I sticked the response because it's a post about an enforcement mechanism. It should be made visible, by definition. You can call it snarky as you want, but he never reported the offending comment. Nobody did. You didn't report it. OP didn't report it. Nobody in this thread reported it.
Not even after making a post about it, and linking to the thread in the comments of this post.
No one reported it because no one believes that it's something worth reporting.
Same thing for u/ger111's comment. There was probably only one single faggot who reported it, likely because he believes that all criticism of jews is antisemitism, which is the one single opinion that no one is allowed to have, or some other similarly retarded belief. The parent comment should remain visible, and the response should also have remained visible. It's free speech, the most important Right that everyone should have.
If people don't think it's rule violating content, then fair enough. But someone did report him. As such, that answers the question for why his content was removed and that the parent content was not. It was not removed because I'm a secret crypto-jew trying to undermine the progress of racial solidarity.
Not every report need be taken seriously, though. The vast majority of people here would clearly much rather have more leeway in what they are allowed to say. The only real times that I saw calls for banning or moderation were against clear trolls or paedophiles.
I sticked the response because it's a post about an enforcement mechanism. It should be made visible, by definition. You can call it snarky as you want, but he never reported the offending comment. Nobody did. You didn't report it. OP didn't report it. Nobody in this thread reported it. Not even after making a post about it, and linking to the thread in the comments of this post.
Well...I mean...we're not faggots?
I moon light as one occasionally but I didn’t report anything.
No one reported it because no one believes that it's something worth reporting.
Same thing for u/ger111's comment. There was probably only one single faggot who reported it, likely because he believes that all criticism of jews is antisemitism, which is the one single opinion that no one is allowed to have, or some other similarly retarded belief. The parent comment should remain visible, and the response should also have remained visible. It's free speech, the most important Right that everyone should have.
If people don't think it's rule violating content, then fair enough. But someone did report him. As such, that answers the question for why his content was removed and that the parent content was not. It was not removed because I'm a secret crypto-jew trying to undermine the progress of racial solidarity.
Not every report need be taken seriously, though. The vast majority of people here would clearly much rather have more leeway in what they are allowed to say. The only real times that I saw calls for banning or moderation were against clear trolls or paedophiles.