1
tobeornotto 1 point ago +1 / -0

Minority men not so much, there seems to be many good actors, and the writing is rarely imersion breaking, but I now avoid anything that has black women in it, it's a clear sign it's going to be trash.

The acting is rubbish for one. Maybe just because there's a lack of good black actressess, to go with the massive demand, but maybe their woke points makes others afraid to give them direction.

I've had enough of independent women(TM) who are engineering geniuses but also the cool people find them so charming even though they're arrogant, condecending, narcissists and everyone acts as if they're beautiful, even though clearly they're at best a 4. The dissonance is just too much.

1
tobeornotto 1 point ago +1 / -0

Odds are they're not mentally capable of planning for the future, or able to delay gratification, so good chance they're 2 to 3 weeks away from financial ruin.

I just hope the lolcows continue to broadcast their misery.

by folx
2
tobeornotto 2 points ago +2 / -0

Don't forget crimestop. It's what makes them NPCs.

by folx
8
tobeornotto 8 points ago +8 / -0

That's arguably the more charitable view.

5
tobeornotto 5 points ago +5 / -0

Will never happen. They only attack popular things.

1
tobeornotto 1 point ago +1 / -0

Before joining team Musk wait until the deal goes through (still an 'if') and if it does wait to see if he actually does whay he's saying he'll do.

by folx
7
tobeornotto 7 points ago +7 / -0

How does the child know this person?

How does it know they're into trans propaganda?

Why does the child have such a strong affinity towards this stranger, to the point of making them things?

Groomer alert.

2
tobeornotto 2 points ago +2 / -0

I hope, but he has said this is his final offer.

I think if the offer was for $69.42 they would have to take it.

4
tobeornotto 4 points ago +4 / -0

It was $70+ just months ago.

It's not about money though. Shareholders are Vanguard, the Saudi's, et al - they will never sell their #1 propaganda tool for any price and all they need is a justification.

It was $70+ just months ago is a justification - doesn't matter if it's realistic.

4
tobeornotto 4 points ago +4 / -0

he has shifted to being overtly pro-white

lol. No.

1
tobeornotto 1 point ago +1 / -0

You're looking at this from the top down, expecting some sort of plot or plan or purpose, expecting someone or some group to be responsible or benefitting.

That's just not how any of this works.

Group selection is real, and culture is the OS of a group. However, this means that theorietically you could take over a group by overwriting their OS with your own, or something else, like let's say a religion. Look at the Middle East - once just as diverse in cultures as Europe, but now one sad monotenous grey islamist unit, for a good example.

Ideologies are viruses, made to exploit some vulnerability in the OS to compel action and ultimatly replace the OS altogether.

They evolve by conquering other competing viruses. Their only goal is virality. They simply want to spread.

The internet has turned the battleground global, and currently one particularly viral strain is spreading and infesting hosts at a record pace.

It's effective because it tapps into the empathy circutry, which itself functions by overriding behaviour.

Wokism is an exploit. It's a hack.

Look at this: https://www.mpg.de/research/supramarginal-gyrus-empathy

The right supramarginal gyrus corrects behaviour. If you hijack it, you can make it work in your favor. By framing issues in empathic terms, the host is led to predictable conclusions. Wokism is this effect, weaponized.

The effect seeks to feed itself, so you get an ever escalating storm of virtue signaling and applied empathy. You will have to find increasingly more groups to cuddle, and increasingly new ways to cuddle them.

This is what we're seeing. The individuals involved in the creation of culture are brainslugged. So they are producing propaganda. Because that's the empathetic thing to do. Becasue to hell with all else, we must immediatly act with empathy, this supercedes all other concerns. The propaganda seeks to convert those who can be converted - to proselytize.

Of course, not everyone is suceptible, because everyones brain is not the same, so as the ideology spreads to the limits of its potential, it'll start to create friction with the out groups, leading to ever increasing tensions, leading to division, leading to othering/demonization, which ultimatly leads to conflict, war, and attrocities.

This is the history of the world. Except until now the battlegrounds for the different viruses, using different exploits to hijack hosts, have been local.

1
tobeornotto 1 point ago +1 / -0

Nevermind the decades it has already run, but you could simulate the Oscars a billion time more with whites and not once would you get an actor resorting to violence over a joke.

We've had a black run and focused Oscar show once now and it's already happened.

But sure, race has nothing to do with it.

2
tobeornotto 2 points ago +2 / -0

If I haven't played Gothic 1, should I skip right to Risen?

4
tobeornotto 4 points ago +4 / -0

Blacks in Europe.

Simultaniously 30% of the population and also so rare that they were kept in zoos as spectacles barey more than a century ago.

7
tobeornotto 7 points ago +9 / -2

The ending is feminism taken to its logical conclusions of genocide, egomania, and the rule of the weak.

4
tobeornotto 4 points ago +4 / -0

Because relocating across oceans is hard and only the high IQ manage the journey.

It's the same reason the only Mexicans you find in Europe are brain surgeons and rocket scientists.

However I do agree that all you need to succeed in the States is a not-too-far-below average IQ and a culture that's not completely retarded, which unfortunatly excludes certain demographics.

by Cascade
5
tobeornotto 5 points ago +5 / -0

That's a twitter post, not a DM.

Twitter is public.

So why the fuck is it cencored?

0
tobeornotto 0 points ago +1 / -1

No that's not the norm, except in times of war, famine, or high anxiety.

Empathy doens't mean 'bleeding heart feeling sorry for'. It just means the ability to imagine the other's emotional state. Could be someone who is in a tough spot, or could be someone who is happy, if you don't have empathy you can't relate to them at all.

Like how leftists can't relate to you at all. They will hate you regardless because you're a wrongthinker. They tell on their own parents for wrongthink. They have no loyalty or ability to relate to the out-group. Meanwhile if you're a lefty and find yourself in a conservative town people will treat you with respect, becasue they're not monsters.

Notice also that I wrote that empathy is stronger the closer you get to the center. Of course we feel intensely about our family, but a regular person would have to get pretty far out from the center to no longer be able to relate. Somehting like people living in a tribe in the amazon, you might start having trouble understanding what they're feeling, but even there you'll probably manage to relate enough to have some sort of distant connection if you try hard enough.

If you truly don't have empathy for the out-group, then you can't even travel as a turist to Italy, or have a conversation with anyone except people from your tribe, and if that's the case then you're worth much less to the in-group than someone who isn't a complete autist. Of course we eveolved to be able to empatize with all humans.

Empathy however isn't the same as sacrifice, or cuddling, or caretaking.

If you drift ashore somewhere, the people will feed you and dry you and send you on your way.

Unless you're a conservative and they're leftist radicals, then they will kick you back into the ocean because something is broken in their brains. That's evil.

Not having empathy is a mental disorder. If you meet an arab face to face and you don't feel empathy, something is broken in you. That doesn't mean however that you have to invite him into your house. You can feel empathy and at the same time say well, it was nice to meet you, see you later.

view more: ‹ Prev Next ›