One of White people's biggest strengths is their honesty but it can be and is used against White people in these situations. In a society of all White people, honesty is a great quality but when your society is full of people who are against White people, being honest is a flaw that can be exploited by your enemies.
It’s a double edged sword…..our trust and ethics are only a weakness when we are forced to live amongst unethical parasitic non-Whites. When we are in our natural environment, amongst our own kind, our values and good will toward our tribe/countrymen is a massive benefit, it’s why White society is so high functioning compared to everyone else aside from certain groups of Asians, Japanese people in particular who are also an honorable people.
Yup…..you are rewarded the more psychopathic and evil you are toward innocent people in brown countries. In White countries, we just rally as a community and kill those psychopaths, at least when it’s a traditional White community. That sort of behavior limits how many psychopaths we Whites have in our own community, whereas in brown communities being psychopathic and evil towards others is rewarded with warlord leadership and many vaginas, propagating even more psychopaths.
I don't want more white murderers roaming the streets though.
As for what I think you intend to imply there, if you think that the state is going to allow a favorable jury for white vigilantes, I have a bridge to sell you.
the state paid prosecutor is supposed to voir dire these people out of the selection. they failed to do so in this case.
either that or it's an area you should know not to relax in if they can't find one sane fucker in a jury pool to hang them up on such an obvious case.
anyways.. it's not like this guy is going to go off and start a business and enjoy his freedom truly.. he's going to go do more crimes and probably get shot for it soon.
If the entre jury pool is tainted, as it is with blacks, there is no amount voir dire that can be practiced short of excluding all blacks when the defendant is black, which is never going to happen.
According to the article, there were issues with the actions the police did during questioning. And the defense got the race element thrown out.
He took a plea deal on a federal charge of possession of a firearm used in a violent crime.
Reading the details of this case is bizarre. He claims he approached the guy's truck, with his weapon drawn to ask for a ride. He was refused. He then claimed he felt intimidated by the 77 year old man in the truck and felt the white guy was going to harm him because he is black. So he dumped 8 rounds into the guy.
I googled for awhile trying to find the demographic makeup of the jury. If anyone else can find that info that would be cool.
Really all I could find on this post was this article, an additional article by the local paper, The Post and Courier, and a bunch of social media pages linked to the P&C article.
I don't have the sources offhand but it's something like only about 1 in 4 black-on-White murders are even prosecuted in Chicago and black jurors vote not to convict nearly 90% of the time.
Considering even the best polls have a minimum 1% margin of error, by the statistics one of America's biggest cities has effectively legalized killing Whites.
They put him in prison even though the jury found him not guilty, though. They just did a bench trial where they found him guilty of possessing the gun he used to shoot Stevens.
The jury never talked to the media about why they reached the verdict they did. Maybe they believed there'd been a coerced confession. Maybe they believed the shooting met the standard for self-defense.
But it doesn't really matter, because our government expects juries to be rubber stamps, and when they don't do their rubber-stamping, the guy just gets thrown in prison anyway.
Some law enforcement and courts have their subhuman evil behavior excused by the type of people complaining about this assumed murder not going to jail.
It was a civil rights violation. He was found not guilty of the crime, and they locked him up anyway. So much for having a justice system.
You didn't see any part of my post where I excused murder, because I'd never do that. The jury found that he was in fact not a murderer.
I can only imagine how you'd feel if you were cleared of murder charges by a jury of your peers and the government threw you in a cage anyway. But, of course, you don't want a justice system. You just want a system of letting one category of people do whatever the fuck they want and locking the other categories of people in cages.
It was the barest fragment of justice. Because in a just nation he'd be dangling from a gallows, preferably one erected in a black neighborhood as an example to the rest of them.
And if that subhuman isn't a murderer then I guess his victim is alive and well, right?
But hey, thanks for proving my point for me. The only time you post here is to try and launder anti white bullshit.
If Kyle Rittenhouse had been thrown in prison after being found not guilty, I'd have objected to that, too. I hate abusive judges that won't respect process. We have the right to a jury trial for a reason; take that away, and all you're left with is the government deciding who it is and isn't expedient to force into slave labor.
The jury listened to days of argument and decided Devon Dunham wasn't guilty of murder. You don't know the first thing about the case; you've read four sentences about it and decided that "black" is synonymous with "should be hanged by the neck until dead."
No you wouldn't have. Nobody here believes that you're operating in good faith without an agenda. Why you're trying to lie about it, I can only speculate.
The jury
Let a fellow nigger walk free for caedes cruor gellidus. Everything except outright saying nullification, but the message was loud and clear.
It's actually one of the things I despise most about liberals. Spitting on the innocent and declaring it justice. Well, one day when justice finally comes for you people, the rest of us will see the sun shine just a little bit brighter.
An unjust law is no law at all. Allowing carjackers to claim self defense from their victims is an obvious breach of the common good. The facts of the case are not even in dispute. The man should be swiftly hanged, and the jury flogged for good measure. That's what our ancestor would do, that's what kind of law built this country.
Re the report on this post, we do not currently have a "don't be an idiot" rule here, so as long as Hematomato doesn't throw gas on flame wars like he did a couple threads ago, he's allowed to post his retarded redditor comments.
I banned him from ConPro for being an obvious pedojeet alt. He advocates for pedophilia.
He was also trolling ConPro the exact same time earlier this week that TheImp tried to troll ConPro with his newest alt DresdenFireBomber. So, they're most likely friends at the same shill farm, or the same person.
If you or others are able to do this please do also message the mods here so we can do something about their presence here at least. I'm not checking every other board on this site, and I'm not on much outside of certain times either, so the more information the better.
Here's what I found digging through his profile for a bit.
Here he tries to defend a clear case of pedophilia interrupted, because the abductor never got the chance, and clearly we're all wrong and bad for assuming pedophilia of the sweet innocent child abductor:
Here he enthuisiastically talks about a 16 year old groupie with Steven Tyler, and defends it. If you're familiar with the pedojeet, at all, you know he makes these kinds of comments all the time, where he skirts the line and tries to make legitimate arguments on the surface, while subversively pushing for going over the line, which becomes more obvious over time. The year range of 14, 15, and 16 is very commonly used by him and all his alts.
Here he makes a low effort post to trash White people, White nationalists, and our intelligence, and the only person to respond to it is his buddy (or alt) DresdenFirebomber.
There was another comment he made that pushed it over the edge, where he was defending sex with minors, but I can't find it now, and I don't really care to spend the time looking for it because he has the comment history of a bot farm.
Other similarities to TheImp, is that he defends jews all the time, trashes White people, defends egalitarianism, hates "Nazis", and advocates for killing us (White nationalists).
Tagging u/CarmenOfSandiego as well if y'all are curious. If you don't ban him immediately, I'd bet you $5 you'll find grounds to ban him within the next week or two, because he can't control his own subversive tendencies, and he hates everyone here.
I didn't like someone's argument, so I tried to get them banned. When there wasn't anything bannable in the thread, I dug through their profile looking for past transgressions. I found
Can only charge people with crimes they committed
Someone deciding to make a show of over legal acts, 54 years after the fact, is #MeToo bullshit. Not from this board.
The First Amendment continues to exist
Actual trolling. Also not from this board
This is sufficient evidence of wrong think. They should be purged.
I don't like all that guy's takes, but most here are contrarian at worst. If this is how you react to disagreement, you need to go back to Reddit. This shit is why we left in the first place.
If he does something bannable, report it and let the mods take care of it. But holy shit, your post is Reddit deja vu.
Being retarded isn't against the rules.
I've been modding ConPro for years. We were the first forum that the pedo tried to corrupt. We're extremely familiar with how he talks, how he acts, what arguments he uses, and how they've changed over time. We were so effective at banning him that he stopped trying it with ConPro for a while, and began doing it to other forums, like KiA2, gaming, MGTOW, and the like. Don't believe me? Ask around. Most people who've been here for years are very familiar with this guy. He's infamous, just like TheImp.
If this was purely about "free speech" and difference of opinion, I'm fine with it. What I'm not fine with is an obvious shill and pedophilia advocate subverting free speech forums to push their degeneracy, through the use of dozens of alts and ban evasion.
I suspect it's Modeler43. They both have that same smug condescending lecturing tone with a contrarian slant, like they believe they're the only one in the room who isn't an idiot and it's their obligation to correct everyone else.
As someone married to a Vietnamese, I take offence to your "non-white" descriptor. It's BLACK. Don't be afraid to call out what you need to call out. BLACK. The vast majority of crimes are committed by blacks, very disproportionately to every other race. But let's not make enemies with "non-whites" who really aren't the enemy.
There is no political solution
NONE!
Nothing will get better waiting for any cocksucker politician. There's only us. We're going to have to fix this ourselves.
Gov't is NOT going to fix the problems they've created, and this verdict is more proof of that.
Im sure we can think of the Reich solution to our problem.
War is just politics by other means.
If black jurors can acquit no matter what, so can white jurors.
One of White people's biggest strengths is their honesty but it can be and is used against White people in these situations. In a society of all White people, honesty is a great quality but when your society is full of people who are against White people, being honest is a flaw that can be exploited by your enemies.
The biggest WEAKNESS that White have is their commitment to "following the rules" and being honest ... with non-Whites.
Non-Whites look down on honest people as gullible fools who DESERVE to be exploited. Don't ever make yourself vulnerable to them.
It’s a double edged sword…..our trust and ethics are only a weakness when we are forced to live amongst unethical parasitic non-Whites. When we are in our natural environment, amongst our own kind, our values and good will toward our tribe/countrymen is a massive benefit, it’s why White society is so high functioning compared to everyone else aside from certain groups of Asians, Japanese people in particular who are also an honorable people.
Bad actors in a homogenous White society can be punished and / or removed from society.
Bad actors in a diverse shithole are set free to abuse others again because non-Whites have an in-group bias, especially if the victims are White.
Whites don't have much in-group bias ( left-leaning Whites have a negative racial in-group bias ).
So non-Whites give their kind a pass, and Whites give non-Whites a pass too. So your town becomes Chicongo.
Yup…..you are rewarded the more psychopathic and evil you are toward innocent people in brown countries. In White countries, we just rally as a community and kill those psychopaths, at least when it’s a traditional White community. That sort of behavior limits how many psychopaths we Whites have in our own community, whereas in brown communities being psychopathic and evil towards others is rewarded with warlord leadership and many vaginas, propagating even more psychopaths.
Good luck getting a White jury.
"Best we can do is a (((white))) jury."
Disclaimer: This won't help you either.
Only takes 1 to cause a mis-trial.
I don't want more white murderers roaming the streets though.
As for what I think you intend to imply there, if you think that the state is going to allow a favorable jury for white vigilantes, I have a bridge to sell you.
Depends on whom they murder, no?
A single juror is enough to prevent a verdict.
you say murder.
i say self defense.
don't be so simple. the justice system is being used as a weapon in exactly this way and you know it.
But the law!
juries aren't selected at random.
the pool is.
the state paid prosecutor is supposed to voir dire these people out of the selection. they failed to do so in this case.
either that or it's an area you should know not to relax in if they can't find one sane fucker in a jury pool to hang them up on such an obvious case.
anyways.. it's not like this guy is going to go off and start a business and enjoy his freedom truly.. he's going to go do more crimes and probably get shot for it soon.
If the entre jury pool is tainted, as it is with blacks, there is no amount voir dire that can be practiced short of excluding all blacks when the defendant is black, which is never going to happen.
Right. So as a White person you should stay the fuck out of that area.
If we've reached that point, stop relying on the system altogether and just burn it all down
https://www.informationliberation.com/?id=62265
This is the article that goes with the headline.
According to the article, there were issues with the actions the police did during questioning. And the defense got the race element thrown out.
He took a plea deal on a federal charge of possession of a firearm used in a violent crime.
Reading the details of this case is bizarre. He claims he approached the guy's truck, with his weapon drawn to ask for a ride. He was refused. He then claimed he felt intimidated by the 77 year old man in the truck and felt the white guy was going to harm him because he is black. So he dumped 8 rounds into the guy.
I googled for awhile trying to find the demographic makeup of the jury. If anyone else can find that info that would be cool.
Really all I could find on this post was this article, an additional article by the local paper, The Post and Courier, and a bunch of social media pages linked to the P&C article.
You are describing a carjacking where the aggressor shot the driver because he didn't hand over his vehicle.
Yup, that's his defense.
Black fragility on display again.
Jury of your peers. A black person is not the peer to a white person. The jury is an illegal jury.
This one is enraging. The carjacker claimed self defense from his victim. The dead cannot defend themselves. Totally outrageous.
I don't have the sources offhand but it's something like only about 1 in 4 black-on-White murders are even prosecuted in Chicago and black jurors vote not to convict nearly 90% of the time.
Considering even the best polls have a minimum 1% margin of error, by the statistics one of America's biggest cities has effectively legalized killing Whites.
Anyway back to games and anime.
They put him in prison even though the jury found him not guilty, though. They just did a bench trial where they found him guilty of possessing the gun he used to shoot Stevens.
The jury never talked to the media about why they reached the verdict they did. Maybe they believed there'd been a coerced confession. Maybe they believed the shooting met the standard for self-defense.
But it doesn't really matter, because our government expects juries to be rubber stamps, and when they don't do their rubber-stamping, the guy just gets thrown in prison anyway.
Another day, another post by this guy excusing subhuman evil behavior.
What's really sad is he gets upvotes
From Imp and the rest of the dick beaters on his containment board.
If you notice, every time he posts a comment, he immediately starts at +2.
Downvotes count as upvotes now, maybe not everyone's aware.
It's a shitty argument since it's a different charge anyways. Him making an argument that it's double jeopardy is his usual dishonest schtick.
Some law enforcement and courts have their subhuman evil behavior excused by the type of people complaining about this assumed murder not going to jail.
I can only guess that you didn't bother reading my post.
I read all of it, especially the part where you bemoan that he got put in jail anyway and tried to frame it as a civil rights violation.
It was a civil rights violation. He was found not guilty of the crime, and they locked him up anyway. So much for having a justice system.
You didn't see any part of my post where I excused murder, because I'd never do that. The jury found that he was in fact not a murderer.
I can only imagine how you'd feel if you were cleared of murder charges by a jury of your peers and the government threw you in a cage anyway. But, of course, you don't want a justice system. You just want a system of letting one category of people do whatever the fuck they want and locking the other categories of people in cages.
No, it wasn't.
It was the barest fragment of justice. Because in a just nation he'd be dangling from a gallows, preferably one erected in a black neighborhood as an example to the rest of them.
And if that subhuman isn't a murderer then I guess his victim is alive and well, right?
But hey, thanks for proving my point for me. The only time you post here is to try and launder anti white bullshit.
If Kyle Rittenhouse had been thrown in prison after being found not guilty, I'd have objected to that, too. I hate abusive judges that won't respect process. We have the right to a jury trial for a reason; take that away, and all you're left with is the government deciding who it is and isn't expedient to force into slave labor.
The jury listened to days of argument and decided Devon Dunham wasn't guilty of murder. You don't know the first thing about the case; you've read four sentences about it and decided that "black" is synonymous with "should be hanged by the neck until dead."
No you wouldn't have. Nobody here believes that you're operating in good faith without an agenda. Why you're trying to lie about it, I can only speculate.
Let a fellow nigger walk free for caedes cruor gellidus. Everything except outright saying nullification, but the message was loud and clear.
It's actually one of the things I despise most about liberals. Spitting on the innocent and declaring it justice. Well, one day when justice finally comes for you people, the rest of us will see the sun shine just a little bit brighter.
Muh principles.
An unjust law is no law at all. Allowing carjackers to claim self defense from their victims is an obvious breach of the common good. The facts of the case are not even in dispute. The man should be swiftly hanged, and the jury flogged for good measure. That's what our ancestor would do, that's what kind of law built this country.
The jury system works only if the jurors are fair, impartial and seeking justice.
It doesn't work when tribal politics get involved.
How can you be so retarded? In objective cases like this the jury shouldn't even be able to decide shit. The whole system doesn't make sense then.
Re the report on this post, we do not currently have a "don't be an idiot" rule here, so as long as Hematomato doesn't throw gas on flame wars like he did a couple threads ago, he's allowed to post his retarded redditor comments.
We don’t want him here.
Why, though? What good is twenty redditor comments derailing every thread?
Something something diversity of thought. Something something echo chamber.
Back in my day we had a saying; "Don't feed the trolls."
Stop replying to him and others who attempt to cause problems. They want attention, and everyone in $CurrentYear+12 keeps giving them it.
I completely agree. I’m not going to feed him. But someone will keep doing it.
All moderators are faggots. No exceptions.
Can confirm.
I banned him from ConPro for being an obvious pedojeet alt. He advocates for pedophilia.
He was also trolling ConPro the exact same time earlier this week that TheImp tried to troll ConPro with his newest alt DresdenFireBomber. So, they're most likely friends at the same shill farm, or the same person.
If you link me to him advocating pedophilia, I can see about getting him taken care of.
If you or others are able to do this please do also message the mods here so we can do something about their presence here at least. I'm not checking every other board on this site, and I'm not on much outside of certain times either, so the more information the better.
Tagging u/ApexVeritas/ for this reply, too.
I certainly shall.
I had to dig up some of his deleted posts but while he is A pedophile, he isn't THE pedophile.
However I still banned him from gaming.
Here's what I found digging through his profile for a bit.
Here he tries to defend a clear case of pedophilia interrupted, because the abductor never got the chance, and clearly we're all wrong and bad for assuming pedophilia of the sweet innocent child abductor:
https://communities.win/c/KotakuInAction2/p/1ASZf5rXgu/indian-realtor-tells-canadian-ju/c/4ebm7dOrSrv?d=50
Here he enthuisiastically talks about a 16 year old groupie with Steven Tyler, and defends it. If you're familiar with the pedojeet, at all, you know he makes these kinds of comments all the time, where he skirts the line and tries to make legitimate arguments on the surface, while subversively pushing for going over the line, which becomes more obvious over time. The year range of 14, 15, and 16 is very commonly used by him and all his alts.
https://communities.win/c/Music/p/1ASZfBWyKU/steven-tyler-is-headed-to-trial-/c/4ebm7w0RYCT?d=50
Here he defends drawings of pedophilia as "free speech", which the pedojeet does quite often.
https://communities.win/c/KotakuInAction2/p/1ASZfAPP1V/you-drew-superman-killing-the-jo/c/4ebm7w1Z86j?d=50
Here he makes a low effort post to trash White people, White nationalists, and our intelligence, and the only person to respond to it is his buddy (or alt) DresdenFirebomber.
https://communities.win/c/TellScored/p/1ASZf4knri/why-is-everyone-who-considers-th/c
There was another comment he made that pushed it over the edge, where he was defending sex with minors, but I can't find it now, and I don't really care to spend the time looking for it because he has the comment history of a bot farm.
Other similarities to TheImp, is that he defends jews all the time, trashes White people, defends egalitarianism, hates "Nazis", and advocates for killing us (White nationalists).
Tagging u/CarmenOfSandiego as well if y'all are curious. If you don't ban him immediately, I'd bet you $5 you'll find grounds to ban him within the next week or two, because he can't control his own subversive tendencies, and he hates everyone here.
That's all I needed to see.
I don't like all that guy's takes, but most here are contrarian at worst. If this is how you react to disagreement, you need to go back to Reddit. This shit is why we left in the first place.
If he does something bannable, report it and let the mods take care of it. But holy shit, your post is Reddit deja vu.
Being retarded isn't against the rules.
I've been modding ConPro for years. We were the first forum that the pedo tried to corrupt. We're extremely familiar with how he talks, how he acts, what arguments he uses, and how they've changed over time. We were so effective at banning him that he stopped trying it with ConPro for a while, and began doing it to other forums, like KiA2, gaming, MGTOW, and the like. Don't believe me? Ask around. Most people who've been here for years are very familiar with this guy. He's infamous, just like TheImp.
If this was purely about "free speech" and difference of opinion, I'm fine with it. What I'm not fine with is an obvious shill and pedophilia advocate subverting free speech forums to push their degeneracy, through the use of dozens of alts and ban evasion.
I suspect it's Modeler43. They both have that same smug condescending lecturing tone with a contrarian slant, like they believe they're the only one in the room who isn't an idiot and it's their obligation to correct everyone else.
You can have a functioning society, with a functioning legal system, or you can have one that allows 85-IQ-Americans to ruin both.
White women betrayed our countries to virtue signal on socials.
Unless they lose their right to vote things won't change.
As someone married to a Vietnamese, I take offence to your "non-white" descriptor. It's BLACK. Don't be afraid to call out what you need to call out. BLACK. The vast majority of crimes are committed by blacks, very disproportionately to every other race. But let's not make enemies with "non-whites" who really aren't the enemy.
Buddy, you gotta learn eventually:
They hate your spouse, and more than likely they hate you for being a race traitor. It’s not about black v white. It’s white v nonwhite.
They consider your spouse the enemy because they’re not white
But all the white women around me were fat and ugly. And mean.
Not sure what that has to do with it.
Look man, if you’re happy with your wife, then I’m happy for you!
However, most users on this site will call you a race traitor for marrying a nonwhite woman. Some will even hate you just because you’re married.
You’re not among friends here, especially if you bring up that you married outside of your race.
He truly got a jury of his peers.