They're protecting this woman because it goes against their narrative to acknowledge that anyone other than straight, white males can commit this kind of crime, and they don't want her reasons for doing so to become public because she shared their motivations.
What would burying the manifesto do when everyone already knows she's trans? It must contain something that shatters some intrinsic part of the narrative.
My money is on a TERF-style "female traitors" rant.
What would burying the manifesto do when everyone already knows she's trans?
The same thing it did when they drug out the last time a tranny shooter happened. Or the Muslim one in Colorado. Or the multitude of black ones.
It drags it out long enough for the outrage to settle, people to move on, and the fuel for whatever to disappear so that when they stop blocking it it can't gain any traction. News is based on cycles, relevant facts won't get the same power weeks distanced.
I'm not going to get into a pointless debate with you. I'm just pointing out that no matter what you'll twist it into something that supports your delusions.
More along the lines of saying something that completely fucks up the sympathetic villain narrative, something they're likely to hold onto until everyone forgets this ever happened.
It would undermine all that work they did with those rallies blaming guns. Having to admit that the motive was Transgenderism and anti-Christian sentiment? Totally unthinkable reversal of the narrative.
People might realize they're being lied to by the media!
Sundance went into great detail about the federal government “tamping down” on any story that threatens to galvanize solidarity and activism among the wrong demographics. Any investigation that might trigger defensive identity politics among whites or Christians is immediately taken over by the feds, who then proceed to bury the story and any evidence that might cause whites or Christians to realize that they are under attack.
These feds do the exact opposite in any situation where the anti-white or anti-Christian narrative is served. That plain disparity reveals the plain agenda: amplify black grievances while suppressing white pattern recognition.
Must be really bad for "the message". I'm guessing it's a big "fuck you" to her parents, teachers and medical community that groomed her down this tragic road.
I wonder if we can crowd fund a bitcoin bounty to encourage someone in the PD that's seen it to leak it.
"Due to pending litigation filed this week, the Metropolitan Nashville Police Department has been advised by counsel to hold in abeyance the release of records related to the shooting at The Covenant School pending orders or direction of the court," the department wrote on Twitter.
Three appeals were filed in recent weeks demanding the release of the shooter's manifesto, the Tennessean reported:
So, due to the pending lawsuits trying to force you to release the manifesto, your attorney advised you to...not release the manifesto?
How does that make any sense? You either aren't going to release it, in which case the lawsuits will determine whether the court will order you to release it. Or you are going to release it, in which case you just do it and the lawsuits become moot and go away.
That statement falsely makes it sound like the lawsuits are the reason they're not releasing it.
They probably were going to release a heavily redacted or edited version and their lawyers said "wait you can't do that because we'll probably have to release the entire thing from one of these lawsuits."
The police really have a a lot to hide, don't they? It's it even subtle either. It's pretty obvious the manifesto would damage left wing ideology, just like the epstine list.
Supposedly it's too dangerous to be released.
NY Post article from 4/20: https://archive.is/8vQza
Metro Nashville Council Member Courtney Johnston confirmed to The Post the FBI has already ruled the manifesto would not be released any time soon.
“What I was told is, her manifesto was a blueprint on total destruction, and it was so, so detailed at the level of what she had planned,” she said, when reached by phone.
“That document in the wrong person’s hands would be astronomically dangerous,” she added.
I'm beginning to think this troon had some choice words or made a whole lot of sense.
They’re justifying Imp ffs lol
They're protecting troons, not women.
They're protecting this woman because it goes against their narrative to acknowledge that anyone other than straight, white males can commit this kind of crime, and they don't want her reasons for doing so to become public because she shared their motivations.
At this point, I doubt it.
What would burying the manifesto do when everyone already knows she's trans? It must contain something that shatters some intrinsic part of the narrative.
My money is on a TERF-style "female traitors" rant.
I'm shocked.
What makes more sense?
A : The official narrative is right, and nothing will come of the manifesto being published, but they're blocking it anyway.
B : The official narrative is completely wrong and that's why they're burying it.
Why no toxicology report showing the testosterone in her system? Because there isn't any. Her "transition" is as fake as women's empathy.
The same thing it did when they drug out the last time a tranny shooter happened. Or the Muslim one in Colorado. Or the multitude of black ones.
It drags it out long enough for the outrage to settle, people to move on, and the fuel for whatever to disappear so that when they stop blocking it it can't gain any traction. News is based on cycles, relevant facts won't get the same power weeks distanced.
The longer it goes, the more likely I'm right.
In your mind everything proves you're right, including things that directly contradict your premises.
Why would they hide it if it just confirms what people know?
I'm not going to get into a pointless debate with you. I'm just pointing out that no matter what you'll twist it into something that supports your delusions.
You sound like a woman.
You sound like you have no idea what the inside of a woman feels like.
Nope, the longer it goes the more you prove how much of a Leftist SJW you are, however.
Clearly she had info on Killary!
More along the lines of saying something that completely fucks up the sympathetic villain narrative, something they're likely to hold onto until everyone forgets this ever happened.
Release the trannifesto.
It'll be anti white, anti Christian, and anti men I bet
It has a list of discord users who inspired this troon to action.
All of them are federal agents.
This is the most likely explanation for why they refuse to release it.
Its the Gretchen Whitmer trial all over again.
"As my good friend Ray Epps suggested..."
Tarrant was a Malthusian who praised China, not exactly a follower of Brother John Birch.
Biden must have sniffed her.
Did the feds ghostwrite the trannifesto? What are they so afraid of?
It will probably show that transgenderism is the motive, and that Christians were targeted. They can't have that.
It would undermine all that work they did with those rallies blaming guns. Having to admit that the motive was Transgenderism and anti-Christian sentiment? Totally unthinkable reversal of the narrative.
People might realize they're being lied to by the media!
They're going to release it when no one cares anymore. See, we're very transparent and 'democratic' by manipulating everything.
After the next election cycle.
Sundance went into great detail about the federal government “tamping down” on any story that threatens to galvanize solidarity and activism among the wrong demographics. Any investigation that might trigger defensive identity politics among whites or Christians is immediately taken over by the feds, who then proceed to bury the story and any evidence that might cause whites or Christians to realize that they are under attack.
These feds do the exact opposite in any situation where the anti-white or anti-Christian narrative is served. That plain disparity reveals the plain agenda: amplify black grievances while suppressing white pattern recognition.
This all started under Obama, of course.
Must be really bad for "the message". I'm guessing it's a big "fuck you" to her parents, teachers and medical community that groomed her down this tragic road.
I wonder if we can crowd fund a bitcoin bounty to encourage someone in the PD that's seen it to leak it.
So, due to the pending lawsuits trying to force you to release the manifesto, your attorney advised you to...not release the manifesto?
How does that make any sense? You either aren't going to release it, in which case the lawsuits will determine whether the court will order you to release it. Or you are going to release it, in which case you just do it and the lawsuits become moot and go away.
That statement falsely makes it sound like the lawsuits are the reason they're not releasing it.
They probably were going to release a heavily redacted or edited version and their lawyers said "wait you can't do that because we'll probably have to release the entire thing from one of these lawsuits."
My bet is that it is so stupidly deranged and nonsensibly sick that it would just embarrass the troon movement too much.
Probably regretted trans surgery and blamed it all on predditors on reddit…
What is the justification for this, other than it's got a lot of choice words that the left doesn't want out.
The police really have a a lot to hide, don't they? It's it even subtle either. It's pretty obvious the manifesto would damage left wing ideology, just like the epstine list.
Supposedly it's too dangerous to be released.
NY Post article from 4/20: https://archive.is/8vQza
If she was that level of strategic genius she would've accomplished more than shooting a few children.
"The manifesto says that I'm to kill all the white people, just like president biden told me to do.
"Oh shit guys