When society expects men to do things men are increasingly asking "What's in it for us?". The answer is often nothing at best and something very painful (socially, physically, or financially) at worst. There's nothing to be gained in intervening in such a situation. You could however get beaten, stabbed, or shot. You'll also get called a racist and get charged with hate crimes if the attackers are non-white as they often are.
You'll also get called a racist and get charged with hate crimes if the attackers are non-white as they often are.
Women overwhelmingly support degenerate nonsense like BLM and multiculturalism. Tell me again why I should rush in to save them from the effects of what they themselves advocated for.
And for what? Helping someone who's almost guaranteed to have voted for this shitshow? No thanks. Elections have consequences.
Your virtue signalling on social media won't save you in real life. Neither will the propaganda journalists whose every word you believe without question. They're more likely to throw you under the bus for drawing attention to the "wrong" kind of perp.
something very painful (socially, physically, or financially) at worst
By the way, that very same thing happened in Germany a few days ago.
A group of "men" harassed a couple of women on a train. A German passenger told them to stop so they beat him up, chased him out of the train and kept beating him.
In a situation like that it's probably best to stay on the train. There are cameras and witnesses everywhere, and eventually the operator will have to call the police because of the fighting. You might be dead by the time they show up, but how do you know that won't happen if you run off the train? Where are you going to go?
It's sad there weren't more men there to stand with him.
It's sad there weren't more men there to stand with him.
~90% of people in Germany vote for parties that are responsible for this shit.
They only stand up for what the media tells them to. They are the definition of NPCs.
Let them reap what they sow. I won't lift a finger for anyone I don't know personally.
Don't put conditions on your protection like the guy in the screenshot. Don't imply you'll protect them if they "appreciate" you. Sure, it may be true-- but it makes the statement read more like a ransom than a statement of truth.
We don't want people to think women are being held hostage for affection, that plays the wrong way in the media. People are already biased to favor women. They won't see that you're attempting to explain the social contract, they'll just read your words as hostility.
Phrase it like "Why should I be obligated to protect you? I have no duty to you or anyone, my safety is as important as yours." Keep it gender neutral. State the inarguable reality that you owe nothing to anyone. After all, that's simple turnabout-- feminists also insist they owe nothing to anyone. That's how they justify treating men like dirt, but it can work for us just as easily. Its effective because it's impossible to spin as a threat.
Let them explain the gender roles they want followed afterwards. Let them insist you should sacrifice yourself for them. Let them open the social contract can of worms and become a hypocrite.
This doesn't have much to do with your comment but "social contract" is an excellent term to describe what feminism destroyed. All the whining about what men are or aren't doing boils down to anger that they're not fulfilling their side of the social contract. Why aren't they holding up their end of the bargain? Because feminism removed the obligation for women to hold up their side of the deal. Men are just realizing that they've been sold a false bill of goods and that there's no benefit to continuing to play the game.
I think pointing out hypocrisy is fine if you're realistic about what it can accomplish. Leftists might not care about being hypocrites but someone on the fence watching their antics will. Leftists have a real knack for driving people into the arms of their opponents and our job is to illustrate their bullshit in clear terms to expedite that process. Pointing out their hypocrisy is one way to do that. But yeah, you'll never get a leftist to hold themselves to their own standards.
When I was a teen I thought Islam was backwards. Now I see Islam just had to figure out how to constructively deal with fighting age Muslim males. Aka don't let women around them.
If your goal is to create an expansionist totalitarian superstate, Islamic doctrine is a real work of genius. Its understanding of how to control and motivate men is unparalleled.
Call Mohammed a schizophrenic, epileptic pedophile all you want, but one look at the results he achieved, and it's no wonder his people believed he was receiving wisdom from the almighty. I'll bet he believed it himself.
Mohammed stands with Genghis Khan in the scope of his military success, and then utterly eclipses him in the scope of his lasting legacy, achieving the immortality Genghis could only dream of.
It's really no surprise that the middle east all but deifies this guy, and no surprise that Adolf Hitler admired his work.
Given the literal Nazis involved in the founding of the EU and Nato, the fucking sig rune shape of not one, but two NATO headquarters, Klaus Schwab's high ranking Nazi parentage, I sometimes find it genuinely difficult to silence the tin foil hat voice in my head that says the the Islamification of Europe is not 'the kalergi plan', but a long game to slowly warm Europe back to Hitler - whom muslims admire, as he admired them, for the same reason.
yeah i believe that BS as much as i believe that "Hitler was Jewish" as they like to claim. As i said before, Klaus Schwab parentage was hidden until people started saying he was related to the Rothschild and then they came up with this
Thanks! That is a compliment. It's also not made up, unlike your claims about infanticide in the West.
No, that women really do desire men being killed,
Who commits nearly all mass killings? Not women. Or is that another fraud by the statistics offices that cover up the 10,000 mass shootings a year by women?
Leftists have created a world where criminals are rewarded and Good Samaritans are punished. I don't know the incident this is referring to, but intervening would probably mean fighting not just the attacker but also the DA and every Democrat within a hundred miles.
Pfft, he'd be lucky to be prosecuted like Kyle. Kyle was textbook and documented in high detail from multiple camera angles and just about scraped by. Same as Johnny Depp in his trial- if Heard and her lawyer weren't absolutely retarded and getting destroyed by mountains of rock-solid evidence, he wouldn't have an ice-cube's chance in hell.
Same as Johnny Depp in his trial- if Heard and her lawyer weren't absolutely retarded and getting destroyed by mountains of rock-solid evidence, he wouldn't have an ice-cube's chance in hell.
I think he doesn't have an ice-cube's chance in hell as it is, unfortunately. Maybe because it's a jury trial, he will.
thanks for the black pill, but the way public opinion is swinging (and the fact that Amber and her team are a goddamn clown show), I'm going to hold out hope that the courts aren't entirely bereft of the merest sliver of justice. I think they'll at least hold this up as an example "see, we prosecute women sometimes too!"
Pretty much. In some way I actually hope he loses just so people can stop having any faith in the system, but it's too popular- too many normies are invested in the outcome and would notice how bullshit it would be for her to get away with this.
Why should men help women in this day and age - especially white men? What is in it for men? Only to get the entire book thrown at them and get his life ruined for women who voted for it and would not even spit on that very good Samaritan if he were on fire?
Feminism did not ruined just chivalry, it set the entire social construct between men and women ablaze. Women are strong and independent now, remember? Call the Uvalde cops miss independent, its not men's problem anymore.
Here's the real reason noone intervened, just like noone intervened last year when a woman was outright getting raped on a Subway, also in New York IIRC: The attacker was a nigger. Here's the whole vid: https://nitter.net/libsoftiktok/status/1529902914554060805#m
Anyone riding the NYC subway should carry at least a tear-gas gun and a taser. My weapon of choice in NYC and elsewhere concealed carry is not an option is the sword-cane. Stylish (for an old man like me) and quite effective when kept razor sharp. Even a wild slash can do quite a bit of damage and create an intimidating non-lethal flow of blood.from the face or appendages of a would-be attacker.
When society expects men to do things men are increasingly asking "What's in it for us?". The answer is often nothing at best and something very painful (socially, physically, or financially) at worst. There's nothing to be gained in intervening in such a situation. You could however get beaten, stabbed, or shot. You'll also get called a racist and get charged with hate crimes if the attackers are non-white as they often are.
Women overwhelmingly support degenerate nonsense like BLM and multiculturalism. Tell me again why I should rush in to save them from the effects of what they themselves advocated for.
And for what? Helping someone who's almost guaranteed to have voted for this shitshow? No thanks. Elections have consequences.
Your virtue signalling on social media won't save you in real life. Neither will the propaganda journalists whose every word you believe without question. They're more likely to throw you under the bus for drawing attention to the "wrong" kind of perp.
You're on your own. Now THAT is true equality.
By the way, that very same thing happened in Germany a few days ago.
A group of "men" harassed a couple of women on a train. A German passenger told them to stop so they beat him up, chased him out of the train and kept beating him.
In a situation like that it's probably best to stay on the train. There are cameras and witnesses everywhere, and eventually the operator will have to call the police because of the fighting. You might be dead by the time they show up, but how do you know that won't happen if you run off the train? Where are you going to go?
It's sad there weren't more men there to stand with him.
~90% of people in Germany vote for parties that are responsible for this shit. They only stand up for what the media tells them to. They are the definition of NPCs.
Let them reap what they sow. I won't lift a finger for anyone I don't know personally.
I don't give a shit about this lady tbh. Price of living around nigs
Don't put conditions on your protection like the guy in the screenshot. Don't imply you'll protect them if they "appreciate" you. Sure, it may be true-- but it makes the statement read more like a ransom than a statement of truth.
We don't want people to think women are being held hostage for affection, that plays the wrong way in the media. People are already biased to favor women. They won't see that you're attempting to explain the social contract, they'll just read your words as hostility.
Phrase it like "Why should I be obligated to protect you? I have no duty to you or anyone, my safety is as important as yours." Keep it gender neutral. State the inarguable reality that you owe nothing to anyone. After all, that's simple turnabout-- feminists also insist they owe nothing to anyone. That's how they justify treating men like dirt, but it can work for us just as easily. Its effective because it's impossible to spin as a threat.
Let them explain the gender roles they want followed afterwards. Let them insist you should sacrifice yourself for them. Let them open the social contract can of worms and become a hypocrite.
This doesn't have much to do with your comment but "social contract" is an excellent term to describe what feminism destroyed. All the whining about what men are or aren't doing boils down to anger that they're not fulfilling their side of the social contract. Why aren't they holding up their end of the bargain? Because feminism removed the obligation for women to hold up their side of the deal. Men are just realizing that they've been sold a false bill of goods and that there's no benefit to continuing to play the game.
I think pointing out hypocrisy is fine if you're realistic about what it can accomplish. Leftists might not care about being hypocrites but someone on the fence watching their antics will. Leftists have a real knack for driving people into the arms of their opponents and our job is to illustrate their bullshit in clear terms to expedite that process. Pointing out their hypocrisy is one way to do that. But yeah, you'll never get a leftist to hold themselves to their own standards.
Bingo. They don't care what you SAY YOURE WRONG AND I WANT MY GENDER GAP CLOSED!!!
-Wahmen
Just how far have you disappeared up your own anus if you think this had anything to do with your petty obsessions?
The bar was 'not supporting infanticide of girls', and still you failed that test.
But this is your aberrant opinion, which you are projecting on "people".
No, I distinctly recall you being mad about combating infanticide of girls in India, even as you make up stuff about boys being killed.
Islam solves this problem by not letting women travel without a male guardian.
Allahu ackbar!
When I was a teen I thought Islam was backwards. Now I see Islam just had to figure out how to constructively deal with fighting age Muslim males. Aka don't let women around them.
We can apply the same logic to urban youth.
If your goal is to create an expansionist totalitarian superstate, Islamic doctrine is a real work of genius. Its understanding of how to control and motivate men is unparalleled.
Call Mohammed a schizophrenic, epileptic pedophile all you want, but one look at the results he achieved, and it's no wonder his people believed he was receiving wisdom from the almighty. I'll bet he believed it himself.
Mohammed stands with Genghis Khan in the scope of his military success, and then utterly eclipses him in the scope of his lasting legacy, achieving the immortality Genghis could only dream of.
It's really no surprise that the middle east all but deifies this guy, and no surprise that Adolf Hitler admired his work.
Given the literal Nazis involved in the founding of the EU and Nato, the fucking sig rune shape of not one, but two NATO headquarters, Klaus Schwab's high ranking Nazi parentage, I sometimes find it genuinely difficult to silence the tin foil hat voice in my head that says the the Islamification of Europe is not 'the kalergi plan', but a long game to slowly warm Europe back to Hitler - whom muslims admire, as he admired them, for the same reason.
Klaus Jewish schwab was a nazi? Lol
George Soros was a nazi. Totalitarian leftists supported a totalitarian leftist ideology as long as they personally benefited, are you surprised?
Too many assume Jew = anti nazi.
There were just as many collaborators as there were anti. The same in the German populace.
His father was the director of Escher Wyss AG, the central company involved in the Nazi's nuclear weapons programme.
Wtf I love schwab now
yeah i believe that BS as much as i believe that "Hitler was Jewish" as they like to claim. As i said before, Klaus Schwab parentage was hidden until people started saying he was related to the Rothschild and then they came up with this
You honestly think they'd even bother hiding if he was related to the Rothschilds? lmao
Allahu a'alam.
How do we know she's a woman? There weren't any biologists on the train to let them know!
i mean its not just that, its also "defund the police" and "ban the guns so no one can protect themselves" that has led to this
If anything, the cop is more likely to arrest a man simply for getting involved, regardless of whether he was morally in the right to do so.
Take your meds, friend.
They're legally not required to protect anyone.
They're legally encouraged not to.
They're a punishment force, not an enforcement force.
And yes those are different things.
What top post?
Good thing the guy who supports female infanticide and who says that the police should not protect women is not 'dehumanizing' anyone.
That wamen are murdering in record numbers, but these murders are covered up by statistics offices?
Link the said 'top post'.
Thanks! That is a compliment. It's also not made up, unlike your claims about infanticide in the West.
Who commits nearly all mass killings? Not women. Or is that another fraud by the statistics offices that cover up the 10,000 mass shootings a year by women?
How many?
Ya I still love my mom. Sorry with whatever happened to yours
Ooof. That's a big oof, even for you.
Leftists have created a world where criminals are rewarded and Good Samaritans are punished. I don't know the incident this is referring to, but intervening would probably mean fighting not just the attacker but also the DA and every Democrat within a hundred miles.
And anyone who does honestly and selflessly stand up for a woman is accused of white-knighting.
I've seen it happen, multiple times.
More likely, he will be prosecuted like Kyle Rittenhouse.
Pfft, he'd be lucky to be prosecuted like Kyle. Kyle was textbook and documented in high detail from multiple camera angles and just about scraped by. Same as Johnny Depp in his trial- if Heard and her lawyer weren't absolutely retarded and getting destroyed by mountains of rock-solid evidence, he wouldn't have an ice-cube's chance in hell.
I think he doesn't have an ice-cube's chance in hell as it is, unfortunately. Maybe because it's a jury trial, he will.
thanks for the black pill, but the way public opinion is swinging (and the fact that Amber and her team are a goddamn clown show), I'm going to hold out hope that the courts aren't entirely bereft of the merest sliver of justice. I think they'll at least hold this up as an example "see, we prosecute women sometimes too!"
The trial is a win because of public opinion alone - there are many urinalists who are mad that this swung opinion "like Gamergate".
Even if she loses, they'll hold her up as a martyr. They're already doing that for the criticism that she has received.
Pretty much. In some way I actually hope he loses just so people can stop having any faith in the system, but it's too popular- too many normies are invested in the outcome and would notice how bullshit it would be for her to get away with this.
Why should men help women in this day and age - especially white men? What is in it for men? Only to get the entire book thrown at them and get his life ruined for women who voted for it and would not even spit on that very good Samaritan if he were on fire? Feminism did not ruined just chivalry, it set the entire social construct between men and women ablaze. Women are strong and independent now, remember? Call the Uvalde cops miss independent, its not men's problem anymore.
Here's the real reason noone intervened, just like noone intervened last year when a woman was outright getting raped on a Subway, also in New York IIRC: The attacker was a nigger. Here's the whole vid: https://nitter.net/libsoftiktok/status/1529902914554060805#m
Anyone riding the NYC subway should carry at least a tear-gas gun and a taser. My weapon of choice in NYC and elsewhere concealed carry is not an option is the sword-cane. Stylish (for an old man like me) and quite effective when kept razor sharp. Even a wild slash can do quite a bit of damage and create an intimidating non-lethal flow of blood.from the face or appendages of a would-be attacker.
Equal rights means society functions differently.
hive cities voted for this, they can have it.