Faggot thinks video game characters are the same as real people
(media.kotakuinaction2.win)
Comments (59)
sorted by:
I mean, leftists are barely more than NPCs in real life. It's no wonder they get confused.
I want them to start marching for fictional characters’ rights.
They kinda are already. Trannies are fictional men and women.
A broken brain is still a brain at least, arguing for the rights of inanimate objects is new game+ retardation.
I have, no shit, seen protests for parasites rights. There was a swamp the local municipality was trying to drain when I lived in Baltimore and the college kept sending out protesters to protect some rare species of tick that lived there.
Being able to parrot a witty quip and feign the animation of emotions probably seems like a being from a higher plane of existence to some of them.
Pretty sure more than one person said "yes" to nude Chun-Li...
Flashgitz made a relevant video: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=fwNN1PSrydE
That smile when Guile ask where Akuma's prayer beads are
Nice attempt at the deepfake argument....just it's complete shit since that's using technology to create an image of something that exists in reality.
Chun Li doesn't exist, will not exist (unfortunately, some women get close... I like thighs) and has never existed. She's a fictional character so you can draw her getting railed harder than a bullet train and no one is hurt.
"You're forcing them to fight in a battle! You're forcing them to work! You're forcing them to eat!"
It gets more stupid if you let the thin wedge of sexualized fictional characters in, best to simply go "You're an idiot, touch grass" and give them no credence.
You like thighs on attractive girls. Hambeasts frequently have gigantic thighs, but I assume you’re not interested in those?
This is kinda like how some men say that they like legs. It’s code for “no fatties” because fat girls never have nice legs. If one inexplicably did, none of the “leg men” would be interested.
By the by, I think foot fetishism is almost certainly crypto pedophilia.
(Shudders in disgust) No I like nice shapely thighs as that leads to having a great ass then a great figure.
It's all about being healthy and in proportion always. Though there's always exceptions, if there's a woman with a sweet personality that's 4'10 with big tits for her stature, I wouldn't say no..
Speak for yourself.
No, degenerates are just more free with their money. Furry artists get paid a LOT more than just general ecchi artists, but that doesn't mean every man is a furry. Those women are just marketing to a crowd that donates liberally.
Simple thought experiment proof: How much attractiveness would a woman lose, if she literally lost that part of her body? (Just poof magic it now doesn't exist on women.) "Her feet" would rank probably among the lowest of the low on that chart for almost all men. Easy proof: Look at ecchi manga, and how often feet are in the images compared to basically any other part of a person. You're just projecting, my coomerly friend. But keep being degenerate, it helps the gatekeeping.
I think the issue here is "fetish" places a high expectation on the level of desire for it. Most men probably feel a minor amount of arousal at feet/legs. Not enough to conceptualize, but enough to note a loss if they are fucked and ugly.
Probably because infinite generations have bred men to enjoy every part of a woman to some extent, which is how these fetishes get started and then warped.
Part of it's supply and demand I suppose, part of it's pent up desperation, and the rest I don't really want to try and fathom.
The result is the same, but at least the right’s reasoning is not insane. “It grosses me out” is considerably better than “it’s violating the fictional character’s right to autonomy.”
This comment was a massacre.
I'm not a fool , a hapless coomer or an infiltrator.
I'm a regular dude who consumes titillating media after my daily duties are done as a form of entertainment.
Once work and chore time kicks in, I turn off my PC and continue acting like a boring inoffensive normie with boring safe interests, boring safe opinions and boring safe values.
The fact that other have a problem with that is ON THEM, NOT ME.
Prohibition on mass scale of any kind is never a solution because there are individuals who have enough self-control to indulge in fantasy without bringing it into reality.
The solution is always to control those who cant control themselves and the mark of those who cant control themselves is a public freak-out. This does not apply to me and people like me.
Example: You don't prohibit selling off alcohol to everyone, you prohibit to those who are alcoholics and cant control themselves.
Just say “I’m a libertarian retard”.
This is totally the time and place - in 2023, in the West - to worry about hypothetical right wing authoritarianism. We’re neck deep in a neo marxist control grid, but we better look out for those religious kooks who haven’t had real institutional power for a century.
Also, no, the right wing argument for censoring sexual media is not “the same”. It’s still a bad argument in many cases, but arguments don’t become identical by virtue of being also bad. The first order principles underlying the arguments are completely different.
I smell a classical liberal. Hopefully you’re still young.
Cringe is the enlightened centrist who thinks our current predicament wasn’t predicated on his preferred worldview.
Right and left are both shit on the fictional content front. It's just the left is in power so most of the institutional censorship comes from them.
Still won't forget the amount of times they called fps games 'murder simulators'...
They can't consent to being punched or fighting either then but he's somehow picking wearing skimpy costumes as the worst thing
"Look how virtuous I am"
If that is the case, then “mind canon LGBTQ shippers” are the equivalent of rapists.
“Oh lawdy, dem cartoons be like SLAVES an sheeit!”
characters also can't consent to hardship, struggle, or literally anything else that happens to them. by this logic, every creator or anything pg and up is an abuser of the highest order. What a fag.
We let leftist retards run wild with 'relative/personal' truth for too long. Post Modernism philosophy is cultural cancer.
For those curious, here's the original tweet that was quoted (NSFW):
https://nitter.net/Pro_Fluke/status/1686097846418710528
Gotta say, not what I was expecting, at all...
It was tactical. The opponent clearly was off their game because of the technique.
What if Chun-Li identifies as an NPC that consents?
Checkmate, faggots.
I see Chrischan managed to get himself a disciple.
We've been down this road before, but I guess there's always someone new who isn't informed like the person in that tweet, so here we go.
Consent lies with the creator of the character.
The fictional characters are wearing whatever they're wearing, and doing whatever it is they're doing because we have to assume that's what the character wants to do. Especially if the creator of the character has them doing that.
This includes things like fan service made by the character creator that someone already mentioned.
At the end of the day, it is deeply immoral people who feel disgust at their own degeneracy grasping at straws to give themselves some sense of morality. It never works, so they are never at peace and always angry, and so they continue the vain crusade to feel good by filling themselves with evil.
So fictional characters can't consent to stuff, but children are allowed to consent to life-changing surgeries that make them sterile and ruin their sex drives? Seems okay to me.
Chris Chan LIVES!
They really just want canon to be in a biblical sense now that the owners now share their politics. Fanfic is back to being blasphemous!
These are the same kind of retards who made rules in ancient times against "depicting anything living", because they confuse a representation of a thing with the thing itself/think that just because someone likes a character, they worship it, etc.
My God I hate this timeline.
All that comes to my mind reading this: Where's the skeleton? Is it in the closet? Potential pedo or wife beater? Most of those people are just trying to be "virtuous" to hide some bad thing they did in the past.
To design clothes for a character, you draw them nude first, and then the clothes around them. That's how it works.
I don't care about two kids having a fight over whether Superman could beat The Hulk.
This is all nonsense and not worthy of noting.