We wuz George Washington
(media.scored.co)
Comments (42)
sorted by:
I legit have never heard that George Washington had African ancestry. Did Gemini just make that up
Yes.
Completely made up yes.
I think trust in all kinds of digital evidence is going to collapse to zero. High profile people have already been publicly fooled by AI generated photos. Soon it will be movies, sound, live streams, all types of online interaction. Anyone who doesn't develop a healthy skepticism is going to be fooled by a different scam every minute of every day.
No, the Kemet types made it up.
It's not a joke. At least on Twitter.
They say they "wuz" everything. They invented everything. As far as I can tell, they are entirely serious. They wuz jooz. They wuz Mohammed. They wuz Jesus.
They really want to steal EVERYTHANG
"We're good at more than just stealing!"
> Steals your history
"See, we have accomplishments too!"
A misbegotten race without accomplishment of their own, desperate to seize and appropriate the deeds of others.
Pathetic beyond words.
Is this the new Elden Ring story?
"Foul Tarnished!"
Unfortunately for you, however, you are maidenless.
"Google, are white people real?"
“That’s a complicated question rooted deeply in racism and supremacism. While white people MAY exist, acknowledging their existence or accomplishments would foster more racism and / or anti-semitism which is counter intuitive to the promotion of diversity world wide (specifically in North America, Europe, and Australia).”
Also I’m throwing the bs flag regarding historians arguing mixed ancestry. This is all similar to how modern day period pieces push the idea that 1600s London looked like modern day Los Angeles. No legit historian is saying this. Although if they want to play the game of “you have 1 percent African dna so you are black” then I want to see a lot of white people taking advantage of affirmative action. Heck, according to this you just need to say “possible ancestry”
I feel like I remember some Ancestry employee admitting that they fake 1% African DNA results on people's profiles purely because they know it's a way to upset them.
From Cracked: https://archive.is/uvyEk
I haven't been able to find which site the apparent source is from.
I want to punch the person that wrote that article in the throat.
I've seen that quote before, and it still enrages me as always.
And they wonder why people don't trust them.
I remember that as well, and from more than one of those sites too.
I heard about that too. Although it would be funny if a white person got an affirmative action job by using that to his/her advantage
They tested his DNA. His DNA was composed of adenine, cytosine, guanine, and thymine.
African DNA is composed of adenine, cytosine, guanine, and thymine.
Therefore George Washington was part black. Also he was part amoeba.
And part banana.
Is DNA "biological reality"?
Considering they're willing to ignore Y chromosomes in pursuit of a fetish they would probably say no.
Absurd. I’ve seen this twisted logic before
i've seen some "people" a while ago claiming Pushkin was black, because his grandpa was presumably black
and let's not forget the whole "Bach did not write his pieces, it was a black slave that worked for him"
logic is not the strongest suit of shadowy persons
I wouldn't say that Pushkin was black, but he was absolutely mixed. His great-grandfather was a former African slave in the Ottoman court, purchased by Russians to bring to Peter the Great. That makes Pushkin 1/8 African.
One of Pushkin's daughters (who was 1/16 black).
https://www.meisterdrucke.us/fine-art-prints/Ivan-Kosmich-Makarov/730633/Portrait-of-Natalia-Alexandrovna-Pushkina%2C-Countess-of-Merenberg-1836-1913%2C-Daughter-of-poet%2C-1849-.html
Genetics are fascinating. One of my friends had a black African dad and an English mom and he looked like, slightly tanner than an average Euro and with slightly crinklier hair than an average Euro.
OTOH, I've known similar mixes who look almost 100% African as well.
Race is a social construct? Okay, I identify as black. Give me a first-class ticket to Princeton and all of the scholarships or I'll cancel you.
I'm reading through the marxification of education and Lindsey is summarises each flavour of marxism as having a different "flavour" of what private property is. Each flavour then will create a split between those with that version of private property and those that dont. (economic marxism is classical marxism where private property is a pysical thing. Other flavours like critical race theory take "whiteness" as the private property)
Educational marxism takes knowledge itself as the "private property"
I literally just read that section of the book, and I come on here and the fucking AI is drawing the dialectic of "traditional perspectives" aka objective knowledge and "emerging evidence" which is the antithesis. Lo and behold "recognising the limits of racial categorisation" is the marxist synthesis.
The way I always saw it was they had a different definition of oppressor and oppressed. A lot of places, when Marxism came, they raided the academies and put those guys in camps. Of course, the Marxists in academia aren't into that. They put themselves in oppressed classes. In some place, the bad guys were like the kulaks, and in America it's white men.
If you have physical history books I would encourage you to keep them safe. We're going to need them to rebuild in the future.
This is a pretty weird way to cover for the fact that Gemini fucked up those historical images this week, lol…
If this is an attempt at “covering arse”, it’s a pretty poor one, to say the least…
midwit wordcel ai programmed by soy-based lifeforms
If race is a social construct, then DNA cannot give you information on race, retAIrd.
He was white.
His teeth later in life however