it was right above my comment, surely you would have seen it. And you still haven't explained how this can be considered an "identity attack" in the first place. it doesn't attack any group as "inferior of conspiring " saying you dislike a group doesn't mean they are "inferior"
why was i banned for 2 days for my comment but the person i replied to didn't even get his comment deleted?
it was right above my comment, surely you would have seen it
"[sic] didn't report it. OP didn't report it. Nobody in this thread reported it."
This is you unironically wanting automated moderation in a thread you made complaining about moderation, all the while assuming a reported post shows context in whatever report tab a mod sees.
Mods might well be faggots but you're retarded, petty, and hypocritical for going about things in this way.
DoM already gave you an answer you refused to accept by playing word games, but I'll add that if DoM started scanning and taking down unreported comments up-and-down thread, then some of you would start bitching about that too.
I sticked the response because it's a post about an enforcement mechanism. It should be made visible, by definition. You can call it snarky as you want, but he never reported the offending comment. Nobody did. You didn't report it. OP didn't report it. Nobody in this thread reported it.
Not even after making a post about it, and linking to the thread in the comments of this post.
No one reported it because no one believes that it's something worth reporting.
Same thing for u/ger111's comment. There was probably only one single faggot who reported it, likely because he believes that all criticism of jews is antisemitism, which is the one single opinion that no one is allowed to have, or some other similarly retarded belief. The parent comment should remain visible, and the response should also have remained visible. It's free speech, the most important Right that everyone should have.
If people don't think it's rule violating content, then fair enough. But someone did report him. As such, that answers the question for why his content was removed and that the parent content was not. It was not removed because I'm a secret crypto-jew trying to undermine the progress of racial solidarity.
Because I didn't see that. Since you insist, I'll go ahead and remove his comment. Why didn't you report it, though?
it was right above my comment, surely you would have seen it. And you still haven't explained how this can be considered an "identity attack" in the first place. it doesn't attack any group as "inferior of conspiring " saying you dislike a group doesn't mean they are "inferior"
Just like I can dislike mods AND think they are inferior as well because those are 2 different things.
This is you unironically wanting automated moderation in a thread you made complaining about moderation, all the while assuming a reported post shows context in whatever report tab a mod sees.
Mods might well be faggots but you're retarded, petty, and hypocritical for going about things in this way.
When I click on your comment from my feed, I only see your comment, not it's parent.
Worst, by definition, means inferior in some way to literally all others.
"i consider them the worst" means i personally dislike them more than other groups. That is not the same as saying they are inferior.
If that were true, you wouldn't consider them inferior to all other groups.
That's assuming we're going to play this game where you deflect from why you consider them worse than all other groups of people on the planet.
DoM already gave you an answer you refused to accept by playing word games, but I'll add that if DoM started scanning and taking down unreported comments up-and-down thread, then some of you would start bitching about that too.
As gay a response as expected...
Snarky stickied response, what a shock.
I sticked the response because it's a post about an enforcement mechanism. It should be made visible, by definition. You can call it snarky as you want, but he never reported the offending comment. Nobody did. You didn't report it. OP didn't report it. Nobody in this thread reported it. Not even after making a post about it, and linking to the thread in the comments of this post.
Well...I mean...we're not faggots?
I moon light as one occasionally but I didn’t report anything.
No one reported it because no one believes that it's something worth reporting.
Same thing for u/ger111's comment. There was probably only one single faggot who reported it, likely because he believes that all criticism of jews is antisemitism, which is the one single opinion that no one is allowed to have, or some other similarly retarded belief. The parent comment should remain visible, and the response should also have remained visible. It's free speech, the most important Right that everyone should have.
If people don't think it's rule violating content, then fair enough. But someone did report him. As such, that answers the question for why his content was removed and that the parent content was not. It was not removed because I'm a secret crypto-jew trying to undermine the progress of racial solidarity.