killed without a second thought. If we were willing to the same we'd have far fewer problems in the West.
This is also why non-western countries don't endlessly wring their hands about their past. Like you said, if you confront African countries about their past atrocities or modern day slavery, they would laugh you out of the room if you are lucky.
Most would probably be upset they didn't finish wiping some other group from existence or letting them have any rights at all, instead of feeling bad about whatever they did.
The Pygmies apparently.
I forgot about them. But my general point still stands. Lol.
Can’t upvote this enough. Show me a non European continent where there wasn’t tribal warfare and land conquest
Everyone says look to Australia for what our future holds, I say look at South Africa…They have a group called BLF (Black First Land First) That has been on this for years, if you listen to them you see where BLM gets it, also worth noting that the government of South Africa was infiltrated and destroyed by a family from India called the Gupta family (yes as in Dr Sanjay Gupta)
Heres the facts. From a guy with direct ties to, and land on reservations.
There was basically no such thing as "Native American land". A tribe had a village somewhere, maybe even 2 or 3, and ABSOLUTELY NOTHING in between. There was no infrastructure. No homes. No tracts of farm land. Not even any form of appreciable roadwork. It was empty and unoccupied, unused and unutilized. It was blank land. At best some dudes wondered through and hunted it, which me putting a house up on interferes with approximately zero. White people didnt come through and push anyone off of anything because it was all empty anyway.
Not to mention the Native American "genocide" was the results of Native Americans starting wars, thinking they could become vikings, and being the aggressors in EVERY SINGLE CASE.
At one point (almost) the entirety of the Native American peoples declared war against France. Despite not owning a ship or knowing how to get to France.
Throughout these wars the Natives were never helpless victims and killer many civilians that earned retaliation and eventually had to receive like tactics to get Natives to stop killing Frank on a farm. The military rode against a military, and Natives killed far more white people than vice versa.
*Purchased or C O N Q U E R E D
One does not simply "steal" land.
And Indians came from Asia, what's their point?
Well,
https://www.smithsonianmag.com/smart-news/the-very-first-americans-may-have-had-european-roots-5517714/
Then steal it back chucklefucks. I dare you.
"You are eating watermelon and fried chicken on stolen land"
same energy.
I had moist and delicious turkey and ham while sitting in the dinning room of my fully paid off home.
Fuck off with your "stolen" nonsense.
Someone better tell the Supreme Court it's been wasting its time on treaty law, because apparently there's no treaties.
BLM is just another bunch of fuckwits who don't know the difference between American and Canadian history. Fuck them to hell.
I'm on stolen land? No, YOU'RE on stolen land!
I bet these types sneer at someone flying a Confederate flag as 'celebrating losers' without a shred of irony.
Tired of these sore losers. Sorry for party rocking
I’m ready to ship them all back to Africa.
I live in a state where vast tracts of it is reservation land. The natives that got the land in my state were only active in this area for a few hundred years; they took it over from another tribe that held it for like 1000 years before that. But because they held it by the time colonists discovered the land, they ultimately got claim of dominion and are now the tribe associated with the land. Meanwhile the actual original tribe that held it for a millennia got nothing.
Ultimately a lot of "native land" in the US is an arbitrary distinction since tribes only vaguely understood and enforced the concept of property rights and due to their nomadic nature never were indigenous to any specific land. Present-day land claims are based on observations of land ownership at the time of contact.
How far back should we go? 50 years, 100 years, 500 years, 1000 years, 10000 years, 50000 years? What is the "true" definitive stopping point, and what is ambiguous? What land hasn't been conquered, reconquered, rerecounqered, ad infinitum to the beginning of unrecorded history?
The Younger Dryas impacts are all but confirmed now, even if the mainstream scientific community continues to stick their fingers in their ears and scream loudly. Furthermore, the Clovis people and white races existing in North American prior to Asiatic immigration is confirmed as well, but they were wiped out by the Younger Dryas impacts. Doesn't that mean, according to the left's own standards, that North America is a white only land, because we were here first? Would they argue that natural disasters wiping people out is different, but diseases wiping out most Native Americans is somehow an exception? Of course they'd evade any logic on this, because they're inherently illogical, and trying to keep to their shifting hypocritical and stupid standards is folly.
Do not cede one inch of ground to them, ever.
Terrorist niggers from Cuckistan have no say on anything american.
*conquered
Fixed that for you.
Vae victis!
bitch pls conquered land
Vae victis
They don't teach history in the US ?
Lol this has to be a joke.
https://youtu.be/WF7mfB72fyE
Gotta respect the strategy. This stuff seems so stupid on its face but you see tons of White people running around parroting this. Apparently its affective.
Yes. They were conquered. Get fucked.
Blacks owned land? That must be before they were slaves.
There's no stolen land it was all conquered fair and square and even if it was stolen land what makes the N's think they have any right to it before anybody else that was already here
it wasn't stolen, it was conquered.
it seems letting your ancestors live was my ancestors' greatest failing.