I tolerate the opinions of Ulysees 31.

Perhaps they plan to rehabilitate the idea of nuking places.

Redditors are "content-married".

http://notaverb.com/meltdown

People who see this as cynical are on the wrong side of history. Believe women!

What is a nonman?

I've had a good laugh at the recent Dick Masterson stuff, but still, good on him for making something, looks pretty decent.

They have to pay someone to chastise the taxpayers on twitter.

It doesn't suck though. Imagine going to the loo and people wanting to be your friend and have a hug. WTF?

Turns out the ACAB people might have a point.

Clear skin in the context of skincare means not having spots, so this isn't necessarily contradictory.

Next time they could go with actually clear skin. Have a mermaid that looks like an Attack on Titan monster / muscle diagram.

edit: oh I read the second half of the title.

Ad is cringe, but it's great to see more of this kind of thing. Also refreshing they don't use the marketing BS term "MR".

Better use case might be HUD while driving, though if it's capable of blacking out the outside world, might be a risk (Apple software is not bug free!).

I doubt the ladies team went into this with misapprehensions. Their goalie did well.

It is flattering though. I too could beat ladies at football if I was a professional footballer!

At least they're doing something a bit different. Good for them.

Possible solution: get a job at a farm or sewage works.

Hindsight is a wonderful thing, but really these people would be better off keeping their meat and vegetables. If people want to make themselves look like sexy ladies and whack off in front of a mirror, who am i to judge? how are you going to do that without your thing though? People don't think this stuff through.

It references https://archive.ph/wQ5vk "Harmful political content policy", which includes:

"We do not allow discriminatory content towards a person’s ... gender identity and expression"

Sex is not listed. Interpretations of this that do not assume malice/insanity on the part of the authors:

A) By "gender identity", they must mean sex.

B) They just forgot. Doubt this though because feedback on drafts of the CoC pointed this out.

The world has genuine incompetence in spades, and one should never assume malice, but I would guess that this is deliberate shenanigans.

If by "gender identity", they don't mean sex, then officially, sexism is permitted on stack overflow. Presumably they'd just say it was discrimination on the basis of "gender identity" though. (whatever that actually means)

If Glamour is a "fashion magazine for women", does this qualify as "misgendering"?

tap on a fap fap fap

London increasingly reminds me of that book I read once with the bloke with the gammy leg.

Documented and commented upon dirty laundry that said persons posted in public.

Interested to see the usual suspects spinning the inevitable gender-affirming brain volume reduction surgery.

That's a stupid typo. These high profile figures should spend slightly longer composing their important tweets.

Brotherhood of the Wolf counts as a horror I think. It is certainly very good.

become a man. It's still a man's fault. It's your fault!

and you don't even need to invent a time machine.