Notice too that the people using the term "woke right" use the same tactics as the woke left. Don't like h1b? You are a racist! Pointing out the control of the Israeli lobby? Antisemite!!! No legitimate discussion based on the merits of the argument because their side would fall apart instantly. Just like the left.
There is something that all of the people pushing this "woke right" narrative cohencidentally all have in common, but I just cohen't quite put my nose on the scent they all carry. It keeps shifting shape and seems to make most people blind and stupid when they smell it though, so I guess I have a good excuse for not being able to put a name to it's eye-wateringly pungent source.
The civic nationalists and libertarians are trying to shove the actual nationalists out of the conservative car. These snakes are no better than the neocons they’ve mostly replaced. In the end, there can be no explicit political representation for whites.
As something of a libertarian, I feel I have to defend them somewhat, by pointing out, basically by definition, that it's a very broad movement. Many claiming the label have almost nothing in common with the people I think represent it the best. A bunch of libertarians are retarded leftists, or the ex-libs who recognize there are problems...but still subscribe to 90% of the doctrine.
Plenty of libertarians realize that property rights apply to the nation, as well. If you should have the right to keep people out of your house, your government has a right to keep people out of your nation. There are libertarians that fully believe in America First, strong borders, all that. They even controlled the big L Libertarian Party for a time, before sadly being ousted by a pro child-transing faggot.
Too many libertarians do not realize, or will not admit, that the minimalist government and individual liberties they want to enjoy are only possible in a high-trust society. And a high-trust society is only possible in a homogenous nation.
So 'woke right' means 'giving a shit about the slow genocide of the white race and wanting to preserve the cultural practices that made western civilization the envy of the world'?
Hell, it's not just racial. If, for any reason, you don't want infinite foreigners flooding the country, you're woke right. If you don't support Israel, you're woke right. If you actually believe in America First, you're woke right. And, yeah, certainly if you care about white people, you're woke right.
The people pushing this act like their "woke right" enemies are the ones destroying and dividing "the conservative movement," when it's the cretins pushing the term who are actually leftists and neocons trying to regain control of the right.
Prior to a month ago it meant exactly what the words said. People "on the Right" that were repeating Woke talking points repackaged. From women who wanted to still censor anything slightly sexual to pro-gay/tranny nonsense, it was basically keeping the Progressive agenda alive with a new coat of point.
Now its basically an empty buzzword to discredit basically anyone who isn't a stereotypical GOP loser. It doesn't have a meaning any longer and its prior meaning can't be used because of its new status.
They're attempting to contain dissident conversation points within a rubric of "extremism" the same way they do with "the woke left." This is how they operate with leftism itself: they largely tolerate 90% of genuine progressive talking points, like trans, but think the 10% pushing for, say, child castration is "too far."
Sensible people on the right who are willing to call delusional retards "delusional retards" are also "too far" because the "sensible position" is that trans people are totally okay bro and anyone can do literally anything as long as there is consent dude.
"Woke left" and "woke right" practically occupy every single point outside of the current overton window. That's why all these faggots are just basically liberals, even if they claim conservatism. The overton window itself is just the left-leaning, manufactured consent of yesteryear that is currently just assumed as correct. Whenever it gets challenged, the James Lindsays of the world are the first to clutch pearls about it.
This feels an awful lot like the beginning of Trump's first term when they tried to make the term "alt-right" happen. The only people I ever heard use that term seriously were Democrats/Lefties and glowing influencers.
I'm still not clear on what concept the phrase "woke right" is trying to express, but it is nice to see a word that's clearly left-aligned be used as a universal slur.
The dividing line between "woke right" and "conservative" is whether you have noticed that jews control America. But they can't say that because it would cause more people to notice.
You may have noticed how many of the people who use the term "woke right" are of jewish descent. For example, Seth Dillon.
Anyone who doesn’t want infinite legal immigrants coming into the country. That’s how you know if someone’s a real right winger. If someone gets wound up when talking about reducing/removing legal immigration then they’re likely not “woke right”.
Notice too that the people using the term "woke right" use the same tactics as the woke left. Don't like h1b? You are a racist! Pointing out the control of the Israeli lobby? Antisemite!!! No legitimate discussion based on the merits of the argument because their side would fall apart instantly. Just like the left.
It is exactly that. 100% same exact tactic.
There is something that all of the people pushing this "woke right" narrative cohencidentally all have in common, but I just cohen't quite put my nose on the scent they all carry. It keeps shifting shape and seems to make most people blind and stupid when they smell it though, so I guess I have a good excuse for not being able to put a name to it's eye-wateringly pungent source.
J
U
E
The civic nationalists and libertarians are trying to shove the actual nationalists out of the conservative car. These snakes are no better than the neocons they’ve mostly replaced. In the end, there can be no explicit political representation for whites.
As something of a libertarian, I feel I have to defend them somewhat, by pointing out, basically by definition, that it's a very broad movement. Many claiming the label have almost nothing in common with the people I think represent it the best. A bunch of libertarians are retarded leftists, or the ex-libs who recognize there are problems...but still subscribe to 90% of the doctrine.
Plenty of libertarians realize that property rights apply to the nation, as well. If you should have the right to keep people out of your house, your government has a right to keep people out of your nation. There are libertarians that fully believe in America First, strong borders, all that. They even controlled the big L Libertarian Party for a time, before sadly being ousted by a pro child-transing faggot.
Too many libertarians do not realize, or will not admit, that the minimalist government and individual liberties they want to enjoy are only possible in a high-trust society. And a high-trust society is only possible in a homogenous nation.
And a homogeneous nation requires defensive governance. Which requires funding. Which requires non-libertarian practices.
Or a bunch of private citizens with guns.
Just more kike double talk. I wonder how this faggot feels about getting flooded with pajeets?
They are his number one supporter saaaarr
Word revisionists working overtime to make "woke right" happen. It's not gonna happen.
So 'woke right' means 'giving a shit about the slow genocide of the white race and wanting to preserve the cultural practices that made western civilization the envy of the world'?
Hell, it's not just racial. If, for any reason, you don't want infinite foreigners flooding the country, you're woke right. If you don't support Israel, you're woke right. If you actually believe in America First, you're woke right. And, yeah, certainly if you care about white people, you're woke right.
The people pushing this act like their "woke right" enemies are the ones destroying and dividing "the conservative movement," when it's the cretins pushing the term who are actually leftists and neocons trying to regain control of the right.
Yup, he was another big pusher. Not to the extent of Lindsay or Kisin, but still one of the big ones.
Still not sure what that term even means.
White and not willing to roll over and take it up the ass (without complaining on twitter, at least)
Prior to a month ago it meant exactly what the words said. People "on the Right" that were repeating Woke talking points repackaged. From women who wanted to still censor anything slightly sexual to pro-gay/tranny nonsense, it was basically keeping the Progressive agenda alive with a new coat of point.
Now its basically an empty buzzword to discredit basically anyone who isn't a stereotypical GOP loser. It doesn't have a meaning any longer and its prior meaning can't be used because of its new status.
They're attempting to contain dissident conversation points within a rubric of "extremism" the same way they do with "the woke left." This is how they operate with leftism itself: they largely tolerate 90% of genuine progressive talking points, like trans, but think the 10% pushing for, say, child castration is "too far."
Sensible people on the right who are willing to call delusional retards "delusional retards" are also "too far" because the "sensible position" is that trans people are totally okay bro and anyone can do literally anything as long as there is consent dude.
"Woke left" and "woke right" practically occupy every single point outside of the current overton window. That's why all these faggots are just basically liberals, even if they claim conservatism. The overton window itself is just the left-leaning, manufactured consent of yesteryear that is currently just assumed as correct. Whenever it gets challenged, the James Lindsays of the world are the first to clutch pearls about it.
Look at the people who use it and it'll become very clear
This is what happens when you let jews and zionists control discourse.
Conservatism is a metastasized cancer on effective political action.
This feels an awful lot like the beginning of Trump's first term when they tried to make the term "alt-right" happen. The only people I ever heard use that term seriously were Democrats/Lefties and glowing influencers.
He's Jewish
OY VEY!
Gatekeepers on the right gotta gatekeep.
It's a good way to filter NPCs if they use that term unironically.
I don’t trust anyone named Seth.
I don't trust anyone named Tzeentch.
Hey, cool it with the anti-Tzeentchism
Considering the guy has a tendency to spout tentacles from your mouth, I can understand.
His name was Seth Rich.
The term "woke right" just appeared so naturally and organics, I'm sure it's spread is equally organic and natural.
The term cooked has mysteriously started springing up everywhere too.
I am shocked that zionists parrot the ''woke right'' new buzzword. /s
I'm still not clear on what concept the phrase "woke right" is trying to express, but it is nice to see a word that's clearly left-aligned be used as a universal slur.
The dividing line between "woke right" and "conservative" is whether you have noticed that jews control America. But they can't say that because it would cause more people to notice.
You may have noticed how many of the people who use the term "woke right" are of jewish descent. For example, Seth Dillon.
Anyone who doesn’t want infinite legal immigrants coming into the country. That’s how you know if someone’s a real right winger. If someone gets wound up when talking about reducing/removing legal immigration then they’re likely not “woke right”.
Woke right means anyone conservative who doesn't tongue punch Israel's fart box.
What dirt does Mossad have on Seth?
I'm sure Seth does it for 30 pieces of silver .
Marketing, rebranding.
Woke right = non zionist, therefore the implied "real" right is zionist.
News flash. FEMINISM. IS. CANCER.