What is womanhood really? They just want access to female privilege.
I guarantee all the TERF fucks know that it will stop if they relinquish their massive list of privileges over those born male.
They won't. This is all just the lashing out of a group that's had an incredibly privileged existence all their lives, for hundreds of years in fact, and have constantly built upon them, entrenching their level of privilege deeper and deeper until a play to inflict sadistic torture on young boys backfired and those boys are now demanding access to female privileges.
It's never been about "womanhood" or stupid shit like that. It never will be. It's about protecting their privileges and acting on their in-group biases.
Also why autistic boys are more susceptible to it, because they are way more logical than normal people and logically they're getting a lot of advantages from pretending to be women at way less cost than other ways.
They could get a lot of benefit from lifting weights and practicing social skills, but that's a lot of work (esp social skills for them). Way easier to put on a dress and say things.
Autistic people of both sexes are more susceptible to transgenderism because they know something is off which gives the troomers an opening to convince them that all their social problems are the result them being the opposite gender on the inside. They're just easy prey for the trans cult.
Yeo. TERFs are mad that their clubs are being invaded by people using the exact same weapon that they used to subjugate men. I love it. Fuck their shit up. No special clubs. No special privileges, no safe spaces. The blade of Progressivism will cut them just the same.
Yep. We let women hold power and 100 years later we are cutting boys dicks off and raping kids in mass at school, mostly young boys. Everyone is pretty cool with it.
Women are children. Women should hold no political power or make decisions outside her immediate family. And even then, under the watchful eye of a responsible male.
If this place didn't have R16, I'd be able to define woman easily.
Being injected with estrogen doesn't give you the in-group bias that controls their decision-making.
That's why they are repulsed. Their brain is telling them "that's not a woman, they're not part of the in-group" and they're forcing themselves to override that.
That's why women have such an angry reaction to transgenderism when it affects their lives - because they're wired to support solely other women and their brain is telling them that these people aren't women and therefore aren't part of the in-group.
In short, all they'd have to do to move past it, is treat everyone the same way they treat other women. But that will never happen.
That's why women have such an angry reaction to transgenderism when it affects their lives - because they're wired to support solely other women and their brain is telling them that these people aren't women and therefore aren't part of the in-group.
In short, all they'd have to do to move past it, is treat everyone the same way they treat other women. But that will never happen.
why should they treat men like women? if you call yourself the impossible tranny, they should talk to you about their ginas? or you should be allowed into womens help groups?
I'm surprised he didn't comment on the guy(?) who said it's "not his place" to define woman because he is not a woman. It's an obviously paradoxical statement. He says he's not a woman therefore he cannot define woman, but how can be claim not to be something undefined? That's like if I were to ask you if you're older or younger than x. No definition for x, just x. Undefined variable. It's an unanswerable question. Yet he claims to have answered it.
I sstill dont get how "non-binary" degenerates and trans-degenerates can exist within the same movement when their entire identities contradict each other. How can you "change" genders if gender doesnt even exist?
The right shouldn't be dodging that question about "less of a woman":
Yes, women who lose the ability to reproduce become less womanly. Men who lose the ability to reproduce, or even procreate, become less manly.
It's why they cry so much when they lose the ability to procreate and reproduce, a key aspect of their womanhood and manhood has been lost.
This is also why when Sex Communists chemically castrate children, they've lost their ability to be either men or women, and why their lives are so miserable that they kill themselves.
This is also why unmarried eggless women in positions of power start absolutely freaking out at 35 realizing that their fertility and ability to start a family has fallen apart, causing them to externalize their personal problems into a political movement.
And you're right, I was hoping Walsh would have retorted "A woman who can't bear children still has her reproductive organs; she's still categorically a biological female even if she can't produce children."
I presume the heat of the moment gave him a bit of brain fog, but the point extends to a fact he already put forward about the biological differences between men and women. Just because some of those properties that define the sex no longer work (i.e., a man who shoots blanks) doesn't mean they're no longer categorically that sex.
I mean, put your self in his shooes. Imagine having to talk to that thing to explain to it why it's an idiot. In the business, we call that an Automatic Brain Fog Generator.
I think that this argument conflates genetics with reproduction and leaves rational positions vulnerable to strawman arguments.
The ability to reproduce is only a small part of what composes genetic sex, which involves many other immutable physical characteristics outside of genitals.
I get that the short brown one is a… sigh “trans male”, or at least would have been, 5 years ago, but I genuinely cannot tell exactly what the other one is…
Is it a woman with a beard, or a faggot with a wig?? I can no longer tell. Sincerely… 🤦🏻♂️
In this case, it genuinely looks like a man with a (shitty) beard uploaded a photo to fucking FaceApp, and it gave him long hair and the upper face (and hands, or at least nails) of a female...
walsh looked like a retard. he had the pseudo lil benji speaking patterns working for him, but it devolved into him asking the same question 15 times in a row. the Xirkin almost gottem while he was trying to gotcha, then he repeated old meme about trannies. I think hes a submidwit irl.
Also, doctor phil invited him on? thats more surprising than looking at two trannies that he's not telling off for their poor lifestyle.
That was exactly what he had to do. Is an easy way to disprove the trans movement that reaches normies. This being on Dr. Phil is even better.
You are correct that Matt has few arguments and I've seen better but overall is exactly what is need it for the audience of Dr. Phill.
Too late. This delusion is being reinforced in our children and has been for at least five years now. We're witnessing the output of this insanity, and the pipeline is hardly empty. Even if we could halt this right now with a snap of the fingers, we're still looking at a damaged generation.
And this pipeline is protected from all criticism by corporate media that will silence your criticisms, whatever they are, no matter how reasonable, as an "attack," the expression of a desire to "deny their existence." Because if you don't agree that a man is a woman just because he says he is and/or dresses up like one and has some cosmetic surgery, you are guilty of something like genocide.
Dude just summed up troonery in 1 statement. I just wish they'd do it without trapping people.
What is womanhood really? They just want access to female privilege.
I guarantee all the TERF fucks know that it will stop if they relinquish their massive list of privileges over those born male.
They won't. This is all just the lashing out of a group that's had an incredibly privileged existence all their lives, for hundreds of years in fact, and have constantly built upon them, entrenching their level of privilege deeper and deeper until a play to inflict sadistic torture on young boys backfired and those boys are now demanding access to female privileges.
It's never been about "womanhood" or stupid shit like that. It never will be. It's about protecting their privileges and acting on their in-group biases.
Also why autistic boys are more susceptible to it, because they are way more logical than normal people and logically they're getting a lot of advantages from pretending to be women at way less cost than other ways.
They could get a lot of benefit from lifting weights and practicing social skills, but that's a lot of work (esp social skills for them). Way easier to put on a dress and say things.
edit: Autistic people challenge preconceived ideas about rationality (ie they're rational)
Autistic people of both sexes are more susceptible to transgenderism because they know something is off which gives the troomers an opening to convince them that all their social problems are the result them being the opposite gender on the inside. They're just easy prey for the trans cult.
They're also suggestible and have a hard time with deceptive people. It's a bad combination.
This is the main reason.
As an autist I can confirm we are INCREDIBLY gullible.
This. I've seen it happen multiple times.
Did it magically solve their problems?
In each and every occurrence this was a resounding NO
A lot of the supposed athletes doing this, yes. The rest are mostly pedophiles.
Yeo. TERFs are mad that their clubs are being invaded by people using the exact same weapon that they used to subjugate men. I love it. Fuck their shit up. No special clubs. No special privileges, no safe spaces. The blade of Progressivism will cut them just the same.
Comment Reported for: Rule 16 - Identity Attacks
Comment Approved: This doesn't do that.
I’m surprised they’re even allowing a debate like this on Dr. Phil at this point
Great clip. Really sad that society has moved to the point where instead of helping delusional people we are told we must play along
Yep. We let women hold power and 100 years later we are cutting boys dicks off and raping kids in mass at school, mostly young boys. Everyone is pretty cool with it.
Women are children. Women should hold no political power or make decisions outside her immediate family. And even then, under the watchful eye of a responsible male.
If this place didn't have R16, I'd be able to define woman easily.
Being injected with estrogen doesn't give you the in-group bias that controls their decision-making.
That's why they are repulsed. Their brain is telling them "that's not a woman, they're not part of the in-group" and they're forcing themselves to override that.
That's why women have such an angry reaction to transgenderism when it affects their lives - because they're wired to support solely other women and their brain is telling them that these people aren't women and therefore aren't part of the in-group.
In short, all they'd have to do to move past it, is treat everyone the same way they treat other women. But that will never happen.
Honestly one of your few actually good posts. You're improving.
why should they treat men like women? if you call yourself the impossible tranny, they should talk to you about their ginas? or you should be allowed into womens help groups?
Two X Chromosomes = Woman
Phew, that was tough.
I'm pretty sure you get reported for R16 by default at this point.
Wouldn't surprise me if ConPro has a script to do it.
I'm surprised he didn't comment on the guy(?) who said it's "not his place" to define woman because he is not a woman. It's an obviously paradoxical statement. He says he's not a woman therefore he cannot define woman, but how can be claim not to be something undefined? That's like if I were to ask you if you're older or younger than x. No definition for x, just x. Undefined variable. It's an unanswerable question. Yet he claims to have answered it.
It's almost like, hear me out, this shit is literally insane
because they said theyre nonbinary, not regular trannies.
I sstill dont get how "non-binary" degenerates and trans-degenerates can exist within the same movement when their entire identities contradict each other. How can you "change" genders if gender doesnt even exist?
How do you know the sun is hot?
you've never been to the sun
https://twitter.com/MattWalshBlog/status/1483994967525707780
https://twitter.com/MattWalshBlog/status/1483995335714291721
https://twitter.com/MattWalshBlog/status/1483929133491138569
Can't have the TV audience at home overdose on red 💊's
The right shouldn't be dodging that question about "less of a woman":
Yes, women who lose the ability to reproduce become less womanly. Men who lose the ability to reproduce, or even procreate, become less manly.
It's why they cry so much when they lose the ability to procreate and reproduce, a key aspect of their womanhood and manhood has been lost.
This is also why when Sex Communists chemically castrate children, they've lost their ability to be either men or women, and why their lives are so miserable that they kill themselves.
This is also why unmarried eggless women in positions of power start absolutely freaking out at 35 realizing that their fertility and ability to start a family has fallen apart, causing them to externalize their personal problems into a political movement.
Well said.
And you're right, I was hoping Walsh would have retorted "A woman who can't bear children still has her reproductive organs; she's still categorically a biological female even if she can't produce children."
I presume the heat of the moment gave him a bit of brain fog, but the point extends to a fact he already put forward about the biological differences between men and women. Just because some of those properties that define the sex no longer work (i.e., a man who shoots blanks) doesn't mean they're no longer categorically that sex.
I mean, put your self in his shooes. Imagine having to talk to that thing to explain to it why it's an idiot. In the business, we call that an Automatic Brain Fog Generator.
I think that this argument conflates genetics with reproduction and leaves rational positions vulnerable to strawman arguments.
The ability to reproduce is only a small part of what composes genetic sex, which involves many other immutable physical characteristics outside of genitals.
I agree with that, but we're talking about a woman not just a female. Reproduction and family is part of being a woman in a human social environment.
when i see a schizo at the bus stop, i don't involve myself in his delusions. i keep my eyes on him, my back away from him, and my exit options open.
Lol these people are clowns. It's a religion to them.
What is that Addison… Thing?? 😳
I get that the short brown one is a… sigh “trans male”, or at least would have been, 5 years ago, but I genuinely cannot tell exactly what the other one is…
Is it a woman with a beard, or a faggot with a wig?? I can no longer tell. Sincerely… 🤦🏻♂️
🤮🤮🤮
Choosing to keep a goatee while transitioning is completely about attention and shock value.
In this case, it genuinely looks like a man with a (shitty) beard uploaded a photo to fucking FaceApp, and it gave him long hair and the upper face (and hands, or at least nails) of a female...
Aaarrrgh... I fucking hate this shit.
Conchita Wurst phones in... facepalm
Fairly confident "Conchita" is what started this fucking trend. No wonder fucking Eastern Europe boycotted Eurotrash afterwards...
I still can't tell, though (in this case). But you're saying it's (biologically) a man, man>?
I fucking hate this timeline, smh... :-/
Gender has turned into a meaningless word, yet somehow people seem to think it’s more important than biological sex.
Has anyone watched the full episode? How was it? I assume the audience was very much against Matt.
I didn't watch it, but I saw others mention that there's only about 5 minutes of actual discussion.
Cringe.
tl;dr
What is a woman.
Ok but what does that mean
ok but whats a woman
DESCRIBE WHATS A WOMAN I GOTTEM
walsh looked like a retard. he had the pseudo lil benji speaking patterns working for him, but it devolved into him asking the same question 15 times in a row. the Xirkin almost gottem while he was trying to gotcha, then he repeated old meme about trannies. I think hes a submidwit irl.
Also, doctor phil invited him on? thats more surprising than looking at two trannies that he's not telling off for their poor lifestyle.
That was exactly what he had to do. Is an easy way to disprove the trans movement that reaches normies. This being on Dr. Phil is even better. You are correct that Matt has few arguments and I've seen better but overall is exactly what is need it for the audience of Dr. Phill.
except his arguent is garbage. hes asking a nonbinary what a woman is. they wouldnt know, because they think they are neither. GOTCHA...
for a brainlet.
Too late. This delusion is being reinforced in our children and has been for at least five years now. We're witnessing the output of this insanity, and the pipeline is hardly empty. Even if we could halt this right now with a snap of the fingers, we're still looking at a damaged generation.
And this pipeline is protected from all criticism by corporate media that will silence your criticisms, whatever they are, no matter how reasonable, as an "attack," the expression of a desire to "deny their existence." Because if you don't agree that a man is a woman just because he says he is and/or dresses up like one and has some cosmetic surgery, you are guilty of something like genocide.
Sadly a genocide may be the only way out of this.
It doesn't matter.
These ideologues have no shame and don't get embarrassed when called out, they just spew out more NPC talking points.
Comment Reported for: Rule 2 - Violent Speech
Comment Removed: Rule 2 - Violent Speech
Don't use slurs at users.
Because it's a rule. 15, specifically.
...
I'm impressed. You've got me.
You didn't refer to a user, but I can't refer to you as one either since the rules still apply to you.
Clever girl.