“My son hasn’t been in my life for seven years, I’m hoping that he is at least watching me on the internet because the reason I’m out there in such a big way is for him,” they somberly added.
Gay guys shouldn't procreate because then this is what happens. Poor kid. Hopefully there was no molestation involved while he was growing up, but with a degenerate clearly out of control of his insane urges, the odds aren't great.
“My son hasn’t been in my life for seven years, I’m hoping that he is at least watching me on the internet because the reason I’m out there in such a big way is for him,” they somberly added.
Yeah, I'm sure the reason you drove away your own son with your urge to find increasingly deranged things to coom to was actually that you did it all for him. Go die of Fagpox you fucking narcissist.
Did you hear about the stunning and brave gay couple in Georgia who were pimping out their young children to local faggots and then making and distributing CP of the abuse?
You'd think if somebody was going to mutilate themselves to this degree, they would be slightly more autistic about the details of their persona. Yeah sure, a "non-binary" dragon named after Tiamat and Medusa...only one of which might be a dragon, and both of which are explicitly female.
I know I'm pissing into the wind expecting any kind of sense out of that thing, but come the fuck on. What an awful, pitiful creature. Euthanasia would be a mercy.
I can understand why this creature's son distances himself, but blood usually ends up being thicker than water, even if dad is a wannabe reptile.
I also imagine this guy has an independent income or he's got a gig lined up as a traveling 1-man freak show . . . but who knows? These days, with progressivism being what it is, he can find a job somewhere and become a stunning and brave inspiration to so-called "transhuman" freaks.
The saying is "The blood of the Covenant is thicker than the water of the womb". So it actually means that bonds you forged yourself can be stronger than family.
As an addendum, this is not Transhumanism.. This is Otherkin. Mental illness trans"species". Please don't confuse the two.
There is sketchy evidence of an earlier literary reference, but that seems to have been in error? That would make the entire reversed meaning a confabulation, with an attempt to push the etymology backwards from its origin in the Nineties. Wikipedia (of course) is all over the place, and (this source claims) is full of errors.
The discussion is interesting, but the tl;dr is that there's a long etymology of kin ties being referred to as 'blood,' while referring to your kin as 'water' smacks of 'found family' 90s bullshit and doesn't have a firm etymology.
Its worth noting that concepts like "blood brothers" have existed for centuries, and are common enough that boys still forge those types of ritual bonds on instinct.
So clearly the idea of it has always been somewhat around, even if not in a settled phrase.
I can't imagine how much pain my confusing the one form of insanity with the other might have caused Otherkin who might be reading this.
There's being pedantic and then there's just correcting someone when they're wrong. It's best to be corrected in a relatively friendly place like this than to go and refer to a freak who thinks he is an animal as a trans-humanist elsewhere and get laughed at for it.
I know I still laugh at my brother for thinking globalism is a synonym for being able to have trade and travel between different countries, and that anyone pushing back on it genuinely wants every country to be like 1700s Japan and close themselves off to the world.
It's best to be corrected in a relatively friendly place like this than to go and refer to a freak who thinks he is an animal as a trans-humanist elsewhere and get laughed at for it.
I suppose you're right.
Your reply has also led me to look into these differences.
Thanks for the motivation I needed to clarify these things in my mind.
I must shed this habit of becoming snarky when I'm properly contradicted or corrected. I blame online anonymity. It feeds my egotism.
No problem man trust me I get it. I am the exact same way sometimes. I honestly blame reddit. Years and years of dwelling in a place where the average user is borderline retarded, not to mention probably acting in bad faith, did a number on me mentally when it comes to interacting on the internet and I'm still shaking free from it.
I also imagine this guy has an independent income or he's got a gig lined up as a traveling 1-man freak show
61, former banker. I'm guessing he's retired and has enough money to live on without working, though he could absolutely be pulling in cash as some kind of circus freak. Honestly, I can't say he doesn't look cool.
...But when that's a costume you can't ever take off... yeah. It's gonna impact your life one way or another. I guess his son doesn't like the constant in-your-face reminder that his dad's a weirdo sex freak.
Oh, this guy. He made the news a couple times. The banking world was so boring he created these kinks to deal with it. It's like finance guys and blow. I can understand why his son is distancing himself. The bank isn't there, but the kinks remained.
/facepalm
If HE didn't molest HIS son in the past, then HE's definitely making disgusting overtures to him right now.
Gay guys shouldn't procreate because then this is what happens. Poor kid. Hopefully there was no molestation involved while he was growing up, but with a degenerate clearly out of control of his insane urges, the odds aren't great.
Yeah, I'm sure the reason you drove away your own son with your urge to find increasingly deranged things to coom to was actually that you did it all for him. Go die of Fagpox you fucking narcissist.
I'd bet a month's pay that the freak molested the son. It's damn near a guarantee.
Did you hear about the stunning and brave gay couple in Georgia who were pimping out their young children to local faggots and then making and distributing CP of the abuse?
https://www.nbcnews.com/news/us-news/georgia-couple-facing-charges-allegedly-producing-child-porn-using-ado-rcna41917
Which leads to my point: lobotomize and institutionalize all faggots and troons. And repeal the 19th.
Good for the son.
You'd think if somebody was going to mutilate themselves to this degree, they would be slightly more autistic about the details of their persona. Yeah sure, a "non-binary" dragon named after Tiamat and Medusa...only one of which might be a dragon, and both of which are explicitly female.
I know I'm pissing into the wind expecting any kind of sense out of that thing, but come the fuck on. What an awful, pitiful creature. Euthanasia would be a mercy.
"Sometimes when I'm alone, I like to run around in my underwear and sing. Doesn't make me Madonna. Never will."
This guy might have needed to hear this line. He was around in 1988, too.
WHAT THE FUCK IS THAT THING?!
Surely it can't be that b... opens article SWEET EMPEROR, THE TYRANNIDS ARE HERE!
Brother! Get the flamer - the heavy flamer!
Way ahead of you, brother!
"Surely it can't be that ba-"
Halt. Flammenwerferzeit.
An attention whore. But you probably figured that out already.
Horrifying.
I can understand why this creature's son distances himself, but blood usually ends up being thicker than water, even if dad is a wannabe reptile.
I also imagine this guy has an independent income or he's got a gig lined up as a traveling 1-man freak show . . . but who knows? These days, with progressivism being what it is, he can find a job somewhere and become a stunning and brave inspiration to so-called "transhuman" freaks.
The saying is "The blood of the Covenant is thicker than the water of the womb". So it actually means that bonds you forged yourself can be stronger than family.
As an addendum, this is not Transhumanism.. This is Otherkin. Mental illness trans"species". Please don't confuse the two.
I searched the phrase and found a discussion on the etymology which argues the origins of the phrase: https://english.stackexchange.com/questions/147902/original-meaning-of-blood-is-thicker-than-water-is-it-real.
There is sketchy evidence of an earlier literary reference, but that seems to have been in error? That would make the entire reversed meaning a confabulation, with an attempt to push the etymology backwards from its origin in the Nineties. Wikipedia (of course) is all over the place, and (this source claims) is full of errors.
The discussion is interesting, but the tl;dr is that there's a long etymology of kin ties being referred to as 'blood,' while referring to your kin as 'water' smacks of 'found family' 90s bullshit and doesn't have a firm etymology.
Its worth noting that concepts like "blood brothers" have existed for centuries, and are common enough that boys still forge those types of ritual bonds on instinct.
So clearly the idea of it has always been somewhat around, even if not in a settled phrase.
Thanks for setting me straight.
I was unaware of the origin of the homily. Live and learn. Did I get that one right? Or am I using another old saw out of context?
I can't imagine how much pain my confusing the one form of insanity with the other might have caused Otherkin who might be reading this.
I will reform, Commissar.
There's being pedantic and then there's just correcting someone when they're wrong. It's best to be corrected in a relatively friendly place like this than to go and refer to a freak who thinks he is an animal as a trans-humanist elsewhere and get laughed at for it.
I know I still laugh at my brother for thinking globalism is a synonym for being able to have trade and travel between different countries, and that anyone pushing back on it genuinely wants every country to be like 1700s Japan and close themselves off to the world.
I suppose you're right.
Your reply has also led me to look into these differences.
Thanks for the motivation I needed to clarify these things in my mind.
I must shed this habit of becoming snarky when I'm properly contradicted or corrected. I blame online anonymity. It feeds my egotism.
No problem man trust me I get it. I am the exact same way sometimes. I honestly blame reddit. Years and years of dwelling in a place where the average user is borderline retarded, not to mention probably acting in bad faith, did a number on me mentally when it comes to interacting on the internet and I'm still shaking free from it.
61, former banker. I'm guessing he's retired and has enough money to live on without working, though he could absolutely be pulling in cash as some kind of circus freak. Honestly, I can't say he doesn't look cool.
...But when that's a costume you can't ever take off... yeah. It's gonna impact your life one way or another. I guess his son doesn't like the constant in-your-face reminder that his dad's a weirdo sex freak.
Jesus Christ, no wonder!
I'm not a legal expert but if someone puts on armor and identifies as St. George, can they slay this dragon creature without going to prison ?
What are the laws governing mythological fights ?
PS: bonus points if the son turns out to be St. George
Not even a Saint can legally slay a mythical creature without a tag. You'll have to check with the local Fish and Game to see how to get one.
It is very natural to want to hit this dude.
This is very triggering to my knightly tulpas. We must ban this before dragging on more of these nuts.
Poor genderless dragonpersonthing. His/their/Xir life must be difficult.
"What do you mean you don't have genderless dragon restrooms in this movie theater? What kind of bigoted business do you nazis run here?"
His/Their/Xir son has no heart.
The son is entitled to free GOOD therapy for life because of this nutcase
Oh, this guy. He made the news a couple times. The banking world was so boring he created these kinks to deal with it. It's like finance guys and blow. I can understand why his son is distancing himself. The bank isn't there, but the kinks remained.
Very good. Please face wall now.
man is obviously mentally ill
It's the transgender/transhumanism connection again.
I recall a dude that did the same thing, but he went with a cat look. It didn't end well for him.
Now where did I put my corded-hair whip?
Why wasn't there a warning added? Who could even read that article with those pictures? Disgusting.
He'd welcome that I'm sure