it was right above my comment, surely you would have seen it. And you still haven't explained how this can be considered an "identity attack" in the first place. it doesn't attack any group as "inferior of conspiring " saying you dislike a group doesn't mean they are "inferior"
DoM already gave you an answer you refused to accept by playing word games, but I'll add that if DoM started scanning and taking down unreported comments up-and-down thread, then some of you would start bitching about that too.
why was i banned for 2 days for my comment but the person i replied to didn't even get his comment deleted?
it was right above my comment, surely you would have seen it
"[sic] didn't report it. OP didn't report it. Nobody in this thread reported it."
This is you unironically wanting automated moderation in a thread you made complaining about moderation, all the while assuming a reported post shows context in whatever report tab a mod sees.
Mods might well be faggots but you're retarded, petty, and hypocritical for going about things in this way.
I consider them worse than other groups because i dislike their behavior more than other groups. But that is not the same as saying they are inferior. To other people their behavior might mean that they are actually superior in fact. Saying that i dislike something is not the same as saying that that thing is inferior. Why is that hard to understand?
You're trying to reframe Rule 16 as dealing with objectivity. But it's not that, it's regarding your subjective assessment. You are saying that they are inferior by saying that they are the worst.
I sticked the response because it's a post about an enforcement mechanism. It should be made visible, by definition. You can call it snarky as you want, but he never reported the offending comment. Nobody did. You didn't report it. OP didn't report it. Nobody in this thread reported it.
Not even after making a post about it, and linking to the thread in the comments of this post.
No one reported it because no one believes that it's something worth reporting.
Same thing for u/ger111's comment. There was probably only one single faggot who reported it, likely because he believes that all criticism of jews is antisemitism, which is the one single opinion that no one is allowed to have, or some other similarly retarded belief. The parent comment should remain visible, and the response should also have remained visible. It's free speech, the most important Right that everyone should have.
If people don't think it's rule violating content, then fair enough. But someone did report him. As such, that answers the question for why his content was removed and that the parent content was not. It was not removed because I'm a secret crypto-jew trying to undermine the progress of racial solidarity.
Not every report need be taken seriously, though. The vast majority of people here would clearly much rather have more leeway in what they are allowed to say. The only real times that I saw calls for banning or moderation were against clear trolls or paedophiles.
To think Synagogue of Satan is bad thing is a religious value judgement. Which I guess we're not allowed to make. But some people love Satan. So I think you can say Synagogue of Satan.
I can't say that I think Satanists are the worst. I can say "hey that's a Satanist."
since when was saying that i personally dislike a group more than others considered an "identity attack"?
Since DoM is a mod, that's when. He's as bad about rule 2, taking talking about potential violent consequences to actions the same as advocating for same.
What is the message of this comic? Pretty straight-forward: In the inter-temporal race war of jews against all civilization, the republican party exists to serve jews and jews alone.
One would think a user's opinion is not the same as an attack. An attack is, perhaps, "I think you should feel this way." at the very least. I don't see how an attack can take place entirely within someone's head.
However the rules are enforced defines the rules. I guess. You can't say you don't like whatever. It would be easier if that were explicit. You don't get banned completely for making that "mistake" so I would just take it in stride. Do something else for a day.
Reddit mods are worse, expecting you to be able to read their minds.
I haven't had trouble actually following the rules here (I think I got one suspension). So that indicates that it is actually possible to follow them and share your opinions. I modify maybe the way I say something here. That's it.
On ConPro you can say wtf you want about the Js. The fact that there's more sane people here probably says somethign.
i find it funny how 95% of his community is j-pilled and he pretends like the goyim won't know if he just bans people for pointing out the obvious
the saddest thing that this sad jew actually came to us to help him to deal with the pedopajeet and he promised to "do better" when it comes to censoring goyim on his little fiefdom, he did not improve...
I wish people wouldn't take things out of context. I've been incredibly critical of Dom, including in this very thread, and including on the Jew topic, but I also believe in being fair and accurate. He's said he's not a Jew* (and you can believe that or not), but every time I've seen someone with an alleged gotcha where he "admits" it, it's out of context.
Admitting to faggotry is a joke because all mods are fags. No exceptions. If you're not gay, you become gay the second you assume mod powers.
When he says "not because I'm jewish," it doesn't mean he's admitting to being a Jew, it's saying he thinks he'd be killed by people even though he isn't. The context is clear. He's still retarded, and his spergouts are legendary, and, yes, he is paranoid that the "Leftists" (and that's anyone who has any issues with Jews, clearly!) are going to murder him and his family.
TL;DR: Dom may or may not be a Jew, but I have yet to see any evidence that he is, and everyone who has claimed to have such evidence is taking things out of context or misunderstanding something.
* It is worth pointing out a linguistic trick I've seen many on the "pro-Jew" side pull, whether or not they are Jews, which is not even acknowledging the existence of Jews outside of a religious context, and sometimes not even then. e.g. Leftists can't be Jews, because Leftism supersedes Jewishness...so there is no such thing as a Leftist Jew. So, and I'm not saying this is the case, but Dom could say he's not a Jew, and in his mind think he's completely honest, because he's not religious, or something.
censoring goyim because they said something critical of jews is the clearest evidence of jewish behavior
Yeah, but you claimed he admitted to being Jewish. He didn't.
And, yeah, that comic spergout was weak shit, and I was one of the main people calling that out and drawing attention to his terrible behavior.
Be honest in your criticism, is all I'm saying. You can think Dom is a Jew if you want. But until he actually says "I'm a Jew," don't go around saying he "admitted" it. Because he hasn't.
That's the problem with all these topics, and unfortunately many of the anti-Jew ones too.
Its not enough for Dom to be a gay faggot and a retard. He has to be the MOST Ultra Evil Giga Nigga Subversive Agent whose every action is bad and every trait is corrupted.
You can't be honest or fair in your criticisms, because everyone is engaged in a struggle session virtue signal to show themselves to say all the necessary affirmations (R16 bad, Dom jew, I got banned for nothing) to prove they are on the "good side" who believes all the right things. That's how you get people acting like he is somehow as bad as or worse than a reddit mod, its a good one up on those affirmations about how bad he is.
Dom is retarded and really needs a check on forcing his opinions as rules, but too many are engaging in Mind-Kill techniques on themselves just to hate him.
The conpro fags whining loudest are not here to engage in good faith discussion, they are here to distract, derail and subvert like the good federal puppets they are. Not everybody that criticizes dom is one, but spamming meta bullshit and trying to overthrow mods is one of their tactics.
I am always hesitant to say "guys from other subs are the problem" but a lot of the time their descriptions of things allowed over there just sound like its a lot worse of a place treating its low effort circle jerk as a win somehow.
Like, one of the reasons why the rules exist as they do was to prevent the place becoming nothing but /pol/ memes on repeat and Jew being every 5th word, and while I don't agree with how they are used I do prefer think they do some work preventing us becoming a place like that.
Also, I'm literally not a jew, you fucking idiot. That quote is me pointing out that you retards are too stupid to tell the fucking difference between someone who's not a jew, and someone who is a jew, so you'll shoot both because you're violent faggots with no ability to live outside your psychotic delusions.
The same as users letting certain groups of people occupy too much space in their brain. I don't think there's a magic solution for all of life's problems.
Given people's behavior on the Internet and looking at History, I'm at the point where I don't think eliminating the Special Ones is going to stop Whites from killing each other over petty bullshit. It'll be like the Muslims bombing each other over the "proper" version of Islam.
Mean speech hurts the feelings of power-bottoms, so it has been banned from this free speech forum. We wouldn't want the reddit admins to get angry at us, you see.
This is why I use euphemisms to keep it super vague so that nobody can tell which identity groups I am talking about. Since all identity groups are the same in practice, it is impossible to identify a specific one just from context.
I am, right now, not looking at the parent comment because I'm replying to you in my messages.
We're now back to an unfalsifiable position: you should have removed the parent comment even though it wasn't reported, because you should have known it was there without a report, but you shouldn't have removed the child comment, even though it was reported.
Because I didn't see that. Since you insist, I'll go ahead and remove his comment. Why didn't you report it, though?
it was right above my comment, surely you would have seen it. And you still haven't explained how this can be considered an "identity attack" in the first place. it doesn't attack any group as "inferior of conspiring " saying you dislike a group doesn't mean they are "inferior"
Just like I can dislike mods AND think they are inferior as well because those are 2 different things.
DoM already gave you an answer you refused to accept by playing word games, but I'll add that if DoM started scanning and taking down unreported comments up-and-down thread, then some of you would start bitching about that too.
This is you unironically wanting automated moderation in a thread you made complaining about moderation, all the while assuming a reported post shows context in whatever report tab a mod sees.
Mods might well be faggots but you're retarded, petty, and hypocritical for going about things in this way.
When I click on your comment from my feed, I only see your comment, not it's parent.
Worst, by definition, means inferior in some way to literally all others.
"i consider them the worst" means i personally dislike them more than other groups. That is not the same as saying they are inferior.
Did you just express a personal preference my dude?
Lashes!
If that were true, you wouldn't consider them inferior to all other groups.
That's assuming we're going to play this game where you deflect from why you consider them worse than all other groups of people on the planet.
Is this how you actually you think? that anytime you dislike something or someone that must mean they are inferior?
You said they are the worst.
I consider them worse than other groups because i dislike their behavior more than other groups. But that is not the same as saying they are inferior. To other people their behavior might mean that they are actually superior in fact. Saying that i dislike something is not the same as saying that that thing is inferior. Why is that hard to understand?
You're trying to reframe Rule 16 as dealing with objectivity. But it's not that, it's regarding your subjective assessment. You are saying that they are inferior by saying that they are the worst.
As gay a response as expected...
Snarky stickied response, what a shock.
I sticked the response because it's a post about an enforcement mechanism. It should be made visible, by definition. You can call it snarky as you want, but he never reported the offending comment. Nobody did. You didn't report it. OP didn't report it. Nobody in this thread reported it. Not even after making a post about it, and linking to the thread in the comments of this post.
Well...I mean...we're not faggots?
I moon light as one occasionally but I didn’t report anything.
No one reported it because no one believes that it's something worth reporting.
Same thing for u/ger111's comment. There was probably only one single faggot who reported it, likely because he believes that all criticism of jews is antisemitism, which is the one single opinion that no one is allowed to have, or some other similarly retarded belief. The parent comment should remain visible, and the response should also have remained visible. It's free speech, the most important Right that everyone should have.
If people don't think it's rule violating content, then fair enough. But someone did report him. As such, that answers the question for why his content was removed and that the parent content was not. It was not removed because I'm a secret crypto-jew trying to undermine the progress of racial solidarity.
Not every report need be taken seriously, though. The vast majority of people here would clearly much rather have more leeway in what they are allowed to say. The only real times that I saw calls for banning or moderation were against clear trolls or paedophiles.
Why are Israelis such faggots? Unbelievably weak
Because they are the synagogue of Satan.
Inb4 banned for quoting the Bible.
To think Synagogue of Satan is bad thing is a religious value judgement. Which I guess we're not allowed to make. But some people love Satan. So I think you can say Synagogue of Satan.
I can't say that I think Satanists are the worst. I can say "hey that's a Satanist."
Since DoM is a mod, that's when. He's as bad about rule 2, taking talking about potential violent consequences to actions the same as advocating for same.
Hell, he takes comics that he reads things into as advocating for eternal genocide.
He claimed this comic was "pushing a race war."
One would think a user's opinion is not the same as an attack. An attack is, perhaps, "I think you should feel this way." at the very least. I don't see how an attack can take place entirely within someone's head.
However the rules are enforced defines the rules. I guess. You can't say you don't like whatever. It would be easier if that were explicit. You don't get banned completely for making that "mistake" so I would just take it in stride. Do something else for a day.
But, see, Dom can read minds.
Truly my least favorite trait of his, when he makes up what the user is thinking, and uses that as justification for banning.
Reddit mods are worse, expecting you to be able to read their minds.
I haven't had trouble actually following the rules here (I think I got one suspension). So that indicates that it is actually possible to follow them and share your opinions. I modify maybe the way I say something here. That's it.
On ConPro you can say wtf you want about the Js. The fact that there's more sane people here probably says somethign.
DoM IS a reddit mod.
Oh. I havne't messed around with worse KiA.
Because rule 16 exists only to ban the discussion of Jews and to ban Imp every 6 to 12 months for sperging too hard.
The bans of Imp is so Dom can say "not all r16 violations are for criticizing jews".
I guess Imp gets banned for ragging on women?
Imp gets banned because he's nearly as retarded as Rule 16.
He has been known to be mildly critical of them at times.
I have started to pick up on this as well. He is very subtle with his messaging, so it took me a while.
kikeku in action
*Translator's note: Kikeku means (((plan)))
because mr Domitus is self-professed jew who's afraid we'll genocide him
i find it funny how 95% of his community is j-pilled and he pretends like the goyim won't know if he just bans people for pointing out the obvious
the saddest thing that this sad jew actually came to us to help him to deal with the pedopajeet and he promised to "do better" when it comes to censoring goyim on his little fiefdom, he did not improve...
I wish people wouldn't take things out of context. I've been incredibly critical of Dom, including in this very thread, and including on the Jew topic, but I also believe in being fair and accurate. He's said he's not a Jew* (and you can believe that or not), but every time I've seen someone with an alleged gotcha where he "admits" it, it's out of context.
Admitting to faggotry is a joke because all mods are fags. No exceptions. If you're not gay, you become gay the second you assume mod powers.
When he says "not because I'm jewish," it doesn't mean he's admitting to being a Jew, it's saying he thinks he'd be killed by people even though he isn't. The context is clear. He's still retarded, and his spergouts are legendary, and, yes, he is paranoid that the "Leftists" (and that's anyone who has any issues with Jews, clearly!) are going to murder him and his family.
TL;DR: Dom may or may not be a Jew, but I have yet to see any evidence that he is, and everyone who has claimed to have such evidence is taking things out of context or misunderstanding something.
* It is worth pointing out a linguistic trick I've seen many on the "pro-Jew" side pull, whether or not they are Jews, which is not even acknowledging the existence of Jews outside of a religious context, and sometimes not even then. e.g. Leftists can't be Jews, because Leftism supersedes Jewishness...so there is no such thing as a Leftist Jew. So, and I'm not saying this is the case, but Dom could say he's not a Jew, and in his mind think he's completely honest, because he's not religious, or something.
I think if you come to the conclusion that Leftists can't be Jews, then you should go backwards a bit.
Yeah, but you claimed he admitted to being Jewish. He didn't.
And, yeah, that comic spergout was weak shit, and I was one of the main people calling that out and drawing attention to his terrible behavior.
Be honest in your criticism, is all I'm saying. You can think Dom is a Jew if you want. But until he actually says "I'm a Jew," don't go around saying he "admitted" it. Because he hasn't.
That's the problem with all these topics, and unfortunately many of the anti-Jew ones too.
Its not enough for Dom to be a gay faggot and a retard. He has to be the MOST Ultra Evil Giga Nigga Subversive Agent whose every action is bad and every trait is corrupted.
You can't be honest or fair in your criticisms, because everyone is engaged in a struggle session virtue signal to show themselves to say all the necessary affirmations (R16 bad, Dom jew, I got banned for nothing) to prove they are on the "good side" who believes all the right things. That's how you get people acting like he is somehow as bad as or worse than a reddit mod, its a good one up on those affirmations about how bad he is.
Dom is retarded and really needs a check on forcing his opinions as rules, but too many are engaging in Mind-Kill techniques on themselves just to hate him.
The conpro fags whining loudest are not here to engage in good faith discussion, they are here to distract, derail and subvert like the good federal puppets they are. Not everybody that criticizes dom is one, but spamming meta bullshit and trying to overthrow mods is one of their tactics.
I am always hesitant to say "guys from other subs are the problem" but a lot of the time their descriptions of things allowed over there just sound like its a lot worse of a place treating its low effort circle jerk as a win somehow.
Like, one of the reasons why the rules exist as they do was to prevent the place becoming nothing but /pol/ memes on repeat and Jew being every 5th word, and while I don't agree with how they are used I do prefer think they do some work preventing us becoming a place like that.
I think some are just not above the compositional fallacy.
"DoM engages in Jewish behavior, ergo, he must be a Jew"
Comment Reported for: Rule 16 - Identity Attacks
Comment Removed for: Rule 16 - Identity Attacks
Assertion of innate inferiority by behavior.
Jews do often be liking to censor antisemitism, to be fair. He was wrong in his logic/conclusion but, as expected, your modding is retarded too.
Comment Reported for: Rule 16 - Identity Attacks
This comment doesn't do that.
Also, I'm literally not a jew, you fucking idiot. That quote is me pointing out that you retards are too stupid to tell the fucking difference between someone who's not a jew, and someone who is a jew, so you'll shoot both because you're violent faggots with no ability to live outside your psychotic delusions.
All identities are equal. Some are more equal than others.
In before the post gets removed for featuring negative opinion of you know who in the screenshot.
Another day, another meta-post complaining about DoM being a bad mod.
Are we going on 3 years now of complaints surrounding his behavior?
But at least he's highly interactive and receptive!
HAHAHAHA.
:(
It's important to criticize the authorities.
Were you banned previously? Because I've been seeing you everywhere on this forum recently as though you've been here a long time.
No I've not been banned. I delete old accounts so trannies can't come here and data mine me to dox me.
KIA2 was founded on complaining about mod behavior.
Its the most sacred of traditions and should not be interfered with.
I just get tired of it.
The same as users letting certain groups of people occupy too much space in their brain. I don't think there's a magic solution for all of life's problems.
No, but there is a final one. Hey-oh! Ba-dum-chshhh
Given people's behavior on the Internet and looking at History, I'm at the point where I don't think eliminating the Special Ones is going to stop Whites from killing each other over petty bullshit. It'll be like the Muslims bombing each other over the "proper" version of Islam.
Dom in his natural habitat. Being a faggot on reddit, a place where he should stay tbh.
Some of god’s people are more chosen than others
https://kotakuinaction2.win/p/199OB82AQp/x/c/4ZFBNAre08n
Mean speech hurts the feelings of power-bottoms, so it has been banned from this free speech forum. We wouldn't want the reddit admins to get angry at us, you see.
This is why I use euphemisms to keep it super vague so that nobody can tell which identity groups I am talking about. Since all identity groups are the same in practice, it is impossible to identify a specific one just from context.
This place is as gay as reddit
Because your comment was aimed at Mod's chosen people.
Um, you are not supposed to criticize them. Ask u/JosephGoebbels5 for sources.
Dude, you know why.
I guess because Jewish is an ethnicity as well as a religion. Whereas Muslims are not an ethnic group.
The rule is identity group. If the standard was consistent, it'd apply to both. It's not. We all know why.
It does apply to both. I just missed it. I enforced it now, but it was never reported, that's probably why I missed it.
You missed the post directly above the post you got pissy over. And then you blame the users for not reporting it.
Either you're even more incompetent than people give you credit for. Or you seriously need glasses.
I am, right now, not looking at the parent comment because I'm replying to you in my messages.
We're now back to an unfalsifiable position: you should have removed the parent comment even though it wasn't reported, because you should have known it was there without a report, but you shouldn't have removed the child comment, even though it was reported.
Incompetence and shifting the blame, got it.
Are you the new Imp? gImp?
c/JewishPrivilege