“The day black ppl seek revenge instead of acceptance will be the day they regret what they started.”
That statement is absolutely true as written. Black people will unequivocally regret what they’ve started after blindly stumbling too far down this path. Will they have the wisdom to turn back? I seriously doubt it.
She undoubtedly meant that white people would regret their whiteness while trembling in the face of righteous black rage, but that’s not the way it reads. Nor will it be what happens.
You mean endorsing an egregiously racist culture, prone to violence and anti-intellectualism, then ramping up division over numbers that pale in comparison to the violent crime rates of blacks on every other race in existence? It’s almost like Democrats and the media went into racist overdrive trying to keep their niggers in line because black people were waking up to what Clinton and Obama did to their communities. The second we were reaching towards assimilation the racial tensions exploded and have been intentionally pushed ever since. This is why Democrats need revisionist history like the 1619 project, common core, and crt. It’s amazing anyone can say that progressives want peace and equality went they openly say they want men and white people dead.
Votes. They need black votes. Problem is, no matter how hard they jammed "Orange Man Kill Blacks" down their throats, more and more blacks walked off their plantation. Imagine if they hadn't sent Dr. Dre and company in to convince Kanye to stop taking his meds? It would have been a lot more off the plantation.
Look at the intersectionality/CRT push. The goal was to stop assimilation, and create fear, rage, and hate towards the white man. They even tried to create a culture of marginalized Asians. This was supposed to create a united front, voting against the "evil" white Republicans. It worked until the stats and videos showed that the problem wasn't Asian hate crimes. It was simply increased black crime. So, back to doing it the easy way. (Importing voters, then no ID required.)
The decline of blacks started with the civil rights movement, after which single mothers became standard, abortion normalized, and crime skyrocketed. Prior to that, blacks were on track to be at economic parity with whites around the 90s.
The foundations of their destruction comes from the progressives of early 20th century. They declared their intention of removing blacks with a combination of minimum wage, welfare, and abortion.
It is much better to enact a minimum-wage law even if it deprives these unfortunates of work... Better that the state should support the inefficient wholly and prevent the multiplication of the breed than subsidize incompetence and unthrift, enabling them to bring forth more of their kind.
-Royal Meeker, Commissioner of Labor for Woodrow Wilsin
saw a video of a black dude randomly beating up an asian to a coma for no reason (Except he misheard a word that was spoken in another language?) and you had a bunch of leftists and black people on twitter defending it. And even claiming you're racist for condemning him
Black America is a parallel society attempting to overthrow established American society. If this endeavor is successful, you will see rates of black-on-white violence begin to approach those of black-on-black violence. That's the goal; they want to kill whitey at the same rate that they kill each other, and that can't happen so long as American society adheres to even a semblance of traditional law and order.
Of course, established American society is armed to the teeth, so gun confiscation will be necessary at some point.
That's the thing about the second amendment: it was once intended to protect you from the government, but right now it's mostly protecting you from diversity.
Rather old, it's from last summer. But yes, the first time I saw this incident marked another addition to my list of reasons as to why the KKK may have been on to something with that whole 'you need to lynch a few joggers from time to time to set an example for the rest' idea of theirs, the most recent addition to which was that horrible kidnapping & murder of a 4-year-old last week. I have not a damn clue as to how anyone expects the American and, more generally, Western social fabric to hold for much longer as shit like this inevitably piles up over the coming years.
KKK threatened random people. That would be as low-iq as what the dumb negro bitch proposes. Justice needs to be targeted to where it's deserved or it doesn't work.
That is the narrative that's been pushed for a century and the one I believed until a few years ago. But there's reason to think at least some of the people who were lynched (whether by the Klan or, more regularly, just random mobs) were criminals who absolutely had their horrific deaths coming, like Jesse Washington (who even the NAACP investigator of his lynching concluded actually murdered the white woman whose death caused his) and Leo Frank (the guy the ADL was founded to defend, who together with the best lawyers money could buy desperately tried to blame his rape & murder of a white girl on a black guy, but couldn't get even the 1910s Deep South to buy his story).
And I do have to wonder: if the popular narrative around the Klan and the lynch mobs is wrong on that count, that they weren't just going around killing random black people for fun but on at least several high-profile occasions lynched actual criminals who have since been lionized and (heh) whitewashed by the media and academia, what else is said narrative wrong about?
But there's reason to think at least some of the people who were lynched (whether by the Klan or, more regularly, just random mobs) were criminals who absolutely had their horrific deaths coming
If you have mob justice and lynching, inevitably some people whom you lynch turn out to be guilty. There's a reason that is not acceptable.
Leo Frank (the guy the ADL was founded to defend, who together with the best lawyers money could buy desperately tried to blame his rape & murder of a white girl on a black guy, but couldn't get even the 1910s Deep South to buy his story).
I've never understood this argument. I have no idea if Leo Frank was guilty or not, but it's not as if people in the deep south were just assuming that every crime was committed by a black guy.
if the popular narrative around the Klan and the lynch mobs is wrong on that count, that they weren't just going around killing random black people for fun
Depends on who 'they' are. Basically, they tended to lynch people whom they presumed guilty, based on good evidence or faulty. Also, in the Reconstruction era, people who dared to vote Republican - black or white.
If you have mob justice and lynching, inevitably some people whom you lynch turn out to be guilty. There's a reason that is not acceptable.
Under normal circumstances, yes. In the event of a total breakdown of society or the capture of the state's organs of justice and law & order by factions which care not a whit for either except to use it as a bludgeon against their enemies however, I find it very difficult to not at least slightly sympathize with those who take law & order into their own hands. Better whatever bloody little slices of justice vigilantism can mete out than none at all, IMO.
I've never understood this argument. I have no idea if Leo Frank was guilty or not, but it's not as if people in the deep south were just assuming that every crime was committed by a black guy.
Can't find the article which laid the case against Frank out right now, all I remember is that it was on a website long tarred as 'antisemitic' and a nest of conspiracy theories by the mainstream (despite, as far as I can tell, hardly being Stormfronty). Unz, Urz or something like that - I recall it also had an Assange associate on board, which was what drew my interest to it in the first place way back in the day.
But I do remember one of its arguments as to why the Frank case was so exceptional was that 'raped and murdered white girls' was the #1 accusation for lynching, and that it obviously carried the most waving-red-flags-in-front-of-a-bull racial implications for white Southern society. There's no way the Deep South of the 1910s would have allowed a black guy they thought, even for a second, really did rape and murder a 13-year-old white girl go free, which would be tantamount to letting him pose a further threat to other little white girls as far as they'd be concerned.
Couple that with other arguments on how Frank was a wealthy & well-connected (particularly to the media and other Jewish business tycoons) businessman with no known enemies in Georgia who was capable of affording, or even being practically gifted, top-end lawyers while the aforementioned black guy was literally a dirt-poor janitor, as well as how the trial & appeals process were quite exhaustive and dragged on for years (as opposed to being the extremely quick & unfair affairs as you might expect of an actual 'we just really want this guy dead/free because he's not white/white' case), and well. You can see why the ADL's interpretation of the case & lynching, which have been the popular view for a century, makes less and less sense the more you examine it.
Depends on who 'they' are. Basically, they tended to lynch people whom they presumed guilty, based on good evidence or faulty. Also, in the Reconstruction era, people who dared to vote Republican - black or white.
We don't need to go overboard.
Yeah, fair enough. Sometimes I forget the need to take a break from this enraging shit & go do something else to wind myself down.
I say you lock away these welfare queens, there's maybe a 100K, and black crimes percentage will go below national average for even white people in fifteen years. Maybe more, as the next generation won't have been born and raised in that time.
People tend to forget just bad black cities have gotten because they constantly see how they’re “coming back”. They’ve been saying that about Detroit for decades now.
I shoulda put KWANES! Because they, like the black men shooting people, are a small minority of the black community. They just reproduce like roaches and don't take care of their babies. Now, you throw in hoodrats, hos, thug bitches, and skanks, you got a good portion of the hood, but they all start with a single welfare queen that not only provides for them and their babies when they go to the club, get shot, just don't want to take care of their babies, but they pass on their knowledge/contacts in the welfare offices.
“The day black ppl seek revenge instead of acceptance will be the day they regret what they started.”
That statement is absolutely true as written. Black people will unequivocally regret what they’ve started after blindly stumbling too far down this path. Will they have the wisdom to turn back? I seriously doubt it.
She undoubtedly meant that white people would regret their whiteness while trembling in the face of righteous black rage, but that’s not the way it reads. Nor will it be what happens.
Which way, awakened Saxon?
You may be right. She might be honestly advocating sober restraint and reflection towards the backlash they’ll be stirring up.
You see too many bad takes, you start assuming the worst.
Why not just remove the ones that deserve to be removed?
As evidenced by every time the police justifiably kill a black criminal and the media starts broadcasting about it.
I read it as OP as well, but after reading your comment, you're likely correct.
Beware the fury of the patient man.
The longer the fuse, the bigger the explosion.
You mean endorsing an egregiously racist culture, prone to violence and anti-intellectualism, then ramping up division over numbers that pale in comparison to the violent crime rates of blacks on every other race in existence? It’s almost like Democrats and the media went into racist overdrive trying to keep their niggers in line because black people were waking up to what Clinton and Obama did to their communities. The second we were reaching towards assimilation the racial tensions exploded and have been intentionally pushed ever since. This is why Democrats need revisionist history like the 1619 project, common core, and crt. It’s amazing anyone can say that progressives want peace and equality went they openly say they want men and white people dead.
Don't put it all on culture. Most of what we've seen is genetic inclination towards impulsiveness. We're entering premeditative territory, now.
Don't relax.
Votes. They need black votes. Problem is, no matter how hard they jammed "Orange Man Kill Blacks" down their throats, more and more blacks walked off their plantation. Imagine if they hadn't sent Dr. Dre and company in to convince Kanye to stop taking his meds? It would have been a lot more off the plantation.
Look at the intersectionality/CRT push. The goal was to stop assimilation, and create fear, rage, and hate towards the white man. They even tried to create a culture of marginalized Asians. This was supposed to create a united front, voting against the "evil" white Republicans. It worked until the stats and videos showed that the problem wasn't Asian hate crimes. It was simply increased black crime. So, back to doing it the easy way. (Importing voters, then no ID required.)
South Africa is the end goal.
The decline of blacks started with the civil rights movement, after which single mothers became standard, abortion normalized, and crime skyrocketed. Prior to that, blacks were on track to be at economic parity with whites around the 90s.
The foundations of their destruction comes from the progressives of early 20th century. They declared their intention of removing blacks with a combination of minimum wage, welfare, and abortion.
-Royal Meeker, Commissioner of Labor for Woodrow Wilsin
saw a video of a black dude randomly beating up an asian to a coma for no reason (Except he misheard a word that was spoken in another language?) and you had a bunch of leftists and black people on twitter defending it. And even claiming you're racist for condemning him
Fun fact - The chinese word for “that one” is “nagga”
Black America is a parallel society attempting to overthrow established American society. If this endeavor is successful, you will see rates of black-on-white violence begin to approach those of black-on-black violence. That's the goal; they want to kill whitey at the same rate that they kill each other, and that can't happen so long as American society adheres to even a semblance of traditional law and order.
Of course, established American society is armed to the teeth, so gun confiscation will be necessary at some point.
That's the thing about the second amendment: it was once intended to protect you from the government, but right now it's mostly protecting you from diversity.
What would be the point of killing whitey?
It's becoming evident that the reason blacks believe white cops are killing them for sport is because they'd do the same to you.
It's always about projection
Rather old, it's from last summer. But yes, the first time I saw this incident marked another addition to my list of reasons as to why the KKK may have been on to something with that whole 'you need to lynch a few joggers from time to time to set an example for the rest' idea of theirs, the most recent addition to which was that horrible kidnapping & murder of a 4-year-old last week. I have not a damn clue as to how anyone expects the American and, more generally, Western social fabric to hold for much longer as shit like this inevitably piles up over the coming years.
KKK threatened random people. That would be as low-iq as what the dumb negro bitch proposes. Justice needs to be targeted to where it's deserved or it doesn't work.
That is the narrative that's been pushed for a century and the one I believed until a few years ago. But there's reason to think at least some of the people who were lynched (whether by the Klan or, more regularly, just random mobs) were criminals who absolutely had their horrific deaths coming, like Jesse Washington (who even the NAACP investigator of his lynching concluded actually murdered the white woman whose death caused his) and Leo Frank (the guy the ADL was founded to defend, who together with the best lawyers money could buy desperately tried to blame his rape & murder of a white girl on a black guy, but couldn't get even the 1910s Deep South to buy his story).
And I do have to wonder: if the popular narrative around the Klan and the lynch mobs is wrong on that count, that they weren't just going around killing random black people for fun but on at least several high-profile occasions lynched actual criminals who have since been lionized and (heh) whitewashed by the media and academia, what else is said narrative wrong about?
If you have mob justice and lynching, inevitably some people whom you lynch turn out to be guilty. There's a reason that is not acceptable.
I've never understood this argument. I have no idea if Leo Frank was guilty or not, but it's not as if people in the deep south were just assuming that every crime was committed by a black guy.
Depends on who 'they' are. Basically, they tended to lynch people whom they presumed guilty, based on good evidence or faulty. Also, in the Reconstruction era, people who dared to vote Republican - black or white.
We don't need to go overboard.
Under normal circumstances, yes. In the event of a total breakdown of society or the capture of the state's organs of justice and law & order by factions which care not a whit for either except to use it as a bludgeon against their enemies however, I find it very difficult to not at least slightly sympathize with those who take law & order into their own hands. Better whatever bloody little slices of justice vigilantism can mete out than none at all, IMO.
Can't find the article which laid the case against Frank out right now, all I remember is that it was on a website long tarred as 'antisemitic' and a nest of conspiracy theories by the mainstream (despite, as far as I can tell, hardly being Stormfronty). Unz, Urz or something like that - I recall it also had an Assange associate on board, which was what drew my interest to it in the first place way back in the day.
But I do remember one of its arguments as to why the Frank case was so exceptional was that 'raped and murdered white girls' was the #1 accusation for lynching, and that it obviously carried the most waving-red-flags-in-front-of-a-bull racial implications for white Southern society. There's no way the Deep South of the 1910s would have allowed a black guy they thought, even for a second, really did rape and murder a 13-year-old white girl go free, which would be tantamount to letting him pose a further threat to other little white girls as far as they'd be concerned.
Couple that with other arguments on how Frank was a wealthy & well-connected (particularly to the media and other Jewish business tycoons) businessman with no known enemies in Georgia who was capable of affording, or even being practically gifted, top-end lawyers while the aforementioned black guy was literally a dirt-poor janitor, as well as how the trial & appeals process were quite exhaustive and dragged on for years (as opposed to being the extremely quick & unfair affairs as you might expect of an actual 'we just really want this guy dead/free because he's not white/white' case), and well. You can see why the ADL's interpretation of the case & lynching, which have been the popular view for a century, makes less and less sense the more you examine it.
Yeah, fair enough. Sometimes I forget the need to take a break from this enraging shit & go do something else to wind myself down.
Stares in German and Viking blood
Also known as the worst parts of Europe.
BEST parts. We'll kill you and fuck your wives on your corpse.
I say you lock away these welfare queens, there's maybe a 100K, and black crimes percentage will go below national average for even white people in fifteen years. Maybe more, as the next generation won't have been born and raised in that time.
People tend to forget just bad black cities have gotten because they constantly see how they’re “coming back”. They’ve been saying that about Detroit for decades now.
I shoulda put KWANES! Because they, like the black men shooting people, are a small minority of the black community. They just reproduce like roaches and don't take care of their babies. Now, you throw in hoodrats, hos, thug bitches, and skanks, you got a good portion of the hood, but they all start with a single welfare queen that not only provides for them and their babies when they go to the club, get shot, just don't want to take care of their babies, but they pass on their knowledge/contacts in the welfare offices.
Try about 5 million.
Unintentionally correct.
ivordaughta, you stupid retard.
something something never relax
I'm sure it was everyone's fault but his /s
Radicalised by online propaganda he viewed on facebook and youtube.
So sick of these stories. I’m sure CNN will give this breathless coverage. Oh wait there is still more to report on the “insurrection”
I sure have seen a lot, and I mean a lot, of videos of black people assaulting/harrassing/robbing/murdering random innocent people of all races.
I've yet to go out to do some stabbing.
Feeling a bit less relaxed though.
hang him. feral animals don't belong in society.