They're one trick ponies when they don't get their way. It's almost like sex is the only thing they're good for. It won't work of course. Chad and Tyrone have plenty of willing replacements, and we all know this 4B shit will go out the window the minute a hawt guy breathes in their direction. It also turns out that threatening to withhold sex from men who aren't getting laid anyway doesn't really change anything. It's the same old shit, they're just being more self righteous about it now.
It's almost like sex is the only thing they're good for.
Scratch the 'almost'. These women define themselves entirely around their sexuality. It's the paradox of "I'm not a sex object!" while they go out of their way to present themselves as just a sex object.
Honestly, Patrice may be the only thing that is keeping me going at this point. Even when I was a youngster when I found his stuff, it all clicked. There are hardly any dudes like him irl, especially in England
Do... Do they know the 4B movement in worst Korea resulted in a tradcon resurgence?... Do they know the Megalia movement tried to be an edgy feminist version of 4chan and not only failed but radicalized a lot of men?
Do they know 4B is inherently trans-exclusionary because they have to gatekeep the womyn identity?
Do they know they can't even replicate the 4B movement because worst Korea culture is just different?
And femcel only has negative connotation because women themselves spent the last decade screaming about incels (a formerly niche community and a small time slang word) until it became a literal boogeyman that the highest offices cry about it.
They desperately needed to make it a 'movement' so they could demonize it all as one, when it was really just that men aren't interested in participating in a society that actively hates them simply for existing. That's not even getting into the elephant in the room, that modern culture is being deliberately steered in a negative direction, and many men have noticed and act accordingly.
when it was really just that men aren't interested in participating in a society that actively hates them simply for existing
The original "incel" boards were never this kind of MGTOW pseudo-positive thinking. They were cesspits of misery and depression endlessly repeating from completely broken shutins and losers that would drop everything from a crumb of affection let alone pussy.
That's what made the stereotype of them so ridiculous. Simply looking at any of them and you would find a specimen so pathetic that you couldn't be afraid of him. Think Randy Stair, who even after a shooting is still considered a sad joke. The only "threat" they posed was that they were so crushed down by lack of womanly attention that they couldn't be manipulated by it anymore due to sheer despair.
Because that's where the hate truly came from. Women saw groups of men that were below even the beta bux, who could truly provide nothing to them. And the hate they felt for those guys was so unwarranted that they had to invent a monster caricature instead to justify it to the masses.
They REALLY underestimate women's natural desire to breed. Men have it too and have it broadcast EVERYWHERE that we basically think with our dicks but women are just as horny as men as they literally are made in a way to make and raise kids.
It's why the left made so much progress by being sexual degenerates and the right/religious made more progress promoting monogamy than abstinence. It's easier to sell people on a committed relationship than outright saying you should refuse all sex till marriage when the West made marriage into a spike pit trap for men.
but women are just as horny as men as they literally are made in a way to make and raise kids
Most guys don't know this because they are the soft, "sensitive" males who can never inspire women to be horny around them. Likely from listening to women's words instead of their actions.
Its actually quite wild just how far that idea spread. You look at TV writers, the most Jewy-Jew looking nerds around, and you know that that guy has never been able to pull women. He might have a few, but on a compromise level instead of raw sexual prowess. But he, among thousands of others, writes his experience as universal that women aren't as sexual as men and only give sex on holidays/birthdays out of obligation.
Which creates this society level belief in women not being as sexual creatures as men are and it makes all sorts of problems crop out of teaching people a very demonstrable false reality.
That's part of it, but I think there's more to it. It's not just Pedowood pushing this idea. In a society where the vast majority of people pair up in monogamous relationships (you know, a society that's functional) that lie is necessary to keep beta provider types from asking inconvenient questions like "Why am I paying this whore's bills when she obviously sees me as unworthy?". The biggest black pill I've had to swallow about society is the amount of lying and gaslighting that's necessary to keep bottom 90% SMV men engaged.
The spreading idea that women are inherently un-sexual is how betas get created in such large numbers to begin with. If you don't think women will ever exhibit sexual attraction, then you don't look for its signs or learn how to get to it.
If men learned from an early age that women are massive sluts for X Y Z, then a lot of them would change course and begin trying to exhibit those traits during puberty/early adulthood. Some would fail or not care, but a huge amount of today's betas would be at least partially successful with women if they had actually known the correct path to take before they were too far gone.
Sexual market value is still a market. There is a huge difference between a middle class of historical America, who could afford a house and family on a single salary, and a middle class today who need two incomes to barely scrape by.
In the same way, the bottom 90% SMV men wouldn't need lying and gaslighting to be kept productive and happy, because they'd be successful enough to be satisfied themselves. Not Chad Thundercock level, but enough to keep a regular man happy.
Well that's the other half. Even if you are born with an extreme privilege leg up, you can still be an awkward wierdo who is unattractive regardless of it.
Every one of us can picture a tall gangley, lanky nerd who no woman will ever be attracted to despite him being a top 1% in size.
Adamrises did say born ultra rich. Gates and Zuckerberg were 19/20 year old nerds in college when they started their respective companies. The ultra riches came later.
Gates and Zuck didn't settle, they married women who were in the same intellectual circles as them. Plus Zuck got an Asian chick. In his milieu that was considered winning.
The meme about lawyers marrying hairdressers only goes so far. All the intellectual people I've known to marry have valued IQ in their spouse.
Part of the reason for this is women themselves; a large number of them viscerally loathe the idea of a man working to improve themselves in the social arena - they desire a man who 'just gets it' and the notion that a man could be a 'fake' alpha and still be successful with them makes them physically ill.
This is why Pick-up Artists made women loose their shit so much.
Of course, and that is them telling you exactly what you need to change to improve. If you still come across as "faking it" then you haven't actually begun to exhibit what they like, you are merely wearing the trappings of it like a coat.
You look at TV writers, the most Jewy-Jew looking nerds around, and you know that that guy has never been able to pull women.
It's also how the ideas that jocks are particularly dumb and that all it takes for you to get a girl to like you is to have a big dramatic display to let her know how much you've been pining for her.
As an aside, they make these terribly horny series where Jewy nerds sleep with hot white women. This show about a Jewish country club comes to mind. And everything with Seth Rogan.
There isn't a single woman committing to this who could even comprehend the idea of somebody who hasn't been hugged or talked to a woman outside of a checkout line for a decade.
It's why the left made so much progress by being sexual degenerates and the right/religious made more progress promoting monogamy than abstinence. It's easier to sell people on a committed relationship than outright saying you should refuse all sex till marriage when the West made marriage into a spike pit trap for men.
Abstinence made a lot more sense with the cultural framework around marriage intact. Women wanted to be virgins to be suitable marriage partners. Since marriage is the most reliable way to raise good children, and all the stability it provides, women were emotionally and rationally attracted to marriage and therefore incentivized as much as anyone can be to abstinence. Traditionally less capital expended by men by extramarital sex, but that's not a given.
Christ, can we just be honest about the fact that women want to be viewed as sex objects and that by and large they are sex objects? It's the one thing they have to contribute to society, everything else is taken care of by the men.
I would have voted for him for this one thing alone. Anyone willing to catlady themselves over a Presidental election is not additive to a good society and we simply wash them out of the gene pool.
The lie that women are more "emotionally intelligent" than men might be the most absurd claim ever made. They're ruled by their emotions and float between having little or no control over them.
Femcels are the ones that can't get chad to fuck them, so there's no legs to close.
Not an official term, mind, just a personal observation. Morbid curiosity when stumbling across several self-labeled 'femcels' drove me down that rabbit hole, and I started finding several trends - it's not that they can't get sex, it's that they can't get sex from the men they think they deserve.
It also tracks from what I've seen of a few 'Forever Alone' forums. Where men have a dry spell of thier entire lives, women can have a dry spell of a few years and stumble in thinking they're going to receive sympathy of how it's so painful, only to receive vitriolic hatred in response.
They're one trick ponies when they don't get their way. It's almost like sex is the only thing they're good for. It won't work of course. Chad and Tyrone have plenty of willing replacements, and we all know this 4B shit will go out the window the minute a hawt guy breathes in their direction. It also turns out that threatening to withhold sex from men who aren't getting laid anyway doesn't really change anything. It's the same old shit, they're just being more self righteous about it now.
Scratch the 'almost'. These women define themselves entirely around their sexuality. It's the paradox of "I'm not a sex object!" while they go out of their way to present themselves as just a sex object.
For all those who've never seen it, this Patrice O'Neal stand-up routine is gold
Honestly, Patrice may be the only thing that is keeping me going at this point. Even when I was a youngster when I found his stuff, it all clicked. There are hardly any dudes like him irl, especially in England
Gone far too soon.
Rest in peace, sweet prince.
;_;7
;_;7
Yes. This is Leftist women saying they are going to punish Leftist men by not spreading their legs for random guys.
Okay ladies.
Do... Do they know the 4B movement in worst Korea resulted in a tradcon resurgence?... Do they know the Megalia movement tried to be an edgy feminist version of 4chan and not only failed but radicalized a lot of men?
Do they know 4B is inherently trans-exclusionary because they have to gatekeep the womyn identity?
Do they know they can't even replicate the 4B movement because worst Korea culture is just different?
No. They just want to say "4B" because "Femcel" has a negative connotation to it.
And femcel only has negative connotation because women themselves spent the last decade screaming about incels (a formerly niche community and a small time slang word) until it became a literal boogeyman that the highest offices cry about it.
They desperately needed to make it a 'movement' so they could demonize it all as one, when it was really just that men aren't interested in participating in a society that actively hates them simply for existing. That's not even getting into the elephant in the room, that modern culture is being deliberately steered in a negative direction, and many men have noticed and act accordingly.
The original "incel" boards were never this kind of MGTOW pseudo-positive thinking. They were cesspits of misery and depression endlessly repeating from completely broken shutins and losers that would drop everything from a crumb of affection let alone pussy.
That's what made the stereotype of them so ridiculous. Simply looking at any of them and you would find a specimen so pathetic that you couldn't be afraid of him. Think Randy Stair, who even after a shooting is still considered a sad joke. The only "threat" they posed was that they were so crushed down by lack of womanly attention that they couldn't be manipulated by it anymore due to sheer despair.
Because that's where the hate truly came from. Women saw groups of men that were below even the beta bux, who could truly provide nothing to them. And the hate they felt for those guys was so unwarranted that they had to invent a monster caricature instead to justify it to the masses.
They REALLY underestimate women's natural desire to breed. Men have it too and have it broadcast EVERYWHERE that we basically think with our dicks but women are just as horny as men as they literally are made in a way to make and raise kids.
It's why the left made so much progress by being sexual degenerates and the right/religious made more progress promoting monogamy than abstinence. It's easier to sell people on a committed relationship than outright saying you should refuse all sex till marriage when the West made marriage into a spike pit trap for men.
Most guys don't know this because they are the soft, "sensitive" males who can never inspire women to be horny around them. Likely from listening to women's words instead of their actions.
Its actually quite wild just how far that idea spread. You look at TV writers, the most Jewy-Jew looking nerds around, and you know that that guy has never been able to pull women. He might have a few, but on a compromise level instead of raw sexual prowess. But he, among thousands of others, writes his experience as universal that women aren't as sexual as men and only give sex on holidays/birthdays out of obligation.
Which creates this society level belief in women not being as sexual creatures as men are and it makes all sorts of problems crop out of teaching people a very demonstrable false reality.
That's part of it, but I think there's more to it. It's not just Pedowood pushing this idea. In a society where the vast majority of people pair up in monogamous relationships (you know, a society that's functional) that lie is necessary to keep beta provider types from asking inconvenient questions like "Why am I paying this whore's bills when she obviously sees me as unworthy?". The biggest black pill I've had to swallow about society is the amount of lying and gaslighting that's necessary to keep bottom 90% SMV men engaged.
The spreading idea that women are inherently un-sexual is how betas get created in such large numbers to begin with. If you don't think women will ever exhibit sexual attraction, then you don't look for its signs or learn how to get to it.
If men learned from an early age that women are massive sluts for X Y Z, then a lot of them would change course and begin trying to exhibit those traits during puberty/early adulthood. Some would fail or not care, but a huge amount of today's betas would be at least partially successful with women if they had actually known the correct path to take before they were too far gone.
Sexual market value is still a market. There is a huge difference between a middle class of historical America, who could afford a house and family on a single salary, and a middle class today who need two incomes to barely scrape by.
In the same way, the bottom 90% SMV men wouldn't need lying and gaslighting to be kept productive and happy, because they'd be successful enough to be satisfied themselves. Not Chad Thundercock level, but enough to keep a regular man happy.
Literally just being tall is enough
So is just being born ultra rich. Most people don't get to choose to be part of a 1-5%, so they need to became capable on their own.
And when the quality across the board rises, the value of extreme outliers lowers.
Disagree on riches. It's not universal, look what Bill Gates and Mark Zuckerberg had to settle for.
Well that's the other half. Even if you are born with an extreme privilege leg up, you can still be an awkward wierdo who is unattractive regardless of it.
Every one of us can picture a tall gangley, lanky nerd who no woman will ever be attracted to despite him being a top 1% in size.
Adamrises did say born ultra rich. Gates and Zuckerberg were 19/20 year old nerds in college when they started their respective companies. The ultra riches came later.
Gates and Zuck didn't settle, they married women who were in the same intellectual circles as them. Plus Zuck got an Asian chick. In his milieu that was considered winning.
The meme about lawyers marrying hairdressers only goes so far. All the intellectual people I've known to marry have valued IQ in their spouse.
Part of the reason for this is women themselves; a large number of them viscerally loathe the idea of a man working to improve themselves in the social arena - they desire a man who 'just gets it' and the notion that a man could be a 'fake' alpha and still be successful with them makes them physically ill.
This is why Pick-up Artists made women loose their shit so much.
Of course, and that is them telling you exactly what you need to change to improve. If you still come across as "faking it" then you haven't actually begun to exhibit what they like, you are merely wearing the trappings of it like a coat.
It's also how the ideas that jocks are particularly dumb and that all it takes for you to get a girl to like you is to have a big dramatic display to let her know how much you've been pining for her.
As an aside, they make these terribly horny series where Jewy nerds sleep with hot white women. This show about a Jewish country club comes to mind. And everything with Seth Rogan.
There isn't a single woman committing to this who could even comprehend the idea of somebody who hasn't been hugged or talked to a woman outside of a checkout line for a decade.
Abstinence made a lot more sense with the cultural framework around marriage intact. Women wanted to be virgins to be suitable marriage partners. Since marriage is the most reliable way to raise good children, and all the stability it provides, women were emotionally and rationally attracted to marriage and therefore incentivized as much as anyone can be to abstinence. Traditionally less capital expended by men by extramarital sex, but that's not a given.
I didn't have this on my bingo card
Didn't they do this last time as well?
Christ, can we just be honest about the fact that women want to be viewed as sex objects and that by and large they are sex objects? It's the one thing they have to contribute to society, everything else is taken care of by the men.
They did threaten it, but then they needed to make money for rent.
I would have voted for him for this one thing alone. Anyone willing to catlady themselves over a Presidental election is not additive to a good society and we simply wash them out of the gene pool.
Lol, if they were capable of closing their legs, they wouldn't be whores. I bet every single 4b ho is still regularly swiping on tinder.
Emphasis on "threatening."
The lie that women are more "emotionally intelligent" than men might be the most absurd claim ever made. They're ruled by their emotions and float between having little or no control over them.
Not whores, Femcels.
Femcels are the ones that can't get chad to fuck them, so there's no legs to close.
Not an official term, mind, just a personal observation. Morbid curiosity when stumbling across several self-labeled 'femcels' drove me down that rabbit hole, and I started finding several trends - it's not that they can't get sex, it's that they can't get sex from the men they think they deserve.
It also tracks from what I've seen of a few 'Forever Alone' forums. Where men have a dry spell of thier entire lives, women can have a dry spell of a few years and stumble in thinking they're going to receive sympathy of how it's so painful, only to receive vitriolic hatred in response.
If you want a really good laugh, they're already fighting with one another over whether the second "B" is transphobic.
You mean these same ones who use abortion like birth control are going to stop?
HA HA HA HA HA HA
Lefties accidentally discovering conservatism is hilarious
My lefty friends call it 'Vote Red? Get blue balls' attack. All of them are in a monogamous relationship or none at all.
Lol, if they could do that, abortion wouldn't be such a hot topic.
https://www.youtube.com/shorts/tFMc4mPs0cc