Some questions literally can’t be answered with yes or no answers. Some questions have explanations behind their answers that need to be said.
I personally just want whoever wins the GOP nomination to actually be able to win the election and not have a terrible VP as a part of the ticket, but considering the history of why .win exists as a domain, I understand why many of us are so laser-focused for Trump to be who wins the nomination.
At some point I need to go find election results and polls from suburban areas so that when the topic comes up it doesn’t go to accusing people of being lefties when they aren’t just because they don’t like Trump.
Elections are fake and democracy is gay. The country has been captured by a socialist mafia state that will not be deprived of power willingly or peacefully.
By all means vote. But if you aren't preparing for the coming conflict you are a fool.
People really need to read some of the good Balkanization books, non-fiction and fiction from people who have been in the military/law enforcement or lived through those periods. The best outcome of the current situation is a national split... and that leads us to having a free and prosperous country flanked by two failing East Germany clones.
The biggest difference between us and the Roman Empire is that the Roman infrastructure failed after the Empire did.
Winning the caucus by a greater margin than any candidate in history isn't a grand resounding victory?
Is the sacking of Carthage the new standard of comparison?
Considering how deep the infestation is I'd say it's a good starting point
Most votes of any sitting candidate in history, millions more votes than any other candidate in history except our savior Biden ... and this is supposedly:
The information psyops are real.
What possible relevance does that have to what I said? Or were you just piggybacking the highest comment or something?
If elections are fake, then there's no democracy.
The best case scenario is some sort of conflict, rather than slowly and silently going under.
Sir, this is clearly speech that promotes, advocates, glorifies, or endorses violence.
As this is an obvious violation of rule 2, please ban yourself for 48 hours.
You have your chicken and egg mixed up. One pulse one vote, lowest common denominator, is the driver of fraud and corruption here.
If you think elections don't matter, then there is by definition no democracy. I'll also never understand people who think that the elites have too little power.
One pulse, one vote. As opposed to? Giving Zuckerberg a million votes? Yes, the system sucks, but not because ordinary people have too much power.
IQ tests for every government office and for voters. Electoral colleges or district voting at all levels, so rural areas are not dominated by the corrupt cities - perhaps even disallow cities over a certain size from having a vote at all. Otherwise one vote per property-owning head of household, then add a narrow path of various ways to earn citizenship through service or sacrifice.
Who would score higher on an IQ test, Zuckerberg or the average coal miner?
That probably would have a desirable effect, but is that just?
A lot of people who are not doing well, due to the corruption of the elites, are Trump supporters. I'm not sure why they should lose out to VP of diversity earning $250,000 for doing literally nothing.
Hey I'm just getting started. I still want to ban politicians too. Several alternative methods come to mind, including the jury system of representation: Ben Franklin's idea that instead of elections, a citizen from the district is randomly chosen to be our representative.
That would only be reasonable when the above standards on enfranchised citizens are enforced. Heck it might even be ok (or "just" in your eyes) to go with direct democracy as long as the franchise was kept sufficiently narrow. Everyone else could get a "non-binding" vote like Puerto Rico.
You're not actually arguing, you're just repeating the same flawed premise I already addressed.
You didn't actually address it. You just made an assertion.
Comment Reported for: Rule 2 - Violent Speech
Comment Approved: That is heavily inferred. A "conflict" especially in the context of an election does not mean a violent conflict.
As this is your most recent post using this to point out Rule 4 is currently spelled "Slacious" on the report tab. It's spelled correctly in the sidebar and I have no idea what you might see so I tagged this post with a Rule 4 flag if that highlights things any differently.
This is not a good strategy, Nikky Haley winning would be disastrous no matter what the VP is.
The question is who is going to make the most radical change possible, to be honest I don't think Trump has it in him. I hope I'm wrong but he was president for 4 years and while good he got defeated by the swamp in part do to his ego.
That being said, Trump has the highest change to actually do something about alphabet agencies, the border, the economy. Honestly things are already lost do to mass immigration but watching the left scream for 4 more years about walls closing in will be fun.
I don’t think Haley would be able to win the election though, I think the two most likely candidates who could win are DeSantis and Trump, so it’ll end up being a dogfight.
Either would be good but DeSantis just seems to nice of a person. I am ok with either of them winning.
I posted that Trump didn’t go far enough- he didn’t weaponize the DOJ nor the FBI nor the IRS nor the SEC like democrats did to target republicans.
He needs to pull his fat lazy finger out of his ass and hire competent people with a vision (like bannon) and like the lawyer Robert Barnes.
He also needs to pardon the Jan 6th patriots and put them in charge of dismantling/weaponizing the DOJ. Also the cowardly liar needs to pardon Julian Assange and Edward Snowden.
And people accused me of being a leftist lol.
I think it's more that he couldn't rather than he didn't. I don't think even he expected the rot to be THAT bad. The DOJ is completely compromised and needs completely rooted out.
give them orders you know they won't want to carry out. fire anyone who slow walks it.
No, just fire them all like Reagan did with the FAA.
People regularly explain why they don't like Trump and it goes over fine, I don't particularly like or trust him and have said that since like 2019.
Other people sperg about Trump like a retard and that doesn't and creates long standing beefs and jokes about it.
People really need to learn that most other people don't hate you for believing X, they hate you for being a spazzy retard who can't contain their spaghetti on the topic long enough to make a coherent and logical point.
Many of the anti-Trump people on the right are filled with TDS nonsense that rarely can make a coherent point beyond "well I'd rather the Left destroy everything than let an imperfect get my support." Which is functionally no better than a Leftist anyway, since it wins for them the same and always has.
Right wing TDS is so much more wild than leftist TDS. At least the lefties can make a semi coherent point about how they think he's rayciss so they hate him. Right wing TDS just say he's mean and can't win over suburban white women who won't be won over anyway.
I’ll vote for Trump if he is the nominee. The main concern is that he really drives out the vote on both sides and those that hate him will crawl naked over broken glass to vote against him. In 2020 I knew suburban republicans who voted against him due to mean tweets. They now say they’ll vote for Trump. I guess with Trump you have to hope enough suburban voters will switch from Biden. I think he has the rural vote locked up
Big Tech is totally committed to turning out the vote for Democrats; they'll claim they're just A/B testing, but magically the "remember to vote this Tuesday" messages only go to Democrats.
So the choice is high democrat / high Trump turnout or high democrat / moderate Republican turnout.
Ask them if that's how their wife's boyfriend told them to vote.
I really can not understand that mindset. They didn't like "mean tweets", so they voted for the party out to destroy the country out of spite? "Cutting off your nose to spite your face" is too mild of an analogy for something that stupid.
I know. I tried to tell them that they were voting for someone they agreed with nothing on.
Correct. Some people get super obsessed and combative about things, and it spirals from there.
It's a bit more complicated than that, at least in my eyes. I've said before, I'd rather take the chance of Trump losing, than take the chance of Haley winning, for example. She's not a real improvement over Biden, and she comes with her own large package of dangers. DeSantis is a mixed bag; he's done some things I really like and appreciate, and some things I really don't like. He's also ran in opposition to both Trump and MAGA/America First, which is important, because he's basically flat out said he wants to turn the Republican party back into more like what it was pre-Trump. Like or hate Trump, I personally at least love what he did to the party, and am willing to roll the dice on Trump to try to preserve the small but growing amount of actual good in the GOP.
DeSantis over Biden is an improvement in the office, no question, but I think it would be bad for the Republican party, at least from my personal perspective. One of the major reasons I favor Trump over the others. Trump is very imperfect, but still the best chance for the country. Again, in my opinion. It is of course very subjective. "Electability" isn't everything, especially if you don't like a bunch of what the more electable candidates bring to the table.
That's because someone is a spazz. A sad fucking retarded spaz who actively hates people he views as trumpers and sees them much like dems see them, as a plague on the nation.
Not even joking. Check his comments out
https://kotakuinaction2.win/p/17s5kMahBT/x/c/4Z8iANsoebg
https://kotakuinaction2.win/p/17s5kMahBT/x/c/4Z8iANsoek5
It would be very sad if he wasnt sperging out on people randomly so they just get annoyed instead of pitying him
It's a shame because I like his MGTOW posts but for whatever reason this topic brings out the worst in him.
I hate losing to the Dems and you guys insist on running Trump who will lose again to them.
My hatred is very visceral at this point towards OnlyTrumper idiots.
As an aside, "cope and seethe" was funny and effective at first, but I think it's played out. It just makes the person saying it look pathetic at this point, by and large. It used to be used to point out people too weak to be on the internet...now it serves that same purpose, but the indicated party is reversed.
The narcissism of small differences. Either DeSantis or Trump would have been an absolute gem in any GOP primary before 2016. We should be happy that the top 2 are such excellent candidates and anti-neocon.
To be fair, people said that since 2020 about Biden too and here we are with the ancient coot still kicking on his strings and his VP pushed to the background.