There’s no conspiracy with modern advertising, honest!
(media.kotakuinaction2.win)
Comments (64)
sorted by:
I hate that i've started to notice it and i don't know if its just /pol/ or what, but its fucking everywhere
And i don't even have a problem with it, but its like OK, why is literally every other couple mixed? And if there is a white guy husband he's a dumbass.
Yeah, I've noticed it for years now, but I agree, it's not something I should have to notice, or that I want to be noticing.
I do have a problem with it. Not interracial couples in general, but the motive behind these portrayals. The issue isn't mixed couples. The issue is that it's done specifically in the ongoing effort to reduce and erase white people and make them hate themselves more.
That's the thing. This isn't a celebration of diversity, which I wouldn't really have a problem with. This is an attack.
It sounds like a conspiracy but I definitely agree this is being done on purpose. Only reason I can think of is the Nazi uprising of Germany scared the absolute shit out of globalists and theyve decided white people are too smart to control... hell the UN has a "European Replacement Plan" for fuck sake
Not what I'm saying, for the record. No matter how people feel about race and IQ, I doubt that's what threatens the elites in regard to white people. If it is something like what you'd describe, I think it would be more accurate to say that whites perhaps have a culture that values independence more, or something. And I'm not even claiming that, either.
Asians and Jews generally test higher than whites in regard to IQ, so it's not like whites are even the smartest group. And, although I think it's probable that race does play a role in IQ, it's not the only determining factor. Culture, especially around family, is vitally important, and probably a big reason why Asians are so successful in aggregate, for example.
I think one big reason the shadow cabal (to use that Time article's words) hate white people, is not even any inherent trait of white people. That could be a part of it, but I think basically white hate is merely being used as a tool to divide and conquer. There's a reason the phrase 'cultural Marxism' gets used; it's all about divide and conquer. Instead of talking about class, you talk about race, and sex, and gender, and sexuality, and all that. Put people into their little columns, and find them someone to hate. It's all about breaking people down, and making them more controllable.
You're right on the money about how it's not about intelligence but independence, self reliance, personal drive, ingenuity, etc.
That's what they're trying to stamp out.
On average, South East Asians have demonstrably higher IQs than whites.
That's a consistently reproducible result of intelligence testing.
But just they're not being targeted in the way that western culture is for the simple reason that intelligence isn't the threat.
It's the decidedly western values of individualism are the threat.
to be honest that does sound more likely than the IQ reasons ive seen and presented, as unlike IQ, culture and believe can spread
It's DEFINITELY real, more about making white people an EXTREME minority than making them extinct since they tend to vote right more and so they can import more and more people from socialist and commie shitholes who will vote for those same policies due to lower intelligence and purposeful lack of education that let's them put 2 and 2 together and verify that it's not ONLY the people in power in their former countries that are the problem but the ideology as well. Basically turn the US into South Africa meets Venezuela which will purposely cause racially motivated infighting while their masters do as they please.
if nothing else, if you're a white man, remember that every breath you take terrifies them to pants-shitting levels. until you're 6 feet under in a sealed stone coffin, they don't rest, and it's because they're scared of what could happen while you still live and breathe.
Started in the 90s really but it wasn't this focused and obvious, it was more they're just a couple. Now it's ramped up.
The thing is, I’m a product of miscegenation; black slave ancestry, not that you could tell now.
Members of my family actively practice miscegenation, and I hold no ill will towards them.
In theory, there’s nothing wrong with it. In practice, miscegenation was/is weaponized as a tool to destroy ancestral ties and devalue cultures.
Which is exactly what we’re seeing now.
This priority towards race mixing propaganda is being used to popularize the death of the racial and social identity of our descendants, to turn them into a compliant mass of sub class serfs with no structural social identity.
Industrialized psychological abuse.
youre not crazy my friend, its even more prevalent in countries that have recently been invaded by muslims.
During the Super Bowl there was an active betting pool on the exact makeup of the first multi-racial couple to be shown on screen.
Black man/ white women looks to have had the highest odds. It makes sense.
Look at how porn is pushed currently. It’s all social engineering to destroy white culture.
I doubt it. It's probably racist white women fetishizing black men because of the promotion of weak white men around them.
Women are consuming fairly violent porn, and I don't think that's being intentionally pushed.
The push for black men was from intentional propaganda. The fetishization of black men for white women was one of the pillars of the social justice movement since the 60s. Women’s attraction towards violence is considered to be a byproduct from evolutionary psychology, where violent dominant men were more likely to mate. Women in culture have always been a shitshow, to think this is anything new would be ignoring history.
I don't agree on either of these points.
Women's attraction towards violent porn has increased in the past decade. That's not just a general thing about women, the problem is that women are more interested in more violence than normal, or in previous times. I still argue that that is a result of the feminization of men creating such a drought of strong masculine attractive figures in their lives, that they are fetishizing violence.
Blacks become a token of that fetiziation because of the cultural mapping of violent crime and aggression ascribed to blacks through much black media.
Now, I don't deny that blacks were fetishized by Social Justice. My citation is Fritz The Cat. However, I'd still argue this is an internal fetishization, not an external one. I also don't deny that women are attracted to some amount of violence & aggression as it can be used to denote a male capable of protecting them. However, the current trends are outside the norm.
Yeah, I know, Facebook.
But, I’ve been screenshotting everytime I see a mixed couple in recent ads, and, well, it’s been a lot.
I know I’m beating a dead horse, but it’s either this, or gays aplenty.
At least the comments are 50/50 on calling this shit out; the other half are the expected useful idiots who fail to see the agenda at play.
I've been ( ( ( NOTICING ) ) ) a lot of commercials and ads doing this fucking mixed race shit. Way more blacks and Hispanics in ads as well.
And just like this ad has shown, it's mostly the woman who's an ethnic minority and the man being some soycuck white millennial male.
It's been irritating the fuck out of me because it's so fucking blatant. Commercials for brands that are mostly popular among whites have these commercials too - it's not shit like Starbucks where you expect dumb progressive shit like that but extremely corporate brands that have nothing to do with socjus shit.
And you know what? I'm Korean. I shouldn't care, but it's fucking jarring going from commercials being mostly whites (which is what the US population is) to an over disproportionate number of them being mixed race/ethnic minorities.
It's even more jarring seeing 100% Asian families as well - they NEVER mix Asians, they're always full Asian families yet blacks and whites are mixed race - I bet these companies aren't even aware of how fucking hypocritical it is.
A lot of the corporate stuff is heavy into every possible combination of non-white, non-straight, non-masculine they can find; but this particular ad isn't really out of the ordinary. This is something you could have seen 30 years ago too.
This particular ad isn't showing the man in an effeminate form, and isn't showing him in a submissive form, and is even keeping the woman in the background, not directly in front of the viewer. This makes sense for ads involving sexuality, so I don't really see why you would think this is particularly egregious.
I actually did see an asian male black female couple once, I remember because I though "oh how rare". I think they were a real couple too, I don't remember what the ad was about. But I do see white dad asian daughter pretty often for some reason. No other family members, just the dad and daughter.
Only time i saw it was that jackie chan movie rumble in the bronx where jackie's uncle marries a sassy, fat black lady lol.
This is the start of a JAV I know it.
At least it’s a white guy this time.
Awkwardly enough, doesn't that usually point to the black woman actually being decent? Considering no self-respecting man of ANY ethnicity (not even black) would put themselves anywhere near a relationship with a woman that fits the stereotype?
To get a little more specific, I recall a mixed relationship chart basically saying white man/black woman was NEAR NONEXISTENT. And basically no ethnicity other than black man had interest, though they also had quite the white woman lean at the same time. So basically, no one wants to date black women, and if a white man does, they are either the most pathetic men around, or they hit a fucking jackpot of an amazing human being.
Near non-existent, but if a WM/BF pair forms, it usually lasts. It is one of the lowest divorce rates of any interracial pair.
Doesn't this kinda go against the white ethnonationalist argument that mixed race couples and the dilution of social identity causes social unrest then?
If WM/BF creates the lowest divorce rates, even lower than WM/WF and healthy stable marriages then isn't that something you want to promote?
Only problem is more likely than not those babies are going to be born with an identity crisis and more suceptible to far left wing stupidity... so I guess maybe not that route then.
Not really. The offspring often struggle with identity issues later in life.
The stability of the marriage comes from the woman knowing that a good white man is the best mate she can get and has absolutely no desire to ever trade down, so she sticks by him.
Thats just the issue, because social pressure will hit them from both sides and neither is pleasant. There are two ways of dealing with this: pick a side, or retreat into the family unit. Unfortunately, the latter is less possible thanks to a variety of socioeconomic factors, such as two earner households, distance between immediate amd extended family, and societal pressure to conform to the new orthodoxy.
WMBF is such a ridiculously low number of pairs you can't draw a lot of information from it because low sample size makes it hard to judge more factors around it.
We know BMWF is very volatile because many of them start based on drug deals or "getting back at daddy" reasons, rather than anything inherent to the pair itself.
Well, it's an ad, so what it actually points to is an advertisement agency deliberately going out of their way to cast interracial couples for reasons that have nothing to do with the personalities of the actual people involved.
But as to your point, probably a different chart, but yeah, I saw some statistics from a dating site that tracked every race's interest in dating every other race, and every race had a significant in-group preference, and a significant preference against black women. Except blacks, where they cancelled out. Basically, the races don't agree on who's most desirable, but they do agree that black women are the least desirable.
I remember that chart from awhile back, you are remembering incorrectly.
Asian women are THE most sought-after by ALL races, including black men, white men, and other Asian men.
I mean, considering the amount of JAV and Asian porn available out there, I'm not surprised lol
And her higher T explains his ED.
Every commerical I see online or streaming 95% if the people in them are black and couples are always a black dude and a white lady or the other way around it's so stupid considering how much of the population is black
12% of the population, but present in 50% of the advertisements.
Do this commercial actually help sales? I assume leftists eat it up as woke but for the rest it just seem like pandering.
I honestly believe this extends far past any sort of economic benefit.
If you truly believe that the global elite are aiming for the “Great Reset” by 2030 — and they aren’t shy about admitting as such — Then they are fitting to redistribute 99% of all wealth exclusively to themselves within that timeframe.
To that end, what is the purpose of maintaining the façade that is crony capitalism?
This is pure propaganda to demoralize the detractors and continue to brainwash the sheep.
The WEF got a bunch of corporations(Disney, AT&T, etc) to sign onto diversity marketing in 2012ish. It's pure communism.
You hit the nail on the head.
Globalists care about pushing their propaganda rather than prioritizing sales or money.
Exactly. The goal has long since ceased to be making money.
The goal is to program the masses.
I think OP is going a bit overboard on this. This probably does help sales, because the models in the picture are being sexually assertive with each other, which should help.
I seriously doubt most people will care about the race of the models involved.
Dont' forget, this started with "mere" pleas for tolerance in the 1970s (The Jeffersons.) Any cartoons of Obumbum depicted as a zebra out there anywhere?
What are you, a boomer ethno-nat?
Don't remember The Jeffersons? Specifically, George having that nightmare about going down an escalator, with a herd of zebras at the bottom? He kept callling the neighbour kid that, and honestly, the Norman Lear shows are about the only place I've ever heard most of those slurs.
And I'm an old Gen X, not a boomer.
I didn't watch The Jeffersons, only "All In The Family".
That's a boomer Facebook 2011 Obama meme right there.
Burgers?
Also... all ED and penis growth ads show white dicks lol.
I mean, there is, but this isn't anything in particular.
The black woman is still affectionate to the white man and in a supportive posture and pose; so this isn't really that bad as things go. Seems more like an advertising agency just making sure they appeal to non-whites.
Nah. Most people don't support interracial relationships, beyond lip service, as evidenced by their engagement in them. This shit is so kids see it, and have a false perception of people from races that will probably steal their bike.
That's two completely different things. Not to mention, I've seen very little resistance to inter-racial coupling. There are some preferences, but most of them relate to behavior more than anything else.
If you're arguing that the general public opposes inter-racial relationships, you're completely wrong. Most people don't care. And most people date within groupings that aren't primarily decided by race. Like hobbies, jobs, interests, and geographic location.
I've literally never met a single man that said he wanted to marry 'within his own race', of any race. It's just not a thing that most men do.
However, if you are a white man, and you are looking to date a black woman by going to an anime convention, you're wrong.
It's a very cheap virtue signal that avoids some potentially nasty repercussions.
I've met plenty. That probably more a reflection of who we are as individuals, than any useful anecdotal evidence. Statistical evidence would disagree with your personal experience, anyway.
I meant their resistance to them engaging in inter-racial coupling.
I think it shows the opposite. Again: outcomes of relationships is not the same as relationship preference. It's not a surprise to me that whites get into relationships with other whites, and the vast and sweeping majority of the time, it has nothing to do with both of them choosing to date white people for a racial reason.
It's likely something that goes entirely without saying. Just because Giz hasn't heard someone express that wish doesn't mean that it doesn't exist, and just because it isn't verbalized or even realized doesn't mean that those men aren't solely interested in women who are memetically compatible - which in almost every case means a degree of genetic proximity.
It could also mean that those men simply aren't sorting potential female mates by race, and are considering a litany of other discriminating factors that are more important to them. Those other factors then generate the results that we see.
Like I said, if you're trying to date a black woman at an anime convention, you're going to have very limited success. If you want to date any woman who is interested in anime, she's likely going to be white.
strange seeing the roles revered, normally its black male, white female, typically because women are hardwired to find foreign men attractive (some mechanism that encourages gene-diversity... im not an expert though)
It's close. Both genders are designed to find different immune signatures attractive. But not dissimilar ones. Dissimilar is okay, but it doesn't allow you to cover each other's immune weaknesses to your previous environments. Different signatures allow you to cover each other's weaknesses and promote each other's strengths.
That's because the ad is for "dick don't work", and they've been pushing Big Nick Digger propaganda for fifty years for the same purpose.