I say try because maybe one woman in a thousand is fit to serve.
Just lower standards.
Also, I always find it ridiculous how I, as a very antiwar person, still want us to be better at war. We could be winning these wars I don't think we should be fighting...easily. And it would probably have a lower deathcount, even. It's just insane. We do war in the worst possible way, for all involved. Except the defense contractors, rebuilding companies, lobbyists, and the like, of course.
Please, if we're going to do war, can we at least do it competently? We're capable of it, the powers that be just choose not to do it that way. It's a fucking joke.
I remember stories from early in the Ukraine war where ex-US military guys who volunteered with the Ukrainian army were really not happy about fighting guys who could also call in artillery and air support.
Nah, that isn't why. Killing shit kickers has been a staple of human warfare for thousands of years.
Our rot comes from a different source. In part, altering our doctrine to counter insurgency contributed to the decay, but the true cause of that is the foolishness behind trying to rehabilitate mohammandan subhumans.
But the truth is that the decay is purposeful. Both of society and of our military.
I mean, one of the reasons why our Elites felt comfortable purposefully decaying such a thing is because they saw the power gap between us and those dirt farmers and thought our technology put us so far ahead we didn't need some mega awesome force.
J6 showed that they really don't consider themselves "mortal" or in an danger whatsoever physically, because they've been seeing war as something way over there that can never reach them. A game they don't need to take seriously and can play with.
Right, but when you don't consider something's high quality a necessity you can do what you wish with it. Neglect it when you want to, destroy it when you think it wise, etc.
The root being they consider themselves invincible and thereby a "strong military" isn't necessary, so whatever little thought goes through their mind they can run through it to see what happens. The lasting damage is negligible because they don't need that protection.
If you haven't already, go read General Butler's War Is a Racket and Marine!, the General Puller biography. Our incompetence in warfighting is a direct result of corporate influence, and has been for a century. If we had super capable and competent militaries, we could get away with smaller militaries. Look at what the Marines were from 1940-1990 compared to the Army, and imagine if that concept were carried over to every service branch.
The fact that military men are often prohibited from maintaining their own damn equipment because of obscenely cronyist contracts genuinely shocked me the first time I heard about it. How the fuck are you supposed to fight a war if you have to wait for a licensed contractor technician to be sent over every time you need something fixed?
That's obviously a decision to prevent armies going rogue. If a division is self sufficient than that general can easily coup the government. No doubt that's how it was sold at first anyway.
Also, I just have to say, I despise modern leftists. They managed to take any of the positive points out, while keeping all the negatives. Antiwar? Slava Ukraini! Anti authoritarian? Nope...STATISTS.
Nothing more pathetic than a statist leftist, man.
I'd argue that all leftism is statism. They're only anarchists until they can take power. Their ostensible goals require overwhelming state power to enact upon the unwilling.
The reason why that contradiction doesn't bother them is because they're comfortable with their hypocrisy.
And that principle promotes them to adopt and skinwalk dozens of others when necessary. The same way Muslims and Jews have it written in their doctrine that they can openly lie and cheat the non-believers as need be to accomplish their goals.
Didn’t the marines do a study during Obama years that showed poor results for women in combat but they just ignored it because it wasn’t what the Obama administration wanted
Woulda been the funniest thing ever to see him try. Watching a bunch of grown men trying to trudge through mud up to their waists (because they are too overloaded with equipment) while a toothless man in overalls flies by them on an airboat throwing jugs of piss with 5 different infectious diseases everyone from the Swamp is immune to into all their faces.
Honestly, I'd almost love to see the looks on their faces when their pet negros don't run to lick their feet as "liberators" and instead loot their camps dry and shoot them for giggles as they try to move to the Dirty Rotten Racists they are after.
Oh it wasn’t just that. They offered massive advancement opportunities for any women willing to be infantry officers. The problem was the physical requirements and risks required women to actually do something. They cancelled the program after no women signed up.
Women need special accomodation for mentruation, which reduces combat effectivness. Women can get pregnant in tbe field, second verse, same as the first. Women are also more likely to be mistreated as POWs, and every single female soldier death weighs more heavily on the public conscience than a man's, undermining the war effort.
Even taking a shit in the field is different between men and women. With men, you tell them to suck it up and go shit behind a bush or a rock. With women, you have two other men dig a hole and put up a makeshift tent around it so wahman can feeeeel safe shitting around the men.
Women can get pregnant in tbe field, second verse, same as the first. Women are also more likely to be mistreated as POWs
I'll be more blunt: Female soldiers are free stress relief for the other side.
Women only agreed to the vote because the Progressives took the draft off the table for them. One century later, now they're getting drafted anyway. GG no re.
Which do you think more women would support; no Draft, but the 19th gets repealed, or Draft and they can keep voting like they have been since the 19th was added? My money is on them keeping the Draft and voting, not because they would vote more intelligently and avoid conflicts that would result in wars, but because they can just keep getting out of it by getting pregnant. Forced abortions and mandatory contraceptives would have to be instated for all servicewomen. The Progressives couldn't possibly disagree with that, right?
There are state militias. And, retired vets not pleased that the US govt declared all retired military terrorists. People with dyslexia fail the tests all the time.
There might be an opportunity for private military academies that operate paintball/airsoft courses to find promising recruits, and put them in apprenticeship programs. Only problem would be civil rights law and ESG bullshit, it would unfortunately need to be HQ'd in some LatAm country, although since LatAm is such a hotspot for mercs I suppose it's not the worst inconvenience.
Edit: Argentina would be the perfect place for such an academy, come to think of it. That country could become the Switzerland of the western hemisphere.
A robust civilization that is winning wars, doesn't have to try and conscript females.
I say try because maybe one woman in a thousand is fit to serve.
Just lower standards.
Also, I always find it ridiculous how I, as a very antiwar person, still want us to be better at war. We could be winning these wars I don't think we should be fighting...easily. And it would probably have a lower deathcount, even. It's just insane. We do war in the worst possible way, for all involved. Except the defense contractors, rebuilding companies, lobbyists, and the like, of course.
Please, if we're going to do war, can we at least do it competently? We're capable of it, the powers that be just choose not to do it that way. It's a fucking joke.
Decades of bullying poor farmers with rusty AKs and RPGs has made the US complacent and retarded.
I remember stories from early in the Ukraine war where ex-US military guys who volunteered with the Ukrainian army were really not happy about fighting guys who could also call in artillery and air support.
Nah, that isn't why. Killing shit kickers has been a staple of human warfare for thousands of years.
Our rot comes from a different source. In part, altering our doctrine to counter insurgency contributed to the decay, but the true cause of that is the foolishness behind trying to rehabilitate mohammandan subhumans.
But the truth is that the decay is purposeful. Both of society and of our military.
I mean, one of the reasons why our Elites felt comfortable purposefully decaying such a thing is because they saw the power gap between us and those dirt farmers and thought our technology put us so far ahead we didn't need some mega awesome force.
J6 showed that they really don't consider themselves "mortal" or in an danger whatsoever physically, because they've been seeing war as something way over there that can never reach them. A game they don't need to take seriously and can play with.
They did it not from neglect, but with a goal in mind. A patriotic, professional military would overthrow them for what they have planned.
Pinochet terrified them. They have been trying to prevent that ever since.
The enemy desires compliant slaves.
Right, but when you don't consider something's high quality a necessity you can do what you wish with it. Neglect it when you want to, destroy it when you think it wise, etc.
The root being they consider themselves invincible and thereby a "strong military" isn't necessary, so whatever little thought goes through their mind they can run through it to see what happens. The lasting damage is negligible because they don't need that protection.
If you haven't already, go read General Butler's War Is a Racket and Marine!, the General Puller biography. Our incompetence in warfighting is a direct result of corporate influence, and has been for a century. If we had super capable and competent militaries, we could get away with smaller militaries. Look at what the Marines were from 1940-1990 compared to the Army, and imagine if that concept were carried over to every service branch.
The fact that military men are often prohibited from maintaining their own damn equipment because of obscenely cronyist contracts genuinely shocked me the first time I heard about it. How the fuck are you supposed to fight a war if you have to wait for a licensed contractor technician to be sent over every time you need something fixed?
"Your puny AR-15 can't do anything against a tank!"
"I'm sorry, sir, but all of our tanks are stuck in the garage. The civilian technicians keep...disappearing."
That's obviously a decision to prevent armies going rogue. If a division is self sufficient than that general can easily coup the government. No doubt that's how it was sold at first anyway.
Also, I just have to say, I despise modern leftists. They managed to take any of the positive points out, while keeping all the negatives. Antiwar? Slava Ukraini! Anti authoritarian? Nope...STATISTS.
Nothing more pathetic than a statist leftist, man.
I'd argue that all leftism is statism. They're only anarchists until they can take power. Their ostensible goals require overwhelming state power to enact upon the unwilling.
The reason why that contradiction doesn't bother them is because they're comfortable with their hypocrisy.
I (and many others, to be fair) have said before that leftists can't be hypocrites, because you need principles to be a hypocrite.
Amounts to the same thing, in essence. One cannot speak falsehoods so constantly without rewiring your brain.
There's nothing hypocritical about anything they do because their single goal is the destruction of civilization.
And that principle promotes them to adopt and skinwalk dozens of others when necessary. The same way Muslims and Jews have it written in their doctrine that they can openly lie and cheat the non-believers as need be to accomplish their goals.
I know the general gist, but I'll check them out. I've heard good things, but haven't read them myself.
Didn’t the marines do a study during Obama years that showed poor results for women in combat but they just ignored it because it wasn’t what the Obama administration wanted
That and worse yes. Obama ordered several wargames about declaring war on the South for example.
Woulda been the funniest thing ever to see him try. Watching a bunch of grown men trying to trudge through mud up to their waists (because they are too overloaded with equipment) while a toothless man in overalls flies by them on an airboat throwing jugs of piss with 5 different infectious diseases everyone from the Swamp is immune to into all their faces.
Shit would make Vietnam look like a joke.
Oh I very much agree.
Because I was part of that scenario planning and I've seen the results before they buried them.
Spoiler: the feds lose. Bad.
Honestly, I'd almost love to see the looks on their faces when their pet negros don't run to lick their feet as "liberators" and instead loot their camps dry and shoot them for giggles as they try to move to the Dirty Rotten Racists they are after.
Oh it wasn’t just that. They offered massive advancement opportunities for any women willing to be infantry officers. The problem was the physical requirements and risks required women to actually do something. They cancelled the program after no women signed up.
Sounds like most things under Obizzle.
'uhhh, what do you mean, unconstitutional? duhhhh that ain't right!'
No Women are fit to serve, her fitness is only one side of the coin.
The true problem is that any who are, don't make up for the resources necessary to train, equip, and house them differently from the male soldiers.
Were it up to me I'd ban females from serving active duty, and reconstitute the women's service corps.
You won't get many takers if they have to wear heels and dresses.
Still just the tip of the iceberg.
Women need special accomodation for mentruation, which reduces combat effectivness. Women can get pregnant in tbe field, second verse, same as the first. Women are also more likely to be mistreated as POWs, and every single female soldier death weighs more heavily on the public conscience than a man's, undermining the war effort.
Even taking a shit in the field is different between men and women. With men, you tell them to suck it up and go shit behind a bush or a rock. With women, you have two other men dig a hole and put up a makeshift tent around it so wahman can feeeeel safe shitting around the men.
I'll be more blunt: Female soldiers are free stress relief for the other side.
Yes to all. Hence service corps. They should be doing paperwork far from the battlefield, to free up real soldiers.
Imagine being on the front with your lives in the hands of some draftee female support fobbit.
Didn't they drop standards lower than an OF ho's panty's?
69th Mattress Division, reporting for duty.
My very first thought on reading the title: that’s one way to shore up the birthrates.
Women only agreed to the vote because the Progressives took the draft off the table for them. One century later, now they're getting drafted anyway. GG no re.
Which do you think more women would support; no Draft, but the 19th gets repealed, or Draft and they can keep voting like they have been since the 19th was added? My money is on them keeping the Draft and voting, not because they would vote more intelligently and avoid conflicts that would result in wars, but because they can just keep getting out of it by getting pregnant. Forced abortions and mandatory contraceptives would have to be instated for all servicewomen. The Progressives couldn't possibly disagree with that, right?
It only makes sense that the state would provide healthcare, which I'm told abortion is, to conscripts.
Suddenly our population increased 33% as 100million women went pregnant at the same time.
It's obviously men's fault. We need to castrate all males below O-1. That will stop the rampant pregnancies.
#draftourdaughters
shaniqua can fight for shaniqua's government, because i sure won't.
A) Hahahahahaha.
B) Fuck off, gubmint.
I'm calling it now. Selective Service will be completely abolished inside 5 years due to simping.
That outcome is acceptable.
I just told my son to become a mercenary because our military doesn't deserve him.
Don't mercs only accept vets due to the expense of training?
There are state militias. And, retired vets not pleased that the US govt declared all retired military terrorists. People with dyslexia fail the tests all the time.
My hope is that nothing serious happens.
There might be an opportunity for private military academies that operate paintball/airsoft courses to find promising recruits, and put them in apprenticeship programs. Only problem would be civil rights law and ESG bullshit, it would unfortunately need to be HQ'd in some LatAm country, although since LatAm is such a hotspot for mercs I suppose it's not the worst inconvenience.
Edit: Argentina would be the perfect place for such an academy, come to think of it. That country could become the Switzerland of the western hemisphere.
Most America's don't have passports. Isn't that odd? Most of the planet has passports.
I feel like there was a case where somebody was convicted of federal crimes for saying this would happen.
Step 1: Create female army
Step 2: Tell them to kill all men
The morality of a woman just following orders is somehow even lower than that of a man just following orders.
Thier attempts will make for good comedy, if nothing else.
this combined with the automatic entry into Selective service makes me think the faggots are actually considering starting a draft.
It won't happen.