2
subbookkeeper 2 points ago +2 / -0

Keep in mind this is a tactical win but a strategic loss as it just means that companies have to pay more and more for this shit, draining society further which is the marxists goal.

The best outcome would be no civil suits like this at all.

1
subbookkeeper 1 point ago +1 / -0

A) It doesn't matter that they aren't actually woke, they are still acting woke. It doesn't matter that the dude hitting you with an axe does or doesn't actually hate you.

B) The legal landscape prevents them acting in any other fashion due to lawsuits.

If companies were actually not woke, they would spawn separate companies to operate in progressive states to shield themselves from legal liability.

3
subbookkeeper 3 points ago +3 / -0

Ironically enough the subsequent stages of cultural revolutions involve liquidating the vanguard. Having smart homes is going to make it real easy.

1
subbookkeeper 1 point ago +1 / -0

Regression is definitely the better choice in a lot of areas. Progress is not inherently good.

2
subbookkeeper 2 points ago +2 / -0

That's a leftist frame. confusing the definition of words. Having an opinion on gender regardless is a lose lose.

2
subbookkeeper 2 points ago +3 / -1

Not just schizos, many skilled and serious people start collecting fucking heads.

No. They wont. The idea that there is some army of disgruntled capable and diligent individuals that have the capability and drive and opportunity to do "something" is getting on par with Q posting.

If they existed they would have done something by now. Trump getting indicted is far below any threshold for action that they may have, because they probably don't like Trump after operation warp speed and leaving the january 6 people rotting in jail.

1
subbookkeeper 1 point ago +1 / -0

I don't know why he doesn't post this on Truth himself. He can just say the documents weren't classified because I declassified them.

1
subbookkeeper 1 point ago +1 / -0

I mean if Tucker says it there's probably something behind it.

But a hashtag working as it's meant to do is not the same as a programmer reviewing each hashtag created manually, and programming instagram to find that stuff.

8
subbookkeeper 8 points ago +8 / -0

Linus has no connection to anything beyond the material and the now. He is the end result of liberalism, an atomised formless blob of a human.

6
subbookkeeper 6 points ago +6 / -0

This is concerning but I wish people who write shit like this would stop lying. hashtags are not the algorithm "helping pedos" it's just a keyword search that is linked to others and showing clusters. (I'm pretty sure) The algorithm does not have a "pro pedo" weighting attached to it.

I'm all for instagram copping shit for it's existence, but I just want to point out that this article is a creative reinterpretation of the truth.

2
subbookkeeper 2 points ago +2 / -0

Don't bother.

Point out that no-one can take this at face value by now, and that the organisers are either marxist ideologues that support grooming children or simply stupid enough to somehow think that this a good idea, and ask which one they are?

6
subbookkeeper 6 points ago +6 / -0

Just to be clear, we are in a maoist cultural revolution. The red guard is just the rainbow guard.

5
subbookkeeper 5 points ago +5 / -0

Lotus Eaters are on this shit.

Not that the legislators care but the public service is ignoring their heads of departments.

2
subbookkeeper 2 points ago +2 / -0

I mean it's not like they have a choice, the only possible customers they could sell too now are marxists.

3
subbookkeeper 3 points ago +3 / -0

Was this game broadcast at all? can we watch the replay?

15
subbookkeeper 15 points ago +15 / -0

Can this please be sidebar material.

3
subbookkeeper 3 points ago +3 / -0

No it's not a win, but it's not a binary win/loss event. Events can be +100 or -100. This is double figure positive.

3
subbookkeeper 3 points ago +3 / -0

Technically he might be able to, there's only a handful of counties that can be harvested for blue votes, and they traditionally come in late.

In a perfect world you could "harvest" 100% of votes from all the rural countries in illinios and then when millions of "late harvest" votes come from Chicago you can't count them because they'll push the voter "turnout" to above 100%.

This wont happen because the cheating is well advanced, or "ground game" networks are far more established and efficient. Also the locations favour city harvesting over rural harvesting. It's just more efficient to spend an hour harvesting 100 ballots from an apartment block then an hour driving between 12 rural farm properties for a 12 ballot harvest.

33
subbookkeeper 33 points ago +33 / -0

it's a step in the right direction, we are allowed to be a little happy about events in the world.

1
subbookkeeper 1 point ago +1 / -0

It's better then nothing but it is a cultural revolution. "Marxism with American characteristics" is the best descriptor I've heard.

Blind reactions are good, but they risk advancing the dialectic in the way the marxists want as they still all hold the levers of power.

Remember the vanguard is disposable anyway so having the state dispose of them isn't the automatic win that people think. It could just be the next phase. Mao was famous for wavering "left" and "right" to keep people off balance.

This MLB shit is good though and fun to watch.

view more: ‹ Prev Next ›