Reminder that JK Rowling doesn't dislike trans ideology because it's brainwashing, sterilizing, and butchering children: she just doesn't like that boys and men are in girls' and women's spaces.
Even in this post, she spends half of it whining about how hard-done-by women are. I will never have any sympathy for the TERFs until they can acknowledge the role feminism played in creating trans ideology in the first place.
Yeah but to Rowling, it's happening to ''men as a class'', perpetrated by ''men as a class'', therefore no sympathy for men being the vast majority of victims of prison rapes.
She’s a rabid misandrist feminist. That this a “moderate right” position in modernity while the overwhelming majority of women simultaneously believe they are oppressed should be causing defcon level alarms in men’s brains.
Exactly. She's a radical feminist and the last thing they want is gender equality. If the law became that there was girls-only bathroom and a unisex one where the trannies all had to use alongside the boys, she'd be perfectly happy with that. They virtue signal until it's their group paying the diversity tax
I've heard feminazis actually throw that idea out there in the past
She's not on our side but she does a good job of pissing the left off, but she is certainly not our ally. She still supports a bevy of retarded left wing causes and bitches about Nigel Farage.
I didn't say anything about friend/enemy. I just pointed out that the only interest she has in the subject is that biological males are allowed to invade female spaces.
She doesn't care about the mutilations, she doesn't care about the sterilization, she doesn't care about the psychological abuse directed at these people that makes them think they need to "transition."
So that's where her priorities lie. How it affects her (or womankind). That's it. Hack as many boys and girls up as you want, just keep them out of the women's bathroom afterwards.
Thanks. Also, as Sargon pointed out she was totally silent after that video of that girl having to defend herself from a migrant with an axe. She only cares about "protecting women and girls" when it comes to men trying to get a piece of that female privilege pie.
They have been numerous times in the past, both on .win and the original KIA2.
Its why so many of us feel compelled to make such post in the first place. Because many people will rush to yell "um.... BASED" if someone says something remotely on our side one time. Even on the Rowling topic specifically.
Fortunate as it is, that it does seem the wheel has turned enough for that to be in the minority. But it wasn't always the case.
I see her as kind of a meatshield that will take aggro for us. She is still our enemy as she is a rich leftist feminazi, but it keeps the troons chimping out so I find muc satisfaction hearing them screech.
She is a useful "ally" in the sense that I will do little to support her other than egg on more conflicts with her and the trannies (and their allies), but in no sense should she be given any form of platform or power through support to do anything but be this lightning rod and attack dog.
She is great for those purposes and is completely useless in any other form. Fortunate I suppose, she seems content with making this her life's work for now.
True, shes useful for taking a ton of energy and vitriol from the freaks. This takes a lot of their attention and it also exposed how nuts they are to people who don't understand that. I don't really notice some massive growth in TERFs either, I think she's unwittingly made more right wingers (at least safe, center right) than actual TERFs
3 comments in Cernovich throws her support of unlimited rape-niggers from streetshitistan at her and she just hand waves it away and tries to laugh at him.
Fuck this dumb cunt. As the average woman, she's too cowardly to admit WHO is doing all the fucking rape and assault and trafficking and murder.
Stupid cunt can burn in hell for all I care. I'm glad she's getting endlessly dogpiled, because even with all the dog piling and hatred she still refuses to back down from being an idiot.
Rowling is a TERF (aka radical feminist, the most important part) and a retard that helped contribute to all of this nonsense until it crossed a line for her, but this response is incredibly good and well crafted in a way that will make it hard to defend against.
Sure they can go with the standard "kill yourself, talentless bitch" like always, but it lacks many of the common holes that people use to poke into these responses and shows how completely worthless Emma is as a person and activist, basically ending any attempt at a comeback she might have after branding herself to these sinking ships.
I'm firmly team "A pox on both their houses" myself. Rowling is a big cheerleader and financial supporter of the great replacement "migration" in the EU.
However, Emma and Dan in particular have both made it clear over the last few years that they think our former professional association gives them a particular right - nay, obligation - to critique me and my views in public. Years after they finished acting in Potter, they continue to assume the role of de facto spokespeople for the world I created.
Imagine creating a world and some unaffiliated retards feel some kind of connection to it and molest it into some unholy amalgamation of your world. Now imagine that that world is called “society” and those retards are “feminists”
Close. Those retards are the general public, and you will continue to be lumped in with them until you distinguish yourself, proving you aren't like the rest.
Well they're not unaffiliated. Pretty sure Rowling had a strong say on the casting of who would represent her characters. And given they knew her and probably got told more about Rowling's vision of the characters and stories than was included in the books, it makes sense they would know more about that fictional world than someone who just watched the movies or read the books. Rowling can't be taken as an infallible source either since she's contradicted her own books.
I have some sympathy for Emma Watson. Growing up in hollywood as a child actor is bad enough, but she had an entire generation of pedophiles leering at her and her formative sexual experience was probably being raped by Harvey Weinstein. She'll be lucky if she can avoid becoming the next "Elliot" Page.
I'm seeing quite a bit of comment about this, so I want to make a couple of points.
I'm not owed eternal agreement from any actor who once played a character I created. The idea is as ludicrous as me checking with the boss I had when I was twenty-one for what opinions I should hold these days.
Emma Watson and her co-stars have every right to embrace gender identity ideology. Such beliefs are legally protected, and I wouldn't want to see any of them threatened with loss of work, or violence, or death, because of them.
However, Emma and Dan in particular have both made it clear over the last few years that they think our former professional association gives them a particular right - nay, obligation - to critique me and my views in public. Years after they finished acting in Potter, they continue to assume the role of de facto spokespeople for the world I created.
When you've known people since they were ten years old it's hard to shake a certain protectiveness. Until quite recently, I hadn't managed to throw off the memory of children who needed to be gently coaxed through their dialogue in a big scary film studio. For the past few years, I've repeatedly declined invitations from journalists to comment on Emma specifically, most notably on the Witch Trials of JK Rowling. Ironically, I told the producers that I didn't want her to be hounded as the result of anything I said.
The television presenter in the attached clip highlights Emma's 'all witches' speech, and in truth, that was a turning point for me, but it had a postscript that hurt far more than the speech itself. Emma asked someone to pass on a handwritten note from her to me, which contained the single sentence 'I'm so sorry for what you're going through' (she has my phone number). This was back when the death, rape and torture threats against me were at their peak, at a time when my personal security measures had had to be tightened considerably and I was constantly worried for my family's safety. Emma had just publicly poured more petrol on the flames, yet thought a one line expression of concern from her would reassure me of her fundamental sympathy and kindness.
Like other people who've never experienced adult life uncushioned by wealth and fame, Emma has so little experience of real life she's ignorant of how ignorant she is. She'll never need a homeless shelter. She's never going to be placed on a mixed sex public hospital ward. I'd be astounded if she's been in a high street changing room since childhood. Her 'public bathroom' is single occupancy and comes with a security man standing guard outside the door. Has she had to strip off in a newly mixed-sex changing room at a council-run swimming pool? Is she ever likely to need a state-run rape crisis centre that refuses to guarantee an all-female service? To find herself sharing a prison cell with a male rapist who's identified into the women's prison?
I wasn't a multimillionaire at fourteen. I lived in poverty while writing the book that made Emma famous. I therefore understand from my own life experience what the trashing of women's rights in which Emma has so enthusiastically participated means to women and girls without her privileges.
The greatest irony here is that, had Emma not decided in her most recent interview to declare that she loves and treasures me - a change of tack I suspect she's adopted because she's noticed full-throated condemnation of me is no longer quite as fashionable as it was - I might never have been this honest.
Adults can't expect to cosy up to an activist movement that regularly calls for a friend's assassination, then assert their right to the former friend's love, as though the friend was in fact their mother. Emma is rightly free to disagree with me and indeed to discuss her feelings about me in public - but I have the same right, and I've finally decided to exercise it.
What part of this was eloquent? This was just a leftist wall of text attempting to excuse Rowling's strange decision to criticize Watson all of a sudden after (so she says) refraining to do so for all these years. Just tell us you're a capricious woman who loves to complain on Twitter and get involved in drama.
No matter how you spin it. Rowling is still part of the enemy camp and is a radical left wing feminist. Never forget this and never forgive her. Even when the left eat their own.
Reminder that JK Rowling doesn't dislike trans ideology because it's brainwashing, sterilizing, and butchering children: she just doesn't like that boys and men are in girls' and women's spaces.
Even in this post, she spends half of it whining about how hard-done-by women are. I will never have any sympathy for the TERFs until they can acknowledge the role feminism played in creating trans ideology in the first place.
I'm just enjoying the clown on clown violence.
"Clown On Clown Violence" is my ICP cover band.
The pro palestine group has just crashed your
pussy hatpride parade.Women in prison are the ones at risk of rape???
Bitch…. For my entire life I’ve heard non-stop jokes and encouragement about men being systematically raped in prison
Yeah but to Rowling, it's happening to ''men as a class'', perpetrated by ''men as a class'', therefore no sympathy for men being the vast majority of victims of prison rapes.
Did you really expect good writing from her
She’s a rabid misandrist feminist. That this a “moderate right” position in modernity while the overwhelming majority of women simultaneously believe they are oppressed should be causing defcon level alarms in men’s brains.
"2040 Republican" meme is getting more real every day
Exactly. She's a radical feminist and the last thing they want is gender equality. If the law became that there was girls-only bathroom and a unisex one where the trannies all had to use alongside the boys, she'd be perfectly happy with that. They virtue signal until it's their group paying the diversity tax
I've heard feminazis actually throw that idea out there in the past
The enemy of my enemy is a useful tool.
She's not on our side but she does a good job of pissing the left off, but she is certainly not our ally. She still supports a bevy of retarded left wing causes and bitches about Nigel Farage.
I didn't say anything about friend/enemy. I just pointed out that the only interest she has in the subject is that biological males are allowed to invade female spaces.
She doesn't care about the mutilations, she doesn't care about the sterilization, she doesn't care about the psychological abuse directed at these people that makes them think they need to "transition."
So that's where her priorities lie. How it affects her (or womankind). That's it. Hack as many boys and girls up as you want, just keep them out of the women's bathroom afterwards.
What has she said about Farage?
Not much on twitter: https://xcancel.com/jk_rowling/search?f=tweets&q=farage
Though her unironic quotations of guardian articles tends to indicate she's an unrepentant shitlib.
Thanks. Also, as Sargon pointed out she was totally silent after that video of that girl having to defend herself from a migrant with an axe. She only cares about "protecting women and girls" when it comes to men trying to get a piece of that female privilege pie.
This is an extremely important point to note. She's not even a feminist, just a misandrist.
This would only be important if you mistake everyone who partially agrees with you as a full on ally that could never disagree on anything else.
Yes, obviously, I'm not going to suddenly "champion" JK Rowling, but when she accidentally says something intelligent, it's worth recognizing anyways.
Your invocation of brainwashing is slightly ironic.
And yet legions of people will, which is why these types of comments reminding people of their prior and current ideologies are important.
I'm not sure any of those people are here.
They have been numerous times in the past, both on .win and the original KIA2.
Its why so many of us feel compelled to make such post in the first place. Because many people will rush to yell "um.... BASED" if someone says something remotely on our side one time. Even on the Rowling topic specifically.
Fortunate as it is, that it does seem the wheel has turned enough for that to be in the minority. But it wasn't always the case.
There is always a slim chance of a stranger wandering by.
I see her as kind of a meatshield that will take aggro for us. She is still our enemy as she is a rich leftist feminazi, but it keeps the troons chimping out so I find muc satisfaction hearing them screech.
She is a useful "ally" in the sense that I will do little to support her other than egg on more conflicts with her and the trannies (and their allies), but in no sense should she be given any form of platform or power through support to do anything but be this lightning rod and attack dog.
She is great for those purposes and is completely useless in any other form. Fortunate I suppose, she seems content with making this her life's work for now.
True, shes useful for taking a ton of energy and vitriol from the freaks. This takes a lot of their attention and it also exposed how nuts they are to people who don't understand that. I don't really notice some massive growth in TERFs either, I think she's unwittingly made more right wingers (at least safe, center right) than actual TERFs
Thanks for pointing out the obvious; I'm sure it will be a helpful mental note for you.
Keep trying. One day you maybe will get recognized for your efforts in the bullshit culture war.
Let them fight. Rowling wouldn't lift a finger for any of us, so don't do it for her. Everyone involved in this is equally a cancer on the world.
As I say many times:
"The enemy of my enemy buys me time to set up the artillery.."
heh
All this shows is that bitter, used up broads are a massive detriment to any society and should have zero political power or influence.
I'm half convinced we should bring back witch burning tbh.
Careful, a lot of that was fueled by broads such as herself. And not as the one being burned.
If you need more convincing, take a gander at antifa mugshots.
What's funny is that I don't know if you're talking about Rowling, or Watson.
;D
3 comments in Cernovich throws her support of unlimited rape-niggers from streetshitistan at her and she just hand waves it away and tries to laugh at him.
Fuck this dumb cunt. As the average woman, she's too cowardly to admit WHO is doing all the fucking rape and assault and trafficking and murder.
Stupid cunt can burn in hell for all I care. I'm glad she's getting endlessly dogpiled, because even with all the dog piling and hatred she still refuses to back down from being an idiot.
Rowling is a TERF (aka radical feminist, the most important part) and a retard that helped contribute to all of this nonsense until it crossed a line for her, but this response is incredibly good and well crafted in a way that will make it hard to defend against.
Sure they can go with the standard "kill yourself, talentless bitch" like always, but it lacks many of the common holes that people use to poke into these responses and shows how completely worthless Emma is as a person and activist, basically ending any attempt at a comeback she might have after branding herself to these sinking ships.
I just hope everyone has a good time.
I'm firmly team "A pox on both their houses" myself. Rowling is a big cheerleader and financial supporter of the great replacement "migration" in the EU.
The enemy of my enemy is still my enemy.
Edit: Citation (Time.com).
damn
Imagine creating a world and some unaffiliated retards feel some kind of connection to it and molest it into some unholy amalgamation of your world. Now imagine that that world is called “society” and those retards are “feminists”
That's every piece of art, ever. People try turning "The Last Supper" into a hidden pro-homosexual painting
Close. Those retards are the general public, and you will continue to be lumped in with them until you distinguish yourself, proving you aren't like the rest.
Well they're not unaffiliated. Pretty sure Rowling had a strong say on the casting of who would represent her characters. And given they knew her and probably got told more about Rowling's vision of the characters and stories than was included in the books, it makes sense they would know more about that fictional world than someone who just watched the movies or read the books. Rowling can't be taken as an infallible source either since she's contradicted her own books.
I have some sympathy for Emma Watson. Growing up in hollywood as a child actor is bad enough, but she had an entire generation of pedophiles leering at her and her formative sexual experience was probably being raped by Harvey Weinstein. She'll be lucky if she can avoid becoming the next "Elliot" Page.
I wouldn't rush to celebrate her too much yet- https://x.com/Cernovich/status/1972684650268049739
https://x.com/jk_rowling/status/1972752429407236562
https://x.com/JackPosobiec/status/1972762909043499220
Yeah, we all know Rowling is a moron otherwise
Picking a fight with JK Rowling was the worst decision the troon lobby ever made.
Rowling is pro muzzie sand nigger rape-fugee, it's hard for me to give a shit what she thinks or says.
Bad for us, but it sure makes it awkward for them.
I'm going to base a character on her in my upcoming YA novel. Her name will be Cutshup Unt.
She ONLY wants special protections and gibs for her chosen people (females).
An honest/genuine person is someone who applies these lessons to EVERY issue and everyone. Not just to her pet project.
What the fuck is that thing with the bowling ball size forehead?
A typical British woman
What part of this was eloquent? This was just a leftist wall of text attempting to excuse Rowling's strange decision to criticize Watson all of a sudden after (so she says) refraining to do so for all these years. Just tell us you're a capricious woman who loves to complain on Twitter and get involved in drama.
If you can't appreciate "I lived in poverty while writing the book that made Emma famous," then I don't know what to tell you.
Wow, such a way with words...not! It makes no difference if she was in poverty or Antarctica - this isn't the oppression olympics.
Yeah OK lol, I'm not going to try to explain this
https://youtu.be/62UzLgdb1GQ
No matter how you spin it. Rowling is still part of the enemy camp and is a radical left wing feminist. Never forget this and never forgive her. Even when the left eat their own.