It's projection, like how Libs of Tiktok makes them so upset they start howling about how she's literally trying to get people killed by showing their content to the wrong people.
Exactly, and perhaps more broadly her behavior is typical of any Twitter attention-bait post. The initial short-winded gotcha style post, the posturing in the immediate reply, the fact she’s replying to everyone who tweets back in order to big up the numbers and get it pushed into more people’s suggestions by the algorithm… etc. etc.
But to the point of her claim, the “not making a judgment” claim falls apart by reading her response to the first three replies Twitter shows me (as of this writing), which is OP saying how gross DiCaprio is. Her other replies also confirm she is judging DiCaprio very harshly. Then there’s the other big reply post of her bragging about “look at me, you know I don’t struggle in the romance department” which in online world is guaranteed to attract the standard YASSSS KWEEENNNN posts from every NPC to further big up the numbers and get the whole thing into even more people’s feeds…. Etc.
But if you criticize this cynical clout-chasing, she’ll ask why you care so much or why you’re “obsessed” with her, as if she doesn’t care too much about DiCaprio. This sort of clout-chasing always follows the same script.
It's the same way a lot of "lefties" say they want to kill White people, but when they get heavy pushback they like to claim "I was just joking". Or, they used to. Now they can just openly say it without any consequence.
They want the ability to say whatever they want, without facing consequences for it, while simultaneously saying their political enemies (us) can't say what we want, or we'll face consequences. It's just one more hypocrisy in their world of hypocrisy.
It's not hypocrisy. Stop calling it anything other than what it is: a capricious display of power. Leftism is a philosophy of power and revolution and these double-standards are displayed intentionally to signal dominance-- nothing else.
Except, that's literally what it is. It's a form of lie. They're logically inconsistent and their views are logically unsound, and in debates with them they use logical fallacies. It's the best and easiest way to identify them. The central philosophical tenet of globalists is that they lie. The entire political left has embraced globalist dogma and lies. The right has too for a large part, merely delaying their beliefs in the lies by a few years. It's why the Overton window has shifted so far to the left the last 100 years. Lies are how the globalists control, manipulate, and weaken people, and thus gain power over people. It can certainly be used to achieve other ends, as you pointed out. More than one thing can be true at the same time.
So? I mean, if I had a daughter who's 18, would I want her going out with a 48 year old guy? I'd vet him first but I'd feel safer with him dating her than an 18 looking like some gangbanger or even worse, a feminist!
It's so funny how they retract consent from women when it doesn't fit their narrative, like all the Tate girls that went 'no we freely work and joined him', let alone the fictional debate where the fact that it's a debate is moronic since it's a drawing or a bunch of pixels, who gives a fuck?
if I had a daughter who's 18, would I want her going out with a 48 year old guy? I'd vet him first but I'd feel safer with him dating her than an 18 looking like some gangbanger or even worse, a feminist!
No, I'd want someone closer to her age for the obvious 'I don't want her partner to die early on her' and easier to understand each other culturally. But if those were the two options, I'd tell the older guy 'just never call me dad!'
I have to word this VERY carefully thanks to all the pedo pushes we've had and currently having, there isn't anything fundamentally wrong with a LEGAL adult woman going out with a man that's 10 years older or more as they might prefer someone more mature and in control of their lives as let's be honest, a lot of us were idiots when we were younger romantically compared to now that if you had the same maturity you have now when you were younger, A LOT of us would be in relationships earlier.
Women it's different as you have a biological clock ticking fast. Guys don't have as much of a time-limit so we can take ages to mature when a lot of women want to settle earlier. So long as everyone is consenting and there was NO grooming before she became an adult, could be worse.
there isn't anything fundamentally wrong with a LEGAL adult woman going out with a man that's 10 years older or more as they might prefer someone more mature and in control of their lives
Not at all. It is not pedophilia. And the people complaining about this are very bitter about their own miserable, empty lives, and with good reason. That said (TW), there is an argument to be made against it. Robert Wright made it in his brilliant book The Moral Animal. That modern society may be dysfunctional because high-status males serially monopolize the prime reproductive years of different females. If a very rich man has three relationships with girls aged 20 until they are 30, that is three other men who are denied that.
And this is a book written in the damn 1990s. Long before all the whiners started complaining that women "sleep with Chads until they're beaten up and then they come for the beta bucks in my $14 Robin Hood account).
So long as everyone is consenting and there was NO grooming before she became an adult, could be worse.
I fully support Leonardo DiCaprio, because he's just doing the best he can in the current state of affairs. I'd be doing the very same thing if I had hundreds of gazillions to my name. But I also think that the current state of affairs is broken. I also believe that our standard should be higher than "could be worse".
Oh yeah shits fucked, been that way for decades since the war on male role models because they were the ones to teach boys how to measure their strength and how to take charge effectively.
Now thanks to feminists, we have boys that can't act on their own intuition and boys that don't now patience and restraint.
"sleep with Chads until they're beaten up and then they come for the beta bucks in my $14 Robin Hood account).
That's definitely a real thing and way too common. I've heard women say this shit. They don't use beta or Chad but they certainly talk about wanting to "settle down" with someone and putting their "wild" years behind them.
I’ve noticed it. No point complaining because I know the right lady is out there for me if I keep looking but I’ve seen women who have wild times or multiple kids after dating some questionable dudes then as the get older complain that there are no good men. I’ve seen it with my own relatives. Not complaining but that has been observed
I mean I'm not going to go rant about it on the internet randomly but I certainly think it's bullshit behavior and I've told women who say that shit that I think so. Especially since I actually have shit to offer in this situation and they're the scrub
It wasn't that long ago that a 10+ year age gap between husband and wife was the norm. Women wanted a proven provider who was already established, while men wanted a wife most likely to produce children. Nothing's changed, but most people want to pretend it has.
Someone on Twitter said that this is just discomfort with the fact that DiCaprio is not settling down and having a family, like a normal, healthy person. But since families are passe, the only way they are allowed to express this is by ridiculous criticism of age differences.
From people who want to cut off the breasts of your 13-year-old girls.
I think more of it is from bitter, hateful millennial women who want it to be illegal for men to not fuck them instead of women they're actually attracted to.
The concept of “muh power imbalance” is fucking pernicious. Women are only attracted to men who are more powerful than them, so men who don’t have power are automatically ruled out. At the same time, men who do have power are not allowed to pursue with less power. The end result is that women are in total control of all relationships between themselves and men. Gee, I wonder why women subscribe to this shit.
Possibly. It was always funny to me how that DiCaprio story ever became a controversy. Decades ago the fact that he's an unmarried playboy living a hedonistic life would have been considered unseemly, but tolerated if he's famous and good looking. Age of the women wouldn't even be a thing. Yeah of course it's going to be young women, what else?
And it's primarily feminists that reject their so-called agency of women. At the same time I don't see them complaining about women who go after young men. If Demi Moore or Jennifer Lopez had a 20yo boy-toy the feminists would call it empowering.
Its a dick move, but its an obvious thing he does. So any woman who agrees to be with him anyway is too stupid to feel sympathy for if she gets upset about it.
These women know what they get into when they date him. It's not a zero sum transaction. Forgive the red pill cliché but "5 minutes of an alpha is worth a lifetime to women".
It's the female equivalent of notches in her belt. She likes the validation and boost to her social status that dating Leo gives her.
I’m certainly open to correction on this, but I believe that phrase first gained wider attention when it was used by Andrew Gilliam (sp?) the Dem nominee for FL governor who was beaten by DeSantis in 2018. I’m certain that if DeSantis had used the phrase in that debate instead, lefties would despise the phrase and claim it is irrelevant/wrong, that hollering doesn’t prove you’re a “hit dog,” as it were. But a black Democrat introduced it to them instead, so they consider it irrefutable black wisdom, similar to the power they ascribe to what they call “black girl magic,” etc. Ultimately, both phrases are just part of their NPC programming now so we won’t hear them stop talking about hit dogs for a while.
Andrew Gillam could be what made Chapo-influenced online leftists add it to their dialogue tree, I have no idea. It originated long before he ever said it though. Like most of what they say it's just signaling to allies with catchphrases instead of actually communicating actual information or opinions.
It's still a bad comparison by this cooper cunt because Leo dates attractive young women. I don't think he would ever be caught dead dating the elephant woman actor who plays Ellie.
they intentionally picked this girl because she also looks a lot younger than she is, like some weird baby fat thing. she looks like she's maybe 14 years old. that's why they picked her for the role in TLOU in the first place.
I think the funniest thing about it is that it's pretty easy to say that it's sleazy without it also being some grand immorality, because as OP said, adult women are perfectly capable of consenting.
But Feminists love ignoring the agency of women, and it's not limited to this either. Just look at how they react to women that say they want to be housewives and/or mothers.
They're so threatened by that 18 year old who will actually build the natural rapport to appreciate a man that they have reached comical levels of mental gymnastics to justify why it is wrong.
NOOOOOOOOO SHE HAS TO BURN OUT FIRST YOU DISGUSTING FUCK! SHE HAS TO LISTEN TO CARDI B ON REPEAT WHILE ASPHYXIATING ON HER FIRST 50 DICKS, VOMIT ALL OVER HERSELF, AND PASS OUT ON SOMEONE'S LAWN WITH HER HOOCH OUT FOR THE NEIGHBOR KID TO SEE! THEN WAIT TILL SHE IS 30~ WHEN SHE IS DESPERATE, BROKEN, AND STRETCHED BEYOND BELIEF WITH A MAXIMUM OF 3 EGGS LEFT. SHE HAS TO BE WHOLELY UNAPPRECIATIVE WITH A THOUSAND COCK STARE BEFORE YOU EVEN THINK ABOUT COURTING HER.
If women were men they'd constantly be getting punched in the mouth. A man doing this passive aggressive shit would be constantly getting his ass kicked
Such an annoying tactic by these leftist people when they claim that they aren't saying exactly what they are heavily implying.
"I didn't make a judgement"
Yes you did toots, or you wouldn't have made the post.
It's projection, like how Libs of Tiktok makes them so upset they start howling about how she's literally trying to get people killed by showing their content to the wrong people.
I've stopped categorizing why, at this point. I just hate 'em.
Exactly, and perhaps more broadly her behavior is typical of any Twitter attention-bait post. The initial short-winded gotcha style post, the posturing in the immediate reply, the fact she’s replying to everyone who tweets back in order to big up the numbers and get it pushed into more people’s suggestions by the algorithm… etc. etc.
But to the point of her claim, the “not making a judgment” claim falls apart by reading her response to the first three replies Twitter shows me (as of this writing), which is OP saying how gross DiCaprio is. Her other replies also confirm she is judging DiCaprio very harshly. Then there’s the other big reply post of her bragging about “look at me, you know I don’t struggle in the romance department” which in online world is guaranteed to attract the standard YASSSS KWEEENNNN posts from every NPC to further big up the numbers and get the whole thing into even more people’s feeds…. Etc.
But if you criticize this cynical clout-chasing, she’ll ask why you care so much or why you’re “obsessed” with her, as if she doesn’t care too much about DiCaprio. This sort of clout-chasing always follows the same script.
These are the people who will remake a beloved movie or game, change a bunch of stuff, and then try to make you the idiot for caring about that stuff.
It's the same way a lot of "lefties" say they want to kill White people, but when they get heavy pushback they like to claim "I was just joking". Or, they used to. Now they can just openly say it without any consequence.
They want the ability to say whatever they want, without facing consequences for it, while simultaneously saying their political enemies (us) can't say what we want, or we'll face consequences. It's just one more hypocrisy in their world of hypocrisy.
It's not hypocrisy. Stop calling it anything other than what it is: a capricious display of power. Leftism is a philosophy of power and revolution and these double-standards are displayed intentionally to signal dominance-- nothing else.
Except, that's literally what it is. It's a form of lie. They're logically inconsistent and their views are logically unsound, and in debates with them they use logical fallacies. It's the best and easiest way to identify them. The central philosophical tenet of globalists is that they lie. The entire political left has embraced globalist dogma and lies. The right has too for a large part, merely delaying their beliefs in the lies by a few years. It's why the Overton window has shifted so far to the left the last 100 years. Lies are how the globalists control, manipulate, and weaken people, and thus gain power over people. It can certainly be used to achieve other ends, as you pointed out. More than one thing can be true at the same time.
Old women are jealous of young women's youthfulness and beauty.
It's a tale as old as time itself.
No need for intricate analysis. That's all it is and all it will ever be. Everything else is just noise to distract from the truth.
Feminists will agree with any idea that increases their own sexual market value without them having to do any work for it.
A fat girl will support feminism because it says she’s pretty no matter what.
An average girl will support feminism because it gives her permission to get fat.
A pretty girl will support feminism because it will turn her competition fat.
I mean, in the context of the picture in the OP this statement doesn't really apply, does it?
So? I mean, if I had a daughter who's 18, would I want her going out with a 48 year old guy? I'd vet him first but I'd feel safer with him dating her than an 18 looking like some gangbanger or even worse, a feminist!
It's so funny how they retract consent from women when it doesn't fit their narrative, like all the Tate girls that went 'no we freely work and joined him', let alone the fictional debate where the fact that it's a debate is moronic since it's a drawing or a bunch of pixels, who gives a fuck?
Surely, that's not the standard though.
No, I'd want someone closer to her age for the obvious 'I don't want her partner to die early on her' and easier to understand each other culturally. But if those were the two options, I'd tell the older guy 'just never call me dad!'
I have to word this VERY carefully thanks to all the pedo pushes we've had and currently having, there isn't anything fundamentally wrong with a LEGAL adult woman going out with a man that's 10 years older or more as they might prefer someone more mature and in control of their lives as let's be honest, a lot of us were idiots when we were younger romantically compared to now that if you had the same maturity you have now when you were younger, A LOT of us would be in relationships earlier.
Women it's different as you have a biological clock ticking fast. Guys don't have as much of a time-limit so we can take ages to mature when a lot of women want to settle earlier. So long as everyone is consenting and there was NO grooming before she became an adult, could be worse.
Not at all. It is not pedophilia. And the people complaining about this are very bitter about their own miserable, empty lives, and with good reason. That said (TW), there is an argument to be made against it. Robert Wright made it in his brilliant book The Moral Animal. That modern society may be dysfunctional because high-status males serially monopolize the prime reproductive years of different females. If a very rich man has three relationships with girls aged 20 until they are 30, that is three other men who are denied that.
And this is a book written in the damn 1990s. Long before all the whiners started complaining that women "sleep with Chads until they're beaten up and then they come for the beta bucks in my $14 Robin Hood account).
I fully support Leonardo DiCaprio, because he's just doing the best he can in the current state of affairs. I'd be doing the very same thing if I had hundreds of gazillions to my name. But I also think that the current state of affairs is broken. I also believe that our standard should be higher than "could be worse".
Oh yeah shits fucked, been that way for decades since the war on male role models because they were the ones to teach boys how to measure their strength and how to take charge effectively.
Now thanks to feminists, we have boys that can't act on their own intuition and boys that don't now patience and restraint.
"sleep with Chads until they're beaten up and then they come for the beta bucks in my $14 Robin Hood account).
That's definitely a real thing and way too common. I've heard women say this shit. They don't use beta or Chad but they certainly talk about wanting to "settle down" with someone and putting their "wild" years behind them.
Yeah, but the people complaining about it, in general, don't have anything to offer beyond a $14 Robin Hood account./
I’ve noticed it. No point complaining because I know the right lady is out there for me if I keep looking but I’ve seen women who have wild times or multiple kids after dating some questionable dudes then as the get older complain that there are no good men. I’ve seen it with my own relatives. Not complaining but that has been observed
I mean I'm not going to go rant about it on the internet randomly but I certainly think it's bullshit behavior and I've told women who say that shit that I think so. Especially since I actually have shit to offer in this situation and they're the scrub
It wasn't that long ago that a 10+ year age gap between husband and wife was the norm. Women wanted a proven provider who was already established, while men wanted a wife most likely to produce children. Nothing's changed, but most people want to pretend it has.
Someone on Twitter said that this is just discomfort with the fact that DiCaprio is not settling down and having a family, like a normal, healthy person. But since families are passe, the only way they are allowed to express this is by ridiculous criticism of age differences.
From people who want to cut off the breasts of your 13-year-old girls.
I think more of it is from bitter, hateful millennial women who want it to be illegal for men to not fuck them instead of women they're actually attracted to.
The concept of “muh power imbalance” is fucking pernicious. Women are only attracted to men who are more powerful than them, so men who don’t have power are automatically ruled out. At the same time, men who do have power are not allowed to pursue with less power. The end result is that women are in total control of all relationships between themselves and men. Gee, I wonder why women subscribe to this shit.
Mission accomplished.
Possibly. It was always funny to me how that DiCaprio story ever became a controversy. Decades ago the fact that he's an unmarried playboy living a hedonistic life would have been considered unseemly, but tolerated if he's famous and good looking. Age of the women wouldn't even be a thing. Yeah of course it's going to be young women, what else?
And it's primarily feminists that reject their so-called agency of women. At the same time I don't see them complaining about women who go after young men. If Demi Moore or Jennifer Lopez had a 20yo boy-toy the feminists would call it empowering.
Kate Beckinsale routinely dates much younger men. No one cares.
Its a dick move, but its an obvious thing he does. So any woman who agrees to be with him anyway is too stupid to feel sympathy for if she gets upset about it.
These women know what they get into when they date him. It's not a zero sum transaction. Forgive the red pill cliché but "5 minutes of an alpha is worth a lifetime to women".
It's the female equivalent of notches in her belt. She likes the validation and boost to her social status that dating Leo gives her.
"A hit dog will holler" is one of many smug phrases that immediately tells you that you're dealing with a caricature instead of an actual person.
I’m certainly open to correction on this, but I believe that phrase first gained wider attention when it was used by Andrew Gilliam (sp?) the Dem nominee for FL governor who was beaten by DeSantis in 2018. I’m certain that if DeSantis had used the phrase in that debate instead, lefties would despise the phrase and claim it is irrelevant/wrong, that hollering doesn’t prove you’re a “hit dog,” as it were. But a black Democrat introduced it to them instead, so they consider it irrefutable black wisdom, similar to the power they ascribe to what they call “black girl magic,” etc. Ultimately, both phrases are just part of their NPC programming now so we won’t hear them stop talking about hit dogs for a while.
It’s almost the inverse of “cries out in pain as he strikes you”.
Andrew Gillam could be what made Chapo-influenced online leftists add it to their dialogue tree, I have no idea. It originated long before he ever said it though. Like most of what they say it's just signaling to allies with catchphrases instead of actually communicating actual information or opinions.
It's still a bad comparison by this cooper cunt because Leo dates attractive young women. I don't think he would ever be caught dead dating the elephant woman actor who plays Ellie.
She’s so fucking ugly.
they intentionally picked this girl because she also looks a lot younger than she is, like some weird baby fat thing. she looks like she's maybe 14 years old. that's why they picked her for the role in TLOU in the first place.
the girl dicaprio is dating does not look like some underage child
Oh no! He wants live eggs! How horrible.
"Will no one rid me of this turbulent priest?"
Didn't the king who said that get misconstrued in the worst way possible, the priest was killed, and that haunted the king for the rest of his life?
I think the funniest thing about it is that it's pretty easy to say that it's sleazy without it also being some grand immorality, because as OP said, adult women are perfectly capable of consenting.
But Feminists love ignoring the agency of women, and it's not limited to this either. Just look at how they react to women that say they want to be housewives and/or mothers.
Virtually none of these people object to 18 year old girls showing their buttholes to millions of strangers on the internet for $5 a pop.
Almost 100% of those 18 year old girls would rather be Leonardo DiCaprio’s girlfriend than an “empowered sex worker”.
They're so threatened by that 18 year old who will actually build the natural rapport to appreciate a man that they have reached comical levels of mental gymnastics to justify why it is wrong.
If women were men they'd constantly be getting punched in the mouth. A man doing this passive aggressive shit would be constantly getting his ass kicked