10
subbookkeeper 10 points ago +10 / -0

To their credit they did admit that they didn't expect Trump to win and didn't really know what to write about it. Most TDS'ers don't admit it.

1
subbookkeeper 1 point ago +1 / -0

Ironically one of the few ways a kinetic orbital weapon would actually work. It's so slow to reach Earth the only thing you could hit would be geography.

2
subbookkeeper 2 points ago +2 / -0

They just copy pasted this from the gulf war where the Iraqi army did this when invading Kuwait.

15
subbookkeeper 15 points ago +17 / -2

I saw a video of her that was apparently pre festival and claiming that she wasn't stripped naked, that's just what she was wearing to the festival in the back of the truck.

1
subbookkeeper 1 point ago +1 / -0

Do you have a link handy to the video with her in the back of the truck? I don't think her legs were around backwards.

Secondly is there any evidence that they actually raped anyone? I'm not saying they wouldn't, but have they? I've seen the videos of a bunch of what looks like some Israeli Girls cowering but logistically, if you're on the run behind enemy lines, stopping to rape someone seems an odd choice.

Again no doubt that'll happen to anyone they take back to Gaza, but where's the evidence of this? It's logistically hard to take groups of people back over what could be a couple of kilometres, they sure as hell weren't using paragliders to get back into Gaza.

1
subbookkeeper 1 point ago +1 / -0

Aren't they just getting straight up donated to Israel?

-4
subbookkeeper -4 points ago +1 / -5

Is there any serious evidence to what's actually going on in the war and that they are conscripting people off the street in Ukraine? It's obvious that Ukraine aren't doing anything to dislodge Russia but where are people getting that it's that bad in ukraine?

6
subbookkeeper 6 points ago +6 / -0

I'm not sure what Russian strategy was re the column to Kiev but it was pretty obvious that they wanted Crimea and Donbass, and have been occupying it since day 1 plus some additional territory but it's hard to tell exactly where.

It'll grind down into a stalemate and a hastily signed peace agreement along basically the same territory that exists now with some bullshit posturing.

6
subbookkeeper 6 points ago +6 / -0

It's also no feasible because they lack "ground game"

that is the density of likely voters/registered voters as well as the people that will understand what "vote collection means"

To ballot harvest like the democrats you need population density so you can see many people at once, and infrastructure to get people registered and enrolled for absentee ballots who don't want to vote. That takes time, energy and people.

You also need people to go door to door collecting these ballots A) from areas you know are favourable and will vote overwhelmingly blue. or B) dodgy enough that you can pay them "$5 per Democrat vote"give them a list of names of absentee ballots and addresses and let nature take it's course.

That wont work in rural Tennessee because the population density is so low, if you spend a day driving from address to address you might get 20 ballots because most people will be at work and the distances work against you.

There's just nothing corresponding to the "voter registration drive" booth outside a inner city liquor store that will benefit the Gop as much. Maybe a gun show? but you're going to get a lower % of people willing to give their address and register and you've still go the problem of having to physically pick them up.

7
subbookkeeper 7 points ago +7 / -0

Literally risking death to play shitty globo homo pop music in a cab.

Amazing.

17
subbookkeeper 17 points ago +17 / -0

This is like a bomber blowing himself up and only himself when planting a bomb.

Rarely do these people face the consequences other people normally have to pay for.

3
subbookkeeper 3 points ago +3 / -0

They brought in my boy Thrawn to the character sacrifice pile. Very sad to see him be assassinated.

1
subbookkeeper 1 point ago +1 / -0

Yes, raising them via peaceful parenting. They are very frustrating and constantly making me angry. Obviously an infant has to be physically picked up and carried as they have no ability to do otherwise, but even a 2 year old is capable of understanding basic explanations. Sure they might cry and mis behave but that's not them defying you, that's them emotionally upset and needing comfort. But if they grow up with their first memories of being talked too and reasoned with not told "because I said so" which is fundamentally relying on the fact that they don't have a choice. It tends to build up and get easier as they know that what you say makes sense and that if they disagree, the way to do that is with words not actions/misbehaviour.

0
subbookkeeper 0 points ago +1 / -1

It's peaceful Parenting. Obviously grabbing them to prevent them walking into traffic is acceptable.

But overall don't use force against your Children. It's just the Libertarian NAP in a non retarded way.

Shouting at your Kids in anger is using the threat of force as you are intimidating them with Anger. Raising your voice is not always anger obviously.

5
subbookkeeper 5 points ago +5 / -0

Having experienced both I can say absolutely yes. Ironically enough a Woman demanded I have sex with her or she would say I raped her.

If you're raped you have support and people will defend and help you.

You get none of that in the reverse.

2
subbookkeeper 2 points ago +2 / -0

Good.

It'd be great to hear there was an increase in attacks against activists but sadly this is probably just randomly hitting a good target.

Reminds me of Kyle Rittenhouse, shoots 3 random people in an antifa crowd, 2 pedos.

2
subbookkeeper 2 points ago +2 / -0

Broken clock is kind of right twice a day.

You shouldn't be yelling at your kids, it's not physical abuse or sexual abuse but it's using your disparity in size and strength to force compliance.

The only people that should be yelled at are CNN employees.

2
subbookkeeper 2 points ago +2 / -0

Hilarious. But a tactical victory but a strategic mistake.

Progressive ideology is marxist in nature, that means it follows the dialectic. It relies on contradictions to move forward. The synthesis or the "next thing" can only come from a contradiction.

This will allow some academics to determine who is "really" non binary. Similar to how "you aint black" classified "the right political opinions" as being crucial to being black.

Exploiting their rules is still playing by their rules. The only way that this could be a strategic victory is if it leads to something.

view more: ‹ Prev Next ›