Some questions literally can’t be answered with yes or no answers. Some questions have explanations behind their answers that need to be said.
I personally just want whoever wins the GOP nomination to actually be able to win the election and not have a terrible VP as a part of the ticket, but considering the history of why .win exists as a domain, I understand why many of us are so laser-focused for Trump to be who wins the nomination.
At some point I need to go find election results and polls from suburban areas so that when the topic comes up it doesn’t go to accusing people of being lefties when they aren’t just because they don’t like Trump.
Who would score higher on an IQ test, Zuckerberg or the average coal miner?
That probably would have a desirable effect, but is that just?
A lot of people who are not doing well, due to the corruption of the elites, are Trump supporters. I'm not sure why they should lose out to VP of diversity earning $250,000 for doing literally nothing.
Hey I'm just getting started. I still want to ban politicians too. Several alternative methods come to mind, including the jury system of representation: Ben Franklin's idea that instead of elections, a citizen from the district is randomly chosen to be our representative.
That would only be reasonable when the above standards on enfranchised citizens are enforced. Heck it might even be ok (or "just" in your eyes) to go with direct democracy as long as the franchise was kept sufficiently narrow. Everyone else could get a "non-binding" vote like Puerto Rico.