I supported age appropriate sex ed until the teacher unions fought Florida's anti-grooming bill and proved that they couldn't be trusted to keep it informational and age appropriate.
Human sexuality taught in psychology departments covers how to fuck, though it's more like capstone course in a graduate program on fucking than a 101 class. A buddy of mine took it and since those classes are mostly women any man taking that class gets dump truck full of red pills.
The main thing is that they're very open about the degenerate shit they do in bed with men they're actually attracted to. So the red pills are that women are more degenerate than men with a little bit of AF/BB thrown in.
There's no plausible scenario, even outside of clown world, where I think the education system would ever be capable of providing any kind of helpful information or guidance on human sexuality and/or romantic relationships beyond the technical biological basics.
And within clown world it can't even manage to provide THOSE basics.
In my day, it consisted of 50% the biomechanical nuts and bolts, and 50% all the diseases you could catch, complete with graphic, full-colour photos (and AIDS wasn't even a thing yet, not for another couple of years or so.)
All I remember from sex ed was they spent an inordinate ammount of time trying to convince us that AIDS wasn’t a “gay” disease. They never gave us any statistics or anything, they just really wanted us to know that straight people could get it too.
How long ago was this? I took it in the mid to late 00s and while they made it clear that straight people can get it they never mentioned homos. The notion that you can't educate kids without bringing up faggots and troons at every opportunity is very recent. I got through the entirety of K-12 and they were never brought up in anything more than an offhand manner, and always at the instigation of a student. I never knew any of my teachers' political affiliations either, though I'm sure they were mostly Democrats even back then.
This was the late 2000’s. We had AIDS week a few years at my school district, they had people with AIDS come in, shit like that. It was a very rural School district in a red county too.
Similar here, aids was already a thing though and it was very much about contraception and that's totally fine with me. I am worried about some younger family members around the age where they have sex ed. I've already heard stories of all the boys in class sharing feet pics, I was utterly floored how degenerate this generation is turning out to be and add the whole gay agenda on top... We might have a big issue coming up there.
I just got a day each of a diagram of the parts, then 3 days of "here is a list of every birth control on the market, its side effects and price."
Which, I get the point it was trying to make. But the guy portion was finished in 5 minutes of day 1, so it was a completely useless waste of time from there.
An attractive woman in a bideo game is the end of the world, but your kids being exposed full-on raw buttsex is beautiful and must be celebrated for some reason.
The whole basis of sexual education was fucked up in the first place.
The idea was to reduce teen pregnancies. Why? Because girls and boys were fucking thanks to meeting in school. The solution was always to abolish mixed schools and/or go back to home schooling.
So home economics with an emphasis on obeying their husbands for the girls who haven't been ruined by feminism, and internships at brothels for the rest.
They should just go with Dave Chappelle’s idea: get the two oldest, ugliest teachers in the school and make them fuck in front of the whole student body, that should put everyone off sex at least until they’re twenty.
Teen pregnancies are a good thing if the boys are allowed to work at a young age, the girls aren't sent to school, and marriage is forced after pregnancy
Not between boys and girls they aren't. Teenage boys are not ready for families. I support 25-35yo men with teenage girls but I don't believe teenage boys should be with teenage girls at all.
I wonder about this, sometimes. I've seen enough instances where men effectively 'rise to the challenge' of leading thier family and fatherhood that makes me question how such things should be managed, and if we coddle boys too much from potential failure, even in this.
...conversely, there's the economic part of this whole clusterfuck to consider, so I dunno.
(As an aside, one of the most based catholic takes I ever saw on the question of 'how do we get teenagers to wait for marriage to have sex' was 'get them married while they're teens in an arranged marriage so they can have sex, you idiot'.)
The history is young girl with older man. Even Plato suggested the ideal age of marriage between man and woman was 25-35 for men and 16-20 for women and that was BC. Thousands of years ago. Teenage boys and girls being together is a rather modern degenerate take. Teenage boys need to grow into men before they start a family and teenage girls need to start a family before they expire like raw milk.
People did a pretty good job of figuring out how sex works for tens of thousands of years before the concept of sex ed existed. Even the dumbest animals have no issues figuring it out.
6-7th grade. semen + egg = baby. babies are a huge responsibility. Semen comes from the penis, egg resides in the womb. humans have a natural urge to conduct intercourse. excessive relief of those urges can create an addiction. intercourse of any kind can transmit disease and damage the body.
what sex education has become apparently:
elementary school. masturbation is the bee's knees! what is a woman really? be free and have sex! abortion is no big deal.
I supported age appropriate sex ed until the teacher unions fought Florida's anti-grooming bill and proved that they couldn't be trusted to keep it informational and age appropriate.
Sex ed should be a biology class not a how to fuck 101. The “safe sex” movement was a lie to push sex ideology on kids.
Human sexuality taught in psychology departments covers how to fuck, though it's more like capstone course in a graduate program on fucking than a 101 class. A buddy of mine took it and since those classes are mostly women any man taking that class gets dump truck full of red pills.
The main thing is that they're very open about the degenerate shit they do in bed with men they're actually attracted to. So the red pills are that women are more degenerate than men with a little bit of AF/BB thrown in.
Sex ed should be replaced with arranged marriage. too many young boys get left behind in the dating scene.
100% agreed.
There's no plausible scenario, even outside of clown world, where I think the education system would ever be capable of providing any kind of helpful information or guidance on human sexuality and/or romantic relationships beyond the technical biological basics.
And within clown world it can't even manage to provide THOSE basics.
I denounce any form of public education. The government and it's slaves clearly can't be trusted to teach anything at this point.
I denounce the public. They gave us the government.
In my day, it consisted of 50% the biomechanical nuts and bolts, and 50% all the diseases you could catch, complete with graphic, full-colour photos (and AIDS wasn't even a thing yet, not for another couple of years or so.)
All I remember from sex ed was they spent an inordinate ammount of time trying to convince us that AIDS wasn’t a “gay” disease. They never gave us any statistics or anything, they just really wanted us to know that straight people could get it too.
How long ago was this? I took it in the mid to late 00s and while they made it clear that straight people can get it they never mentioned homos. The notion that you can't educate kids without bringing up faggots and troons at every opportunity is very recent. I got through the entirety of K-12 and they were never brought up in anything more than an offhand manner, and always at the instigation of a student. I never knew any of my teachers' political affiliations either, though I'm sure they were mostly Democrats even back then.
This was the late 2000’s. We had AIDS week a few years at my school district, they had people with AIDS come in, shit like that. It was a very rural School district in a red county too.
I remember asking what happens if you have to pee during sex lol
Similar here, aids was already a thing though and it was very much about contraception and that's totally fine with me. I am worried about some younger family members around the age where they have sex ed. I've already heard stories of all the boys in class sharing feet pics, I was utterly floored how degenerate this generation is turning out to be and add the whole gay agenda on top... We might have a big issue coming up there.
Contraception is a jewish invention to destroy white birth rates and normalize premarital sex. Contraceptive sellers deserve death.
The issue is already here. It's just a matter of how many parents in the West will be fine with knowing their lineage ends with them?
I just got a day each of a diagram of the parts, then 3 days of "here is a list of every birth control on the market, its side effects and price."
Which, I get the point it was trying to make. But the guy portion was finished in 5 minutes of day 1, so it was a completely useless waste of time from there.
that's how it was for me
An attractive woman in a bideo game is the end of the world, but your kids being exposed full-on raw buttsex is beautiful and must be celebrated for some reason.
Normies are against this but have to shut up just to keep their jobs and not be banned on whatever site they're communicating on.
The whole basis of sexual education was fucked up in the first place.
The idea was to reduce teen pregnancies. Why? Because girls and boys were fucking thanks to meeting in school. The solution was always to abolish mixed schools and/or go back to home schooling.
So what you're saying is the government created it's own problem, and then used the problem it created to further advance it's own agenda?
Impossibru
Why do girls need to go to school in the first place?
Ideally, they should go to school to learn skills to better please men.
So home economics with an emphasis on obeying their husbands for the girls who haven't been ruined by feminism, and internships at brothels for the rest.
wtf... since when did KIA2 turn into ChatGPT versions of myself.
I thought you'd like that one lol.
we could always do korea method of 'beating the libido out of our students by overworking the fuck out of them'
It worked so well for s.korea....
I thought the South Korean method was make the women so feminist no one wants to fuck them.
why not both?
They should just go with Dave Chappelle’s idea: get the two oldest, ugliest teachers in the school and make them fuck in front of the whole student body, that should put everyone off sex at least until they’re twenty.
You'd think but in reality 50% of the school who are just as ugly as the ugliest teachers would be turned on.
Teen pregnancies are a good thing if the boys are allowed to work at a young age, the girls aren't sent to school, and marriage is forced after pregnancy
Not between boys and girls they aren't. Teenage boys are not ready for families. I support 25-35yo men with teenage girls but I don't believe teenage boys should be with teenage girls at all.
I wonder about this, sometimes. I've seen enough instances where men effectively 'rise to the challenge' of leading thier family and fatherhood that makes me question how such things should be managed, and if we coddle boys too much from potential failure, even in this.
...conversely, there's the economic part of this whole clusterfuck to consider, so I dunno.
(As an aside, one of the most based catholic takes I ever saw on the question of 'how do we get teenagers to wait for marriage to have sex' was 'get them married while they're teens in an arranged marriage so they can have sex, you idiot'.)
I think arranged marriages for sex would be superior to teenage sex without marriage tbh.
16-20yo girls are ideal for marriage.
The history is young girl with older man. Even Plato suggested the ideal age of marriage between man and woman was 25-35 for men and 16-20 for women and that was BC. Thousands of years ago. Teenage boys and girls being together is a rather modern degenerate take. Teenage boys need to grow into men before they start a family and teenage girls need to start a family before they expire like raw milk.
People did a pretty good job of figuring out how sex works for tens of thousands of years before the concept of sex ed existed. Even the dumbest animals have no issues figuring it out.
what sex education needs to be:
what sex education has become apparently:
Remember when they told me that I was crazy for thinking there was an agenda? Pepperidge Farm remembers
I remember the Disney produced videos. I was disappointed mickey and goofy weren't involved.
Another prediction South Park got right. Are they showing kids how to put on a condom with their mouths yet?
That's not even bordering on education, but instead pure indoctrination.