Not your shield, JK. You (liberal white woman) brought this on yourselves. You yourself were leading all manner of cancel culture mobs back in the day.
This is going to be a classic "reap what you sow" karmic smack down.
Edgelord JK had to put the Bible in the same category as trans women, of course, as far as infringements on women's freedoms. (Not shown in the screenshot.) I wonder if she'll ever get around to speaking about the Quran and its subjugation of Muslim girls. Probably not, as judging from Cho Chang and those Indian twin characters she has absolutely no idea what non white people are like beyond the fact that they exist somewhere outside of her castle.
That’s the funny thing about diversity and representation. If a non-white character behaves “white”, then it isn’t genuine representation. But if genuine representation means the character must be an insufferable feminist cunt or a ghetto black retard, then sign me up for no diversity.
The implied premise of identity politics is that certain values are inherent to certain identities. A white character can’t present a relatable experience for a black audience, yes? But if ideas and values are inherent to identities, and some ideas and values are better than others, then some identities are better than others.
This is how supremacist ideologies get off the ground.
The implied premise of identity politics is that certain values are inherent to certain identities.
Acting "white" has been a massive cause of bullying amongst the black community for decades. That's not identity politics, that's people literally believing that acting smart and talking proper makes you not-black anymore.
For once, this wasn't the Left poisoning their little pet negros, its something the Left learned from them.
A white character can’t present a relatable experience for a black audience, yes?
I'm not white or black, but the thought that a character needs to be the same color as you hadn't even crossed my mind until they started screaming about it non-stop 10 years ago. It still seems bizarre to me.
By the way, it is funny that these militant activist sort of people always say that they want to see people "who look like me". So... people look like them if they are black - all blacks look alike. That is one of the many statements that you can say if you're on one side and not when you're on another side.
Edgelord JK had to put the Bible in the same category as trans women, of course, as far as infringements on women's freedoms
It's the opposite of reality. Just one of the many ways that mainstream propaganda infects people's minds and they repeat slogans that they have not thought through. The Bible is, in fact, a major advancement for women.
In the Roman Empire, girls were regularly exposed for wild animals to eat them or for slaveholders/brothel keepers to gather them and abuse them to their whims. That still happens in India and China today. It was Christianity that put an end to that. It was Christianity that insisted on the spiritual equality of men and women, that revered worthy women like the Virgin Mary and Saint Catherine.
Only after 2000 years of taking for granted everything that Christianity provided, can you make such foolish and childish claims.
That said, Rowling's activism is damaging to transgenderism and not to the Bible, which is why I'm glad that she is doing it.
I'm not gonna bother checking if this is actually the case, but this reads exactly like her original statement. She was always of the opinion that "men are bad and woman are good, and I don't believe men can become good." The only reason she got leeway is because the tranny issue is so fucking insane that even people who would hate each other any other day can agree that trannies are worse.
its all about power with these cunts, they love homos and trannies (feminized men) UNTIL the same faggots takes away their little power privledge class
when Troons become more valuable/important than wimminz then suddenly it becomes AN ISSUE
but a decade prior this cunt has been clamoring for more faggotry, more feminism and more minority representation as well (you can google that if you don't believe me)
Unfortunately she voted for a muslim Scottish leader who hates women
No she didn't, nor did anyone outside of the actual party because those elections haven't even happened yet. Sturgeon was First Minister at the time the SNP were re-elected, Humza Yousef was a result of Sturgeon's own financial fuckups with her husband leading to her resignation and vacating the spot Yousef then filled.
No, it shows you where a lot of Western countries.
Why is there a Somali in charge of a certain area of the US? Because the population that voted for them is largely Somali.
Why is there very large "Asian" representation in England at Westminister through both the current Prime Minister and many others? Because again the local areas those politicians come and are voted by experience disproportionate populations of the same groups,
The same thing is happening in Scotland with Huma Yousef. He's from Glasgow, the largest city in the country, which like many cities vs rural areas cases results in vastly skewed demographs that rarely match the rest of the country but end up wielding disproportionate political power that is then used to bludgeon everyone else.
It's the same thing every time; large city populations with minority voting blocks tactically voting and beating everyone else who splits the remaining votes amongst random parties.
I wonder if you get jail time in Scotland now for saying blacks have a pattern of criminality, or that muslims have a pattern of rape and pedophilia ( truth ).
This bitch is not your friend. She is still a rabid man hating feminist.
Fuck her. Feminism brought us this gender identity stupidity.
Trans women are real women and they are entitled to ALL your women only spaces, ALL your women only sports, ALL your women only programs and privileges.
Feminists made their bed, now lie in it and learn to suck trans lesbian cock and STFU, you hateful bitches.
I have hated Rowling since the beginning, I still hate her to this day and only faggots defend this stupid bitch. Just because she also hates trannies does not make her an ally to the fight against the left, it just makes her a useful idiot.
I respect Rowling for the same reason I respect that Roger Moorehouse fellow, whose opinions on Israel I don't like. She could have lived a comfortable life, but instead she had the spine and courage to swim against the mainstream, creating considerable difficulty for herself.
And if there is something that is lacking in the modern age, it's people with courage.
If there is one thing that has me second guess my opposition to the tranny degeneracy, it's seeing them eat the feminists. I hope JKR gets hit with an Alex Jones sized fine over all of this.
Absolutely. That's the only reason I said it makes me second guess it instead of wanting to wait until their fight is over and then taking out whoever wins.
Which men exactly, J.K.?
Which group is massively overrepresented in UK gang rape gangs, JK Rowling?
She's a radfem. To her most regular sex is rape and disagreements are verbal abuse.
So to her its literally all men.
doesn't matter. me woman, me victim. nevermind that she's one of the wealthiest women to ever live.
All the men that raised her to Queen of the TERFs from consuming her 'adventures in hogwash' empire should definitely be registered as criminals.
Not your shield, JK. You (liberal white woman) brought this on yourselves. You yourself were leading all manner of cancel culture mobs back in the day.
This is going to be a classic "reap what you sow" karmic smack down.
Back in the day? This tweet was posted after her cancellation.
She will continue to demand her right to speak at the same time she demands you be denied yours.
Based.
Abolish Title IX.
Edgelord JK had to put the Bible in the same category as trans women, of course, as far as infringements on women's freedoms. (Not shown in the screenshot.) I wonder if she'll ever get around to speaking about the Quran and its subjugation of Muslim girls. Probably not, as judging from Cho Chang and those Indian twin characters she has absolutely no idea what non white people are like beyond the fact that they exist somewhere outside of her castle.
That’s the funny thing about diversity and representation. If a non-white character behaves “white”, then it isn’t genuine representation. But if genuine representation means the character must be an insufferable feminist cunt or a ghetto black retard, then sign me up for no diversity.
The implied premise of identity politics is that certain values are inherent to certain identities. A white character can’t present a relatable experience for a black audience, yes? But if ideas and values are inherent to identities, and some ideas and values are better than others, then some identities are better than others.
This is how supremacist ideologies get off the ground.
Ironically the "No true Scotsman" fallacy.
Acting "white" has been a massive cause of bullying amongst the black community for decades. That's not identity politics, that's people literally believing that acting smart and talking proper makes you not-black anymore.
For once, this wasn't the Left poisoning their little pet negros, its something the Left learned from them.
Have you posted this comment before? I am getting deja vu, here.
I'm not white or black, but the thought that a character needs to be the same color as you hadn't even crossed my mind until they started screaming about it non-stop 10 years ago. It still seems bizarre to me.
By the way, it is funny that these militant activist sort of people always say that they want to see people "who look like me". So... people look like them if they are black - all blacks look alike. That is one of the many statements that you can say if you're on one side and not when you're on another side.
One of the actresses almost got honor killed so it's not like she didnt have the opportunity.
6 months for battery and the female victim begs for him not to even get that much?
JK, your patriarchy is over there, with the brown Muslims, the Whites lost that privilege long ago.
It's the opposite of reality. Just one of the many ways that mainstream propaganda infects people's minds and they repeat slogans that they have not thought through. The Bible is, in fact, a major advancement for women.
In the Roman Empire, girls were regularly exposed for wild animals to eat them or for slaveholders/brothel keepers to gather them and abuse them to their whims. That still happens in India and China today. It was Christianity that put an end to that. It was Christianity that insisted on the spiritual equality of men and women, that revered worthy women like the Virgin Mary and Saint Catherine.
Only after 2000 years of taking for granted everything that Christianity provided, can you make such foolish and childish claims.
That said, Rowling's activism is damaging to transgenderism and not to the Bible, which is why I'm glad that she is doing it.
I'm not gonna bother checking if this is actually the case, but this reads exactly like her original statement. She was always of the opinion that "men are bad and woman are good, and I don't believe men can become good." The only reason she got leeway is because the tranny issue is so fucking insane that even people who would hate each other any other day can agree that trannies are worse.
its all about power with these cunts, they love homos and trannies (feminized men) UNTIL the same faggots takes away their little power privledge class
when Troons become more valuable/important than wimminz then suddenly it becomes AN ISSUE
but a decade prior this cunt has been clamoring for more faggotry, more feminism and more minority representation as well (you can google that if you don't believe me)
honestly speaking, Harry Potter isn't worth shit and Rowling should be hanged like the rest of the anti-White foids
'TERF' is not a label chosen by them. It's what they are called by their enemies, and which they have adopted in turn.
She does not want merit for all.
She wants extra gibs for her team.
Unfortunately she voted for a muslim
Scottishleader who hates womenNo she didn't, nor did anyone outside of the actual party because those elections haven't even happened yet. Sturgeon was First Minister at the time the SNP were re-elected, Humza Yousef was a result of Sturgeon's own financial fuckups with her husband leading to her resignation and vacating the spot Yousef then filled.
Where did you get that she voted SNP - which is the party of that Pakistani lowlife?
(Just imagine, a Scottish Nationalist Party being led by a Pakistani who hates white people. Shows you what they are.)
No, it shows you where a lot of Western countries.
Why is there a Somali in charge of a certain area of the US? Because the population that voted for them is largely Somali.
Why is there very large "Asian" representation in England at Westminister through both the current Prime Minister and many others? Because again the local areas those politicians come and are voted by experience disproportionate populations of the same groups,
The same thing is happening in Scotland with Huma Yousef. He's from Glasgow, the largest city in the country, which like many cities vs rural areas cases results in vastly skewed demographs that rarely match the rest of the country but end up wielding disproportionate political power that is then used to bludgeon everyone else.
It's the same thing every time; large city populations with minority voting blocks tactically voting and beating everyone else who splits the remaining votes amongst random parties.
Oh so because I was born a man, I have a “pattern of criminality”?
Go fuck yourself, Rowling. I agree with her on the tranny bullshit, but she’s still a man hating feminist cunt.
I wonder if you get jail time in Scotland now for saying blacks have a pattern of criminality, or that muslims have a pattern of rape and pedophilia ( truth ).
That would probably get you jailtime almost everywhere in Europe.
Because we are free, democratic countries, you know.
This bitch is not your friend. She is still a rabid man hating feminist.
Fuck her. Feminism brought us this gender identity stupidity.
Trans women are real women and they are entitled to ALL your women only spaces, ALL your women only sports, ALL your women only programs and privileges.
Feminists made their bed, now lie in it and learn to suck trans lesbian cock and STFU, you hateful bitches.
Nasty woman.
I have hated Rowling since the beginning, I still hate her to this day and only faggots defend this stupid bitch. Just because she also hates trannies does not make her an ally to the fight against the left, it just makes her a useful idiot.
I respect Rowling for the same reason I respect that Roger Moorehouse fellow, whose opinions on Israel I don't like. She could have lived a comfortable life, but instead she had the spine and courage to swim against the mainstream, creating considerable difficulty for herself.
And if there is something that is lacking in the modern age, it's people with courage.
If there is one thing that has me second guess my opposition to the tranny degeneracy, it's seeing them eat the feminists. I hope JKR gets hit with an Alex Jones sized fine over all of this.
The only problem is that they are eating children at a much faster rate.
Absolutely. That's the only reason I said it makes me second guess it instead of wanting to wait until their fight is over and then taking out whoever wins.
No that tracks. Scratch a conservative and you'll find a feminist and a bootlicker
Hey wouldn't you know it, feminism is just class warfare (marxism) but for sex! And just like communism, feminism was created by the same people!
Let the TERFs and trannies fight each other. If we're lucky maybe some leftists will get confused about who to support and end up hating both.