Precisely. They are complaining that people identified as non-binary, and then used he/him pronouns.
Congratulations, those aren't mutually exclusive. Non-binary he/him/his pronouns are entirely acceptable because "non-binary" does not exclude either men or women, it is an acceptance from Gender Ideology that "gender" is a spectrum.
And this is not me using their logic against them. They're switching to reality, only because their ideology didn't align with their tactical objectives. Suddenly "males" are no biologically determined, and not socially constructed. Suddenly "biological male" isn't a transphobic term and can be identified visually. Suddenly "males" and "men" are interchangeable. Suddenly the gender binary exists. And all only because women's privilege was threatened.
And let's be clear, it is "women's" privilege (both real women and fake transwomen). One of the complainants was saying that this was one of the "few" spaces in STEM where women could find opportunity. Bullshit. Back in my University days, there was nothing short of six different organizations advocating for women in STEM besides the colleges themselves, and the university itself. There were well over twenty different programs, grants, and funding opportunities. Every major employer had hiring preferences for women, and dedicated women internship programs; on top of the programs that were set up by the previous organizations.
Most of STEM is already fully supportive of non-men and non-whites and non-straights. It is only within the past 5 years that they've gone out of their way to now actively discriminate against those groups in a desperate attempt to pump up the numbers of other groups.
There is no advantage for men, it is an explicit detriment, and it is necessary for many men to lie in order to equalize their own opportunities.
That being said, you shouldn't. Notice the branding at the end: "Goldman Sachs"
Don't support your enemies. If they don't want you around, give your skills to people who do.
But that's the point, what makes a "non-binary" "non-binary"? It's meaningless and absurd, and she(?) goes on blaming males for that shit, but who the fuck invented intersectionality? Men? NO, Feminists.
Technically it was communist academics that created all the above, feminism just had the most impact, like the stickiest piece of shit thrown, it clung well. However it’s hilarious to watch them try and objectively look at something they made entirely subjective on purpose.
I know my answer is; likely intentionally fat, ugly, androgynous, probably with dyed hair, and generally dysgenic. Again, much of it on purpose. Because going out of your way to be disgusting is easier than going out of your way to be attractive, I suppose.
Like much of our current problems, the whole thing is a fucking vengeful psyop against beauty. Also discipline and accountability.
Why are all these hateful female bigots not affirming these brave theys? Women seem unique in their ability to bitch endlessly about problems they created and then demand men do something about it.
Hopefully men stop tolerating this shit and start blaming women. Women know what they are doing. There's no illusion that only you can see. Women see it but specifically gaslight you into believing they don't see it because women are benefiting from it. Women are not your friend in all of this.
Nah, my name is accurate. Races are what determine the difference between men and women behavior. Do female Lions act the same as female black bears or female wolves? A lot of the problems in modernity stem from the race in charge of society and how that specific race runs thing.
Bonobos are matriarchal leaning whereas chimpanzees are patriarchal. It stands to reason certain races of humans are gynocratic leaning and others more patriarchal leaning. When you oppress the natural inclinations of one race of humans to bolster the inclinations of another you get what we have today. A society that works for a racial group composed of 1-2% of society to the detriment of those who previously called much of NA and Europe home leads to what we have today.
If Bonobos took over Chimpanzee society and forced Chimpanzees to be matriarchal compared to their patriarchy, the Chimpanzees wouldn't be too happy would they? Even if the Bonobos felt they were doing what was right.
As with any job it should always be based on merit, maybe there's something to look at these instead of what you identify as?
Theres more men in tech because it's better suited to men, same as many other fields women rarely share the same personality traits to do it well.
And of course there's nothing bad about that, like I'd be shit at trying to understand peoples emotions but I'm not going to actively make a conference targeted at men in healthcare. This conference shouldn't be a thing as it's discriminatory towards men, they argue that it's a women in tech conference; why not open it to everyone then? So everyone can appreciate these women in tech and to get past the stereotype that there are none. It's such a melt brain idea
But finally, employers only care about gender when they're trying to boast. Companies that want to make money don't care and will hire the best person for the job; if it happens to be a man that's the reason- it's not because he's a man.
Hilarious. But a tactical victory but a strategic mistake.
Progressive ideology is marxist in nature, that means it follows the dialectic. It relies on contradictions to move forward. The synthesis or the "next thing" can only come from a contradiction.
This will allow some academics to determine who is "really" non binary. Similar to how "you aint black" classified "the right political opinions" as being crucial to being black.
Exploiting their rules is still playing by their rules. The only way that this could be a strategic victory is if it leads to something.
Does she really want to go there? Sounds awful bigoted, doesn't it?
Huh. But mah male privilege?
It's almost like there's no consistency here at all.
The consistency is in their hatred.
And thirst for control.
Precisely. They are complaining that people identified as non-binary, and then used he/him pronouns.
Congratulations, those aren't mutually exclusive. Non-binary he/him/his pronouns are entirely acceptable because "non-binary" does not exclude either men or women, it is an acceptance from Gender Ideology that "gender" is a spectrum.
And this is not me using their logic against them. They're switching to reality, only because their ideology didn't align with their tactical objectives. Suddenly "males" are no biologically determined, and not socially constructed. Suddenly "biological male" isn't a transphobic term and can be identified visually. Suddenly "males" and "men" are interchangeable. Suddenly the gender binary exists. And all only because women's privilege was threatened.
And let's be clear, it is "women's" privilege (both real women and fake transwomen). One of the complainants was saying that this was one of the "few" spaces in STEM where women could find opportunity. Bullshit. Back in my University days, there was nothing short of six different organizations advocating for women in STEM besides the colleges themselves, and the university itself. There were well over twenty different programs, grants, and funding opportunities. Every major employer had hiring preferences for women, and dedicated women internship programs; on top of the programs that were set up by the previous organizations.
Most of STEM is already fully supportive of non-men and non-whites and non-straights. It is only within the past 5 years that they've gone out of their way to now actively discriminate against those groups in a desperate attempt to pump up the numbers of other groups.
There is no advantage for men, it is an explicit detriment, and it is necessary for many men to lie in order to equalize their own opportunities.
That being said, you shouldn't. Notice the branding at the end: "Goldman Sachs"
Don't support your enemies. If they don't want you around, give your skills to people who do.
Technically it was communist academics that created all the above, feminism just had the most impact, like the stickiest piece of shit thrown, it clung well. However it’s hilarious to watch them try and objectively look at something they made entirely subjective on purpose.
It reminds me of the Jew/anti-Semite dynamic, cries of anti-Semitism coming from under the couch cushions.
Being an attention whore.
Pretty sure that question is hate speech.
I know my answer is; likely intentionally fat, ugly, androgynous, probably with dyed hair, and generally dysgenic. Again, much of it on purpose. Because going out of your way to be disgusting is easier than going out of your way to be attractive, I suppose.
Like much of our current problems, the whole thing is a fucking vengeful psyop against beauty. Also discipline and accountability.
What she means is they didn't act like little leftist simp bitch faggots.
Love the fact that you now have to sufficiently "pass" to be non-binary.
Why are all these hateful female bigots not affirming these brave theys? Women seem unique in their ability to bitch endlessly about problems they created and then demand men do something about it.
Who isn't lying about "being non-binary"?
Don't complain when people exploit your own rules.
Particularly when people have been warning for years that "those rules can be easily exploited" while you ridiculed them and accused them of bigotry.
Hopefully men stop tolerating this shit and start blaming women. Women know what they are doing. There's no illusion that only you can see. Women see it but specifically gaslight you into believing they don't see it because women are benefiting from it. Women are not your friend in all of this.
I hope you're prepared to tell that to a lot of people here. LOL
You really need to retire this account and startup "GenderCreatesCulture" or "SexCreatesCulture" or maybe even "WomenCreateCulture."
Nah, my name is accurate. Races are what determine the difference between men and women behavior. Do female Lions act the same as female black bears or female wolves? A lot of the problems in modernity stem from the race in charge of society and how that specific race runs thing.
Bonobos are matriarchal leaning whereas chimpanzees are patriarchal. It stands to reason certain races of humans are gynocratic leaning and others more patriarchal leaning. When you oppress the natural inclinations of one race of humans to bolster the inclinations of another you get what we have today. A society that works for a racial group composed of 1-2% of society to the detriment of those who previously called much of NA and Europe home leads to what we have today.
If Bonobos took over Chimpanzee society and forced Chimpanzees to be matriarchal compared to their patriarchy, the Chimpanzees wouldn't be too happy would they? Even if the Bonobos felt they were doing what was right.
As with any job it should always be based on merit, maybe there's something to look at these instead of what you identify as?
Theres more men in tech because it's better suited to men, same as many other fields women rarely share the same personality traits to do it well.
And of course there's nothing bad about that, like I'd be shit at trying to understand peoples emotions but I'm not going to actively make a conference targeted at men in healthcare. This conference shouldn't be a thing as it's discriminatory towards men, they argue that it's a women in tech conference; why not open it to everyone then? So everyone can appreciate these women in tech and to get past the stereotype that there are none. It's such a melt brain idea
But finally, employers only care about gender when they're trying to boast. Companies that want to make money don't care and will hire the best person for the job; if it happens to be a man that's the reason- it's not because he's a man.
Rant over
This is a good use of tranny ideology, not unironically rooting for tranny pedos like some people want to do.
Twitter link: https://twitter.com/rottengirl/status/1709195019792318622
Nitter link: https://nitter.net/rottengirl/status/1709195019792318622
Twitter link Archive Today: https://archive.ph/0Wxl4
Twitter link Wayback Machine Archive: https://web.archive.org/web/20231003211245/https://twitter.com/rottengirl/status/1709195019792318622
Nitter link Wayback Machine Archive: https://web.archive.org/web/20231003211631/https://nitter.net/rottengirl/status/1709195019792318622
I appreciate the thoroughness good sir.
My pronouns are don/gle
Fuck women's spaces. They killed male spaces everywhere. Time for some karma.
Don't hate the player. Hate the game.
So many bigoted NERFs (non-binary exclusionary radical feminists) on tech. This is [current year], we should do better as a society fr fr 😤✊
"Women are lazy programmers"
Fuck TERFs. They deserve this and much more.
Scratch a Feminist and a transphobe bleeds. I'm so proud of these folx, braving such hateful, far-left temper tantrums.
Hilarious. But a tactical victory but a strategic mistake.
Progressive ideology is marxist in nature, that means it follows the dialectic. It relies on contradictions to move forward. The synthesis or the "next thing" can only come from a contradiction.
This will allow some academics to determine who is "really" non binary. Similar to how "you aint black" classified "the right political opinions" as being crucial to being black.
Exploiting their rules is still playing by their rules. The only way that this could be a strategic victory is if it leads to something.
Hmm, so suddenly identifying as a woman no longer makes you a woman? How about those double standards on the left, huh?