Gen F next, will be half or more
(media.kotakuinaction2.win)
Comments (68)
sorted by:
Didn’t the idea of the indoctrination of children get laughed at in the 80s and 90s? Also I have to wonder how many Gen z teens are out there who claim they are queer/pansexual or whatever made up exists but exclusively dates the opposite sex. The fact that lgbt is very trendy and constantly in your face like it was the majority has to be taken into account
It is not even just that. But also that it's glorified, and that you get privileges for being a part of it.
Obviously, if you get privileges for anything, more people will start to do that.
Similar to how many well to do young blacks people endlessly talk about being oppressed. You can make a lot of money that way.
If you can monetize the grift absolutely, but most of them just end up being miserable failures. Successful people don't wallow in self pity while doing nothing to improve their situation. The victimbux grifters on social media are rare exceptions.
Successful people use people wallowing in self pity to make the news and earn big bucks taking 40% or whatever when a "racism" settlement check comes in
It's also easy power grab. The ability to humiliate people just because you said something and knowing the law will back you up to harm them.
The drama that goes with it too.
This whole thing is breeding narcissism on a large scale.
turns out the ones laughing it out of the room were the ones planning to do it.
It's called demisexual, and I blame Ryan Long for forcing that knowledge into my brain.
I talked to an 18yo guy about a year ago about this kind of stuff. He told me in his school, the LGBTQ+ people were essentially given extra "regard" by the teachers on everything such that they were essentially regarded as a "special class". Since all the girls are easily swept up into the "oppression", "struggling" "white supremacy" narrative and women like to follow the rules or are easily swayed by stronger authorities (special classes), all the girls in high school would be friends with the LGBTQ+ group or at least always come to their defense on things. This meant if you were a guy and trying to sleep with a girl then you needed to also be in good with the LGBTQ+ groups because if you weren't in good with them then they'd blacklist you and girls wouldn't want to be seen as friends with you because it would ruin their reputation.
So in short, the LGBTQ+ group in schools are actually the gate keepers to getting laid. That means a lot of guys are immediately attracted to being in the group or in good terms with the group as a means of getting laid. This starts to die down passed high school and first 2 years of university, when cliques and possies matter a whole lot less.
Basically, what you might actually see happen is a decrease in the numbers for Gen Zs who align LGBTQ+ as times goes on because a lot of women are doing it to enhance their reputation for better male simping prospects and social status and men are doing it to get laid.
It's pretty sad that LGBTQ+ are the gatekeepers for sex in schools but that appears to be the case. Shouldn't be surprising since LGBTQ+ is all about grooming kids for sex.
Frankly there should be no sex in high school so the fags are somehow doing everyone a favor for once in their miserable existence.
Maybe they can gatekeep harder and prevent all fornication.
That's not how it works because they aren't preventing fornication because it happens in high school, they're just forcing submission to LGBTQ in order to get laid and most men have been programmed from childhood to base their entire value as a man on their ability to have sex with attractive women so they submit to LGBTQ+ to get laid.
It's not happening the way you want it to happen.
Frankly, what I'm hearing just strengthens my view that men and women should be entirely segregated in society until adulthood and most especially in schools and universities.
The basing value on number of sexual encounters is probably the biggest lie facing men in our society today.
Its an an inversion of the truth. A man isn't valuable because he has sex with a lot of women, however a valuable man will be desirable to most women.
You're not wrong but that's not the full picture of the problem. Why shouldn't a man who is desirable by most women indulge himself in having sex with many different women?
Because doing so is selfish and harmful to the community as a whole because each woman he does that to becomes less attractive to other men; thereby, making it harder for the community to grow and prosper. It negatively impacts the happiness of all; however, men will still be selfish and attempt to do what is only in his interest (make mistakes). It's for this reason good communities would then encourage a man to marry whoever he slept with and most especially if he got her pregnant.
It's not just on the men alone either, women should not be giving it up easy to other men for the same reasons and because it does have a negative impact on her value as a woman.
We've completely lost touch to these things as a society.
"I'm here, I'm queer, now suck my cock bitch"
If transracialism had taken off, half of all white peoples would disappear overnight, too. If you let people self-identify and give them bonuses for choosing certain identities, you will end up with a lot of people “spontaneously” choosing those identities.
You are one hundred percent right, my nigga.
Only thing that you are incorrect about is that you think only half of white people would disappear, try 90%.
Groomers be like.
Then they be like.
When will they be like?
Bingo. GenZ'ers are fucking retarded and they think that wearing a nice shirt makes you 'metrosexual' or some nonsense like that.
Notice how the phrase tomboy has all but disappeared.
Daft thing is by forcing lqbt onto people, they're belying their own rehtoric that women can be masculine and men can be feminine. Oh you're acting feminine? Must be a transwoman then!
So far, it seems to have doubled every generation. Next generation may be even worse, though 40% seems... inauspicious for the BLTPQ+1/1024+DEFCON1DJIA community.
They'll unironically go over 100% by counting people who are members of multiple degenerate groups more than once.
Whites are going to queer themselves out of existence.
Until a new fad happens and all the fad hoppers jump on that.
Until the next world crisis happens.
Note how most of gen z and millennials belaboured that there was no "great purpose, war or cause".
So they've picked up on social drama to create one.
Not necessarily. Sparta was super fucking homosexual.
They just enslaved thousands of people and stagnated for centuries.
They were sodomites, but they werent faggots.
It was all about power, and they did nothing to hide that.
Thats actually one of the reasons sodomy is such a severe sin, its pure arrogance in the face of God and abuse of the fellow man.
You're completely wrong.
Greek Pederasty and Homosexuality just wasn't innately effeminate. The Spartans were groomers to the fucking core.
In order to consummate a spartan marriage, the newly wed wives would have their heads shaved, be dressed in boys clothing, and be placed in a dark room to make the groom more comfortable.
These weren't modern day camp faggots. But claiming it was all about power is absolutely fucking stupid. They were institutionalized homosexuals. They were groomed homosexuals.
There is a reason that Afghanistan's pederasty comes from ancient greek colonies there, and why there were men in Afghanistan who literally were disgusted at the thought that any man would fuck a vagina.
The Spartans, Athenians, and Thebians were gay; they just weren't camp.
That sounds pretty damn gay. Next you're gonna tell me the men in the middle east who gang rape homosexuals to punish them for being faggots are not gay. It's just showing dominance, right?
Literal proof of grooming. Like, maybe trads suppressed some people that otherwise would have said they were gay, but I have a hard time believing the 'true' numbers for this are greater than the Gen X ers. Rest is straight up grooming.
Fuck it. Bring on the Islamic state.
I'd prefer a Crusader state instead.
Islam is too tolerant.
What studies, by who, asking what, to which people?
I made it up
We made this one up.
For a group that can’t procreate they sure did multiply
So, statistically speaking, nearly a quarter of the next generation will off themselves? That's a lot of dead kids....
You're wrong. There's already a shift against progressive doctrine in kids. Gen Z are the first generation of kids that aren't aggressively more Leftist than their predecessors. They are just slightly more Leftist than Millennials are now.
Those numbers are going to be going down, not up. It's a large scale cultural shift.
When you also consider that Leftism breeds resentment mongering and balkanization, there's a high liklihood in my mind that you're going to see a lot more radically right wing teens growing up in Gen Z+1. I'd bet you that Gen Z +1 will end up slightly more Leftist than Gen X.
Gen Z isn't exactly going backwards, it's balkanized. The lefties in Gen Z are insanely far left, there's just a legit anti-woke / tradcon countermovement now.
We're going to have a massive ideological split of people into red and blue states over the next 20 years as Gen Z enters the world.
Yes! I frequently see people both in the left and right worry that Gen Z is being radicalized to either side, when both things are true. There are both super woke and equally anti woke kids. But if I may allow myself a white pill, is the fact that for the first time since the hippies you have kids thinking it's cool to be right wing. From the late 60's to the 00's any young political militant was pretty much necessarily a leftie. It looks like the pendulum is already swinging back.
I agree. My bf is a teacher and he has both ends of the spectrum in his class. Someone in a "Let's Go Brandon" hoodie, and then someone whose gender changes often in the same classroom. And they're not outliers - kids form groups based off of political ideologies.
It's heartening to see kids push back against the woke bullshit, but I don't think it's healthy, to be honest. They shouldn't have to worry about that shit, you know? Besides that, I'm worried that the degradation of natural discourse will even further divide these kids.
They have to worry about it because their parents did nothing to stop their society from being stolen.
Entire generations of children have lost any chance at an actual childhood because the "greatest" generation died to introduce Marxism in the name of "Democracy", boomers were indoctrinated into Marxism and spread it at home, and gen-x clapped like seals as Marxism was normalized under the guise of "edgy humor" and "tolerance".
Millennials and Gen-Z were born into a dystopia and we rail against it in our very souls.
I was going to make exactly this point: being a leftoid is becoming too mainstream, whereas being right-wing is becoming counter-culture. NOTHING appeals more to kids than doing something they shouldn't; fighting the system.
I hope it comes sooner rather than later, but I think there will come a time where being a tradcon is cool again just because the parents are ultra-progressives.
Frankly, that's a win. There hasn't been a genuine right-wing movement among young people in at least 70 years.
The only difference is that the Gen Z Leftists are so unprincipled, that I don't think you have to worry about them being balkanized to the point of being irreconcilable. They do what they are told. They'll just believe the opposite once the right actually gains ground.
Identifying as a fag may be the only way to get leftist swine to leave you be.
I'd prefer if leftists identified as straight to get me to leave them alone.
And people honestly believed that Gen Z would save society
Half of it will and the other half will be too weak and gay to stop it.
20.8% * 0.4 = 5.2%
They identify because it gives them social points, but the actual LGBTQWERTY population is closer to the "traditionalist" ratio.
And when things start to collapse and people realize they need to reproduce or die, it will drop back to that level.
There were never any gay genes. Even Lefty scientists had to finally admit the ruse was up: https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/31481774/
It was a falsehood spread by literal gay propagandists back in the 1980s with ZERO science supporting it. All actual hard sciences show zero biological traits of gay genetics, gay endocrinology, or gay neurophysiology.
It's all behavioural.
There's a great psychogenic profile explaining the phenomenon here, and how there is no gay gene and never was, and that a lot of propaganda was used to confuse people about the origins homosexuality (i.e., most times it's spawned from grooming): https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6026959/
If you want the actual scientific breakdown of why homosexuality cannot be genetic due to a number of factors, you can check out the older comment permalinks here, but they're quite lengthy:
https://archive.ph/p4csm
https://kotakuinaction2.win/p/141YWlHPh3/x/c/4OTPNQp5PaK
https://kotakuinaction2.win/p/141F1CVn6N/x/c/4JKzDPN4Hvn
Ok, but if you're involved with a "T" you're definitely gay
And they forcibly included the "I" even though they are literally just physically deformed.