It's projection, like how Libs of Tiktok makes them so upset they start howling about how she's literally trying to get people killed by showing their content to the wrong people.
Exactly, and perhaps more broadly her behavior is typical of any Twitter attention-bait post. The initial short-winded gotcha style post, the posturing in the immediate reply, the fact she’s replying to everyone who tweets back in order to big up the numbers and get it pushed into more people’s suggestions by the algorithm… etc. etc.
But to the point of her claim, the “not making a judgment” claim falls apart by reading her response to the first three replies Twitter shows me (as of this writing), which is OP saying how gross DiCaprio is. Her other replies also confirm she is judging DiCaprio very harshly. Then there’s the other big reply post of her bragging about “look at me, you know I don’t struggle in the romance department” which in online world is guaranteed to attract the standard YASSSS KWEEENNNN posts from every NPC to further big up the numbers and get the whole thing into even more people’s feeds…. Etc.
But if you criticize this cynical clout-chasing, she’ll ask why you care so much or why you’re “obsessed” with her, as if she doesn’t care too much about DiCaprio. This sort of clout-chasing always follows the same script.
It's the same way a lot of "lefties" say they want to kill White people, but when they get heavy pushback they like to claim "I was just joking". Or, they used to. Now they can just openly say it without any consequence.
They want the ability to say whatever they want, without facing consequences for it, while simultaneously saying their political enemies (us) can't say what we want, or we'll face consequences. It's just one more hypocrisy in their world of hypocrisy.
It's not hypocrisy. Stop calling it anything other than what it is: a capricious display of power. Leftism is a philosophy of power and revolution and these double-standards are displayed intentionally to signal dominance-- nothing else.
Except, that's literally what it is. It's a form of lie. They're logically inconsistent and their views are logically unsound, and in debates with them they use logical fallacies. It's the best and easiest way to identify them. The central philosophical tenet of globalists is that they lie. The entire political left has embraced globalist dogma and lies. The right has too for a large part, merely delaying their beliefs in the lies by a few years. It's why the Overton window has shifted so far to the left the last 100 years. Lies are how the globalists control, manipulate, and weaken people, and thus gain power over people. It can certainly be used to achieve other ends, as you pointed out. More than one thing can be true at the same time.
Such an annoying tactic by these leftist people when they claim that they aren't saying exactly what they are heavily implying.
"I didn't make a judgement"
Yes you did toots, or you wouldn't have made the post.
It's projection, like how Libs of Tiktok makes them so upset they start howling about how she's literally trying to get people killed by showing their content to the wrong people.
I've stopped categorizing why, at this point. I just hate 'em.
Exactly, and perhaps more broadly her behavior is typical of any Twitter attention-bait post. The initial short-winded gotcha style post, the posturing in the immediate reply, the fact she’s replying to everyone who tweets back in order to big up the numbers and get it pushed into more people’s suggestions by the algorithm… etc. etc.
But to the point of her claim, the “not making a judgment” claim falls apart by reading her response to the first three replies Twitter shows me (as of this writing), which is OP saying how gross DiCaprio is. Her other replies also confirm she is judging DiCaprio very harshly. Then there’s the other big reply post of her bragging about “look at me, you know I don’t struggle in the romance department” which in online world is guaranteed to attract the standard YASSSS KWEEENNNN posts from every NPC to further big up the numbers and get the whole thing into even more people’s feeds…. Etc.
But if you criticize this cynical clout-chasing, she’ll ask why you care so much or why you’re “obsessed” with her, as if she doesn’t care too much about DiCaprio. This sort of clout-chasing always follows the same script.
These are the people who will remake a beloved movie or game, change a bunch of stuff, and then try to make you the idiot for caring about that stuff.
It's the same way a lot of "lefties" say they want to kill White people, but when they get heavy pushback they like to claim "I was just joking". Or, they used to. Now they can just openly say it without any consequence.
They want the ability to say whatever they want, without facing consequences for it, while simultaneously saying their political enemies (us) can't say what we want, or we'll face consequences. It's just one more hypocrisy in their world of hypocrisy.
It's not hypocrisy. Stop calling it anything other than what it is: a capricious display of power. Leftism is a philosophy of power and revolution and these double-standards are displayed intentionally to signal dominance-- nothing else.
Except, that's literally what it is. It's a form of lie. They're logically inconsistent and their views are logically unsound, and in debates with them they use logical fallacies. It's the best and easiest way to identify them. The central philosophical tenet of globalists is that they lie. The entire political left has embraced globalist dogma and lies. The right has too for a large part, merely delaying their beliefs in the lies by a few years. It's why the Overton window has shifted so far to the left the last 100 years. Lies are how the globalists control, manipulate, and weaken people, and thus gain power over people. It can certainly be used to achieve other ends, as you pointed out. More than one thing can be true at the same time.