So? I mean, if I had a daughter who's 18, would I want her going out with a 48 year old guy? I'd vet him first but I'd feel safer with him dating her than an 18 looking like some gangbanger or even worse, a feminist!
It's so funny how they retract consent from women when it doesn't fit their narrative, like all the Tate girls that went 'no we freely work and joined him', let alone the fictional debate where the fact that it's a debate is moronic since it's a drawing or a bunch of pixels, who gives a fuck?
if I had a daughter who's 18, would I want her going out with a 48 year old guy? I'd vet him first but I'd feel safer with him dating her than an 18 looking like some gangbanger or even worse, a feminist!
No, I'd want someone closer to her age for the obvious 'I don't want her partner to die early on her' and easier to understand each other culturally. But if those were the two options, I'd tell the older guy 'just never call me dad!'
I have to word this VERY carefully thanks to all the pedo pushes we've had and currently having, there isn't anything fundamentally wrong with a LEGAL adult woman going out with a man that's 10 years older or more as they might prefer someone more mature and in control of their lives as let's be honest, a lot of us were idiots when we were younger romantically compared to now that if you had the same maturity you have now when you were younger, A LOT of us would be in relationships earlier.
Women it's different as you have a biological clock ticking fast. Guys don't have as much of a time-limit so we can take ages to mature when a lot of women want to settle earlier. So long as everyone is consenting and there was NO grooming before she became an adult, could be worse.
there isn't anything fundamentally wrong with a LEGAL adult woman going out with a man that's 10 years older or more as they might prefer someone more mature and in control of their lives
Not at all. It is not pedophilia. And the people complaining about this are very bitter about their own miserable, empty lives, and with good reason. That said (TW), there is an argument to be made against it. Robert Wright made it in his brilliant book The Moral Animal. That modern society may be dysfunctional because high-status males serially monopolize the prime reproductive years of different females. If a very rich man has three relationships with girls aged 20 until they are 30, that is three other men who are denied that.
And this is a book written in the damn 1990s. Long before all the whiners started complaining that women "sleep with Chads until they're beaten up and then they come for the beta bucks in my $14 Robin Hood account).
So long as everyone is consenting and there was NO grooming before she became an adult, could be worse.
I fully support Leonardo DiCaprio, because he's just doing the best he can in the current state of affairs. I'd be doing the very same thing if I had hundreds of gazillions to my name. But I also think that the current state of affairs is broken. I also believe that our standard should be higher than "could be worse".
Oh yeah shits fucked, been that way for decades since the war on male role models because they were the ones to teach boys how to measure their strength and how to take charge effectively.
Now thanks to feminists, we have boys that can't act on their own intuition and boys that don't now patience and restraint.
"sleep with Chads until they're beaten up and then they come for the beta bucks in my $14 Robin Hood account).
That's definitely a real thing and way too common. I've heard women say this shit. They don't use beta or Chad but they certainly talk about wanting to "settle down" with someone and putting their "wild" years behind them.
It wasn't that long ago that a 10+ year age gap between husband and wife was the norm. Women wanted a proven provider who was already established, while men wanted a wife most likely to produce children. Nothing's changed, but most people want to pretend it has.
So? I mean, if I had a daughter who's 18, would I want her going out with a 48 year old guy? I'd vet him first but I'd feel safer with him dating her than an 18 looking like some gangbanger or even worse, a feminist!
It's so funny how they retract consent from women when it doesn't fit their narrative, like all the Tate girls that went 'no we freely work and joined him', let alone the fictional debate where the fact that it's a debate is moronic since it's a drawing or a bunch of pixels, who gives a fuck?
Surely, that's not the standard though.
No, I'd want someone closer to her age for the obvious 'I don't want her partner to die early on her' and easier to understand each other culturally. But if those were the two options, I'd tell the older guy 'just never call me dad!'
I have to word this VERY carefully thanks to all the pedo pushes we've had and currently having, there isn't anything fundamentally wrong with a LEGAL adult woman going out with a man that's 10 years older or more as they might prefer someone more mature and in control of their lives as let's be honest, a lot of us were idiots when we were younger romantically compared to now that if you had the same maturity you have now when you were younger, A LOT of us would be in relationships earlier.
Women it's different as you have a biological clock ticking fast. Guys don't have as much of a time-limit so we can take ages to mature when a lot of women want to settle earlier. So long as everyone is consenting and there was NO grooming before she became an adult, could be worse.
Not at all. It is not pedophilia. And the people complaining about this are very bitter about their own miserable, empty lives, and with good reason. That said (TW), there is an argument to be made against it. Robert Wright made it in his brilliant book The Moral Animal. That modern society may be dysfunctional because high-status males serially monopolize the prime reproductive years of different females. If a very rich man has three relationships with girls aged 20 until they are 30, that is three other men who are denied that.
And this is a book written in the damn 1990s. Long before all the whiners started complaining that women "sleep with Chads until they're beaten up and then they come for the beta bucks in my $14 Robin Hood account).
I fully support Leonardo DiCaprio, because he's just doing the best he can in the current state of affairs. I'd be doing the very same thing if I had hundreds of gazillions to my name. But I also think that the current state of affairs is broken. I also believe that our standard should be higher than "could be worse".
Oh yeah shits fucked, been that way for decades since the war on male role models because they were the ones to teach boys how to measure their strength and how to take charge effectively.
Now thanks to feminists, we have boys that can't act on their own intuition and boys that don't now patience and restraint.
"sleep with Chads until they're beaten up and then they come for the beta bucks in my $14 Robin Hood account).
That's definitely a real thing and way too common. I've heard women say this shit. They don't use beta or Chad but they certainly talk about wanting to "settle down" with someone and putting their "wild" years behind them.
It wasn't that long ago that a 10+ year age gap between husband and wife was the norm. Women wanted a proven provider who was already established, while men wanted a wife most likely to produce children. Nothing's changed, but most people want to pretend it has.