Some questions literally can’t be answered with yes or no answers. Some questions have explanations behind their answers that need to be said.
I personally just want whoever wins the GOP nomination to actually be able to win the election and not have a terrible VP as a part of the ticket, but considering the history of why .win exists as a domain, I understand why many of us are so laser-focused for Trump to be who wins the nomination.
At some point I need to go find election results and polls from suburban areas so that when the topic comes up it doesn’t go to accusing people of being lefties when they aren’t just because they don’t like Trump.
Elections are fake and democracy is gay. The country has been captured by a socialist mafia state that will not be deprived of power willingly or peacefully.
By all means vote. But if you aren't preparing for the coming conflict you are a fool.
People really need to read some of the good Balkanization books, non-fiction and fiction from people who have been in the military/law enforcement or lived through those periods. The best outcome of the current situation is a national split... and that leads us to having a free and prosperous country flanked by two failing East Germany clones.
The biggest difference between us and the Roman Empire is that the Roman infrastructure failed after the Empire did.
Winning the caucus by a greater margin than any candidate in history isn't a grand resounding victory?
Is the sacking of Carthage the new standard of comparison?
Considering how deep the infestation is I'd say it's a good starting point
Most votes of any sitting candidate in history, millions more votes than any other candidate in history except our savior Biden ... and this is supposedly:
The information psyops are real.
What possible relevance does that have to what I said? Or were you just piggybacking the highest comment or something?
If elections are fake, then there's no democracy.
The best case scenario is some sort of conflict, rather than slowly and silently going under.
Sir, this is clearly speech that promotes, advocates, glorifies, or endorses violence.
As this is an obvious violation of rule 2, please ban yourself for 48 hours.
You have your chicken and egg mixed up. One pulse one vote, lowest common denominator, is the driver of fraud and corruption here.
If you think elections don't matter, then there is by definition no democracy. I'll also never understand people who think that the elites have too little power.
One pulse, one vote. As opposed to? Giving Zuckerberg a million votes? Yes, the system sucks, but not because ordinary people have too much power.
IQ tests for every government office and for voters. Electoral colleges or district voting at all levels, so rural areas are not dominated by the corrupt cities - perhaps even disallow cities over a certain size from having a vote at all. Otherwise one vote per property-owning head of household, then add a narrow path of various ways to earn citizenship through service or sacrifice.
You're not actually arguing, you're just repeating the same flawed premise I already addressed.
Comment Reported for: Rule 2 - Violent Speech
Comment Approved: That is heavily inferred. A "conflict" especially in the context of an election does not mean a violent conflict.
As this is your most recent post using this to point out Rule 4 is currently spelled "Slacious" on the report tab. It's spelled correctly in the sidebar and I have no idea what you might see so I tagged this post with a Rule 4 flag if that highlights things any differently.