The core foundation for a good pizza is how the base is. The core foundation for how a good woman is how based she is. The pizza delivery scene is often a throwaway, but it can be used to good effect to create a para-social/para-sexual relationship between watcher and performer, increasing the odds of rewatches, sponsorships, and payments.
"Arianna Huffington is unattractive both inside and out. I fully understand why her former husband left her for a man- he made a good decision." - Donald Trump
I always think of this quote whenever I see something about the Huffington Post.
Reminds me of a scene in Frasier where Lilith is talking about how her new husband left her for "someone more feminine" and comes out with "He found him!" while bawling at Frasier as if it's his problem any more.
I hate it when people open pornography, and skip right to the part where they are having sex, rather than the great dialogue that's in there. Right-wing, neo-Nazi white supremacists do that to pretend that pornography is not suitable for children.
Obscenity is the secondary issue to the main one about how the book is promoting gender identity extremism along with regressive leftist ideology by extension.
Queer Theory's goal is to attack and dismantle normative behavior, ESPECIALLY heteronormative behavior. Teaching young children how to perform sex acts and that faggotry is good furthers their goal of destroying normal society.
Let's try looking at the context Smith insists we examine: Maia Kobabe engaged in sex as a minor, probably with an adult, and this experience caused them to be mentally damaged.
Nobody wants to ban gay porn books. The conversation is about whether gay porn books should be bought with tax dollars and supplied to children for free.
I’ve not seen a single leftist accurately argue against a “book ban”. Nobody is trying to get smut removed from amazon.
Well it's 100% okay to keep sexually explicit material out of schools. As a general rule, society has laws against exposing people under 18 to sexually explicit material. Schools have every right to control the material they make available to kids. It would be one thing if they were excluding things for political reasons, but this wasn't a political issue until 2 seconds ago when the libtards decided to adopt tranny mental illness into their platform.
Is this the equivalent of "yes, it LOOKS like he's banging a little girl, but if you read further you'd understand she's actually a thousand year old vampire."
No, because it's in text. As we know from the adoring fans of all of George R. R. Martin's underaged rape scenes and Steven King's underage sex party scenes, when it's in written text, it's all A-OK!
Remember, if you say the letter "P" sideways represents a penis, it's in need of censorship, but if you say "penis" represents a penis, you're in the clear! So say all our overlords!
PTA: “Would you compromise and put out an expurgated version that removed the blowjob scene, and let each school decide for itself which version to make available?”
Them, almost certainly: “NOOOOOO the blowjob is vital to the plot!!”
Edit: To give my full view on these issues, kids and teens trying to sneak around parental and teacher controls to look at dirty stuff is a tale as old as time and there’s nothing you can ever do to stop them from getting a look at some dirty stuff, all you can do is try to make their access as limited as possible to stuff inappropriate for their age. It’s a part of growing up and having been the sneaky kid once, we all have to play the watchdog adult in our turn. What makes this recent stuff so sinister in my eyes is that the alleged adults are (1) openly handing the stuff to the kids and (2) in many cases, doing so as teachers while knowing the parents wouldn’t approve, which just absolutely reeks of the “it’s okay to do this with me, I’m your secret adult friend, just don’t tell your parents about what we’ve been doing” sort of thing abusers do.
And what context, exactly, would make a dildo blow job acceptable for an elementary school book? And "Journey to figuring out they're nonbinary" is not an actual answer.
"Sure, it is porn, but there was a 20 second period where a pizza got delivered. Think of the context!"
I'm only watching it because of the crime plot about the lemon stealing whores!
That bitch is a menace to society! Lemon trees are awesome and I will not have a literal whore stealing my beautiful lemons!
"Only a few scenes in Cuties had half-naked 10yos dancing in it, it wasn't the focus of the film."
That was an actual argument used to defend the movie btw.
I mean to most fat people they get the same result from seeing the pizza as they do the guy getting the blowjob.
The core foundation for a good pizza is how the base is. The core foundation for how a good woman is how based she is. The pizza delivery scene is often a throwaway, but it can be used to good effect to create a para-social/para-sexual relationship between watcher and performer, increasing the odds of rewatches, sponsorships, and payments.
I always think of this quote whenever I see something about the Huffington Post.
I still hear "Huffington-Puffington Post" in my head whenever I see the name.
That's pretty good!
I can't claim credit. Rush had a way with words.
I miss El Rushbo so much it hurts.
Reminds me of a scene in Frasier where Lilith is talking about how her new husband left her for "someone more feminine" and comes out with "He found him!" while bawling at Frasier as if it's his problem any more.
With some people, Trump really just BTFO'd the hell out of them.
I hate it when people open pornography, and skip right to the part where they are having sex, rather than the great dialogue that's in there. Right-wing, neo-Nazi white supremacists do that to pretend that pornography is not suitable for children.
Obscenity is the secondary issue to the main one about how the book is promoting gender identity extremism along with regressive leftist ideology by extension.
Perversion. And in this case, perversion aimed at kids with the purpose of grooming the kids to become LGBTQ, with focus on the TQ.
Queer Theory's goal is to attack and dismantle normative behavior, ESPECIALLY heteronormative behavior. Teaching young children how to perform sex acts and that faggotry is good furthers their goal of destroying normal society.
Training for the other kind of "girl" dick.
How else are you going to demonstrate the grapefruit technique?
i don't care what the book's about, or what else is in it. you will not use my money to pay for this degenerate smut.
"But do they call me ‘McGonagall The Bridge Builder’? No! They do na!”
10/10
Very interesting, comrade. You face wall now.
Let's try looking at the context Smith insists we examine: Maia Kobabe engaged in sex as a minor, probably with an adult, and this experience caused them to be mentally damaged.
Yeah, not a great argument.
Nobody wants to ban gay porn books. The conversation is about whether gay porn books should be bought with tax dollars and supplied to children for free.
I’ve not seen a single leftist accurately argue against a “book ban”. Nobody is trying to get smut removed from amazon.
Well it's 100% okay to keep sexually explicit material out of schools. As a general rule, society has laws against exposing people under 18 to sexually explicit material. Schools have every right to control the material they make available to kids. It would be one thing if they were excluding things for political reasons, but this wasn't a political issue until 2 seconds ago when the libtards decided to adopt tranny mental illness into their platform.
I don't think this is the rebutal to criticism xir thinks it is.
The book is about teaching horny boys to act on every passing degenerate sexual impulse they ever have to 'discover themselves'.
Today it's 'I wonder what wearing a skirt and sucking cock would be like?'.
Tomorrow it'll be 'I wonder what sex with my labrador would be like?'.
Is this the equivalent of "yes, it LOOKS like he's banging a little girl, but if you read further you'd understand she's actually a thousand year old vampire."
go on...
No, because it's in text. As we know from the adoring fans of all of George R. R. Martin's underaged rape scenes and Steven King's underage sex party scenes, when it's in written text, it's all A-OK!
Remember, if you say the letter "P" sideways represents a penis, it's in need of censorship, but if you say "penis" represents a penis, you're in the clear! So say all our overlords!
Off the top, I think they're hoping for more exposition or foreplay to go with these school board exhibitions.
"You really miss the full homoerotic impact of the dildo blowjob scene without the context being included."
PTA: “Would you compromise and put out an expurgated version that removed the blowjob scene, and let each school decide for itself which version to make available?”
Them, almost certainly: “NOOOOOO the blowjob is vital to the plot!!”
Edit: To give my full view on these issues, kids and teens trying to sneak around parental and teacher controls to look at dirty stuff is a tale as old as time and there’s nothing you can ever do to stop them from getting a look at some dirty stuff, all you can do is try to make their access as limited as possible to stuff inappropriate for their age. It’s a part of growing up and having been the sneaky kid once, we all have to play the watchdog adult in our turn. What makes this recent stuff so sinister in my eyes is that the alleged adults are (1) openly handing the stuff to the kids and (2) in many cases, doing so as teachers while knowing the parents wouldn’t approve, which just absolutely reeks of the “it’s okay to do this with me, I’m your secret adult friend, just don’t tell your parents about what we’ve been doing” sort of thing abusers do.
I'm not religious, but as time goes on, these people being literal demons seems more and more plausible.
The extremist retard who made that thing did not even bother to recolour the dildo to try and suppress complaints.
And what context, exactly, would make a dildo blow job acceptable for an elementary school book? And "Journey to figuring out they're nonbinary" is not an actual answer.
libs think that as long as you give child porn an "artistic" paint job, that makes it okay.
these are the same people who defended roman polanski fully knowing he drugged and anally raped a 13 year old.
We live in a world where nailing your scrotum to the ground is considered art. Just because someone says it's art doesn't make it appropriate for an elementary school.
so.. we can have a page where its sex with a donkey, but as long as the rest of the book is fine, its all good?? rofl.