I'm in the camp where pedos preying on kids that young don't do it for sexual desire. It's about dominating a helpless person. Doesn't matter if it was a boy or girl. They are basicly the same when prebubecant.
Not a fan of Lincoln for what he did to the Constitution and the future of the states, but this video is such horseshit. "Lincoln had at least 4 intimate male relationships, possibly even sexual." Erasure of male friendships. This is just female yaoi strokeoff fantasy.
Good thing they got the best of the best to comment on this video. A professor of history from that bastion of scholarship, Eastern Connecticut State University.
The original Union of states was entirely voluntary. Voluntary in, voluntary out.
It's what kept things fair and balanced and what allowed most major decisions to be made at the state level.
Lincoln completely destroyed that system, killing a million Americans to do it, because he was such a believer in centralized tyrannical power. After Lincoln, there was no longer a voluntary union of states but rather states united by the threat of force from the federal government
It's like the difference between a marriage, voluntary Union of man and woman, and a guy keeping a sex slave in the basement.
I appreciated the answer as it has been very informative. Though my question is reserved for the Preserve the Union dummies, who thinks Lincoln’s Union is the right side and wholeheartedly believe that House divided quotes.
Well Lincoln? was it worth "winning " the civil war in the end? I ask the same thing of Winston Churchill who also fought for the wrong side of the war, and now his memory is being disrespected by the very side that he fought for
I wouldn't say Churchill was on the wrong side. Rather, Churchill (and everyone else) should have listened to Patton. Of course, Patton then got relieved of command and a couple months later got murdered for his trouble, I mean was coincidentally paralyzed and later died of his injuries in a low-speed collision that everyone else walked away from fine.
Its definitely about fighting for the wrong side. Do you think America would be the way it is now if the Confederate South had won? Do you think the world would be like it is now if the Axis had won? Keep in mind it was the Axis that were against the League of Nations which was basically the United Nations of that time.
I had a thought yesterday wondering if it would be a worthwhile troll to proclaim bullshit about diversity icons. For instance, making up an argument that Amelia Earhart was actually a male.
My concern would mostly be that it might further annoy history buffs or other non-npcs unaware of the troll endeavor.
Lincoln was a grifter, a railroad man, a kickback crony for big rail. Worse still, he was a statist. He didn't care about liberty, didn't care about truth, and didn't give a rat's ass about freeing slaves. Emancipation was just an escalation of the economic war he had been fighting against the southern States since he first went to Congress.
His wife had some mental problems, so they had a difficult but loving relationship. She actually begged him to forgive her several times after his assassination. We could say it's a modern illness, but half the stuff the rich used at the time was made of stuff like lead, so it's anyone's guess.
Lincoln was a Pro wrestler and often used his knowledge of how that worked in politics.
So we're at the point, now, then, where claiming the exact opposite of established truth (I mean, this goes against every account I have ever heard about the man) is the only way to get your shit on fucking Discovery...?
Jesus... This is... Worse than even I would expect, at this point.
No great loss, really. Lincoln was a prick afaik. didn't care about slavery, at least that he would have kept slaves if the Feds had rejoined the Union.
Him allowing the scorched earth policy that destroyed the South and has left us poor ever since was surely a great plan to induce feelings of unity and brotherhood, and definitely not a cruel subjugation and humiliation tactic.
Lincoln didn’t do that because getting rid of the slave was never the goal, if it was, Lincoln would’ve focused on freeing his Northern slaves first. The true cause of the war is the reason why America became a country in the first place, tax increase.
Unlike Egypt, I highly doubt the US administration will rush to the defense of it's nations history.
They probably subsidised it knowing what a pile of fags they are.
Now do Mohammad...
I'd love to see that...
...from my underground bunker, I'll watch via drone on a satellite feed.
at best he was bi, don't forget he had a pedophilic marriage with a 9 year old girl...
Wasn’t she 6 when they got married?
yeah, but you inevitably get the "yeah, but he didn't consummate the marriage until she was nine argument if you bring that up.🙄
No that was when she was committed to be his wife at the age of 9.
Look up islamic marriages. Its all a contract. Committed is contracted which is married in islam.
Yes. He fucked her at 9. "Apparently" because bandit lords are all about decency.
I'm in the camp where pedos preying on kids that young don't do it for sexual desire. It's about dominating a helpless person. Doesn't matter if it was a boy or girl. They are basicly the same when prebubecant.
“No one called Lincoln a homosexual, because the word homosexual didn’t exist at the time”
They’re literally trying to claim we didn’t have a word for faggots throughout history
"Gays have been persecuted throughout history, even when we didn't know what they were."
Deviant. People who "deviated" from norms.
sodomite...
Not a fan of Lincoln for what he did to the Constitution and the future of the states, but this video is such horseshit. "Lincoln had at least 4 intimate male relationships, possibly even sexual." Erasure of male friendships. This is just female yaoi strokeoff fantasy.
Good thing they got the best of the best to comment on this video. A professor of history from that bastion of scholarship, Eastern Connecticut State University.
Lincoln pretty much destroyed the Union and created the American globalist empire.
How can Lincoln destroyed the Union when his Union is what created the GAE?
The original Union of states was entirely voluntary. Voluntary in, voluntary out.
It's what kept things fair and balanced and what allowed most major decisions to be made at the state level.
Lincoln completely destroyed that system, killing a million Americans to do it, because he was such a believer in centralized tyrannical power. After Lincoln, there was no longer a voluntary union of states but rather states united by the threat of force from the federal government
It's like the difference between a marriage, voluntary Union of man and woman, and a guy keeping a sex slave in the basement.
Lincoln turned the Union into a sex dungeon
I appreciated the answer as it has been very informative. Though my question is reserved for the Preserve the Union dummies, who thinks Lincoln’s Union is the right side and wholeheartedly believe that House divided quotes.
Well Lincoln? was it worth "winning " the civil war in the end? I ask the same thing of Winston Churchill who also fought for the wrong side of the war, and now his memory is being disrespected by the very side that he fought for
I wouldn't say Churchill was on the wrong side. Rather, Churchill (and everyone else) should have listened to Patton. Of course, Patton then got relieved of command and a couple months later got murdered for his trouble, I mean was coincidentally paralyzed and later died of his injuries in a low-speed collision that everyone else walked away from fine.
I have been meaning to look into that. I heard his death was suspicious
The other driver was a Polish-American and rumored Communist who was "drunk", but was a renown teetotaler.
Even Bill O'Reilly, who disbelieved in JFK conspiracy theories, thinks that Patton's death was bizarre and suspicious.
I think i have that book somewhere. Although I think there is enough weird stuff with JFK to raise eyebrows
Agreed. Frankly, if the Deep State was not guilty in assassinating Kennedy, they certainly acted guilty.
I mean, I'm pretty sure Ike warned the population that shit like this would likely happen, so I'm not so sure about "wrong side"...
More like, "every thing they fought for has been completely inverted, subverted and turned into a sad parody of itself", IMHO...
Its definitely about fighting for the wrong side. Do you think America would be the way it is now if the Confederate South had won? Do you think the world would be like it is now if the Axis had won? Keep in mind it was the Axis that were against the League of Nations which was basically the United Nations of that time.
The Axis were just as shitty as the Communists. We should have listened to Patton though. That was the mistake.
I had a thought yesterday wondering if it would be a worthwhile troll to proclaim bullshit about diversity icons. For instance, making up an argument that Amelia Earhart was actually a male.
My concern would mostly be that it might further annoy history buffs or other non-npcs unaware of the troll endeavor.
susan b anthony
harriet tubman
rosa parks
all MTF trannies!
As a historian, your efforts cause my eyes to twitch.
Fuck Lincoln. I'll allow it.
Eh why not, everything else we know about Lincoln is a lie already. Maybe this will make people look into him more
Explain please.
Lincoln was a grifter, a railroad man, a kickback crony for big rail. Worse still, he was a statist. He didn't care about liberty, didn't care about truth, and didn't give a rat's ass about freeing slaves. Emancipation was just an escalation of the economic war he had been fighting against the southern States since he first went to Congress.
Unintentionally based.
Haven’t they been trying to push this for years? I think that’s why the log cabin republicans used that name.
"Abraham lincoln was black. He freed himself motherfuckers" -Discovery, 2024
His wife had some mental problems, so they had a difficult but loving relationship. She actually begged him to forgive her several times after his assassination. We could say it's a modern illness, but half the stuff the rich used at the time was made of stuff like lead, so it's anyone's guess.
Lincoln was a Pro wrestler and often used his knowledge of how that worked in politics.
Well, the throne at his memorial does have two faggots on it.
they can have him
Good. Tear him down.
Of course they doo.
So we're at the point, now, then, where claiming the exact opposite of established truth (I mean, this goes against every account I have ever heard about the man) is the only way to get your shit on fucking Discovery...?
Jesus... This is... Worse than even I would expect, at this point.
Sad...
No great loss, really. Lincoln was a prick afaik. didn't care about slavery, at least that he would have kept slaves if the Feds had rejoined the Union.
Him allowing the scorched earth policy that destroyed the South and has left us poor ever since was surely a great plan to induce feelings of unity and brotherhood, and definitely not a cruel subjugation and humiliation tactic.
Oh THIS is what he meant by "four score"?
I don't know whether he ever had male lovers, but Lincoln was a giant faggot all the same.
Comment Reported for: Rule 16 - Identity Attacks (x2)
Comment Removed for: Rule 16 - identity Attacks
Now could he do that without starting a retarded war that mostly killed white Americans.
Lincoln didn’t do that because getting rid of the slave was never the goal, if it was, Lincoln would’ve focused on freeing his Northern slaves first. The true cause of the war is the reason why America became a country in the first place, tax increase.