The whole basis of sexual education was fucked up in the first place.
The idea was to reduce teen pregnancies. Why? Because girls and boys were fucking thanks to meeting in school. The solution was always to abolish mixed schools and/or go back to home schooling.
So home economics with an emphasis on obeying their husbands for the girls who haven't been ruined by feminism, and internships at brothels for the rest.
They should just go with Dave Chappelle’s idea: get the two oldest, ugliest teachers in the school and make them fuck in front of the whole student body, that should put everyone off sex at least until they’re twenty.
Teen pregnancies are a good thing if the boys are allowed to work at a young age, the girls aren't sent to school, and marriage is forced after pregnancy
Not between boys and girls they aren't. Teenage boys are not ready for families. I support 25-35yo men with teenage girls but I don't believe teenage boys should be with teenage girls at all.
I wonder about this, sometimes. I've seen enough instances where men effectively 'rise to the challenge' of leading thier family and fatherhood that makes me question how such things should be managed, and if we coddle boys too much from potential failure, even in this.
...conversely, there's the economic part of this whole clusterfuck to consider, so I dunno.
(As an aside, one of the most based catholic takes I ever saw on the question of 'how do we get teenagers to wait for marriage to have sex' was 'get them married while they're teens in an arranged marriage so they can have sex, you idiot'.)
The history is young girl with older man. Even Plato suggested the ideal age of marriage between man and woman was 25-35 for men and 16-20 for women and that was BC. Thousands of years ago. Teenage boys and girls being together is a rather modern degenerate take. Teenage boys need to grow into men before they start a family and teenage girls need to start a family before they expire like raw milk.
The whole basis of sexual education was fucked up in the first place.
The idea was to reduce teen pregnancies. Why? Because girls and boys were fucking thanks to meeting in school. The solution was always to abolish mixed schools and/or go back to home schooling.
So what you're saying is the government created it's own problem, and then used the problem it created to further advance it's own agenda?
Impossibru
Why do girls need to go to school in the first place?
Ideally, they should go to school to learn skills to better please men.
So home economics with an emphasis on obeying their husbands for the girls who haven't been ruined by feminism, and internships at brothels for the rest.
wtf... since when did KIA2 turn into ChatGPT versions of myself.
we could always do korea method of 'beating the libido out of our students by overworking the fuck out of them'
It worked so well for s.korea....
I thought the South Korean method was make the women so feminist no one wants to fuck them.
why not both?
They should just go with Dave Chappelle’s idea: get the two oldest, ugliest teachers in the school and make them fuck in front of the whole student body, that should put everyone off sex at least until they’re twenty.
You'd think but in reality 50% of the school who are just as ugly as the ugliest teachers would be turned on.
Teen pregnancies are a good thing if the boys are allowed to work at a young age, the girls aren't sent to school, and marriage is forced after pregnancy
Not between boys and girls they aren't. Teenage boys are not ready for families. I support 25-35yo men with teenage girls but I don't believe teenage boys should be with teenage girls at all.
I wonder about this, sometimes. I've seen enough instances where men effectively 'rise to the challenge' of leading thier family and fatherhood that makes me question how such things should be managed, and if we coddle boys too much from potential failure, even in this.
...conversely, there's the economic part of this whole clusterfuck to consider, so I dunno.
(As an aside, one of the most based catholic takes I ever saw on the question of 'how do we get teenagers to wait for marriage to have sex' was 'get them married while they're teens in an arranged marriage so they can have sex, you idiot'.)
I think arranged marriages for sex would be superior to teenage sex without marriage tbh.
16-20yo girls are ideal for marriage.
The history is young girl with older man. Even Plato suggested the ideal age of marriage between man and woman was 25-35 for men and 16-20 for women and that was BC. Thousands of years ago. Teenage boys and girls being together is a rather modern degenerate take. Teenage boys need to grow into men before they start a family and teenage girls need to start a family before they expire like raw milk.