Daily reminder that liberals are insane
(media.communities.win)
Comments (53)
sorted by:
They're just salty that someone stopped the shooter before he killed more people they could have exploited for their gun grabbing agenda.
I doubt they are that self-aware. They were told that by someone who was salty and then blindly repeated it, as is their wont.
Further reinforcing my belief that these creatures are not actually sentient and need to be regarded as such.
Bots online and bots IRL.
There’s a desperate need to appear ‘informed’ now that I’m not sure existed before. Most people know less about what’s going on than ever now because we have less time to do that and most people are consumers now anyway. I almost never hear anybody making a proud political stance in public that has any idea what’s going on. Not in the sense I disagree with them but in the sense that they’re obviously repeating a headline they read on the can.
Their leaders most certainly are. Look at that mass shooting in Texas. The police were quite clearly told to make sure no one stopped the shooting.
NPCs aside, this matter should be upsetting to anyone who desires the government to hold a monopoly on violence. If a private citizen can stop a crime with violence (without the law turning them into a criminal), then it means the dream of the violence monopoly is further away, and that makes those people angry. In order to achieve that dream, they need to chip away legal self defense. The traditional vector is to corrode gun rights, but here we can see the desire to see this hero turned into a criminal (this would be the government softly declaring a monopoly on violence). In fact, because they believe that government violence monopolies are just, such a man is automatically a dangerous criminal to them.
I think that is how they see things.
It's, "a monopoly on initiating violence".
Self-defense does not intersect with initiating violence.
Originally, yes. But I think it's fairly common now to criminalize the use of violence on someone who isn't attacking you directly.
They also need to frame the event in a way that doesnt humiliate institutional "we made a safe space guise!" virtue signals
But... my gun-free zones! IT'S NOT FAIR!
This depends on the state's laws. In some states, violating the posting is a crime. In others it's not. I'm not sure what the rule says in Indiana, but if I carried past the signs in Michigan I'm at worst looking at a trespass charge if I'm found out and refuse to leave when asked.
No worries, I wasn't calling you out on it so much as all these twitter people thinking they actually know what the gun laws are in a state they've probably never been to.
Signs are not enforced in Indiana according to the USCCA resprosicity map
Holy crap if we find out this was Kyle Rittenhouse...
If anything, the shooter targeted the mall because it WAS a gun free zone.
Liberals seething over the hero carrying a gun can’t seem to understand that small signs don’t stop evil intent.
See, that's one thing that should be nailed down: If you're going to declare your property to be "gun-free," you should be liable for protection of your guests since you're forcing them to give up their own possible defense.
That is the current argument and why I refuse to patronize any business that declares its property "gun free".
The other side of the argument grates against me as well, though. Why do I want more government when self-preservation has worked well enough?
"Good people didn't die unnecessarily. REEEEEEE!"
Good people do not exist, IMO.
Then go out and become one. :D
It's just Christian teaching. While I am not a Christian, they are correct about this, and the loss of knowledge of man's fallen nature has cost us dearly.
Good people can be sinful. In fact, everyone is sinful. There’s no amount of good deeds we can do to avoid that.
“Good” in this case means a triumph over evil. That’s definitely something that exists.
Yes, but that doesn't mean anyone is righteous.
That says it all.
He probably thinks: crap, now I have to slit my own wrist rather than having someone else do my dirty work for me.
This country cannot continue if we have to share it with these retards
https://gab.com/PNN/posts/108669240024762875
Not cucking to the government = bad. I see.
If it was a gun free zone, why did the bad guy have a gun?
It's impossible for criminals to bring guns in places where it is illegal to have guns
Repeal the 19th amendment.
way too late for that, find a based church, make friends with rednecks, and stockpile
When you have zero skills, the only thing you can do to stand out is be more obedient than the next guy.
Shall not be infringed.
Fuck off.
Statists love to define "good" as "law-abiding", even when the law is unjust.
Especially when the law is injust.
Id be willing to bet my life savings that the majority of people who feel this way are women
Such people should be banished from society to go live in a wilderness landscape that is full of predators.
they sound like bots not humans
Nearly all random mass shootings take place in a gun free zone. And why wouldn't they? It's a soft target. It's the moral equivalent of killing a baby. The fact that their targets are unarmed and helpless emboldens them.
Unless a gun free zone is behind bars and metal detectors, it is not a gun free zone. It's a slaughterhouse.
A gun free zone ensures only law abiding citizens within it will not have guns. The entire idea is silly. Signs that tell people not to skate and grind in some areas don’t even work. Why would ‘no gun’ signs? Speed limits don’t make people not speed. In CA most people don’t really stop at stop signs all the way. Almost all public notices and declarations don’t work as intended if they’re not notices that prevent immediate harm to the reader.
I’m in CA in an area with the strictest gun rules and we have the most gun deaths. Richmond out here has the most gun deaths by capita. Oakland’s on the top list too. Some kid in Berkeley of all places was caught trying to do another school shooting right after the last big school shooting. Think it was the same weekend.
Telling people not to have guns doesn’t help people looking to commit crimes with guns.
I could understand 1-sided gun free zone, ie employees and LE only can have guns within this building. But a true gun free zone is idiotic
Lol what are they going to do, call the police that they defunded?
I assume this means you're allowed to carry if you're carrying a 30-06.
It was grandpa's favorite cartridge for good reason.