What would burying the manifesto do when everyone already knows she's trans? It must contain something that shatters some intrinsic part of the narrative.
My money is on a TERF-style "female traitors" rant.
What would burying the manifesto do when everyone already knows she's trans?
The same thing it did when they drug out the last time a tranny shooter happened. Or the Muslim one in Colorado. Or the multitude of black ones.
It drags it out long enough for the outrage to settle, people to move on, and the fuel for whatever to disappear so that when they stop blocking it it can't gain any traction. News is based on cycles, relevant facts won't get the same power weeks distanced.
At this point, I doubt it.
What would burying the manifesto do when everyone already knows she's trans? It must contain something that shatters some intrinsic part of the narrative.
My money is on a TERF-style "female traitors" rant.
I'm shocked.
What makes more sense?
A : The official narrative is right, and nothing will come of the manifesto being published, but they're blocking it anyway.
B : The official narrative is completely wrong and that's why they're burying it.
Why no toxicology report showing the testosterone in her system? Because there isn't any. Her "transition" is as fake as women's empathy.
The same thing it did when they drug out the last time a tranny shooter happened. Or the Muslim one in Colorado. Or the multitude of black ones.
It drags it out long enough for the outrage to settle, people to move on, and the fuel for whatever to disappear so that when they stop blocking it it can't gain any traction. News is based on cycles, relevant facts won't get the same power weeks distanced.